VRT vs. MPWR, NET, FICO, WIT, ANSS, FTV, CDW, VEEV, HUBS, and GRMN
Should you be buying Vertiv stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Vertiv include Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR), Cloudflare (NET), Fair Isaac (FICO), Wipro (WIT), ANSYS (ANSS), Fortive (FTV), CDW (CDW), Veeva Systems (VEEV), HubSpot (HUBS), and Garmin (GRMN). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.
Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) and Vertiv (NYSE:VRT) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and community ranking.
Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Vertiv pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 57.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Vertiv pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Monolithic Power Systems has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Vertiv has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Monolithic Power Systems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.
In the previous week, Vertiv had 35 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for Vertiv and 12 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. Vertiv's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Monolithic Power Systems' score of 0.68 indicating that Monolithic Power Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Monolithic Power Systems presently has a consensus target price of $670.30, indicating a potential downside of 1.02%. Vertiv has a consensus target price of $81.11, indicating a potential downside of 13.24%. Given Vertiv's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than Vertiv.
Monolithic Power Systems received 649 more outperform votes than Vertiv when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 75.11% of users gave Monolithic Power Systems an outperform vote while only 54.31% of users gave Vertiv an outperform vote.
93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.9% of Vertiv shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Vertiv shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Vertiv has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Monolithic Power Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vertiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vertiv has a beta of 1.59, meaning that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Monolithic Power Systems has a net margin of 23.47% compared to Monolithic Power Systems' net margin of 5.79%. Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity of 42.43% beat Vertiv's return on equity.
Summary
Monolithic Power Systems beats Vertiv on 11 of the 21 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Vertiv News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for VRT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding VRT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartThis chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Related Companies and Tools