Watts Water Technologies (WTS) Competitors

$295.27 -2.89 (-0.97%)

As of 11:48 AM Eastern

WTS vs. FELE, LECO, NDSN, PEGA, and WWD

Should you be buying Watts Water Technologies stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Watts Water Technologies include Franklin Electric (FELE), Lincoln Electric (LECO), Nordson (NDSN), Pegasystems (PEGA), and Woodward (WWD).

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Franklin Electric?

Watts Water Technologies (NYSE:WTS) and Franklin Electric (NASDAQ:FELE) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franklin Electric has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Watts Water Technologies had 8 more articles in the media than Franklin Electric. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Watts Water Technologies and 8 mentions for Franklin Electric. Franklin Electric's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 0.48 indicating that Franklin Electric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Watts Water Technologies	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Franklin Electric	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Franklin Electric pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Watts Water Technologies pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franklin Electric pays out 33.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Franklin Electric has raised its dividend for 33 consecutive years. Franklin Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Watts Water Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $329.44, suggesting a potential upside of 11.57%. Franklin Electric has a consensus target price of $106.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.69%. Given Watts Water Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Watts Water Technologies is more favorable than Franklin Electric.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Watts Water Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Franklin Electric	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Watts Water Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Franklin Electric. Watts Water Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franklin Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Watts Water Technologies	$2.44B	4.04	$340.80M	$10.93	27.02
Franklin Electric	$2.13B	2.02	$147.09M	$3.32	29.37

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 14.32% compared to Franklin Electric's net margin of 6.91%. Watts Water Technologies' return on equity of 18.92% beat Franklin Electric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Watts Water Technologies	14.32%	18.92%	13.48%
Franklin Electric	6.91%	14.86%	9.81%

95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Franklin Electric shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Franklin Electric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Watts Water Technologies beats Franklin Electric on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Lincoln Electric?

Watts Water Technologies (NYSE:WTS) and Lincoln Electric (NASDAQ:LECO) are both industrial machinery companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lincoln Electric has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Watts Water Technologies had 5 more articles in the media than Lincoln Electric. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Watts Water Technologies and 11 mentions for Lincoln Electric. Lincoln Electric's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 0.48 indicating that Lincoln Electric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Watts Water Technologies	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Lincoln Electric	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Lincoln Electric pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Watts Water Technologies pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lincoln Electric pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Lincoln Electric has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Lincoln Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Watts Water Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $329.44, suggesting a potential upside of 11.57%. Lincoln Electric has a consensus target price of $296.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.02%. Given Watts Water Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Watts Water Technologies is more favorable than Lincoln Electric.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Watts Water Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Lincoln Electric	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38

Lincoln Electric has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Watts Water Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lincoln Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Watts Water Technologies	$2.44B	4.04	$340.80M	$10.93	27.02
Lincoln Electric	$4.23B	3.45	$520.53M	$9.69	27.51

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 14.32% compared to Lincoln Electric's net margin of 12.38%. Lincoln Electric's return on equity of 39.33% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Watts Water Technologies	14.32%	18.92%	13.48%
Lincoln Electric	12.38%	39.33%	14.93%

95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.6% of Lincoln Electric shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Lincoln Electric shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lincoln Electric beats Watts Water Technologies on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Nordson?

Nordson (NASDAQ:NDSN) and Watts Water Technologies (NYSE:WTS) are both industrial machinery companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Watts Water Technologies had 12 more articles in the media than Nordson. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Watts Water Technologies and 4 mentions for Nordson. Nordson's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 0.48 indicating that Nordson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Nordson	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Watts Water Technologies	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Nordson has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Nordson has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Watts Water Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nordson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nordson	$2.79B	5.59	$484.47M	$9.26	30.21
Watts Water Technologies	$2.44B	4.04	$340.80M	$10.93	27.02

Nordson currently has a consensus target price of $311.50, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. Watts Water Technologies has a consensus target price of $329.44, suggesting a potential upside of 11.57%. Given Watts Water Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Watts Water Technologies is more favorable than Nordson.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nordson	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Watts Water Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Nordson has a net margin of 18.39% compared to Watts Water Technologies' net margin of 14.32%. Nordson's return on equity of 19.73% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nordson	18.39%	19.73%	9.97%
Watts Water Technologies	14.32%	18.92%	13.48%

Nordson pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Nordson pays out 35.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nordson has increased its dividend for 62 consecutive years and Watts Water Technologies has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Nordson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

72.1% of Nordson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Nordson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Nordson beats Watts Water Technologies on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Pegasystems?

Pegasystems (NASDAQ:PEGA) and Watts Water Technologies (NYSE:WTS) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Watts Water Technologies had 10 more articles in the media than Pegasystems. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Watts Water Technologies and 6 mentions for Pegasystems. Pegasystems' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 0.48 indicating that Pegasystems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pegasystems	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Watts Water Technologies	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Pegasystems has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Pegasystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Watts Water Technologies. Pegasystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Watts Water Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pegasystems	$1.75B	3.30	$393.44M	$1.86	18.51
Watts Water Technologies	$2.44B	4.04	$340.80M	$10.93	27.02

Pegasystems currently has a consensus target price of $63.70, suggesting a potential upside of 85.02%. Watts Water Technologies has a consensus target price of $329.44, suggesting a potential upside of 11.57%. Given Pegasystems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Pegasystems is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pegasystems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Watts Water Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Pegasystems has a net margin of 20.04% compared to Watts Water Technologies' net margin of 14.32%. Pegasystems' return on equity of 30.05% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pegasystems	20.04%	30.05%	14.07%
Watts Water Technologies	14.32%	18.92%	13.48%

Pegasystems pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Pegasystems pays out 6.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Watts Water Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

46.9% of Pegasystems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 48.4% of Pegasystems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Pegasystems beats Watts Water Technologies on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Woodward?

Woodward (NASDAQ:WWD) and Watts Water Technologies (NYSE:WTS) are both industrial machinery companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Woodward has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Watts Water Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Woodward. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Watts Water Technologies and 12 mentions for Woodward. Woodward's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 0.48 indicating that Woodward is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Woodward	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Watts Water Technologies	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

81.2% of Woodward shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Woodward shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Woodward has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Watts Water Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Woodward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Woodward	$3.57B	6.07	$442.11M	$8.35	43.51
Watts Water Technologies	$2.44B	4.04	$340.80M	$10.93	27.02

Woodward pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Woodward pays out 15.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Woodward has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Watts Water Technologies has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Watts Water Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 14.32% compared to Woodward's net margin of 12.85%. Woodward's return on equity of 20.12% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Woodward	12.85%	20.12%	10.72%
Watts Water Technologies	14.32%	18.92%	13.48%

Woodward currently has a consensus target price of $390.27, suggesting a potential upside of 7.41%. Watts Water Technologies has a consensus target price of $329.44, suggesting a potential upside of 11.57%. Given Watts Water Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Watts Water Technologies is more favorable than Woodward.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Woodward	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Watts Water Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

Woodward and Watts Water Technologies tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Watts Water Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WTS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WTS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Watts Water Technologies	INSTRU Industry	Computer Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$9.84B	$2.88B	$38.16B	$22.77B
Dividend Yield	0.70%	1.04%	3.16%	4.03%
P/E Ratio	27.02	60.87	164.02	28.59
Price / Sales	4.04	3.54	624.62	103.96
Price / Cash	23.96	26.34	46.29	19.21
Price / Book	4.85	3.92	9.55	4.60
Net Income	$340.80M	$75.72M	$1.03B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	1.16%	-0.05%	0.40%	-1.08%
1 Month Performance	-2.52%	11.23%	14.84%	2.93%
1 Year Performance	20.31%	68.14%	164.50%	23.96%

Watts Water Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WTS Watts Water Technologies	4.366 of 5 stars	$295.28 -1.0%	$329.44 +11.6%	+26.2%	$9.84B	$2.44B	27.02	5,700	Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
FELE Franklin Electric	3.7229 of 5 stars	$99.01 -0.3%	$106.00 +7.1%	+13.9%	$4.39B	$2.13B	29.82	6,500	Positive News
LECO Lincoln Electric	4.3366 of 5 stars	$271.23 +0.0%	$296.00 +9.1%	+45.9%	$14.85B	$4.23B	27.99	12,000	Analyst Upgrade
NDSN Nordson	4.1823 of 5 stars	$281.85 -0.6%	$311.50 +10.5%	+46.3%	$15.82B	$2.79B	30.44	8,000	Positive News
PEGA Pegasystems	4.8562 of 5 stars	$34.26 -4.8%	$63.70 +85.9%	-26.4%	$6.01B	$1.75B	18.42	5,598

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:WTS) was last updated on 5/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Watts Water Technologies (WTS) Competitors

WTS vs. FELE, LECO, NDSN, PEGA, and WWD

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Franklin Electric?

Summary

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Lincoln Electric?

Summary

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Nordson?

Summary

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Pegasystems?

Summary

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Woodward?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WTS vs. The Competition

Watts Water Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Watts Water Technologies (WTS) Competitors

WTS vs. FELE, LECO, NDSN, PEGA, and WWD

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Franklin Electric?

Which has more volatility & risk, WTS or FELE?

Does the media refer more to WTS or FELE?

Is WTS or FELE a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer WTS or FELE?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, WTS or FELE?

Is WTS or FELE more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of WTS or FELE?

Summary

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Lincoln Electric?

Which has more risk and volatility, WTS or LECO?

Does the media prefer WTS or LECO?

Is WTS or LECO a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer WTS or LECO?

Which has better valuation & earnings, WTS or LECO?

Is WTS or LECO more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of WTS or LECO?

Summary

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Nordson?

Does the media refer more to NDSN or WTS?

Which has more volatility & risk, NDSN or WTS?

Which has better earnings and valuation, NDSN or WTS?

Do analysts recommend NDSN or WTS?

Is NDSN or WTS more profitable?

Is NDSN or WTS a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in NDSN or WTS?

Summary

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Pegasystems?

Does the media refer more to PEGA or WTS?

Which has more volatility & risk, PEGA or WTS?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PEGA or WTS?

Do analysts recommend PEGA or WTS?

Is PEGA or WTS more profitable?

Is PEGA or WTS a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PEGA or WTS?

Summary

How does Watts Water Technologies compare to Woodward?

Which has more risk and volatility, WWD or WTS?

Does the media favor WWD or WTS?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of WWD or WTS?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, WWD or WTS?

Is WWD or WTS a better dividend stock?

Is WWD or WTS more profitable?

Do analysts recommend WWD or WTS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WTS vs. The Competition

Watts Water Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools