Which has higher valuation & earnings, AVGO or CLS?

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Broadcom $75.47B 24.45 $23.13B $6.00 64.64 Celestica $15.59B 2.61 $832.50M $9.62 36.79

Is AVGO or CLS more profitable?

Broadcom has a net margin of 38.85% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Broadcom's return on equity of 41.61% beat Celestica's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Broadcom 38.85% 41.61% 19.55% Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06%

Does the media favor AVGO or CLS?

In the previous week, Broadcom had 90 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 157 mentions for Broadcom and 67 mentions for Celestica. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Celestica's score of 1.09 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Broadcom 139 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 5 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Celestica 40 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 16 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CLS or MTSI?

In the previous week, Celestica had 50 more articles in the media than MACOM Technology Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 67 mentions for Celestica and 17 mentions for MACOM Technology Solutions. MACOM Technology Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Celestica's score of 1.09 indicating that MACOM Technology Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 40 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 16 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MACOM Technology Solutions 13 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ZS or CLS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Zscaler. Zscaler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Zscaler $2.67B 8.98 -$41.48M -$0.48 N/A Celestica $15.59B 2.61 $832.50M $9.62 36.79

Is ZS or CLS more profitable?

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -2.44%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Zscaler's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Zscaler -2.44% -0.37% -0.12% Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06%

Does the media prefer ZS or CLS?

In the previous week, Celestica had 43 more articles in the media than Zscaler. MarketBeat recorded 67 mentions for Celestica and 24 mentions for Zscaler. Zscaler's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Celestica's score of 1.09 indicating that Zscaler is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Zscaler 17 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Celestica 40 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 16 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, CIEN or CLS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Ciena. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ciena, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ciena $5.57B 9.44 $123.34M $3.00 123.79 Celestica $15.59B 2.61 $832.50M $9.62 36.79

Is CIEN or CLS more profitable?

Ciena has a net margin of 7.87% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Ciena's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ciena 7.87% 18.15% 8.63% Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06%

Does the media favor CIEN or CLS?

In the previous week, Celestica had 38 more articles in the media than Ciena. MarketBeat recorded 67 mentions for Celestica and 29 mentions for Ciena. Ciena's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Celestica's score of 1.09 indicating that Ciena is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ciena 26 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Celestica 40 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 16 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CLS or ETN?

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica $15.59B 2.61 $832.50M $9.62 36.79 Eaton $28.52B 5.28 $4.09B $10.23 37.93

Is CLS or ETN more profitable?

Eaton has a net margin of 13.99% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Eaton's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06% Eaton 13.99% 24.72% 10.69%

Does the media refer more to CLS or ETN?

In the previous week, Celestica had 30 more articles in the media than Eaton. MarketBeat recorded 67 mentions for Celestica and 37 mentions for Eaton. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Eaton's score of 0.76 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 40 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 16 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Eaton 8 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Celestica (CLS) Competitors

$353.90 +25.47 (+7.76%)

Closing price 07/30/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$367.32 +13.42 (+3.79%)

As of 07:53 AM Eastern

Compare

CLS vs. AVGO, MTSI, ZS, CIEN, and ETN

Should you buy Celestica stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Celestica with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Celestica include Broadcom (AVGO), MACOM Technology Solutions (MTSI), Zscaler (ZS), Ciena (CIEN), and Eaton (ETN).

How does Celestica compare to Broadcom?

Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

Broadcom has a net margin of 38.85% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Broadcom's return on equity of 41.61% beat Celestica's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Broadcom	38.85%	41.61%	19.55%
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%

76.4% of Broadcom shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Broadcom shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Broadcom	$75.47B	24.45	$23.13B	$6.00	64.64
Celestica	$15.59B	2.61	$832.50M	$9.62	36.79

Broadcom has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.05, indicating that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

Broadcom currently has a consensus price target of $493.24, indicating a potential upside of 27.18%. Celestica has a consensus price target of $437.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.48%. Given Broadcom's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Broadcom is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Broadcom	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	28 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96

In the previous week, Broadcom had 90 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 157 mentions for Broadcom and 67 mentions for Celestica. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Celestica's score of 1.09 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Broadcom	139 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	5 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	40 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	16 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Broadcom beats Celestica on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to MACOM Technology Solutions?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and MACOM Technology Solutions (NASDAQ:MTSI) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Celestica currently has a consensus target price of $437.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.48%. MACOM Technology Solutions has a consensus target price of $330.45, indicating a potential upside of 32.87%. Given MACOM Technology Solutions' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MACOM Technology Solutions is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96
MACOM Technology Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.79

67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.1% of MACOM Technology Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of MACOM Technology Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica has a beta of 2.05, meaning that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MACOM Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.65, meaning that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Celestica had 50 more articles in the media than MACOM Technology Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 67 mentions for Celestica and 17 mentions for MACOM Technology Solutions. MACOM Technology Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Celestica's score of 1.09 indicating that MACOM Technology Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	40 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	16 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MACOM Technology Solutions	13 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

MACOM Technology Solutions has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat MACOM Technology Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%
MACOM Technology Solutions	16.46%	16.01%	10.43%

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than MACOM Technology Solutions. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MACOM Technology Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$15.59B	2.61	$832.50M	$9.62	36.79
MACOM Technology Solutions	$967.26M	19.62	-$54.21M	$2.31	107.67

Summary

Celestica beats MACOM Technology Solutions on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Zscaler?

