Mueller Industries (MLI) Competitors

Mueller Industries has a net margin of 18.25% compared to Applied Industrial Technologies' net margin of 8.35%. Mueller Industries' return on equity of 25.68% beat Applied Industrial Technologies' return on equity.

Mueller Industries has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Industrial Technologies has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

94.5% of Mueller Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Applied Industrial Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Mueller Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Applied Industrial Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mueller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Applied Industrial Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Mueller Industries pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Industrial Technologies pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Mueller Industries has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Applied Industrial Technologies has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Mueller Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Applied Industrial Technologies had 17 more articles in the media than Mueller Industries. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Applied Industrial Technologies and 3 mentions for Mueller Industries. Mueller Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat Applied Industrial Technologies' score of 1.13 indicating that Mueller Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Mueller Industries currently has a consensus target price of $75.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.87%. Applied Industrial Technologies has a consensus target price of $400.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.62%. Given Mueller Industries' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Mueller Industries is more favorable than Applied Industrial Technologies.

Mueller Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Applied Industrial Technologies. Mueller Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Industrial Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Mueller Industries has a net margin of 18.25% compared to Dover's net margin of 13.48%. Mueller Industries' return on equity of 25.68% beat Dover's return on equity.

84.5% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of Mueller Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Dover shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Mueller Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Mueller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Dover pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mueller Industries pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dover has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years and Mueller Industries has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Mueller Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Mueller Industries. Mueller Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dover, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dover has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mueller Industries has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Dover had 7 more articles in the media than Mueller Industries. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Dover and 3 mentions for Mueller Industries. Mueller Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat Dover's score of 1.37 indicating that Mueller Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Dover presently has a consensus price target of $238.29, indicating a potential upside of 26.12%. Mueller Industries has a consensus price target of $75.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.87%. Given Dover's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Dover is more favorable than Mueller Industries.

Mueller Industries has a net margin of 18.25% compared to ITT's net margin of 8.90%. Mueller Industries' return on equity of 25.68% beat ITT's return on equity.

Mueller Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ITT. Mueller Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ITT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Mueller Industries has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ITT has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Mueller Industries currently has a consensus price target of $75.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.87%. ITT has a consensus price target of $244.82, suggesting a potential upside of 19.88%. Given Mueller Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Mueller Industries is more favorable than ITT.

94.5% of Mueller Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of ITT shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Mueller Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of ITT shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mueller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. ITT pays an annual dividend of $1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Mueller Industries pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ITT pays out 30.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Mueller Industries has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and ITT has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Mueller Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, ITT had 12 more articles in the media than Mueller Industries. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for ITT and 3 mentions for Mueller Industries. Mueller Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat ITT's score of 1.18 indicating that Mueller Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mueller Industries has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 19 more articles in the media than Mueller Industries. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 3 mentions for Mueller Industries. Mueller Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat Parker-Hannifin's score of 1.45 indicating that Mueller Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Mueller Industries. Mueller Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Mueller Industries has a net margin of 18.25% compared to Parker-Hannifin's net margin of 16.97%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 28.48% beat Mueller Industries' return on equity.

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Mueller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mueller Industries pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years and Mueller Industries has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Mueller Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of Mueller Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Mueller Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Parker-Hannifin currently has a consensus target price of $1,114.55, indicating a potential upside of 17.28%. Mueller Industries has a consensus target price of $75.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.87%. Given Mueller Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mueller Industries is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.