Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CLS or AVGO?

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica $12.39B 3.02 $832.50M $9.62 33.84 Broadcom $63.89B 26.87 $23.13B $7.83 46.08

Is CLS or AVGO more profitable?

Broadcom has a net margin of 42.94% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Broadcom's return on equity of 48.33% beat Celestica's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06% Broadcom 42.94% 48.33% 23.78%

Does the media favor CLS or AVGO?

In the previous week, Broadcom had 199 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 220 mentions for Broadcom and 21 mentions for Celestica. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Celestica's score of 0.84 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 12 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Broadcom 171 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 28 Neutral mention(s) 7 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, LITE or CLS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Lumentum. Lumentum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lumentum $3.01B 27.85 -$6.94B -$82.21 N/A Celestica $12.39B 3.02 $832.50M $9.62 33.84

Is LITE or CLS more profitable?

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Lumentum's net margin of -230.15%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Lumentum's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lumentum -230.15% 26.34% 10.25% Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06%

Does the media prefer LITE or CLS?

In the previous week, Lumentum had 22 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Lumentum and 21 mentions for Celestica. Lumentum's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Celestica's score of 0.84 indicating that Lumentum is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lumentum 23 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Celestica 12 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ZS or CLS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Zscaler. Zscaler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Zscaler $3.35B 7.95 -$63.18M -$0.39 N/A Celestica $12.39B 3.02 $832.50M $9.62 33.84

Is ZS or CLS more profitable?

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -1.88%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Zscaler's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Zscaler -1.88% 1.23% 0.40% Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06%

Does the media prefer ZS or CLS?

In the previous week, Zscaler had 85 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 106 mentions for Zscaler and 21 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Zscaler's score of 0.61 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Zscaler 40 Very Positive mention(s) 18 Positive mention(s) 26 Neutral mention(s) 10 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Celestica 12 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CLS or CIEN?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Ciena. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ciena, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica $12.39B 3.02 $832.50M $9.62 33.84 Ciena $4.77B 9.95 $123.34M $4.48 74.67

Is CLS or CIEN more profitable?

Ciena has a net margin of 10.87% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Ciena's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06% Ciena 10.87% 25.33% 11.27%

Does the media favor CLS or CIEN?

In the previous week, Ciena had 27 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 48 mentions for Ciena and 21 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Ciena's score of 0.47 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 12 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ciena 18 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CLS or ETN?

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica $12.39B 3.02 $832.50M $9.62 33.84 Eaton $27.45B 5.79 $4.09B $9.83 41.65

Is CLS or ETN more profitable?

Eaton has a net margin of 12.75% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Eaton's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06% Eaton 12.75% 24.58% 9.98%

Does the media favor CLS or ETN?

In the previous week, Eaton had 11 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Eaton and 21 mentions for Celestica. Eaton's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Celestica's score of 0.84 indicating that Eaton is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 12 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Eaton 20 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Celestica (CLS) Competitors

$325.51 -8.09 (-2.42%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$324.82 -0.70 (-0.21%)

As of 05:13 PM Eastern

Compare

CLS vs. AVGO, LITE, ZS, CIEN, and ETN

Should you buy Celestica stock or one of its competitors? Celestica's main competitors and comparable companies include Broadcom (AVGO), Lumentum (LITE), Zscaler (ZS), Ciena (CIEN), and Eaton (ETN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Celestica compare to Broadcom?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Celestica currently has a consensus target price of $439.81, indicating a potential upside of 35.11%. Broadcom has a consensus target price of $505.97, indicating a potential upside of 40.22%. Given Broadcom's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Broadcom is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Broadcom	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	30 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

In the previous week, Broadcom had 199 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 220 mentions for Broadcom and 21 mentions for Celestica. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Celestica's score of 0.84 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	12 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Broadcom	171 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	28 Neutral mention(s)	7 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$12.39B	3.02	$832.50M	$9.62	33.84
Broadcom	$63.89B	26.87	$23.13B	$7.83	46.08

Broadcom has a net margin of 42.94% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Broadcom's return on equity of 48.33% beat Celestica's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%
Broadcom	42.94%	48.33%	23.78%

67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Broadcom shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Broadcom shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Celestica has a beta of 2.04, meaning that its stock price is 104% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Broadcom has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Broadcom beats Celestica on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Lumentum?

Lumentum (NASDAQ:LITE) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment and earnings.

