Team (TISI) Competitors

Republic Services has a net margin of 12.90% compared to Team's net margin of -5.49%. Republic Services' return on equity of 18.44% beat Team's return on equity.

57.7% of Republic Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.6% of Team shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Republic Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Team shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Republic Services has higher revenue and earnings than Team. Team is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Republic Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Republic Services presently has a consensus price target of $244.67, indicating a potential upside of 20.04%. Given Republic Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Republic Services is more favorable than Team.

In the previous week, Team had 22 more articles in the media than Republic Services. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Team and 16 mentions for Republic Services. Republic Services' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Team's score of 0.80 indicating that Republic Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Republic Services has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Team has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Team had 19 more articles in the media than Rollins. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Team and 19 mentions for Rollins. Team's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Rollins' score of 0.60 indicating that Team is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Rollins has a consensus price target of $65.27, indicating a potential upside of 20.59%. Given Rollins' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Rollins is more favorable than Team.

Rollins has higher revenue and earnings than Team. Team is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rollins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Rollins has a net margin of 13.77% compared to Team's net margin of -5.49%. Rollins' return on equity of 38.37% beat Team's return on equity.

46.6% of Team shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.8% of Rollins shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Team shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Rollins shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Team has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its share price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Rollins has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Clean Harbors has higher revenue and earnings than Team. Team is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Harbors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Clean Harbors has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Team's net margin of -5.49%. Clean Harbors' return on equity of 14.47% beat Team's return on equity.

Team has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Clean Harbors has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its share price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500.

46.6% of Team shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.4% of Clean Harbors shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Team shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of Clean Harbors shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Clean Harbors has a consensus target price of $314.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.17%. Given Clean Harbors' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Clean Harbors is more favorable than Team.

In the previous week, Team had 33 more articles in the media than Clean Harbors. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Team and 5 mentions for Clean Harbors. Clean Harbors' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Team's score of 0.80 indicating that Clean Harbors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Tetra Tech has higher revenue and earnings than Team. Team is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tetra Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Team has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tetra Tech has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Tetra Tech has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Team's net margin of -5.49%. Tetra Tech's return on equity of 22.89% beat Team's return on equity.

In the previous week, Team had 14 more articles in the media than Tetra Tech. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Team and 24 mentions for Tetra Tech. Team's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Tetra Tech's score of 0.73 indicating that Team is being referred to more favorably in the media.

46.6% of Team shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Tetra Tech shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Team shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Tetra Tech shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tetra Tech has a consensus target price of $41.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.54%. Given Tetra Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Tetra Tech is more favorable than Team.