Which has better earnings and valuation, AVGO or CLS?

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Broadcom $63.89B 25.93 $23.13B $7.83 44.32 Celestica $12.39B 2.44 $832.50M $10.57 22.70

Is AVGO or CLS more profitable?

Broadcom has a net margin of 42.94% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.83%. Broadcom's return on equity of 48.33% beat Celestica's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Broadcom 42.94% 48.33% 23.78% Celestica 6.83% 33.80% 10.88%

Does the media favor AVGO or CLS?

In the previous week, Broadcom had 108 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 132 mentions for Broadcom and 24 mentions for Celestica. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Celestica's score of 0.79 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Broadcom 82 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 25 Neutral mention(s) 11 Negative mention(s) 6 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Celestica 10 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ZS or CLS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Zscaler. Zscaler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Zscaler $3.35B 9.36 -$63.18M -$0.39 N/A Celestica $12.39B 2.44 $832.50M $10.57 22.70

Is ZS or CLS more profitable?

Celestica has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -1.88%. Celestica's return on equity of 33.80% beat Zscaler's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Zscaler -1.88% 1.23% 0.40% Celestica 6.83% 33.80% 10.88%

Does the media favor ZS or CLS?

In the previous week, Celestica had 11 more articles in the media than Zscaler. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Celestica and 13 mentions for Zscaler. Zscaler's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Celestica's score of 0.79 indicating that Zscaler is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Zscaler 10 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Celestica 10 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CIEN or CLS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Ciena. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ciena, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ciena $4.77B 8.34 $123.34M $4.48 62.58 Celestica $12.39B 2.44 $832.50M $10.57 22.70

Is CIEN or CLS more profitable?

Ciena has a net margin of 10.87% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.83%. Celestica's return on equity of 33.80% beat Ciena's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ciena 10.87% 25.33% 11.27% Celestica 6.83% 33.80% 10.88%

Does the media favor CIEN or CLS?

In the previous week, Celestica had 10 more articles in the media than Ciena. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Celestica and 14 mentions for Ciena. Ciena's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Celestica's score of 0.79 indicating that Ciena is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ciena 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Celestica 10 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CLS or ETN?

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica $12.39B 2.44 $832.50M $10.57 22.70 Eaton $27.45B 4.99 $4.09B $10.01 35.20

Is CLS or ETN more profitable?

Eaton has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.83%. Celestica's return on equity of 33.80% beat Eaton's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Celestica 6.83% 33.80% 10.88% Eaton 12.18% 25.09% 9.62%

Does the media prefer CLS or ETN?

In the previous week, Eaton had 3 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Eaton and 24 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Eaton's score of 0.58 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 10 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Eaton 12 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, FN or CLS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Fabrinet. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fabrinet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Fabrinet $4.64B 2.51 $473.03M $13.25 24.61 Celestica $12.39B 2.44 $832.50M $10.57 22.70

Is FN or CLS more profitable?

Fabrinet has a net margin of 9.35% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.83%. Celestica's return on equity of 33.80% beat Fabrinet's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Fabrinet 9.35% 22.32% 14.07% Celestica 6.83% 33.80% 10.88%

Does the media refer more to FN or CLS?

In the previous week, Celestica had 14 more articles in the media than Fabrinet. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Celestica and 10 mentions for Fabrinet. Fabrinet's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Celestica's score of 0.79 indicating that Fabrinet is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fabrinet 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Celestica 10 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Celestica (CLS) Competitors

$239.89 -14.14 (-5.57%)

Closing price 11/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$234.59 -5.30 (-2.21%)

As of 11/13/2026 07:59 PM Eastern

Compare

CLS vs. AVGO, ZS, CIEN, ETN, and FN

Should you buy Celestica stock or one of its competitors? Celestica's main competitors and comparable companies include Broadcom (AVGO), Zscaler (ZS), Ciena (CIEN), Eaton (ETN), and Fabrinet (FN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Celestica compare to Broadcom?

Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Broadcom	$63.89B	25.93	$23.13B	$7.83	44.32
Celestica	$12.39B	2.44	$832.50M	$10.57	22.70

Broadcom presently has a consensus target price of $525.19, suggesting a potential upside of 51.35%. Celestica has a consensus target price of $445.14, suggesting a potential upside of 85.56%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than Broadcom.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Broadcom	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	38 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.04

In the previous week, Broadcom had 108 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 132 mentions for Broadcom and 24 mentions for Celestica. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Celestica's score of 0.79 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Broadcom	82 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	25 Neutral mention(s)	11 Negative mention(s)	6 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	10 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

76.4% of Broadcom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Broadcom shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Broadcom has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

Broadcom has a net margin of 42.94% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.83%. Broadcom's return on equity of 48.33% beat Celestica's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Broadcom	42.94%	48.33%	23.78%
Celestica	6.83%	33.80%	10.88%

Summary

Broadcom beats Celestica on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Zscaler?

