Go Pro

Woodward (WWD) Competitors

Woodward logo
$358.54 -4.16 (-1.15%)
Closing price 08/13/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$360.55 +2.01 (+0.56%)
As of 07:43 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

WWD vs. PERI, ANET, CRS, NOC, and TDG

Should you buy Woodward stock or one of its competitors? Woodward's main competitors and comparable companies include Perion Network (PERI), Arista Networks (ANET), Carpenter Technology (CRS), Northrop Grumman (NOC), and Transdigm Group (TDG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Woodward compare to Perion Network?

Perion Network (NASDAQ:PERI) and Woodward (NASDAQ:WWD) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

68.1% of Perion Network shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Woodward shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Perion Network shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Woodward shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Woodward has a net margin of 13.17% compared to Perion Network's net margin of -2.95%. Woodward's return on equity of 21.89% beat Perion Network's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Perion Network-2.95% 2.39% 1.78%
Woodward 13.17%21.89%11.38%

In the previous week, Perion Network had 4 more articles in the media than Woodward. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Perion Network and 5 mentions for Woodward. Perion Network's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Woodward's score of 0.65 indicating that Perion Network is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Perion Network
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Woodward
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Woodward has higher revenue and earnings than Perion Network. Perion Network is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Woodward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Perion Network$436.22M0.87-$7.93M-$0.35N/A
Woodward$4.19B5.05$442.11M$8.9939.88

Perion Network presently has a consensus price target of $13.88, suggesting a potential upside of 42.02%. Woodward has a consensus price target of $406.45, suggesting a potential upside of 13.36%. Given Perion Network's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Perion Network is more favorable than Woodward.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Perion Network
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Woodward
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

Perion Network has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Woodward has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Woodward beats Perion Network on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Woodward compare to Arista Networks?

Arista Networks (NYSE:ANET) and Woodward (NASDAQ:WWD) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

82.5% of Arista Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Woodward shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Arista Networks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Woodward shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Arista Networks presently has a consensus target price of $226.05, indicating a potential upside of 10.75%. Woodward has a consensus target price of $406.45, indicating a potential upside of 13.36%. Given Woodward's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Woodward is more favorable than Arista Networks.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Arista Networks
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.04
Woodward
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

Arista Networks has a net margin of 38.37% compared to Woodward's net margin of 13.17%. Arista Networks' return on equity of 30.65% beat Woodward's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Arista Networks38.37% 30.65% 19.44%
Woodward 13.17%21.89%11.38%

In the previous week, Arista Networks had 48 more articles in the media than Woodward. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for Arista Networks and 5 mentions for Woodward. Arista Networks' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Woodward's score of 0.65 indicating that Arista Networks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Arista Networks
31 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Woodward
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Arista Networks has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Woodward has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Arista Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Woodward. Woodward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arista Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Arista Networks$9.01B28.58$3.51B$3.1764.38
Woodward$4.19B5.05$442.11M$8.9939.88

Summary

Arista Networks beats Woodward on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Woodward compare to Carpenter Technology?

Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) and Woodward (NASDAQ:WWD) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

Carpenter Technology currently has a consensus price target of $577.25, indicating a potential upside of 7.86%. Woodward has a consensus price target of $406.45, indicating a potential upside of 13.36%. Given Woodward's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Woodward is more favorable than Carpenter Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carpenter Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Woodward
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

Carpenter Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Woodward. Woodward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carpenter Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carpenter Technology$3.12B8.51$529.80M$10.5250.87
Woodward$4.19B5.05$442.11M$8.9939.88

92.0% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Woodward shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Carpenter Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Woodward shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Carpenter Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Woodward pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Carpenter Technology pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Woodward pays out 14.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Woodward has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Woodward is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 16.96% compared to Woodward's net margin of 13.17%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 26.46% beat Woodward's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carpenter Technology16.96% 26.46% 15.02%
Woodward 13.17%21.89%11.38%

In the previous week, Carpenter Technology had 8 more articles in the media than Woodward. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Carpenter Technology and 5 mentions for Woodward. Carpenter Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Woodward's score of 0.65 indicating that Carpenter Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carpenter Technology
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Woodward
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Woodward has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Carpenter Technology beats Woodward on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Woodward compare to Northrop Grumman?

Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC) and Woodward (NASDAQ:WWD) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

83.4% of Northrop Grumman shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Woodward shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Northrop Grumman shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Woodward shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Northrop Grumman pays an annual dividend of $9.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Woodward pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Northrop Grumman pays out 31.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Woodward pays out 14.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Northrop Grumman has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Woodward has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Northrop Grumman is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Northrop Grumman has higher revenue and earnings than Woodward. Northrop Grumman is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Woodward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Northrop Grumman$41.95B1.95$4.18B$31.4818.29
Woodward$4.19B5.05$442.11M$8.9939.88

Northrop Grumman has a beta of -0.11, indicating that its share price is 111% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Woodward has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Woodward has a net margin of 13.17% compared to Northrop Grumman's net margin of 10.48%. Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 24.25% beat Woodward's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Northrop Grumman10.48% 24.25% 8.15%
Woodward 13.17%21.89%11.38%

In the previous week, Northrop Grumman had 9 more articles in the media than Woodward. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Northrop Grumman and 5 mentions for Woodward. Northrop Grumman's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Woodward's score of 0.65 indicating that Northrop Grumman is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Northrop Grumman
10 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Woodward
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Northrop Grumman presently has a consensus target price of $659.30, indicating a potential upside of 14.52%. Woodward has a consensus target price of $406.45, indicating a potential upside of 13.36%. Given Northrop Grumman's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Northrop Grumman is more favorable than Woodward.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Northrop Grumman
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65
Woodward
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

Summary

Northrop Grumman beats Woodward on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Woodward compare to Transdigm Group?

Transdigm Group (NYSE:TDG) and Woodward (NASDAQ:WWD) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, profitability and dividends.

Transdigm Group currently has a consensus price target of $1,463.71, indicating a potential upside of 17.54%. Woodward has a consensus price target of $406.45, indicating a potential upside of 13.36%. Given Transdigm Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Transdigm Group is more favorable than Woodward.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Transdigm Group
0 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.35
Woodward
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

Transdigm Group has higher revenue and earnings than Woodward. Transdigm Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Woodward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transdigm Group$8.83B7.89$2.07B$32.9637.78
Woodward$4.19B5.05$442.11M$8.9939.88

In the previous week, Transdigm Group had 2 more articles in the media than Woodward. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Transdigm Group and 5 mentions for Woodward. Transdigm Group's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Woodward's score of 0.65 indicating that Transdigm Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Transdigm Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Woodward
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Transdigm Group has a net margin of 19.69% compared to Woodward's net margin of 13.17%. Woodward's return on equity of 21.89% beat Transdigm Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Transdigm Group19.69% -23.65% 9.12%
Woodward 13.17%21.89%11.38%

Transdigm Group has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Woodward has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

95.8% of Transdigm Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Woodward shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of Transdigm Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Woodward shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Transdigm Group beats Woodward on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Woodward News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WWD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WWD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WWD vs. The Competition

MetricWoodwardAerospace & Defense IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$21.17B$23.49B$10.94B$12.99B
Dividend Yield0.36%1.60%97.00%10.72%
P/E Ratio39.8845.2327.9225.21
Price / Sales5.05170.33350.8199.03
Price / Cash40.5130.1824.9050.75
Price / Book8.568.704.586.24
Net Income$442.11M$562.35M$609.88M$347.70M
7 Day Performance-1.20%2.01%0.78%0.87%
1 Month Performance-9.89%11.00%3.21%0.90%
1 Year Performance46.15%25.37%14.07%20.13%

Woodward Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WWD
Woodward
4.5152 of 5 stars
$358.54
-1.1%
$406.45
+13.4%
+45.2%$21.17B$4.19B39.8810,200
PERI
Perion Network
3.8885 of 5 stars
$9.81
flat
$13.88
+41.4%
+8.3%$382.84M$440.96MN/A420
ANET
Arista Networks
4.478 of 5 stars
$191.09
+1.3%
$226.05
+18.3%
+48.0%$237.96B$9.01B60.285,115
CRS
Carpenter Technology
3.7409 of 5 stars
$561.14
-1.7%
$577.25
+2.9%
+113.4%$28.35B$3.12B53.344,500
NOC
Northrop Grumman
4.834 of 5 stars
$577.11
+1.0%
$655.30
+13.5%
-1.1%$81.18B$41.95B18.3395,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:WWD) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners