Watts Water Technologies (WTS) Competitors

Lincoln Electric presently has a consensus target price of $299.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.58%. Watts Water Technologies has a consensus target price of $329.44, indicating a potential downside of 4.45%. Given Lincoln Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Lincoln Electric is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

Lincoln Electric has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Watts Water Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Lincoln Electric. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Watts Water Technologies and 5 mentions for Lincoln Electric. Watts Water Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Lincoln Electric's score of 0.58 indicating that Watts Water Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lincoln Electric has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Lincoln Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Watts Water Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

79.6% of Lincoln Electric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Lincoln Electric shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lincoln Electric pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Lincoln Electric pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 23.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lincoln Electric has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years and Watts Water Technologies has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Lincoln Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 14.32% compared to Lincoln Electric's net margin of 12.38%. Lincoln Electric's return on equity of 39.33% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Pegasystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Watts Water Technologies. Pegasystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Watts Water Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Pegasystems currently has a consensus price target of $63.30, suggesting a potential upside of 110.37%. Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of $329.44, suggesting a potential downside of 4.45%. Given Pegasystems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pegasystems is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

46.9% of Pegasystems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.4% of Pegasystems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pegasystems has a net margin of 20.04% compared to Watts Water Technologies' net margin of 14.32%. Pegasystems' return on equity of 30.05% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Pegasystems pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Pegasystems pays out 6.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 23.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Watts Water Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Pegasystems had 3 more articles in the media than Watts Water Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pegasystems and 9 mentions for Watts Water Technologies. Pegasystems' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 0.94 indicating that Pegasystems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Pegasystems has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

81.2% of Woodward shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Woodward shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Woodward currently has a consensus price target of $393.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.62%. Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of $329.44, indicating a potential downside of 4.45%. Given Watts Water Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Watts Water Technologies is more favorable than Woodward.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 14.32% compared to Woodward's net margin of 12.85%. Woodward's return on equity of 20.12% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

In the previous week, Woodward had 6 more articles in the media than Watts Water Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Woodward and 9 mentions for Watts Water Technologies. Woodward's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 0.94 indicating that Woodward is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Woodward has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Woodward pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Woodward pays out 15.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 23.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Woodward has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Watts Water Technologies has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Watts Water Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Woodward has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Watts Water Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Woodward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Watts Water Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Donaldson. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Watts Water Technologies and 6 mentions for Donaldson. Donaldson's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 0.94 indicating that Donaldson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 14.32% compared to Donaldson's net margin of 11.52%. Donaldson's return on equity of 29.17% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Donaldson has higher revenue and earnings than Watts Water Technologies. Donaldson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Watts Water Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Donaldson pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Donaldson pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 23.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Donaldson has increased its dividend for 38 consecutive years and Watts Water Technologies has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Donaldson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

82.8% of Donaldson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Donaldson shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Donaldson presently has a consensus target price of $97.83, indicating a potential upside of 14.30%. Watts Water Technologies has a consensus target price of $329.44, indicating a potential downside of 4.45%. Given Donaldson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Donaldson is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

Donaldson has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.