Go Pro

Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) Competitors

Atmus Filtration Technologies logo
$47.70 +0.41 (+0.87%)
As of 03:58 PM Eastern

ATMU vs. CMI, PH, RBC, LECO, and ROLL

Should you buy Atmus Filtration Technologies stock or one of its competitors? Atmus Filtration Technologies's main competitors and comparable companies include Cummins (CMI), Parker-Hannifin (PH), RBC Bearings (RBC), Lincoln Electric (LECO), and RBC Bearings (ROLL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "machinery" industry.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Cummins?

Cummins (NYSE:CMI) and Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Cummins had 16 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Cummins and 8 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Cummins' score of 1.30 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cummins
22 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Atmus Filtration Technologies
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Cummins has higher revenue and earnings than Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cummins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cummins$33.67B2.23$2.84B$19.5727.90
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.23$207.40M$2.6118.44

Cummins presently has a consensus target price of $764.54, indicating a potential upside of 40.02%. Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus target price of $62.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.79%. Given Cummins' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cummins is more favorable than Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cummins
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Cummins has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Cummins pays an annual dividend of $8.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Cummins pays out 45.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cummins has increased its dividend for 19 consecutive years. Cummins is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.32% compared to Cummins' net margin of 7.82%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 59.85% beat Cummins' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cummins7.82% 25.29% 9.88%
Atmus Filtration Technologies 11.32%59.85%14.66%

83.5% of Cummins shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Cummins shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cummins beats Atmus Filtration Technologies on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Parker-Hannifin?

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.97% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies' net margin of 11.32%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 59.85% beat Parker-Hannifin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Parker-Hannifin16.97% 28.48% 13.49%
Atmus Filtration Technologies 11.32%59.85%14.66%

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Parker-Hannifin$21.50B5.65$3.65B$28.4933.81
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.23$207.40M$2.6118.44

Parker-Hannifin presently has a consensus target price of $1,100.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.19%. Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus target price of $62.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.79%. Given Atmus Filtration Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Parker-Hannifin
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 27 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 8 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Parker-Hannifin's score of 1.54 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Parker-Hannifin
33 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Atmus Filtration Technologies
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Atmus Filtration Technologies on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to RBC Bearings?

Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) and RBC Bearings (NYSE:RBC) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

RBC Bearings has a net margin of 16.40% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies' net margin of 11.32%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 59.85% beat RBC Bearings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Atmus Filtration Technologies11.32% 59.85% 14.66%
RBC Bearings 16.40%12.06%7.78%

32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of RBC Bearings shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Atmus Filtration Technologies had 5 more articles in the media than RBC Bearings. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies and 3 mentions for RBC Bearings. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat RBC Bearings' score of 1.35 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Atmus Filtration Technologies
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
RBC Bearings
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Atmus Filtration Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $62.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.79%. RBC Bearings has a consensus target price of $623.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.95%. Given Atmus Filtration Technologies' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more favorable than RBC Bearings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
RBC Bearings
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

RBC Bearings has higher revenue and earnings than Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RBC Bearings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.23$207.40M$2.6118.44
RBC Bearings$1.87B8.30$287.60M$10.1248.49

Summary

RBC Bearings beats Atmus Filtration Technologies on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Lincoln Electric?

Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) and Lincoln Electric (NASDAQ:LECO) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and media sentiment.

Lincoln Electric has higher revenue and earnings than Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lincoln Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.23$207.40M$2.6118.44
Lincoln Electric$4.48B3.33$520.53M$10.0127.39

32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.6% of Lincoln Electric shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Lincoln Electric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lincoln Electric had 27 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Lincoln Electric and 8 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Lincoln Electric's score of 1.47 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Atmus Filtration Technologies
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Lincoln Electric
26 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Lincoln Electric has a net margin of 12.35% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies' net margin of 11.32%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 59.85% beat Lincoln Electric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Atmus Filtration Technologies11.32% 59.85% 14.66%
Lincoln Electric 12.35%39.23%15.25%

Atmus Filtration Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $62.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.79%. Lincoln Electric has a consensus price target of $307.22, indicating a potential upside of 12.07%. Given Atmus Filtration Technologies' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more favorable than Lincoln Electric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Lincoln Electric
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lincoln Electric has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Atmus Filtration Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Lincoln Electric pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lincoln Electric pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lincoln Electric has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Lincoln Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Lincoln Electric beats Atmus Filtration Technologies on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to RBC Bearings?

RBC Bearings (NASDAQ:ROLL) and Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than RBC Bearings. Atmus Filtration Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RBC Bearings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RBC Bearings$1.14B12.45$59.60M$2.06238.30
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.23$207.40M$2.6118.44

RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus price target of $62.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.79%. Given Atmus Filtration Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more favorable than RBC Bearings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RBC Bearings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.32% compared to RBC Bearings' net margin of 0.00%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 59.85% beat RBC Bearings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RBC BearingsN/A N/A N/A
Atmus Filtration Technologies 11.32%59.85%14.66%

32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of RBC Bearings shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Atmus Filtration Technologies had 6 more articles in the media than RBC Bearings. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies and 2 mentions for RBC Bearings. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat RBC Bearings' score of 0.84 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
RBC Bearings
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Atmus Filtration Technologies
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies beats RBC Bearings on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Atmus Filtration Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ATMU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ATMU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ATMU vs. The Competition

MetricAtmus Filtration TechnologiesMachinery IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.93B$11.30B$10.42B$23.61B
Dividend Yield0.52%2.24%97.16%3.75%
P/E Ratio18.4420.5926.2929.39
Price / Sales2.2366.01408.8616.84
Price / Cash14.6822.6023.8131.92
Price / Book8.644.074.607.62
Net Income$207.40M$359.33M$610.87M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.29%-1.47%-1.85%-0.50%
1 Month Performance-10.63%0.01%-0.40%0.74%
1 Year Performance7.85%11.48%10.63%13.96%

Atmus Filtration Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
4.5724 of 5 stars
$47.70
+0.9%
$62.00
+30.0%
+5.8%$3.89B$1.76B18.284,500
CMI
Cummins
4.9899 of 5 stars
$572.07
+0.1%
$745.64
+30.3%
+39.6%$78.80B$33.67B29.2567,400
PH
Parker-Hannifin
4.8341 of 5 stars
$1,019.48
+0.5%
$1,100.00
+7.9%
+26.7%$128.54B$21.50B35.7857,950
RBC
RBC Bearings
4.134 of 5 stars
$496.13
+0.0%
$623.00
+25.6%
+26.7%$15.71B$1.87B49.025,816
LECO
Lincoln Electric
4.5536 of 5 stars
$283.31
+0.4%
$307.22
+8.4%
+12.7%$15.42B$4.48B28.2612,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:ATMU) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners