Which has preferable valuation and earnings, AVGO or CLS?

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Broadcom $63.89B 27.07 $23.13B $6.00 60.59 Celestica $12.39B 2.76 $832.50M $9.62 30.92

Is AVGO or CLS more profitable?

Broadcom has a net margin of 38.85% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Broadcom's return on equity of 41.61% beat Celestica's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Broadcom 38.85% 41.61% 19.55% Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06%

Does the media refer more to AVGO or CLS?

In the previous week, Broadcom had 80 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 107 mentions for Broadcom and 27 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Broadcom's score of 0.99 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Broadcom 74 Very Positive mention(s) 10 Positive mention(s) 14 Neutral mention(s) 8 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Celestica 20 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CLS or LITE?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Lumentum. Lumentum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica $12.39B 2.76 $832.50M $9.62 30.92 Lumentum $3.01B 25.59 -$6.94B -$82.21 N/A

Is CLS or LITE more profitable?

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Lumentum's net margin of -230.15%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Lumentum's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06% Lumentum -230.15% 26.34% 10.25%

Does the media refer more to CLS or LITE?

In the previous week, Lumentum had 26 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for Lumentum and 27 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Lumentum's score of 0.90 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 20 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Lumentum 33 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 5 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ZS or CLS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Zscaler. Zscaler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Zscaler $2.67B 10.77 -$41.48M -$0.48 N/A Celestica $12.39B 2.76 $832.50M $9.62 30.92

Is ZS or CLS more profitable?

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -2.44%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Zscaler's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Zscaler -2.44% -0.37% -0.12% Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06%

Does the media refer more to ZS or CLS?

In the previous week, Zscaler and Zscaler both had 27 articles in the media. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Zscaler's score of 0.84 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Zscaler 13 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Celestica 20 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CLS or APH?

Amphenol has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amphenol, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica $12.39B 2.76 $832.50M $9.62 30.92 Amphenol $23.09B 8.23 $4.27B $3.99 38.66

Is CLS or APH more profitable?

Amphenol has a net margin of 17.73% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Amphenol's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06% Amphenol 17.73% 39.87% 14.80%

Does the media refer more to CLS or APH?

In the previous week, Celestica had 19 more articles in the media than Amphenol. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Celestica and 8 mentions for Amphenol. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Amphenol's score of 0.56 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 20 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Amphenol 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CIEN or CLS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Ciena. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ciena, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ciena $4.77B 11.76 $123.34M $3.00 132.04 Celestica $12.39B 2.76 $832.50M $9.62 30.92

Is CIEN or CLS more profitable?

Ciena has a net margin of 7.87% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Ciena's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ciena 7.87% 18.15% 8.63% Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06%

Does the media prefer CIEN or CLS?

In the previous week, Celestica had 1 more articles in the media than Ciena. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Celestica and 26 mentions for Ciena. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Ciena's score of 0.30 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ciena 10 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Celestica 20 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Celestica (CLS) Competitors

$297.48 -3.88 (-1.29%)

As of 12:28 PM Eastern

Compare

CLS vs. AVGO, LITE, ZS, APH, and CIEN

Should you buy Celestica stock or one of its competitors? Celestica's main competitors and comparable companies include Broadcom (AVGO), Lumentum (LITE), Zscaler (ZS), Amphenol (APH), and Ciena (CIEN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology" sector.

How does Celestica compare to Broadcom?

Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Broadcom has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.06, meaning that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the broader market.

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Broadcom	$63.89B	27.07	$23.13B	$6.00	60.59
Celestica	$12.39B	2.76	$832.50M	$9.62	30.92

Broadcom has a net margin of 38.85% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Broadcom's return on equity of 41.61% beat Celestica's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Broadcom	38.85%	41.61%	19.55%
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%

Broadcom currently has a consensus target price of $493.24, indicating a potential upside of 35.68%. Celestica has a consensus target price of $438.86, indicating a potential upside of 47.52%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than Broadcom.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Broadcom	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	28 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96

76.4% of Broadcom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Broadcom shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Broadcom had 80 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 107 mentions for Broadcom and 27 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Broadcom's score of 0.99 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Broadcom	74 Very Positive mention(s)	10 Positive mention(s)	14 Neutral mention(s)	8 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	20 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Broadcom beats Celestica on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Lumentum?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Lumentum (NASDAQ:LITE) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

Celestica has a beta of 2.06, indicating that its share price is 106% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lumentum has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Lumentum. Lumentum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$12.39B	2.76	$832.50M	$9.62	30.92
Lumentum	$3.01B	25.59	-$6.94B	-$82.21	N/A

In the previous week, Lumentum had 26 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for Lumentum and 27 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Lumentum's score of 0.90 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	20 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lumentum	33 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	5 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Celestica presently has a consensus price target of $438.86, indicating a potential upside of 47.52%. Lumentum has a consensus price target of $1,044.67, indicating a potential upside of 21.51%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than Lumentum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96
Lumentum	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65

67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of Lumentum shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Lumentum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Lumentum's net margin of -230.15%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Lumentum's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%
Lumentum	-230.15%	26.34%	10.25%

Summary

Celestica beats Lumentum on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Zscaler?

Zscaler (NASDAQ:ZS) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Zscaler has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.06, indicating that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the broader market.

46.5% of Zscaler shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 17.2% of Zscaler shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Zscaler. Zscaler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Zscaler	$2.67B	10.77	-$41.48M	-$0.48	N/A
Celestica	$12.39B	2.76	$832.50M	$9.62	30.92

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -2.44%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Zscaler's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Zscaler	-2.44%	-0.37%	-0.12%
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%

Zscaler currently has a consensus price target of $214.72, suggesting a potential upside of 20.64%. Celestica has a consensus price target of $438.86, suggesting a potential upside of 47.52%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than Zscaler.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Zscaler	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	34 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96

In the previous week, Zscaler and Zscaler both had 27 articles in the media. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Zscaler's score of 0.84 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Zscaler	13 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	20 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Celestica beats Zscaler on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Amphenol?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Amphenol (NYSE:APH) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

Celestica has a beta of 2.06, suggesting that its share price is 106% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amphenol has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Amphenol has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amphenol, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$12.39B	2.76	$832.50M	$9.62	30.92
Amphenol	$23.09B	8.23	$4.27B	$3.99	38.66

Celestica currently has a consensus price target of $438.86, indicating a potential upside of 47.52%. Amphenol has a consensus price target of $191.67, indicating a potential upside of 24.27%. Given Celestica's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than Amphenol.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96
Amphenol	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Amphenol shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Amphenol shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Amphenol has a net margin of 17.73% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Amphenol's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%
Amphenol	17.73%	39.87%	14.80%

In the previous week, Celestica had 19 more articles in the media than Amphenol. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Celestica and 8 mentions for Amphenol. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Amphenol's score of 0.56 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	20 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Amphenol	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Amphenol beats Celestica on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Ciena?

Ciena (NYSE:CIEN) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Ciena has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.06, indicating that its share price is 106% more volatile than the broader market.

Ciena has a net margin of 7.87% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Ciena's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ciena	7.87%	18.15%	8.63%
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%

92.0% of Ciena shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Ciena shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ciena currently has a consensus target price of $527.78, indicating a potential upside of 33.24%. Celestica has a consensus target price of $438.86, indicating a potential upside of 47.52%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than Ciena.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ciena	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96

In the previous week, Celestica had 1 more articles in the media than Ciena. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Celestica and 26 mentions for Ciena. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Ciena's score of 0.30 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ciena	10 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Celestica	20 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Ciena. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ciena, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ciena	$4.77B	11.76	$123.34M	$3.00	132.04
Celestica	$12.39B	2.76	$832.50M	$9.62	30.92

Summary

Celestica beats Ciena on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celestica News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CLS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Celestica	Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry	Technology Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$34.20B	$8.67B	$29.26B	$24.19B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.24%	2.74%	3.72%
P/E Ratio	30.92	29.85	72.80	30.08
Price / Sales	2.76	45.60	596.45	20.09
Price / Cash	43.33	32.70	51.05	31.97
Price / Book	13.79	5.40	9.47	6.85
Net Income	$832.50M	$201.93M	$677.25M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-14.49%	-3.63%	-2.23%	-1.05%
1 Month Performance	-3.27%	1.22%	2.74%	2.47%
1 Year Performance	62.77%	825.88%	192.42%	17.62%

Celestica Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CLS Celestica	4.8293 of 5 stars	$297.48 -1.3%	$438.86 +47.5%	+63.6%	$34.20B	$12.39B	30.92	29,591	Positive News
AVGO Broadcom	5 of 5 stars	$390.93 -6.4%	$493.24 +26.2%	+22.9%	$1.86T	$63.89B	65.15	33,000	Trending News
LITE Lumentum	4.4582 of 5 stars	$915.41 +4.0%	$1,044.67 +14.1%	+601.6%	$71.16B	$3.01B	N/A	10,562	Insider Trade
ZS Zscaler	4.3872 of 5 stars	$185.38 -1.5%	$214.21 +15.5%	-32.9%	$29.93B	$2.67B	N/A	7,923	Analyst Forecast
APH Amphenol	4.9355 of 5 stars	$167.07 +0.8%	$191.67 +14.7%	+42.0%	$206.01B	$23.09B	41.87	170,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CLS) was last updated on 8/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Celestica (CLS) Competitors