Does the media favor CMI or ATMU?

In the previous week, Cummins had 23 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Cummins and 7 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Cummins' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Atmus Filtration Technologies' score of 0.94 indicating that Cummins is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cummins 27 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Atmus Filtration Technologies 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor ATMU or PH?

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 19 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 7 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.65 beat Atmus Filtration Technologies' score of 0.94 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Atmus Filtration Technologies 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Parker-Hannifin 25 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media prefer LI or ATMU?

In the previous week, Atmus Filtration Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Li Auto. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies and 5 mentions for Li Auto. Li Auto's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Atmus Filtration Technologies' score of 0.94 indicating that Li Auto is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Li Auto 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Atmus Filtration Technologies 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer XPEV or ATMU?

In the previous week, Atmus Filtration Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than XPENG. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies and 5 mentions for XPENG. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat XPENG's score of 0.27 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment XPENG 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Atmus Filtration Technologies 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to ATMU or NIO?

In the previous week, Atmus Filtration Technologies and Atmus Filtration Technologies both had 7 articles in the media. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat NIO's score of 0.24 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Atmus Filtration Technologies 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive NIO 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) Competitors

$53.44 +0.36 (+0.68%)

Closing price 07/24/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$53.56 +0.12 (+0.22%)

As of 07/24/2026 07:34 PM Eastern

Compare

ATMU vs. CMI, PH, LI, XPEV, and NIO

Should you buy Atmus Filtration Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Atmus Filtration Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Atmus Filtration Technologies include Cummins (CMI), Parker-Hannifin (PH), Li Auto (LI), XPENG (XPEV), and NIO (NIO).

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Cummins?

Cummins (NYSE:CMI) and Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

83.5% of Cummins shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Cummins shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cummins pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Cummins pays out 41.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cummins has raised its dividend for 19 consecutive years. Cummins is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Cummins presently has a consensus target price of $740.07, suggesting a potential upside of 11.46%. Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus target price of $62.67, suggesting a potential upside of 17.27%. Given Atmus Filtration Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more favorable than Cummins.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cummins	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Atmus Filtration Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Cummins has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cummins had 23 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Cummins and 7 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Cummins' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Atmus Filtration Technologies' score of 0.94 indicating that Cummins is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cummins	27 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Atmus Filtration Technologies	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cummins has higher revenue and earnings than Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cummins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cummins	$33.67B	2.72	$2.84B	$19.27	34.46
Atmus Filtration Technologies	$1.83B	2.39	$207.40M	$2.55	20.96

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Cummins' net margin of 7.89%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat Cummins' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cummins	7.89%	25.25%	9.77%
Atmus Filtration Technologies	11.56%	64.29%	15.78%

Summary

Cummins beats Atmus Filtration Technologies on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Parker-Hannifin?

Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) and Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 19 more articles in the media than Atmus Filtration Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 7 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.65 beat Atmus Filtration Technologies' score of 0.94 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Atmus Filtration Technologies	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Parker-Hannifin	25 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Atmus Filtration Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $62.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.27%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus target price of $1,027.38, indicating a potential upside of 4.18%. Given Atmus Filtration Technologies' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Atmus Filtration Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Parker-Hannifin	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.58% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies' net margin of 11.56%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat Parker-Hannifin's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Atmus Filtration Technologies	11.56%	64.29%	15.78%
Parker-Hannifin	16.58%	27.97%	13.00%

Atmus Filtration Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 29.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Atmus Filtration Technologies. Atmus Filtration Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Atmus Filtration Technologies	$1.83B	2.39	$207.40M	$2.55	20.96
Parker-Hannifin	$19.85B	6.26	$3.53B	$27.11	36.38

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Atmus Filtration Technologies on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Li Auto?

Li Auto (NASDAQ:LI) and Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) are both automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and valuation.

Li Auto currently has a consensus price target of $17.30, indicating a potential upside of 42.74%. Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus price target of $62.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.27%. Given Li Auto's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Li Auto is more favorable than Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Li Auto	3 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Atmus Filtration Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Atmus Filtration Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Li Auto. Li Auto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmus Filtration Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Li Auto	$109.37B	0.12	$160.79M	-$0.28	N/A
Atmus Filtration Technologies	$1.83B	2.39	$207.40M	$2.55	20.96

In the previous week, Atmus Filtration Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Li Auto. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies and 5 mentions for Li Auto. Li Auto's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Atmus Filtration Technologies' score of 0.94 indicating that Li Auto is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Li Auto	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Atmus Filtration Technologies	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

9.9% of Li Auto shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.5% of Li Auto shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Li Auto has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Li Auto's net margin of -1.72%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat Li Auto's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Li Auto	-1.72%	-2.58%	-1.22%
Atmus Filtration Technologies	11.56%	64.29%	15.78%

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies beats Li Auto on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to XPENG?

XPENG (NYSE:XPEV) and Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) are both automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Atmus Filtration Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than XPENG. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies and 5 mentions for XPENG. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat XPENG's score of 0.27 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
XPENG	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Atmus Filtration Technologies	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

XPENG presently has a consensus target price of $25.40, indicating a potential upside of 105.75%. Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus target price of $62.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.27%. Given XPENG's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe XPENG is more favorable than Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
XPENG	4 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Atmus Filtration Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Atmus Filtration Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than XPENG. XPENG is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmus Filtration Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
XPENG	$73.94B	0.16	-$158.50M	-$0.34	N/A
Atmus Filtration Technologies	$1.83B	2.39	$207.40M	$2.55	20.96

21.1% of XPENG shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 27.6% of XPENG shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to XPENG's net margin of -3.09%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat XPENG's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
XPENG	-3.09%	-7.72%	-2.33%
Atmus Filtration Technologies	11.56%	64.29%	15.78%

XPENG has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies beats XPENG on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to NIO?

Atmus Filtration Technologies (NYSE:ATMU) and NIO (NYSE:NIO) are both automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NIO. NIO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmus Filtration Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Atmus Filtration Technologies	$1.83B	2.39	$207.40M	$2.55	20.96
NIO	$100.99B	0.11	-$2.14B	-$0.55	N/A

32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.5% of NIO shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of NIO shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to NIO's net margin of -8.78%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat NIO's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Atmus Filtration Technologies	11.56%	64.29%	15.78%
NIO	-8.78%	-318.96%	-7.67%

Atmus Filtration Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $62.67, suggesting a potential upside of 17.27%. NIO has a consensus price target of $6.70, suggesting a potential upside of 49.39%. Given NIO's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NIO is more favorable than Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Atmus Filtration Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
NIO	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NIO has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Atmus Filtration Technologies and Atmus Filtration Technologies both had 7 articles in the media. Atmus Filtration Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat NIO's score of 0.24 indicating that Atmus Filtration Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Atmus Filtration Technologies	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
NIO	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies beats NIO on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Atmus Filtration Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ATMU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ATMU vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Atmus Filtration Technologies	POLLUTION CNTRL Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$4.34B	$1.93B	$9.49B	$23.47B
Dividend Yield	0.42%	1.46%	3.49%	4.20%
P/E Ratio	20.96	20.82	27.14	30.75
Price / Sales	2.39	3.94	2,003.16	166.55
Price / Cash	16.87	35.61	27.10	31.69
Price / Book	11.52	4.73	4.39	4.73
Net Income	$207.40M	$69.81M	$794.27M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	4.19%	-0.43%	0.34%	-0.45%
1 Month Performance	-1.13%	-6.56%	-0.06%	0.73%
1 Year Performance	38.68%	1.83%	12.99%	14.09%

Atmus Filtration Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ATMU Atmus Filtration Technologies	4.5832 of 5 stars	$53.44 +0.7%	$62.67 +17.3%	+40.5%	$4.34B	$1.83B	20.96	4,500
CMI Cummins	4.8472 of 5 stars	$670.40 +0.9%	$738.00 +10.1%	+81.5%	$92.21B	$33.67B	34.68	67,400	Positive News
PH Parker-Hannifin	4.4761 of 5 stars	$956.91 +0.6%	$1,026.86 +7.3%	+35.1%	$120.28B	$19.85B	35.19	57,950	News Coverage Positive News
LI Li Auto	2.988 of 5 stars	$12.47 +2.3%	$17.30 +38.8%	-59.0%	$13.36B	$16.06B	N/A	30,728
XPEV XPENG	2.9547 of 5 stars	$13.38 +3.3%	$25.51 +90.7%	-35.6%	$12.78B	$10.97B	N/A	19,884

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:ATMU) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) Competitors

ATMU vs. CMI, PH, LI, XPEV, and NIO

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Cummins?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Parker-Hannifin?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Li Auto?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to XPENG?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to NIO?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ATMU vs. The Competition

Atmus Filtration Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) Competitors

ATMU vs. CMI, PH, LI, XPEV, and NIO

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Cummins?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CMI or ATMU?

Is CMI or ATMU a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate CMI or ATMU?

Which has more risk and volatility, CMI or ATMU?

Does the media favor CMI or ATMU?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CMI or ATMU?

Is CMI or ATMU more profitable?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Parker-Hannifin?

Does the media favor ATMU or PH?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of ATMU or PH?

Do analysts recommend ATMU or PH?

Is ATMU or PH more profitable?

Is ATMU or PH a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, ATMU or PH?

Which has better valuation & earnings, ATMU or PH?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to Li Auto?

Do analysts rate LI or ATMU?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, LI or ATMU?

Does the media prefer LI or ATMU?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in LI or ATMU?

Which has more volatility and risk, LI or ATMU?

Is LI or ATMU more profitable?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to XPENG?

Does the media prefer XPEV or ATMU?

Do analysts prefer XPEV or ATMU?

Which has better earnings & valuation, XPEV or ATMU?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of XPEV or ATMU?

Is XPEV or ATMU more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, XPEV or ATMU?

Summary

How does Atmus Filtration Technologies compare to NIO?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ATMU or NIO?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of ATMU or NIO?

Is ATMU or NIO more profitable?

Do analysts prefer ATMU or NIO?

Which has more risk and volatility, ATMU or NIO?

Does the media refer more to ATMU or NIO?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ATMU vs. The Competition

Atmus Filtration Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools