Waste Connections (WCN) Competitors

Waste Connections currently has a consensus price target of $202.84, indicating a potential upside of 31.07%. Republic Services has a consensus price target of $243.26, indicating a potential upside of 16.98%. Given Waste Connections' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Waste Connections is more favorable than Republic Services.

Republic Services has higher revenue and earnings than Waste Connections. Republic Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Connections, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

86.1% of Waste Connections shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Republic Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Waste Connections shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Republic Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Waste Connections had 3 more articles in the media than Republic Services. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Waste Connections and 20 mentions for Republic Services. Republic Services' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Waste Connections' score of 0.69 indicating that Republic Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Waste Connections has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Republic Services has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Republic Services pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Waste Connections pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Republic Services pays out 36.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Waste Connections has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Republic Services has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Republic Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Republic Services has a net margin of 13.00% compared to Waste Connections' net margin of 10.97%. Republic Services' return on equity of 18.57% beat Waste Connections' return on equity.

Waste Management has a net margin of 10.99% compared to Waste Connections' net margin of 10.97%. Waste Management's return on equity of 31.90% beat Waste Connections' return on equity.

86.1% of Waste Connections shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Waste Management shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Waste Connections shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Waste Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Waste Connections has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waste Management has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Waste Management pays an annual dividend of $3.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Waste Connections pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Waste Management pays out 54.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Waste Connections has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Waste Management has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Waste Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Waste Connections had 2 more articles in the media than Waste Management. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Waste Connections and 21 mentions for Waste Management. Waste Connections' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Waste Management's score of 0.48 indicating that Waste Connections is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Waste Connections presently has a consensus target price of $202.84, suggesting a potential upside of 31.07%. Waste Management has a consensus target price of $255.30, suggesting a potential upside of 17.71%. Given Waste Connections' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Waste Connections is more favorable than Waste Management.

Waste Management has higher revenue and earnings than Waste Connections. Waste Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Connections, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Uber Technologies had 87 more articles in the media than Waste Connections. MarketBeat recorded 110 mentions for Uber Technologies and 23 mentions for Waste Connections. Uber Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Waste Connections' score of 0.69 indicating that Uber Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Uber Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $104.97, indicating a potential upside of 44.09%. Waste Connections has a consensus price target of $202.84, indicating a potential upside of 31.07%. Given Uber Technologies' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Uber Technologies is more favorable than Waste Connections.

Uber Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Waste Connections. Uber Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Connections, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waste Connections has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

80.2% of Uber Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.1% of Waste Connections shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Uber Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Waste Connections shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of 15.91% compared to Waste Connections' net margin of 10.97%. Uber Technologies' return on equity of 41.40% beat Waste Connections' return on equity.

Waste Connections has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&P Global has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Waste Connections currently has a consensus price target of $202.84, indicating a potential upside of 31.07%. S&P Global has a consensus price target of $546.39, indicating a potential upside of 28.69%. Given Waste Connections' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Waste Connections is more favorable than S&P Global.

Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Waste Connections pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&P Global pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Waste Connections has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and S&P Global has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years. S&P Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

86.1% of Waste Connections shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of S&P Global shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Waste Connections shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of S&P Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than Waste Connections. S&P Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Connections, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

S&P Global has a net margin of 30.37% compared to Waste Connections' net margin of 10.97%. S&P Global's return on equity of 17.26% beat Waste Connections' return on equity.

In the previous week, S&P Global had 30 more articles in the media than Waste Connections. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for S&P Global and 23 mentions for Waste Connections. S&P Global's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Waste Connections' score of 0.69 indicating that S&P Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.