Free Trial
Your Portfolio Deserves Better! MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) Competitors

Atmus Filtration Technologies logo
$48.88 +0.45 (+0.93%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$48.82 -0.06 (-0.12%)
As of 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ATMU vs. PH, RIVN, MGA, XPEV, and NIO

Should you buy Atmus Filtration Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Atmus Filtration Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Atmus Filtration Technologies include Parker-Hannifin (PH), Rivian Automotive (RIVN), Magna International (MGA), XPENG (XPEV), and NIO (NIO).

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Parker-Hannifin?

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Parker-Hannifin currently has a consensus target price of $1,022.30, suggesting a potential upside of 18.00%. Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus target price of $56.75, suggesting a potential upside of 16.11%. Given Parker-Hannifin's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Parker-Hannifin
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.81
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 29.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 13 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 2 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Atmus Filtration Technologies' score of 0.31 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Parker-Hannifin
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Atmus Filtration Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.58% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies' net margin of 11.56%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat Parker-Hannifin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Parker-Hannifin16.58% 27.97% 13.00%
Atmus Filtration Technologies 11.56%64.29%15.78%

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Parker-Hannifin$19.85B5.51$3.53B$27.1131.96
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.26$207.40M$2.5519.17

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Atmus Filtration Technologies on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Rivian Automotive?

Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) and Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ:RIVN) are both automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, Rivian Automotive had 24 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Rivian Automotive and 2 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Rivian Automotive's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Atmus Filtration Technologies' score of 0.31 indicating that Rivian Automotive is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Atmus Filtration Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Rivian Automotive
13 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of -63.62%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Atmus Filtration Technologies11.56% 64.29% 15.78%
Rivian Automotive -63.62%-75.65%-25.49%

Atmus Filtration Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Rivian Automotive. Rivian Automotive is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmus Filtration Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.26$207.40M$2.5519.17
Rivian Automotive$5.53B3.19-$3.65B-$2.92N/A

Atmus Filtration Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $56.75, suggesting a potential upside of 16.11%. Rivian Automotive has a consensus target price of $18.57, suggesting a potential upside of 30.65%. Given Rivian Automotive's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Rivian Automotive is more favorable than Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Rivian Automotive
6 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.3% of Rivian Automotive shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Rivian Automotive shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.47, meaning that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rivian Automotive has a beta of 1.64, meaning that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Rivian Automotive beats Atmus Filtration Technologies on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Magna International?

Magna International (NYSE:MGA) and Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) are both automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magna International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Magna International$42.01B0.42$829M$2.3927.02
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.26$207.40M$2.5519.17

Magna International presently has a consensus price target of $63.13, suggesting a potential downside of 2.25%. Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus price target of $56.75, suggesting a potential upside of 16.11%. Given Atmus Filtration Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more favorable than Magna International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Magna International
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Magna International has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Magna International pays an annual dividend of $1.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Magna International pays out 82.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magna International has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Magna International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Atmus Filtration Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Magna International. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies and 1 mentions for Magna International. Magna International's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Atmus Filtration Technologies' score of 0.31 indicating that Magna International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Magna International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Atmus Filtration Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Magna International's net margin of 1.60%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat Magna International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Magna International1.60% 14.01% 5.53%
Atmus Filtration Technologies 11.56%64.29%15.78%

67.5% of Magna International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Magna International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Magna International and Atmus Filtration Technologies tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to XPENG?

XPENG (NYSE:XPEV) and Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) are both automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, XPENG had 9 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for XPENG and 2 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat XPENG's score of 0.29 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
XPENG
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Atmus Filtration Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

XPENG has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to XPENG's net margin of -1.46%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat XPENG's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
XPENG-1.46% -3.71% -1.18%
Atmus Filtration Technologies 11.56%64.29%15.78%

XPENG presently has a consensus target price of $25.38, suggesting a potential upside of 62.56%. Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus target price of $56.75, suggesting a potential upside of 16.11%. Given XPENG's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe XPENG is more favorable than Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
XPENG
4 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Atmus Filtration Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than XPENG. XPENG is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmus Filtration Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
XPENG$10.97B1.35-$158.50M-$0.17N/A
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.26$207.40M$2.5519.17

21.1% of XPENG shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.6% of XPENG shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies beats XPENG on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to NIO?

NIO (NYSE:NIO) and Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) are both automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to NIO's net margin of -17.21%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat NIO's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NIO-17.21% -924.56% -13.91%
Atmus Filtration Technologies 11.56%64.29%15.78%

NIO has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

NIO presently has a consensus target price of $6.70, indicating a potential upside of 28.48%. Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus target price of $56.75, indicating a potential upside of 16.11%. Given NIO's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NIO is more favorable than Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NIO
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36
Atmus Filtration Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Atmus Filtration Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NIO. NIO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmus Filtration Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NIO$12.51B0.96-$2.14B-$0.97N/A
Atmus Filtration Technologies$1.76B2.26$207.40M$2.5519.17

48.6% of NIO shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of NIO shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, NIO had 28 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for NIO and 2 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. NIO's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Atmus Filtration Technologies' score of 0.31 indicating that NIO is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NIO
10 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Atmus Filtration Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies beats NIO on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Atmus Filtration Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ATMU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ATMU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ATMU vs. The Competition

MetricAtmus Filtration TechnologiesPOLLUTION CNTRL IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.99B$1.78B$9.39B$23.13B
Dividend Yield0.45%1.51%3.57%4.11%
P/E Ratio19.1721.7025.2130.60
Price / Sales2.264.874,734.5014.47
Price / Cash15.5637.7427.5724.79
Price / Book9.894.464.894.74
Net Income$207.40M$69.81M$792.97M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-5.25%-4.67%0.71%1.93%
1 Month Performance-18.38%20.20%1.88%0.38%
1 Year Performance33.26%12.32%35.50%28.10%

Atmus Filtration Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
4.628 of 5 stars
$48.88
+0.9%
$56.75
+16.1%
+28.6%$3.99B$1.76B19.174,500
PH
Parker-Hannifin
4.7015 of 5 stars
$871.11
-0.4%
$1,022.30
+17.4%
+30.7%$109.93B$19.85B32.1357,950
RIVN
Rivian Automotive
3.5849 of 5 stars
$13.85
-1.6%
$18.57
+34.1%
-13.4%$17.19B$5.39BN/A15,232
MGA
Magna International
3.7568 of 5 stars
$61.58
-1.5%
$63.13
+2.5%
+77.4%$16.88B$42.01B25.75156,000
XPEV
XPENG
2.9219 of 5 stars
$16.03
-0.7%
$24.74
+54.3%
-29.9%$15.23B$10.97BN/A19,884

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:ATMU) was last updated on 5/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners