Celestica (CLS) Competitors

$382.50 +6.95 (+1.85%)

As of 03:51 PM Eastern

CLS vs. AVGO, FLEX, MTSI, ZS, and APH

Should you be buying Celestica stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Celestica include Broadcom (AVGO), Flex (FLEX), MACOM Technology Solutions (MTSI), Zscaler (ZS), and Amphenol (APH). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does Celestica compare to Broadcom?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$13.79B	3.19	$832.50M	$8.27	46.25
Broadcom	$63.89B	31.72	$23.13B	$5.12	83.61

Celestica currently has a consensus price target of $427.42, suggesting a potential upside of 11.74%. Broadcom has a consensus price target of $435.30, suggesting a potential upside of 1.69%. Given Celestica's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than Broadcom.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
Broadcom	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94

In the previous week, Broadcom had 118 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 143 mentions for Broadcom and 25 mentions for Celestica. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Celestica's score of 1.11 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	19 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Broadcom	108 Very Positive mention(s)	12 Positive mention(s)	21 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Broadcom shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Broadcom shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Broadcom has a net margin of 36.57% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.95%. Broadcom's return on equity of 38.61% beat Celestica's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	6.95%	36.91%	10.56%
Broadcom	36.57%	38.61%	17.49%

Celestica has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Broadcom has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Broadcom beats Celestica on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Flex?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Flex (NASDAQ:FLEX) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Flex's net margin of 3.15%. Celestica's return on equity of 36.91% beat Flex's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	6.95%	36.91%	10.56%
Flex	3.15%	22.12%	5.53%

67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.3% of Flex shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Flex shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Flex has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$13.79B	3.19	$832.50M	$8.27	46.25
Flex	$27.91B	1.91	$880M	$2.33	62.08

In the previous week, Flex had 13 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Flex and 25 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Flex's score of 0.79 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	19 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Flex	18 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Celestica currently has a consensus price target of $427.42, suggesting a potential upside of 11.74%. Flex has a consensus price target of $112.80, suggesting a potential downside of 22.02%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than Flex.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
Flex	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Celestica has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flex has a beta of 1.46, meaning that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Celestica beats Flex on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to MACOM Technology Solutions?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and MACOM Technology Solutions (NASDAQ:MTSI) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

MACOM Technology Solutions has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.95%. Celestica's return on equity of 36.91% beat MACOM Technology Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	6.95%	36.91%	10.56%
MACOM Technology Solutions	16.46%	16.01%	10.43%

67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.1% of MACOM Technology Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of MACOM Technology Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than MACOM Technology Solutions. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MACOM Technology Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$13.79B	3.19	$832.50M	$8.27	46.25
MACOM Technology Solutions	$967.26M	28.53	-$54.21M	$2.31	156.58

In the previous week, MACOM Technology Solutions had 14 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for MACOM Technology Solutions and 25 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat MACOM Technology Solutions' score of 1.02 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	19 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MACOM Technology Solutions	17 Very Positive mention(s)	10 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Celestica currently has a consensus price target of $427.42, suggesting a potential upside of 11.74%. MACOM Technology Solutions has a consensus price target of $316.82, suggesting a potential downside of 12.41%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than MACOM Technology Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
MACOM Technology Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77

Celestica has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MACOM Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Celestica beats MACOM Technology Solutions on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Zscaler?

Zscaler (NASDAQ:ZS) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Zscaler has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Celestica had 9 more articles in the media than Zscaler. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Celestica and 16 mentions for Zscaler. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Zscaler's score of 0.90 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Zscaler	9 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	19 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

46.5% of Zscaler shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.2% of Zscaler shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Zscaler presently has a consensus price target of $263.46, suggesting a potential upside of 77.09%. Celestica has a consensus price target of $427.42, suggesting a potential upside of 11.74%. Given Zscaler's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Zscaler is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Zscaler	2 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	29 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Zscaler. Zscaler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Zscaler	$3.00B	7.97	-$41.48M	-$0.42	N/A
Celestica	$13.79B	3.19	$832.50M	$8.27	46.25

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -2.25%. Celestica's return on equity of 36.91% beat Zscaler's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Zscaler	-2.25%	0.06%	0.02%
Celestica	6.95%	36.91%	10.56%

Summary

Celestica beats Zscaler on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Amphenol?

Amphenol (NYSE:APH) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Amphenol has a net margin of 17.24% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.95%. Amphenol's return on equity of 37.44% beat Celestica's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Amphenol	17.24%	37.44%	14.77%
Celestica	6.95%	36.91%	10.56%

In the previous week, Amphenol had 19 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 44 mentions for Amphenol and 25 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Amphenol's score of 1.03 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Amphenol	30 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	19 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

97.0% of Amphenol shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Amphenol shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Amphenol presently has a consensus price target of $176.53, suggesting a potential upside of 44.72%. Celestica has a consensus price target of $427.42, suggesting a potential upside of 11.74%. Given Amphenol's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Amphenol is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Amphenol	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.87
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91

Amphenol has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Amphenol is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Amphenol	$25.90B	5.79	$4.27B	$3.48	35.05
Celestica	$13.79B	3.19	$832.50M	$8.27	46.25

Summary

Amphenol beats Celestica on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celestica News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CLS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Celestica	ELEC MANUF SVS (EMS) Industry	Computer Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$44.17B	$21.40B	$38.76B	$22.92B
Dividend Yield	N/A	0.45%	3.15%	4.02%
P/E Ratio	46.45	56.13	74.20	29.03
Price / Sales	3.19	1.71	622.83	24.74
Price / Cash	52.39	32.47	46.32	19.21
Price / Book	19.83	11.79	9.55	4.66
Net Income	$832.50M	$386.62M	$1.03B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	N/A	N/A	N/A	-1.09%
1 Month Performance	9.09%	31.82%	17.83%	4.17%
1 Year Performance	311.15%	185.62%	174.77%	29.27%

Celestica Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CLS Celestica	4.3898 of 5 stars	$382.50 +1.8%	$427.42 +11.7%	+303.4%	$44.17B	$13.79B	46.45	29,591	Positive News
AVGO Broadcom	4.5739 of 5 stars	$431.20 +3.5%	$435.30 +1.0%	+106.5%	$2.03T	$63.89B	83.89	33,000	Positive News
FLEX Flex	2.2328 of 5 stars	$95.11 +3.6%	$72.30 -24.0%	+269.5%	$34.95B	$25.81B	42.63	147,979	Earnings Report Insider Trade
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions	3.5982 of 5 stars	$301.17 +3.2%	$251.45 -16.5%	+204.8%	$22.52B	$967.26M	140.93	2,000	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
ZS Zscaler	3.664 of 5 stars	$141.36 -0.6%	$263.46 +86.4%	-34.7%	$22.74B	$3.00B	N/A	7,923

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CLS) was last updated on 5/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Celestica (CLS) Competitors