John Bean Technologies Competitors

John Bean Technologies (NYSE:JBT) and Illinois Tool Works (NYSE:ITW) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares John Bean Technologies and Illinois Tool Works' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

John Bean Technologies has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for John Bean Technologies and Illinois Tool Works, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

John Bean Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $149.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 8.89%. Illinois Tool Works has a consensus price target of $206.0625, suggesting a potential downside of 7.84%. Given John Bean Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe John Bean Technologies is more favorable than Illinois Tool Works.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

77.4% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of John Bean Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

John Bean Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Illinois Tool Works pays an annual dividend of $4.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. John Bean Technologies pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Illinois Tool Works pays out 58.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. John Bean Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Illinois Tool Works has increased its dividend for 50 consecutive years. Illinois Tool Works is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares John Bean Technologies and Illinois Tool Works' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Illinois Tool Works has higher revenue and earnings than John Bean Technologies. John Bean Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illinois Tool Works, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Illinois Tool Works beats John Bean Technologies on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

John Bean Technologies (NYSE:JBT) and Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares John Bean Technologies and Parker-Hannifin's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

John Bean Technologies has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.74, meaning that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for John Bean Technologies and Parker-Hannifin, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

John Bean Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $149.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 8.89%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus price target of $307.00, suggesting a potential downside of 4.41%. Given John Bean Technologies' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe John Bean Technologies is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

77.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of John Bean Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

John Bean Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. John Bean Technologies pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. John Bean Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares John Bean Technologies and Parker-Hannifin's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than John Bean Technologies. John Bean Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats John Bean Technologies on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

John Bean Technologies (NYSE:JBT) and Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for John Bean Technologies and Stanley Black & Decker, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

John Bean Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $149.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 8.89%. Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $189.3077, suggesting a potential downside of 7.27%. Given John Bean Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe John Bean Technologies is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares John Bean Technologies and Stanley Black & Decker's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than John Bean Technologies. Stanley Black & Decker is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than John Bean Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

85.4% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of John Bean Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

John Bean Technologies has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.47, meaning that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares John Bean Technologies and Stanley Black & Decker's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

John Bean Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. John Bean Technologies pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. John Bean Technologies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Stanley Black & Decker has increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years. Stanley Black & Decker is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker beats John Bean Technologies on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) and John Bean Technologies (NYSE:JBT) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Ingersoll Rand and John Bean Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Ingersoll Rand currently has a consensus price target of $47.3846, suggesting a potential downside of 5.51%. John Bean Technologies has a consensus price target of $149.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 8.89%. Given John Bean Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe John Bean Technologies is more favorable than Ingersoll Rand.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ingersoll Rand and John Bean Technologies' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Ingersoll Rand has higher revenue and earnings than John Bean Technologies. John Bean Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

95.9% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of John Bean Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.53, indicating that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, John Bean Technologies has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Ingersoll Rand and John Bean Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

John Bean Technologies beats Ingersoll Rand on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dover (NYSE:DOV) and John Bean Technologies (NYSE:JBT) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Dover and John Bean Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Dover currently has a consensus price target of $129.25, suggesting a potential downside of 8.00%. John Bean Technologies has a consensus price target of $149.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 8.89%. Given John Bean Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe John Bean Technologies is more favorable than Dover.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Dover and John Bean Technologies' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than John Bean Technologies. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than John Bean Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

82.7% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Dover shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of John Bean Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Dover has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, John Bean Technologies has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dover and John Bean Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Dover pays an annual dividend of $1.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. John Bean Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Dover pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. John Bean Technologies pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dover has raised its dividend for 59 consecutive years and John Bean Technologies has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Dover beats John Bean Technologies on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Xylem (NYSE:XYL) and John Bean Technologies (NYSE:JBT) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Xylem and John Bean Technologies' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Xylem has higher revenue and earnings than John Bean Technologies. John Bean Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xylem, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Xylem pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. John Bean Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Xylem pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. John Bean Technologies pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Xylem has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and John Bean Technologies has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Risk and Volatility

Xylem has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, John Bean Technologies has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Xylem and John Bean Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Xylem currently has a consensus price target of $84.5455, suggesting a potential downside of 22.01%. John Bean Technologies has a consensus price target of $149.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 8.89%. Given John Bean Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe John Bean Technologies is more favorable than Xylem.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

84.9% of Xylem shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Xylem shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of John Bean Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Xylem and John Bean Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

John Bean Technologies beats Xylem on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.