Free Trial
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free CRDO Stock Alerts

Credo Technology Group (CRDO) Competitors

Credo Technology Group logo
$211.86 -8.15 (-3.70%)
Closing price 10/8/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$216.58 +4.72 (+2.23%)
As of 08:56 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

CRDO vs. ALAB, ASX, MPWR, UMC, and NXPI

Should you buy Credo Technology Group stock or one of its competitors? Credo Technology Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Astera Labs (ALAB), ASE Technology (ASX), Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR), United Microelectronics (UMC), and NXP Semiconductors (NXPI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "semiconductors" industry.

How does Credo Technology Group compare to Astera Labs?

Credo Technology Group (NASDAQ:CRDO) and Astera Labs (NASDAQ:ALAB) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Credo Technology Group has a net margin of 33.83% compared to Astera Labs' net margin of 30.74%. Credo Technology Group's return on equity of 28.77% beat Astera Labs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Credo Technology Group33.83% 28.77% 25.93%
Astera Labs 30.74%19.24%17.27%

Credo Technology Group presently has a consensus target price of $262.67, suggesting a potential upside of 23.98%. Astera Labs has a consensus target price of $348.33, suggesting a potential upside of 0.37%. Given Credo Technology Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Credo Technology Group is more favorable than Astera Labs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Credo Technology Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89
Astera Labs
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Credo Technology Group has a beta of 3.25, indicating that its stock price is 225% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Astera Labs has a beta of 3.68, indicating that its stock price is 268% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Credo Technology Group had 20 more articles in the media than Astera Labs. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Credo Technology Group and 17 mentions for Astera Labs. Credo Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Astera Labs' score of 0.26 indicating that Credo Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Credo Technology Group
17 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Astera Labs
2 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

80.5% of Credo Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.5% of Astera Labs shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Credo Technology Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Astera Labs shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Credo Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than Astera Labs. Credo Technology Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Astera Labs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Credo Technology Group$1.34B29.82$472.28M$2.8175.40
Astera Labs$1.20B50.09$219.13M$2.02171.81

Summary

Credo Technology Group beats Astera Labs on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Credo Technology Group compare to ASE Technology?

ASE Technology (NYSE:ASX) and Credo Technology Group (NASDAQ:CRDO) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

6.8% of ASE Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.5% of Credo Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. 22.9% of ASE Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of Credo Technology Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ASE Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Credo Technology Group. ASE Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Credo Technology Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ASE Technology$20.73B4.87$1.28B$0.8652.55
Credo Technology Group$1.34B29.82$472.28M$2.8175.40

ASE Technology has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Credo Technology Group has a beta of 3.25, meaning that its stock price is 225% more volatile than the broader market.

Credo Technology Group has a net margin of 33.83% compared to ASE Technology's net margin of 8.52%. Credo Technology Group's return on equity of 28.77% beat ASE Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ASE Technology8.52% 16.12% 6.47%
Credo Technology Group 33.83%28.77%25.93%

Credo Technology Group has a consensus target price of $262.67, suggesting a potential upside of 23.98%. Given Credo Technology Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Credo Technology Group is more favorable than ASE Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ASE Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Credo Technology Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89

In the previous week, Credo Technology Group had 31 more articles in the media than ASE Technology. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Credo Technology Group and 6 mentions for ASE Technology. Credo Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat ASE Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Credo Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ASE Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Credo Technology Group
17 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Credo Technology Group beats ASE Technology on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Credo Technology Group compare to Monolithic Power Systems?

Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) and Credo Technology Group (NASDAQ:CRDO) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.68, indicating that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Credo Technology Group has a beta of 3.25, indicating that its share price is 225% more volatile than the broader market.

93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.5% of Credo Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of Credo Technology Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Credo Technology Group has a net margin of 33.83% compared to Monolithic Power Systems' net margin of 24.41%. Credo Technology Group's return on equity of 28.77% beat Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Monolithic Power Systems24.41% 22.31% 18.67%
Credo Technology Group 33.83%28.77%25.93%

Monolithic Power Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Credo Technology Group. Credo Technology Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Monolithic Power Systems$2.79B24.12$621.48M$16.3183.99
Credo Technology Group$1.34B29.82$472.28M$2.8175.40

Monolithic Power Systems presently has a consensus price target of $1,731.42, indicating a potential upside of 26.40%. Credo Technology Group has a consensus price target of $262.67, indicating a potential upside of 23.98%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than Credo Technology Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Monolithic Power Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Credo Technology Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89

In the previous week, Credo Technology Group had 21 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Credo Technology Group and 16 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. Monolithic Power Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Credo Technology Group's score of 0.41 indicating that Monolithic Power Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Monolithic Power Systems
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Credo Technology Group
17 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Credo Technology Group beats Monolithic Power Systems on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Credo Technology Group compare to United Microelectronics?

Credo Technology Group (NASDAQ:CRDO) and United Microelectronics (NYSE:UMC) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

United Microelectronics has higher revenue and earnings than Credo Technology Group. United Microelectronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Credo Technology Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Credo Technology Group$1.34B29.82$472.28M$2.8175.40
United Microelectronics$7.57B7.59$1.29B$1.0721.31

In the previous week, Credo Technology Group had 19 more articles in the media than United Microelectronics. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Credo Technology Group and 18 mentions for United Microelectronics. United Microelectronics' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Credo Technology Group's score of 0.41 indicating that United Microelectronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Credo Technology Group
17 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
United Microelectronics
8 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Credo Technology Group has a beta of 3.25, indicating that its stock price is 225% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Credo Technology Group presently has a consensus target price of $262.67, indicating a potential upside of 23.98%. United Microelectronics has a consensus target price of $8.60, indicating a potential downside of 62.29%. Given Credo Technology Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Credo Technology Group is more favorable than United Microelectronics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Credo Technology Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89
United Microelectronics
3 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

80.5% of Credo Technology Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of Credo Technology Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Credo Technology Group has a net margin of 33.83% compared to United Microelectronics' net margin of 33.18%. Credo Technology Group's return on equity of 28.77% beat United Microelectronics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Credo Technology Group33.83% 28.77% 25.93%
United Microelectronics 33.18%21.00%13.87%

Summary

Credo Technology Group beats United Microelectronics on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Credo Technology Group compare to NXP Semiconductors?

Credo Technology Group (NASDAQ:CRDO) and NXP Semiconductors (NASDAQ:NXPI) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Credo Technology Group had 14 more articles in the media than NXP Semiconductors. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Credo Technology Group and 23 mentions for NXP Semiconductors. NXP Semiconductors' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Credo Technology Group's score of 0.41 indicating that NXP Semiconductors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Credo Technology Group
17 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
NXP Semiconductors
8 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Credo Technology Group has a beta of 3.25, meaning that its share price is 225% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NXP Semiconductors has a beta of 1.8, meaning that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

Credo Technology Group currently has a consensus price target of $262.67, indicating a potential upside of 23.98%. NXP Semiconductors has a consensus price target of $304.91, indicating a potential upside of 31.96%. Given NXP Semiconductors' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NXP Semiconductors is more favorable than Credo Technology Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Credo Technology Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89
NXP Semiconductors
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58

NXP Semiconductors has higher revenue and earnings than Credo Technology Group. NXP Semiconductors is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Credo Technology Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Credo Technology Group$1.34B29.82$472.28M$2.8175.40
NXP Semiconductors$12.27B4.75$2.02B$11.7219.72

80.5% of Credo Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of NXP Semiconductors shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Credo Technology Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of NXP Semiconductors shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Credo Technology Group has a net margin of 33.83% compared to NXP Semiconductors' net margin of 22.56%. Credo Technology Group's return on equity of 28.77% beat NXP Semiconductors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Credo Technology Group33.83% 28.77% 25.93%
NXP Semiconductors 22.56%27.83%11.07%

Summary

Credo Technology Group beats NXP Semiconductors on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Credo Technology Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRDO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRDO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRDO vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCredo Technology GroupSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$41.35B$120.23B$31.87B$13.37B
Dividend YieldN/A1.61%2.75%16.36%
P/E Ratio75.4085.0680.5426.04
Price / Sales29.8274.49579.8776.65
Price / Cash78.3166.9851.2253.72
Price / Book18.9310.638.076.27
Net Income$472.28M$2.57B$766.55M$382.01M
7 Day Performance-3.10%-5.10%-1.68%-1.60%
1 Month Performance26.17%1.30%-0.67%-4.63%
1 Year Performance40.17%63.03%166.42%-0.95%

Credo Technology Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRDO
Credo Technology Group
4.7308 of 5 stars		$211.86
-3.7%		$262.67
+24.0%		+42.3%$41.35B$1.34B75.40807
ALAB
Astera Labs
2.8275 of 5 stars		$350.33
-1.7%		$348.33
-0.6%		+58.2%$61.83B$852.53M173.43756
ASX
ASE Technology
2.38 of 5 stars		$47.45
+6.1%		N/A+280.7%$99.98B$20.73B55.18105,947
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems
4.9049 of 5 stars		$1,439.73
+5.8%		$1,731.42
+20.3%		+39.6%$66.88B$3.27B88.274,501
UMC
United Microelectronics
3.0043 of 5 stars		$26.29
+4.3%		$8.60
-67.3%		+202.0%$63.47B$7.57B24.5719,097

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CRDO) was last updated on 10/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel