Watts Water Technologies (WTS) Competitors

Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Lincoln Electric pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Watts Water Technologies pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lincoln Electric pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Lincoln Electric has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Lincoln Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lincoln Electric has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Lincoln Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Watts Water Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 14.32% compared to Lincoln Electric's net margin of 12.38%. Lincoln Electric's return on equity of 39.33% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Watts Water Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $329.44, suggesting a potential upside of 7.68%. Lincoln Electric has a consensus target price of $296.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.08%. Given Lincoln Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lincoln Electric is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lincoln Electric has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.6% of Lincoln Electric shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Lincoln Electric shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Watts Water Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Lincoln Electric. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Watts Water Technologies and 3 mentions for Lincoln Electric. Lincoln Electric's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 1.12 indicating that Lincoln Electric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Nordson has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Watts Water Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nordson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Nordson has a net margin of 18.19% compared to Watts Water Technologies' net margin of 14.32%. Nordson's return on equity of 20.08% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.1% of Nordson shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Nordson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Nordson pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Watts Water Technologies pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nordson pays out 35.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Nordson has raised its dividend for 62 consecutive years. Nordson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Watts Water Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $329.44, suggesting a potential upside of 7.68%. Nordson has a consensus price target of $311.29, suggesting a potential upside of 10.65%. Given Nordson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nordson is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

In the previous week, Nordson had 7 more articles in the media than Watts Water Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Nordson and 7 mentions for Watts Water Technologies. Nordson's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 1.12 indicating that Nordson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nordson has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Pegasystems pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Watts Water Technologies pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pegasystems pays out 6.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Watts Water Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Watts Water Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $329.44, indicating a potential upside of 7.68%. Pegasystems has a consensus target price of $63.70, indicating a potential upside of 67.55%. Given Pegasystems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pegasystems is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.9% of Pegasystems shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 48.4% of Pegasystems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pegasystems has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Pegasystems has a net margin of 20.04% compared to Watts Water Technologies' net margin of 14.32%. Pegasystems' return on equity of 30.05% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Pegasystems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Pegasystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Watts Water Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Watts Water Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Pegasystems. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Watts Water Technologies and 4 mentions for Pegasystems. Watts Water Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Pegasystems' score of 0.62 indicating that Watts Water Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Woodward pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Watts Water Technologies pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Woodward pays out 15.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Woodward has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Watts Water Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Woodward shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Woodward shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 14.32% compared to Woodward's net margin of 12.85%. Woodward's return on equity of 20.12% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Woodward has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Woodward had 6 more articles in the media than Watts Water Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Woodward and 7 mentions for Watts Water Technologies. Watts Water Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Woodward's score of 0.86 indicating that Watts Water Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Watts Water Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $329.44, indicating a potential upside of 7.68%. Woodward has a consensus target price of $393.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.49%. Given Woodward's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Woodward is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

Woodward has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Watts Water Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Woodward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.