Zscaler (NASDAQ:ZS) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Zscaler. Zscaler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Zscaler	$2.67B	8.98	-$41.48M	-$0.48	N/A
Celestica	$15.59B	2.61	$832.50M	$9.62	36.79

Zscaler has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Celestica had 43 more articles in the media than Zscaler. MarketBeat recorded 67 mentions for Celestica and 24 mentions for Zscaler. Zscaler's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Celestica's score of 1.09 indicating that Zscaler is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Zscaler	17 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	40 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	16 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

46.5% of Zscaler shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 17.2% of Zscaler shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -2.44%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Zscaler's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Zscaler	-2.44%	-0.37%	-0.12%
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%

Zscaler currently has a consensus price target of $214.21, indicating a potential upside of 44.35%. Celestica has a consensus price target of $437.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.48%. Given Zscaler's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Zscaler is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Zscaler	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	34 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96

Summary

Celestica beats Zscaler on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Ciena?

Ciena (NYSE:CIEN) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Celestica had 38 more articles in the media than Ciena. MarketBeat recorded 67 mentions for Celestica and 29 mentions for Ciena. Ciena's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Celestica's score of 1.09 indicating that Ciena is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ciena	26 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	40 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	16 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ciena has a net margin of 7.87% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Ciena's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ciena	7.87%	18.15%	8.63%
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%

Ciena has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Ciena. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ciena, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ciena	$5.57B	9.44	$123.34M	$3.00	123.79
Celestica	$15.59B	2.61	$832.50M	$9.62	36.79

92.0% of Ciena shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Ciena shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ciena presently has a consensus target price of $530.56, indicating a potential upside of 42.86%. Celestica has a consensus target price of $437.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.48%. Given Ciena's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Ciena is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ciena	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96

Summary

Celestica beats Ciena on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Eaton?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Celestica currently has a consensus target price of $437.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.48%. Eaton has a consensus target price of $423.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.02%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than Eaton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96
Eaton	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Celestica had 30 more articles in the media than Eaton. MarketBeat recorded 67 mentions for Celestica and 37 mentions for Eaton. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Eaton's score of 0.76 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	40 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	16 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Eaton	8 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Eaton has a net margin of 13.99% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Eaton's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%
Eaton	13.99%	24.72%	10.69%

Celestica has a beta of 2.05, suggesting that its share price is 105% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$15.59B	2.61	$832.50M	$9.62	36.79
Eaton	$28.52B	5.28	$4.09B	$10.23	37.93

Summary

Celestica beats Eaton on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celestica News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CLS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Celestica	ELEC MANUF SVS (EMS) Industry	Computer Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$37.76B	$17.14B	$36.25B	$23.55B
Dividend Yield	N/A	0.52%	3.17%	4.19%
P/E Ratio	36.79	39.47	75.98	30.73
Price / Sales	2.61	1.49	592.55	81.96
Price / Cash	45.81	26.80	41.20	31.18
Price / Book	16.41	10.27	8.43	4.66
Net Income	$832.50M	$386.62M	$1.08B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	16.01%	-1.04%	0.57%	0.55%
1 Month Performance	-3.19%	-18.19%	-2.68%	1.58%
1 Year Performance	76.97%	73.49%	135.51%	17.66%

Celestica Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CLS Celestica	4.9883 of 5 stars	$353.90 +7.8%	$437.00 +23.5%	+74.9%	$37.76B	$15.59B	36.79	29,591	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Gap Up
AVGO Broadcom	4.9993 of 5 stars	$386.56 +2.2%	$493.24 +27.6%	+28.2%	$1.84T	$63.89B	64.41	33,000	Trending News Gap Up
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions	4.7635 of 5 stars	$284.57 +5.5%	$330.45 +16.1%	+77.6%	$21.70B	$967.26M	123.10	2,000	Positive News Upcoming Earnings Gap Up
ZS Zscaler	4.4641 of 5 stars	$148.42 -0.9%	$214.21 +44.3%	-48.4%	$24.03B	$2.67B	N/A	7,923
CIEN Ciena	4.4967 of 5 stars	$411.00 +8.5%	$530.56 +29.1%	+299.7%	$58.13B	$4.77B	136.90	9,080	Positive News Analyst Forecast Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CLS) was last updated on 7/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Celestica (CLS) Competitors