Lumentum has a beta of 1.53, meaning that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.04, meaning that its share price is 104% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Lumentum. Lumentum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lumentum	$3.01B	27.85	-$6.94B	-$82.21	N/A
Celestica	$12.39B	3.02	$832.50M	$9.62	33.84

In the previous week, Lumentum had 22 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Lumentum and 21 mentions for Celestica. Lumentum's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Celestica's score of 0.84 indicating that Lumentum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lumentum	23 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	12 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Lumentum currently has a consensus price target of $1,053.83, suggesting a potential upside of 12.62%. Celestica has a consensus price target of $439.81, suggesting a potential upside of 35.11%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than Lumentum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lumentum	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Lumentum's net margin of -230.15%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Lumentum's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lumentum	-230.15%	26.34%	10.25%
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%

94.1% of Lumentum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Lumentum shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Celestica beats Lumentum on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Zscaler?

Zscaler (NASDAQ:ZS) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Zscaler had 85 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 106 mentions for Zscaler and 21 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Zscaler's score of 0.61 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Zscaler	40 Very Positive mention(s)	18 Positive mention(s)	26 Neutral mention(s)	10 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	12 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Zscaler presently has a consensus target price of $216.65, suggesting a potential upside of 32.52%. Celestica has a consensus target price of $439.81, suggesting a potential upside of 35.11%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than Zscaler.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Zscaler	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	34 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Zscaler has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.04, meaning that its stock price is 104% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -1.88%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Zscaler's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Zscaler	-1.88%	1.23%	0.40%
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Zscaler. Zscaler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Zscaler	$3.35B	7.95	-$63.18M	-$0.39	N/A
Celestica	$12.39B	3.02	$832.50M	$9.62	33.84

46.5% of Zscaler shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 17.2% of Zscaler shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Celestica beats Zscaler on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Ciena?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Ciena (NYSE:CIEN) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk and profitability.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Ciena. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ciena, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$12.39B	3.02	$832.50M	$9.62	33.84
Ciena	$4.77B	9.95	$123.34M	$4.48	74.67

Celestica has a beta of 2.04, meaning that its share price is 104% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ciena has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Ciena has a net margin of 10.87% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Ciena's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%
Ciena	10.87%	25.33%	11.27%

67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Ciena shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Ciena shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ciena had 27 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 48 mentions for Ciena and 21 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Ciena's score of 0.47 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	12 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ciena	18 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Celestica currently has a consensus target price of $439.81, suggesting a potential upside of 35.11%. Ciena has a consensus target price of $475.68, suggesting a potential upside of 42.20%. Given Ciena's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ciena is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Ciena	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65

Summary

Celestica beats Ciena on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Eaton?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Celestica has a beta of 2.04, meaning that its stock price is 104% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Eaton had 11 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Eaton and 21 mentions for Celestica. Eaton's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Celestica's score of 0.84 indicating that Eaton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	12 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Eaton	20 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica presently has a consensus price target of $439.81, suggesting a potential upside of 35.11%. Eaton has a consensus price target of $450.61, suggesting a potential upside of 10.06%. Given Celestica's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than Eaton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Eaton	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.05

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$12.39B	3.02	$832.50M	$9.62	33.84
Eaton	$27.45B	5.79	$4.09B	$9.83	41.65

Eaton has a net margin of 12.75% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Eaton's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%
Eaton	12.75%	24.58%	9.98%

Summary

Eaton beats Celestica on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celestica News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CLS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Celestica	Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry	Technology Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$37.43B	$8.80B	$29.54B	$23.14B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.23%	2.74%	3.76%
P/E Ratio	33.84	24.02	75.60	28.48
Price / Sales	3.02	40.44	593.56	19.48
Price / Cash	46.03	31.56	48.24	34.36
Price / Book	16.87	4.66	7.66	4.70
Net Income	$832.50M	$202.80M	$703.62M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	4.96%	-1.72%	-1.72%	-2.33%
1 Month Performance	3.38%	-6.13%	-3.31%	-2.85%
1 Year Performance	28.70%	810.54%	181.44%	10.60%

Celestica Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CLS Celestica	4.7854 of 5 stars	$325.51 -2.4%	$439.81 +35.1%	+36.6%	$37.43B	$12.39B	33.84	29,591	Gap Down
AVGO Broadcom	4.9911 of 5 stars	$354.93 -0.6%	$500.60 +41.0%	+8.2%	$1.69T	$63.89B	45.32	33,000	Trending News Analyst Forecast
LITE Lumentum	3.8257 of 5 stars	$882.03 +4.1%	$1,053.83 +19.5%	+551.8%	$79.34B	$3.01B	N/A	13,757	Trending News Gap Down
ZS Zscaler	4.6451 of 5 stars	$167.88 -5.6%	$217.08 +29.3%	-41.2%	$27.20B	$2.67B	N/A	7,923	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
CIEN Ciena	4.7141 of 5 stars	$318.31 +0.3%	$480.95 +51.1%	+176.6%	$45.21B	$4.77B	106.47	9,080	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CLS) was last updated on 9/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Celestica (CLS) Competitors