Watts Water Technologies (WTS) Competitors

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 14.34% compared to Lincoln Electric's net margin of 12.35%. Lincoln Electric's return on equity of 39.23% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Watts Water Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $367.70, indicating a potential upside of 2.09%. Lincoln Electric has a consensus target price of $307.22, indicating a potential upside of 14.04%. Given Lincoln Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lincoln Electric is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.6% of Lincoln Electric shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Lincoln Electric shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lincoln Electric has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Lincoln Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Watts Water Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Lincoln Electric had 4 more articles in the media than Watts Water Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Lincoln Electric and 4 mentions for Watts Water Technologies. Watts Water Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Lincoln Electric's score of 0.24 indicating that Watts Water Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Lincoln Electric pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Watts Water Technologies pays out 22.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lincoln Electric pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Lincoln Electric has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Lincoln Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lincoln Electric has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Nordson has a net margin of 18.63% compared to Watts Water Technologies' net margin of 14.34%. Nordson's return on equity of 20.49% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

72.1% of Nordson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Nordson shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Nordson has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Nordson pays an annual dividend of $3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Nordson pays out 38.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 22.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nordson has increased its dividend for 62 consecutive years and Watts Water Technologies has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Nordson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Nordson had 1 more articles in the media than Watts Water Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Nordson and 4 mentions for Watts Water Technologies. Watts Water Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Nordson's score of 0.59 indicating that Watts Water Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Nordson presently has a consensus price target of $326.57, suggesting a potential downside of 0.74%. Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of $367.70, suggesting a potential upside of 2.09%. Given Watts Water Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Watts Water Technologies is more favorable than Nordson.

Nordson has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Watts Water Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nordson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Pegasystems has a net margin of 18.66% compared to Watts Water Technologies' net margin of 14.34%. Pegasystems' return on equity of 32.21% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Pegasystems has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Pegasystems currently has a consensus target price of $47.40, indicating a potential upside of 37.67%. Watts Water Technologies has a consensus target price of $367.70, indicating a potential upside of 2.09%. Given Pegasystems' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pegasystems is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

Pegasystems pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Pegasystems pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 22.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Watts Water Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

46.9% of Pegasystems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 48.4% of Pegasystems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pegasystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Watts Water Technologies. Pegasystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Watts Water Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Pegasystems had 3 more articles in the media than Watts Water Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Pegasystems and 4 mentions for Watts Water Technologies. Watts Water Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Pegasystems' score of 0.27 indicating that Watts Water Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Watts Water Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $367.70, indicating a potential upside of 2.09%. Woodward has a consensus price target of $414.33, indicating a potential upside of 23.24%. Given Woodward's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Woodward is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 14.34% compared to Woodward's net margin of 13.17%. Woodward's return on equity of 21.89% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Woodward has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Watts Water Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Woodward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Woodward pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Watts Water Technologies pays out 22.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Woodward pays out 14.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Woodward has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Watts Water Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Woodward had 1 more articles in the media than Watts Water Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Woodward and 4 mentions for Watts Water Technologies. Watts Water Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Woodward's score of 0.49 indicating that Watts Water Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Woodward has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Woodward shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Woodward shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.