Go Pro

Albany International (AIN) Competitors

Albany International logo
$58.40 -0.70 (-1.18%)
Closing price 08/24/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$58.36 -0.05 (-0.09%)
As of 08/24/2026 04:20 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

AIN vs. FELE, KAI, NPO, GTES, and JBTM

Should you buy Albany International stock or one of its competitors? Albany International's main competitors and comparable companies include Franklin Electric (FELE), Kadant (KAI), Enpro (NPO), Gates Industrial (GTES), and JBT Marel (JBTM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Albany International compare to Franklin Electric?

Albany International (NYSE:AIN) and Franklin Electric (NASDAQ:FELE) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Albany International presently has a consensus target price of $54.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.54%. Franklin Electric has a consensus target price of $114.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.00%. Given Franklin Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Franklin Electric is more favorable than Albany International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Albany International
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Franklin Electric
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

97.4% of Albany International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Franklin Electric shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Albany International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Franklin Electric shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Albany International has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franklin Electric has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Albany International pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Franklin Electric pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Albany International pays out -64.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franklin Electric pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Albany International has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Franklin Electric has raised its dividend for 33 consecutive years. Albany International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Franklin Electric has higher revenue and earnings than Albany International. Albany International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franklin Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Albany International$1.22B1.36-$57.34M-$1.74N/A
Franklin Electric$2.13B2.14$147.09M$3.4729.73

Franklin Electric has a net margin of 7.06% compared to Albany International's net margin of -4.18%. Franklin Electric's return on equity of 15.18% beat Albany International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Albany International-4.18% 10.76% 4.64%
Franklin Electric 7.06%15.18%10.13%

In the previous week, Albany International and Albany International both had 3 articles in the media. Franklin Electric's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Albany International's score of 0.00 indicating that Franklin Electric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Albany International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Franklin Electric
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Franklin Electric beats Albany International on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Albany International compare to Kadant?

Albany International (NYSE:AIN) and Kadant (NYSE:KAI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

97.4% of Albany International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Kadant shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Albany International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Kadant shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Albany International currently has a consensus price target of $54.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.54%. Kadant has a consensus price target of $357.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.32%. Given Kadant's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kadant is more favorable than Albany International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Albany International
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Kadant
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Albany International pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Kadant pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Albany International pays out -64.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kadant pays out 15.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Albany International has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Kadant has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Albany International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Kadant has a net margin of 9.52% compared to Albany International's net margin of -4.18%. Kadant's return on equity of 13.16% beat Albany International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Albany International-4.18% 10.76% 4.64%
Kadant 9.52%13.16%7.67%

In the previous week, Kadant had 1 more articles in the media than Albany International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Kadant and 3 mentions for Albany International. Kadant's average media sentiment score of 1.78 beat Albany International's score of 0.00 indicating that Kadant is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Albany International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Kadant
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Albany International has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kadant has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Kadant has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Albany International. Albany International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kadant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Albany International$1.22B1.36-$57.34M-$1.74N/A
Kadant$1.05B3.51$101.97M$9.3033.62

Summary

Kadant beats Albany International on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Albany International compare to Enpro?

Enpro (NYSE:NPO) and Albany International (NYSE:AIN) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Enpro has a net margin of 3.60% compared to Albany International's net margin of -4.18%. Enpro's return on equity of 11.83% beat Albany International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enpro3.60% 11.83% 7.10%
Albany International -4.18%10.76%4.64%

Enpro has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Albany International has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Enpro has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Albany International. Albany International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enpro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enpro$1.14B5.65$40.50M$2.05148.78
Albany International$1.22B1.36-$57.34M-$1.74N/A

Enpro currently has a consensus target price of $358.33, suggesting a potential upside of 17.48%. Albany International has a consensus target price of $54.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.54%. Given Enpro's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Enpro is more favorable than Albany International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enpro
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Albany International
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

98.3% of Enpro shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.4% of Albany International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Enpro shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Albany International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Enpro had 6 more articles in the media than Albany International. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Enpro and 3 mentions for Albany International. Enpro's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Albany International's score of 0.00 indicating that Enpro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Enpro
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Albany International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Enpro pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Albany International pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Enpro pays out 62.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Albany International pays out -64.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enpro has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Albany International has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Albany International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Enpro beats Albany International on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Albany International compare to Gates Industrial?

Gates Industrial (NYSE:GTES) and Albany International (NYSE:AIN) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

98.5% of Gates Industrial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.4% of Albany International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Gates Industrial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Albany International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Gates Industrial and Gates Industrial both had 3 articles in the media. Gates Industrial's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Albany International's score of 0.00 indicating that Gates Industrial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gates Industrial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Albany International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Gates Industrial presently has a consensus price target of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.60%. Albany International has a consensus price target of $54.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.54%. Given Gates Industrial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Gates Industrial is more favorable than Albany International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gates Industrial
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Albany International
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Gates Industrial has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Albany International has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Gates Industrial has a net margin of 10.37% compared to Albany International's net margin of -4.18%. Albany International's return on equity of 10.76% beat Gates Industrial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gates Industrial10.37% 10.11% 5.27%
Albany International -4.18%10.76%4.64%

Gates Industrial has higher revenue and earnings than Albany International. Albany International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gates Industrial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gates Industrial$3.44B1.92$251.40M$1.4118.49
Albany International$1.22B1.36-$57.34M-$1.74N/A

Summary

Gates Industrial beats Albany International on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Albany International compare to JBT Marel?

JBT Marel (NYSE:JBTM) and Albany International (NYSE:AIN) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

JBT Marel has a net margin of 4.89% compared to Albany International's net margin of -4.18%. Albany International's return on equity of 10.76% beat JBT Marel's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JBT Marel4.89% 8.75% 4.80%
Albany International -4.18%10.76%4.64%

JBT Marel presently has a consensus price target of $174.67, indicating a potential upside of 51.50%. Albany International has a consensus price target of $54.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.54%. Given JBT Marel's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe JBT Marel is more favorable than Albany International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
JBT Marel
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Albany International
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

JBT Marel has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Albany International has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, JBT Marel had 5 more articles in the media than Albany International. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for JBT Marel and 3 mentions for Albany International. JBT Marel's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Albany International's score of 0.00 indicating that JBT Marel is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
JBT Marel
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Albany International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

JBT Marel pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Albany International pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. JBT Marel pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Albany International pays out -64.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Albany International has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Albany International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

98.9% of JBT Marel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.4% of Albany International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of JBT Marel shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Albany International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

JBT Marel has higher revenue and earnings than Albany International. Albany International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JBT Marel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JBT Marel$3.80B1.57-$50.50M$3.6731.41
Albany International$1.22B1.36-$57.34M-$1.74N/A

Summary

JBT Marel beats Albany International on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Albany International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AIN vs. The Competition

MetricAlbany InternationalMachinery IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.68B$11.49B$10.69B$24.29B
Dividend Yield1.90%2.18%97.24%3.70%
P/E Ratio-33.5720.8426.4730.14
Price / Sales1.3665.36326.3424.16
Price / Cash31.5423.4224.3119.80
Price / Book2.264.434.834.90
Net Income-$57.34M$358.96M$612.94M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-8.51%-1.20%-1.76%-0.20%
1 Month Performance-22.40%1.13%2.24%2.85%
1 Year Performance-10.37%11.24%11.41%14.47%

Albany International Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AIN
Albany International
1.3055 of 5 stars
$58.41
-1.2%
$54.00
-7.5%
-10.4%$1.68B$1.22BN/A5,700
FELE
Franklin Electric
4.4072 of 5 stars
$101.95
-2.0%
$114.50
+12.3%
+3.6%$4.51B$2.13B29.386,500
KAI
Kadant
3.7719 of 5 stars
$309.37
-6.2%
$357.50
+15.6%
-8.2%$3.65B$1.15B33.273,900
NPO
Enpro
3.9788 of 5 stars
$329.82
-4.8%
$358.33
+8.6%
+33.7%$6.98B$1.14B160.894,000
GTES
Gates Industrial
4.7664 of 5 stars
$27.18
-3.4%
$33.00
+21.4%
+3.2%$6.88B$3.44B19.2813,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:AIN) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners