Does the media favor ATMU or PH?

In the previous week, Atmus Filtration Technologies and Atmus Filtration Technologies both had 8 articles in the media. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Parker-Hannifin's score of 0.51 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Atmus Filtration Technologies 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Parker-Hannifin 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer NIO or ATMU?

In the previous week, NIO had 18 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for NIO and 8 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat NIO's score of 0.58 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment NIO 11 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Atmus Filtration Technologies 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to VFS or ATMU?

In the previous week, VinFast Auto had 6 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for VinFast Auto and 8 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat VinFast Auto's score of -0.22 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment VinFast Auto 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Atmus Filtration Technologies 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to ATMU or GTX?

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 7 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Garrett Motion and 8 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Garrett Motion's score of 0.93 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Atmus Filtration Technologies 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Garrett Motion 9 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) Competitors

$49.77 +1.59 (+3.30%)

Closing price 06/12/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$50.63 +0.86 (+1.73%)

As of 06/12/2026 07:55 PM Eastern

Compare

ATMU vs. PH, NIO, ALV, VFS, and GTX

Should you buy Atmus Filtration Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Atmus Filtration Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Atmus Filtration Technologies include Parker-Hannifin (PH), NIO (NIO), Autoliv (ALV), VinFast Auto (VFS), and Garrett Motion (GTX).

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Parker-Hannifin?

Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) and Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Atmus Filtration Technologies and Atmus Filtration Technologies both had 8 articles in the media. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Parker-Hannifin's score of 0.51 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Atmus Filtration Technologies	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Parker-Hannifin	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Atmus Filtration Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $62.67, indicating a potential upside of 25.91%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus target price of $1,021.05, indicating a potential upside of 13.21%. Given Atmus Filtration Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Atmus Filtration Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Parker-Hannifin	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.58% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies' net margin of 11.56%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat Parker-Hannifin's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Atmus Filtration Technologies	11.56%	64.29%	15.78%
Parker-Hannifin	16.58%	27.97%	13.00%

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Atmus Filtration Technologies	$1.76B	2.30	$207.40M	$2.55	19.52
Parker-Hannifin	$19.85B	5.73	$3.53B	$27.11	33.27

32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Atmus Filtration Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 29.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Atmus Filtration Technologies on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to NIO?

NIO (NYSE:NIO) and Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) are both automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, NIO had 18 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for NIO and 8 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat NIO's score of 0.58 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
NIO	11 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Atmus Filtration Technologies	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Atmus Filtration Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NIO. NIO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmus Filtration Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NIO	$12.51B	1.03	-$2.14B	-$0.55	N/A
Atmus Filtration Technologies	$1.76B	2.30	$207.40M	$2.55	19.52

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to NIO's net margin of -8.78%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat NIO's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NIO	-8.78%	-318.96%	-7.67%
Atmus Filtration Technologies	11.56%	64.29%	15.78%

NIO has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

48.6% of NIO shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of NIO shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NIO presently has a consensus price target of $6.70, suggesting a potential upside of 28.72%. Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus price target of $62.67, suggesting a potential upside of 25.91%. Given NIO's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe NIO is more favorable than Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NIO	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.36
Atmus Filtration Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies beats NIO on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Autoliv?

Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) and Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) are both mid-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Autoliv currently has a consensus target price of $135.00, suggesting a potential upside of 5.04%. Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus target price of $62.67, suggesting a potential upside of 25.91%. Given Atmus Filtration Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more favorable than Autoliv.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Autoliv	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.62
Atmus Filtration Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Autoliv's net margin of 6.45%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat Autoliv's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Autoliv	6.45%	29.03%	8.75%
Atmus Filtration Technologies	11.56%	64.29%	15.78%

In the previous week, Atmus Filtration Technologies had 8 more articles in the media than Autoliv. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies and 0 mentions for Autoliv. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Autoliv's score of 1.00 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Autoliv	Positive
Atmus Filtration Technologies	Positive

Autoliv has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than Atmus Filtration Technologies. Autoliv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmus Filtration Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Autoliv	$10.82B	0.89	$735M	$9.30	13.82
Atmus Filtration Technologies	$1.76B	2.30	$207.40M	$2.55	19.52

69.6% of Autoliv shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Autoliv shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Autoliv pays an annual dividend of $3.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Autoliv pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Autoliv has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Autoliv is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies beats Autoliv on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to VinFast Auto?

VinFast Auto (NASDAQ:VFS) and Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) are both mid-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to VinFast Auto's net margin of -110.57%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat VinFast Auto's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
VinFast Auto	-110.57%	N/A	-58.71%
Atmus Filtration Technologies	11.56%	64.29%	15.78%

VinFast Auto has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.2% of VinFast Auto shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than VinFast Auto. VinFast Auto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmus Filtration Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
VinFast Auto	$3.60B	2.05	-$3.96B	-$1.84	N/A
Atmus Filtration Technologies	$1.76B	2.30	$207.40M	$2.55	19.52

In the previous week, VinFast Auto had 6 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for VinFast Auto and 8 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat VinFast Auto's score of -0.22 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
VinFast Auto	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Atmus Filtration Technologies	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

VinFast Auto presently has a consensus price target of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 74.60%. Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus price target of $62.67, suggesting a potential upside of 25.91%. Given VinFast Auto's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe VinFast Auto is more favorable than Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
VinFast Auto	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Atmus Filtration Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies beats VinFast Auto on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Garrett Motion?

Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) and Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX) are both mid-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of 9.29%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Atmus Filtration Technologies	11.56%	64.29%	15.78%
Garrett Motion	9.29%	-42.77%	14.32%

Atmus Filtration Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Garrett Motion pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Garrett Motion pays out 18.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 7 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Garrett Motion and 8 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Garrett Motion's score of 0.93 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Atmus Filtration Technologies	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Garrett Motion	9 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Atmus Filtration Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $62.67, suggesting a potential upside of 25.91%. Garrett Motion has a consensus target price of $31.83, suggesting a potential downside of 5.15%. Given Atmus Filtration Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more favorable than Garrett Motion.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Atmus Filtration Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Garrett Motion	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Garrett Motion has higher revenue and earnings than Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garrett Motion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Atmus Filtration Technologies	$1.76B	2.30	$207.40M	$2.55	19.52
Garrett Motion	$3.58B	1.75	$310M	$1.71	19.63

Summary

Garrett Motion beats Atmus Filtration Technologies on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Atmus Filtration Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ATMU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ATMU vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Atmus Filtration Technologies	POLLUTION CNTRL Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$4.07B	$1.84B	$9.44B	$23.14B
Dividend Yield	0.44%	1.50%	3.56%	4.08%
P/E Ratio	17.85	22.88	25.52	31.33
Price / Sales	2.30	3.48	5,066.06	20.53
Price / Cash	15.83	32.75	27.60	24.25
Price / Book	10.73	4.46	4.73	4.68
Net Income	$207.40M	$69.81M	$793.53M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	8.51%	-2.34%	5.20%	2.11%
1 Month Performance	-8.04%	-7.56%	4.43%	2.32%
1 Year Performance	41.11%	13.76%	30.01%	24.13%

Atmus Filtration Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ATMU Atmus Filtration Technologies	4.9416 of 5 stars	$49.77 +3.3%	$62.67 +25.9%	+37.1%	$4.07B	$1.76B	17.85	4,500	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Downgrade High Trading Volume
PH Parker-Hannifin	4.34 of 5 stars	$825.65 -2.2%	$1,020.80 +23.6%	+35.4%	$106.50B	$20.99B	30.72	57,950	Analyst Upgrade High Trading Volume
NIO NIO	2.8651 of 5 stars	$6.09 +8.8%	$6.70 +10.0%	+43.8%	$12.87B	$100.99B	N/A	35,032	Gap Up
ALV Autoliv	3.9555 of 5 stars	$129.71 +2.0%	$135.00 +4.1%	+16.9%	$9.52B	$10.99B	13.86	64,300
VFS VinFast Auto	2.3506 of 5 stars	$3.43 -1.8%	$5.83 +70.3%	-11.0%	$8.17B	$90.18T	N/A	29,878	Earnings Report Analyst Forecast High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:ATMU) was last updated on 6/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) Competitors

ATMU vs. PH, NIO, ALV, VFS, and GTX

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Parker-Hannifin?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to NIO?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Autoliv?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to VinFast Auto?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Garrett Motion?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ATMU vs. The Competition

Atmus Filtration Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) Competitors

ATMU vs. PH, NIO, ALV, VFS, and GTX

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Parker-Hannifin?

Which has more volatility and risk, ATMU or PH?

Does the media favor ATMU or PH?

Do analysts recommend ATMU or PH?

Is ATMU or PH more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, ATMU or PH?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in ATMU or PH?

Is ATMU or PH a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to NIO?

Does the media prefer NIO or ATMU?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, NIO or ATMU?

Is NIO or ATMU more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, NIO or ATMU?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in NIO or ATMU?

Do analysts prefer NIO or ATMU?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Autoliv?

Do analysts prefer ALV or ATMU?

Is ALV or ATMU more profitable?

Does the media prefer ALV or ATMU?

Which has more volatility & risk, ALV or ATMU?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ALV or ATMU?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ALV or ATMU?

Is ALV or ATMU a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to VinFast Auto?

Is VFS or ATMU more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, VFS or ATMU?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of VFS or ATMU?

Which has better valuation & earnings, VFS or ATMU?

Does the media refer more to VFS or ATMU?

Do analysts prefer VFS or ATMU?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Garrett Motion?

Which has more volatility and risk, ATMU or GTX?

Is ATMU or GTX more profitable?

Is ATMU or GTX a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ATMU or GTX?

Does the media refer more to ATMU or GTX?

Do analysts recommend ATMU or GTX?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ATMU or GTX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ATMU vs. The Competition

Atmus Filtration Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools