Watts Water Technologies (WTS) Competitors

In the previous week, Watts Water Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Lincoln Electric. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Watts Water Technologies and 6 mentions for Lincoln Electric. Lincoln Electric's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 0.95 indicating that Lincoln Electric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lincoln Electric has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Lincoln Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Watts Water Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lincoln Electric has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.6% of Lincoln Electric shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Lincoln Electric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 14.34% compared to Lincoln Electric's net margin of 12.35%. Lincoln Electric's return on equity of 39.23% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Watts Water Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $367.70, indicating a potential upside of 3.28%. Lincoln Electric has a consensus target price of $307.22, indicating a potential upside of 21.40%. Given Lincoln Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lincoln Electric is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Lincoln Electric pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Watts Water Technologies pays out 22.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lincoln Electric pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Lincoln Electric has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Lincoln Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Pegasystems has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

46.9% of Pegasystems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 48.4% of Pegasystems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pegasystems currently has a consensus target price of $50.10, suggesting a potential upside of 38.25%. Watts Water Technologies has a consensus target price of $367.70, suggesting a potential upside of 3.28%. Given Pegasystems' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Pegasystems is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

Pegasystems has a net margin of 18.66% compared to Watts Water Technologies' net margin of 14.34%. Pegasystems' return on equity of 32.21% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Pegasystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Watts Water Technologies. Pegasystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Watts Water Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Pegasystems pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Pegasystems pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 22.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Watts Water Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Pegasystems had 5 more articles in the media than Watts Water Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Pegasystems and 10 mentions for Watts Water Technologies. Pegasystems' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 0.95 indicating that Pegasystems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 14.34% compared to Woodward's net margin of 13.17%. Woodward's return on equity of 21.89% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

In the previous week, Watts Water Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Woodward. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Watts Water Technologies and 7 mentions for Woodward. Woodward's average media sentiment score of 1.69 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 0.95 indicating that Woodward is being referred to more favorably in the media.

81.2% of Woodward shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Woodward shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Woodward pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Woodward pays out 14.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 22.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Woodward has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Watts Water Technologies has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Watts Water Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Woodward has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Watts Water Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Woodward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Woodward presently has a consensus price target of $419.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.24%. Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of $367.70, suggesting a potential upside of 3.28%. Given Woodward's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Woodward is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

Woodward has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 14.34% compared to Donaldson's net margin of 11.68%. Donaldson's return on equity of 28.68% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Donaldson pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Watts Water Technologies pays out 22.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Donaldson pays out 33.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Donaldson has raised its dividend for 38 consecutive years. Donaldson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Watts Water Technologies had 5 more articles in the media than Donaldson. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Watts Water Technologies and 5 mentions for Donaldson. Donaldson's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 0.95 indicating that Donaldson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.8% of Donaldson shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Donaldson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Watts Water Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $367.70, indicating a potential upside of 3.28%. Donaldson has a consensus price target of $101.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.29%. Given Donaldson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Donaldson is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Donaldson has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Donaldson has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Donaldson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Watts Water Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.