Zscaler (NASDAQ:ZS) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Celestica had 11 more articles in the media than Zscaler. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Celestica and 13 mentions for Zscaler. Zscaler's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Celestica's score of 0.79 indicating that Zscaler is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Zscaler	10 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	10 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

46.5% of Zscaler shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 17.2% of Zscaler shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Zscaler currently has a consensus price target of $236.65, suggesting a potential upside of 22.95%. Celestica has a consensus price target of $445.14, suggesting a potential upside of 85.56%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than Zscaler.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Zscaler	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	36 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.04

Celestica has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -1.88%. Celestica's return on equity of 33.80% beat Zscaler's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Zscaler	-1.88%	1.23%	0.40%
Celestica	6.83%	33.80%	10.88%

Zscaler has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Zscaler. Zscaler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Zscaler	$3.35B	9.36	-$63.18M	-$0.39	N/A
Celestica	$12.39B	2.44	$832.50M	$10.57	22.70

Summary

Celestica beats Zscaler on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Ciena?

Ciena (NYSE:CIEN) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Ciena has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

Ciena currently has a consensus price target of $485.93, indicating a potential upside of 73.33%. Celestica has a consensus price target of $445.14, indicating a potential upside of 85.56%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than Ciena.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ciena	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.04

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Ciena. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ciena, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ciena	$4.77B	8.34	$123.34M	$4.48	62.58
Celestica	$12.39B	2.44	$832.50M	$10.57	22.70

In the previous week, Celestica had 10 more articles in the media than Ciena. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Celestica and 14 mentions for Ciena. Ciena's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Celestica's score of 0.79 indicating that Ciena is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ciena	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	10 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

92.0% of Ciena shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Ciena shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ciena has a net margin of 10.87% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.83%. Celestica's return on equity of 33.80% beat Ciena's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ciena	10.87%	25.33%	11.27%
Celestica	6.83%	33.80%	10.88%

Summary

Celestica beats Ciena on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Eaton?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Eaton has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.83%. Celestica's return on equity of 33.80% beat Eaton's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	6.83%	33.80%	10.88%
Eaton	12.18%	25.09%	9.62%

Celestica has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Eaton had 3 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Eaton and 24 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Eaton's score of 0.58 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	10 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Eaton	12 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$12.39B	2.44	$832.50M	$10.57	22.70
Eaton	$27.45B	4.99	$4.09B	$10.01	35.20

Celestica currently has a consensus price target of $445.14, indicating a potential upside of 85.56%. Eaton has a consensus price target of $476.86, indicating a potential upside of 35.34%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than Eaton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.04
Eaton	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.87

Summary

Celestica beats Eaton on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Fabrinet?

Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Fabrinet. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fabrinet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fabrinet	$4.64B	2.51	$473.03M	$13.25	24.61
Celestica	$12.39B	2.44	$832.50M	$10.57	22.70

Fabrinet has a net margin of 9.35% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.83%. Celestica's return on equity of 33.80% beat Fabrinet's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fabrinet	9.35%	22.32%	14.07%
Celestica	6.83%	33.80%	10.88%

Fabrinet has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

97.4% of Fabrinet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fabrinet shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fabrinet currently has a consensus target price of $548.88, indicating a potential upside of 68.31%. Celestica has a consensus target price of $445.14, indicating a potential upside of 85.56%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than Fabrinet.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fabrinet	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.04

In the previous week, Celestica had 14 more articles in the media than Fabrinet. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Celestica and 10 mentions for Fabrinet. Fabrinet's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Celestica's score of 0.79 indicating that Fabrinet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fabrinet	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	10 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Celestica beats Fabrinet on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celestica News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CLS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Celestica	Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry	Technology Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$32.04B	$7.86B	$27.47B	$23.49B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.34%	2.94%	3.78%
P/E Ratio	22.70	40.48	45.31	29.82
Price / Sales	2.44	3.68	5.80	3.47
Price / Cash	35.44	28.39	27.52	15.51
Price / Book	4.87	3.62	5.33	3.72
Net Income	$832.50M	$185.12M	$788.93M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	16.02%	3.41%	1.23%	0.58%
1 Month Performance	-23.78%	-6.26%	-6.27%	-0.31%
1 Year Performance	-22.41%	12.33%	2.93%	7.30%

Celestica Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CLS Celestica	4.7901 of 5 stars	$239.89 -5.6%	$445.14 +85.6%	N/A	$32.04B	$12.39B	22.70	29,591	Trending News Analyst Downgrade Options Volume Gap Up
AVGO Broadcom	4.9252 of 5 stars	$345.75 -5.1%	$525.19 +51.9%	N/A	$1.65T	$63.89B	44.16	33,000	Trending News Analyst Downgrade Gap Down
ZS Zscaler	4.6033 of 5 stars	$192.67 -0.3%	$236.65 +22.8%	N/A	$31.35B	$3.35B	N/A	8,700
CIEN Ciena	4.5737 of 5 stars	$278.43 -5.3%	$485.93 +74.5%	N/A	$39.49B	$4.77B	62.16	9,080	Analyst Upgrade
ETN Eaton	4.8387 of 5 stars	$351.27 -2.2%	$476.86 +35.8%	N/A	$136.52B	$27.45B	35.11	97,000	Ex-Dividend Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CLS) was last updated on 11/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Celestica (CLS) Competitors