Go Pro
→ The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month (From Investors Alley) (Ad)tc pixel Free ATMU Stock Alerts

Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) Competitors

Atmus Filtration Technologies logo
$49.63 -0.08 (-0.16%)
Closing price 07/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$49.72 +0.09 (+0.17%)
As of 07/2/2026 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

ATMU vs. PH, LI, NIO, XPEV, and ALV

Should you buy Atmus Filtration Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Atmus Filtration Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Atmus Filtration Technologies include Parker-Hannifin (PH), Li Auto (LI), NIO (NIO), XPENG (XPEV), and Autoliv (ALV).

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Parker-Hannifin?

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 29.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.58% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies' net margin of 11.56%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat Parker-Hannifin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Parker-Hannifin16.58% 27.97% 13.00%
Atmus Filtration Technologies 11.56%64.29%15.78%

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Parker-Hannifin$19.85B6.12$3.53B$27.1135.54
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.30$207.40M$2.5519.46

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Parker-Hannifin currently has a consensus target price of $1,026.86, suggesting a potential upside of 6.58%. Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus target price of $62.67, suggesting a potential upside of 26.27%. Given Atmus Filtration Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Parker-Hannifin
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 4 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 3 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Parker-Hannifin's score of 1.16 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Parker-Hannifin
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Atmus Filtration Technologies
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Atmus Filtration Technologies on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Li Auto?

Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) and Li Auto (NASDAQ:LI) are both automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Li Auto. Li Auto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmus Filtration Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.30$207.40M$2.5519.46
Li Auto$16.06B0.80$160.79M-$0.28N/A

32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.9% of Li Auto shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.5% of Li Auto shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Atmus Filtration Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $62.67, indicating a potential upside of 26.27%. Li Auto has a consensus price target of $17.30, indicating a potential upside of 43.93%. Given Li Auto's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Li Auto is more favorable than Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Li Auto
4 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.94

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Li Auto's net margin of -1.72%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat Li Auto's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Atmus Filtration Technologies11.56% 64.29% 15.78%
Li Auto -1.72%-2.58%-1.22%

In the previous week, Li Auto had 5 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Li Auto and 3 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Li Auto's score of 0.68 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Atmus Filtration Technologies
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Li Auto
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Li Auto has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies beats Li Auto on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to NIO?

Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) and NIO (NYSE:NIO) are both automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NIO has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to NIO's net margin of -8.78%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat NIO's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Atmus Filtration Technologies11.56% 64.29% 15.78%
NIO -8.78%-318.96%-7.67%

32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.6% of NIO shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of NIO shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, NIO had 10 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for NIO and 3 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat NIO's score of 0.38 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Atmus Filtration Technologies
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NIO
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Atmus Filtration Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $62.67, indicating a potential upside of 26.27%. NIO has a consensus target price of $6.70, indicating a potential upside of 39.79%. Given NIO's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NIO is more favorable than Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
NIO
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36

Atmus Filtration Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NIO. NIO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmus Filtration Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.30$207.40M$2.5519.46
NIO$12.51B0.95-$2.14B-$0.55N/A

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies beats NIO on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to XPENG?

Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) and XPENG (NYSE:XPEV) are both automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to XPENG's net margin of -3.09%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat XPENG's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Atmus Filtration Technologies11.56% 64.29% 15.78%
XPENG -3.09%-7.72%-2.33%

Atmus Filtration Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $62.67, suggesting a potential upside of 26.27%. XPENG has a consensus price target of $25.51, suggesting a potential upside of 95.26%. Given XPENG's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe XPENG is more favorable than Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
XPENG
4 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, XPENG has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, XPENG had 5 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for XPENG and 3 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat XPENG's score of 0.37 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Atmus Filtration Technologies
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
XPENG
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.1% of XPENG shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.6% of XPENG shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than XPENG. XPENG is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmus Filtration Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.30$207.40M$2.5519.46
XPENG$10.97B1.13-$158.50M-$0.34N/A

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies beats XPENG on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Autoliv?

Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) and Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) are both mid-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Autoliv's net margin of 6.45%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat Autoliv's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Atmus Filtration Technologies11.56% 64.29% 15.78%
Autoliv 6.45%29.03%8.75%

32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.6% of Autoliv shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Autoliv shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Autoliv had 3 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Autoliv and 3 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Autoliv's score of 0.95 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Atmus Filtration Technologies
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Autoliv
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Atmus Filtration Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Autoliv pays an annual dividend of $3.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Autoliv pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Autoliv has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Autoliv is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Atmus Filtration Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $62.67, indicating a potential upside of 26.27%. Autoliv has a consensus target price of $135.27, indicating a potential upside of 16.34%. Given Atmus Filtration Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more favorable than Autoliv.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Autoliv
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than Atmus Filtration Technologies. Autoliv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmus Filtration Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.30$207.40M$2.5519.46
Autoliv$10.82B0.80$735M$9.3012.50

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Autoliv has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies beats Autoliv on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Atmus Filtration Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ATMU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ATMU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ATMU vs. The Competition

Export
MetricAtmus Filtration TechnologiesPOLLUTION CNTRL IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.06B$1.89B$9.62B$23.54B
Dividend Yield0.44%1.48%3.53%3.98%
P/E Ratio19.4621.9027.0331.55
Price / Sales2.305.684,756.4022.20
Price / Cash15.8044.3827.4925.36
Price / Book10.704.494.604.81
Net Income$207.40M$69.81M$791.01M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-7.61%-1.72%0.96%0.56%
1 Month Performance8.20%11.36%0.95%4.54%
1 Year Performance31.36%13.37%18.47%18.23%

Atmus Filtration Technologies Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
4.8672 of 5 stars		$49.63
-0.2%		$62.67
+26.3%		+31.4%$4.06B$1.76B19.464,500
PH
Parker-Hannifin
4.4908 of 5 stars		$956.53
-0.6%		$1,021.05
+6.7%		+34.0%$120.11B$20.99B35.1457,950
LI
Li Auto
3.4027 of 5 stars		$12.73
-0.7%		$17.30
+36.0%		-54.0%$13.59B$16.06BN/A30,728
NIO
NIO
2.901 of 5 stars		$5.12
+1.3%		$6.70
+31.0%		+37.1%$12.70B$12.51BN/A35,032
XPEV
XPENG
2.9124 of 5 stars		$12.80
-4.2%		$25.51
+99.4%		-30.4%$12.13B$10.97BN/A19,884

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:ATMU) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump just signed it
A recent policy development is drawing attention from income-focused investors. According to one analyst, c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel