Which has higher valuation & earnings, CLS or AVGO?

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica $12.39B 3.58 $832.50M $8.27 46.71 Broadcom $63.89B 33.11 $23.13B $5.12 87.26

Is CLS or AVGO more profitable?

Broadcom has a net margin of 36.57% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.95%. Broadcom's return on equity of 38.61% beat Celestica's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Celestica 6.95% 36.91% 10.56% Broadcom 36.57% 38.61% 17.49%

Does the media prefer CLS or AVGO?

In the previous week, Broadcom had 126 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 147 mentions for Broadcom and 21 mentions for Celestica. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Celestica's score of 1.04 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 13 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Broadcom 115 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 18 Neutral mention(s) 6 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor CLS or MTSI?

In the previous week, MACOM Technology Solutions had 1 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for MACOM Technology Solutions and 21 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat MACOM Technology Solutions' score of 0.89 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 13 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MACOM Technology Solutions 8 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, CLS or ZS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Zscaler. Zscaler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica $12.39B 3.58 $832.50M $8.27 46.71 Zscaler $2.67B 8.45 -$41.48M -$0.48 N/A

Is CLS or ZS more profitable?

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -2.44%. Celestica's return on equity of 36.91% beat Zscaler's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Celestica 6.95% 36.91% 10.56% Zscaler -2.44% -0.37% -0.12%

Does the media prefer CLS or ZS?

In the previous week, Zscaler had 80 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 101 mentions for Zscaler and 21 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Zscaler's score of 0.21 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 13 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Zscaler 21 Very Positive mention(s) 17 Positive mention(s) 21 Neutral mention(s) 19 Negative mention(s) 4 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation & earnings, CLS or APH?

Amphenol has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Amphenol is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica $12.39B 3.58 $832.50M $8.27 46.71 Amphenol $23.09B 7.91 $4.27B $3.48 42.65

Is CLS or APH more profitable?

Amphenol has a net margin of 17.24% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.95%. Amphenol's return on equity of 37.44% beat Celestica's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Celestica 6.95% 36.91% 10.56% Amphenol 17.24% 37.44% 14.77%

Does the media refer more to CLS or APH?

In the previous week, Amphenol had 5 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Amphenol and 21 mentions for Celestica. Amphenol's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Celestica's score of 1.04 indicating that Amphenol is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 13 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Amphenol 22 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, CIEN or CLS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Ciena. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ciena, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ciena $4.77B 17.21 $123.34M $1.57 369.80 Celestica $12.39B 3.58 $832.50M $8.27 46.71

Is CIEN or CLS more profitable?

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Ciena's net margin of 4.47%. Celestica's return on equity of 36.91% beat Ciena's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ciena 4.47% 12.09% 5.79% Celestica 6.95% 36.91% 10.56%

Does the media prefer CIEN or CLS?

In the previous week, Ciena had 11 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Ciena and 21 mentions for Celestica. Ciena's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Celestica's score of 1.04 indicating that Ciena is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ciena 25 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Celestica 13 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Celestica (CLS) Competitors

$386.28 +35.26 (+10.05%)

Closing price 05/29/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$386.42 +0.14 (+0.04%)

As of 05/29/2026 07:59 PM Eastern

Compare

CLS vs. AVGO, MTSI, ZS, APH, and CIEN

Should you buy Celestica stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Celestica with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Celestica include Broadcom (AVGO), MACOM Technology Solutions (MTSI), Zscaler (ZS), Amphenol (APH), and Ciena (CIEN). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does Celestica compare to Broadcom?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Broadcom had 126 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 147 mentions for Broadcom and 21 mentions for Celestica. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Celestica's score of 1.04 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	13 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Broadcom	115 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	18 Neutral mention(s)	6 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Broadcom shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Broadcom shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Broadcom has a net margin of 36.57% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.95%. Broadcom's return on equity of 38.61% beat Celestica's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	6.95%	36.91%	10.56%
Broadcom	36.57%	38.61%	17.49%

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$12.39B	3.58	$832.50M	$8.27	46.71
Broadcom	$63.89B	33.11	$23.13B	$5.12	87.26

Celestica presently has a consensus price target of $427.42, suggesting a potential upside of 10.65%. Broadcom has a consensus price target of $454.55, suggesting a potential upside of 1.74%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than Broadcom.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
Broadcom	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91

Celestica has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Broadcom has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Broadcom beats Celestica on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to MACOM Technology Solutions?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and MACOM Technology Solutions (NASDAQ:MTSI) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.1% of MACOM Technology Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of MACOM Technology Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MACOM Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than MACOM Technology Solutions. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MACOM Technology Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$12.39B	3.58	$832.50M	$8.27	46.71
MACOM Technology Solutions	$1.07B	25.91	-$54.21M	$2.31	157.85

In the previous week, MACOM Technology Solutions had 1 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for MACOM Technology Solutions and 21 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat MACOM Technology Solutions' score of 0.89 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	13 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MACOM Technology Solutions	8 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

MACOM Technology Solutions has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.95%. Celestica's return on equity of 36.91% beat MACOM Technology Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	6.95%	36.91%	10.56%
MACOM Technology Solutions	16.46%	16.01%	10.43%

Celestica presently has a consensus target price of $427.42, indicating a potential upside of 10.65%. MACOM Technology Solutions has a consensus target price of $321.36, indicating a potential downside of 11.87%. Given Celestica's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than MACOM Technology Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
MACOM Technology Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

Summary

Celestica beats MACOM Technology Solutions on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Zscaler?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Zscaler (NASDAQ:ZS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Zscaler shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.2% of Zscaler shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Zscaler had 80 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 101 mentions for Zscaler and 21 mentions for Celestica. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Zscaler's score of 0.21 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	13 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Zscaler	21 Very Positive mention(s)	17 Positive mention(s)	21 Neutral mention(s)	19 Negative mention(s)	4 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Zscaler. Zscaler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$12.39B	3.58	$832.50M	$8.27	46.71
Zscaler	$2.67B	8.45	-$41.48M	-$0.48	N/A

Celestica currently has a consensus target price of $427.42, indicating a potential upside of 10.65%. Zscaler has a consensus target price of $216.08, indicating a potential upside of 54.64%. Given Zscaler's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Zscaler is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
Zscaler	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	32 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -2.44%. Celestica's return on equity of 36.91% beat Zscaler's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	6.95%	36.91%	10.56%
Zscaler	-2.44%	-0.37%	-0.12%

Celestica has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zscaler has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Celestica beats Zscaler on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Amphenol?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Amphenol (NYSE:APH) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Celestica presently has a consensus target price of $427.42, suggesting a potential upside of 10.65%. Amphenol has a consensus target price of $176.87, suggesting a potential upside of 19.17%. Given Amphenol's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Amphenol is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
Amphenol	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Celestica has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amphenol has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Amphenol had 5 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Amphenol and 21 mentions for Celestica. Amphenol's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Celestica's score of 1.04 indicating that Amphenol is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	13 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Amphenol	22 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Amphenol shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Amphenol shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Amphenol has a net margin of 17.24% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.95%. Amphenol's return on equity of 37.44% beat Celestica's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	6.95%	36.91%	10.56%
Amphenol	17.24%	37.44%	14.77%

Amphenol has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Amphenol is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$12.39B	3.58	$832.50M	$8.27	46.71
Amphenol	$23.09B	7.91	$4.27B	$3.48	42.65

Summary

Amphenol beats Celestica on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Ciena?

Ciena (NYSE:CIEN) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Ciena had 11 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Ciena and 21 mentions for Celestica. Ciena's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Celestica's score of 1.04 indicating that Ciena is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ciena	25 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	13 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ciena currently has a consensus target price of $406.61, suggesting a potential downside of 29.97%. Celestica has a consensus target price of $427.42, suggesting a potential upside of 10.65%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than Ciena.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ciena	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Ciena's net margin of 4.47%. Celestica's return on equity of 36.91% beat Ciena's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ciena	4.47%	12.09%	5.79%
Celestica	6.95%	36.91%	10.56%

92.0% of Ciena shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Ciena shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ciena has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Ciena. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ciena, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ciena	$4.77B	17.21	$123.34M	$1.57	369.80
Celestica	$12.39B	3.58	$832.50M	$8.27	46.71

Summary

Celestica beats Ciena on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celestica News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CLS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Celestica	ELEC MANUF SVS (EMS) Industry	Computer Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$44.31B	$21.38B	$40.83B	$22.74B
Dividend Yield	N/A	0.45%	3.17%	4.08%
P/E Ratio	46.71	55.70	172.23	30.62
Price / Sales	3.58	1.90	628.09	15.47
Price / Cash	53.76	33.14	48.87	25.14
Price / Book	21.17	11.96	10.70	4.79
Net Income	$832.50M	$386.62M	$1.07B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	5.02%	2.15%	4.01%	1.14%
1 Month Performance	-5.83%	6.28%	11.18%	1.26%
1 Year Performance	234.62%	159.03%	172.00%	28.06%

Celestica Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CLS Celestica	4.6082 of 5 stars	$386.28 +10.0%	$427.42 +10.7%	+234.6%	$44.31B	$12.39B	46.71	29,591	Positive News
AVGO Broadcom	4.7604 of 5 stars	$422.72 +2.1%	$448.10 +6.0%	+86.5%	$2.00T	$63.89B	82.56	33,000	Trending News Upcoming Earnings Analyst Upgrade
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions	3.3574 of 5 stars	$406.81 +5.4%	$321.36 -21.0%	+200.9%	$31.04B	$967.26M	176.11	2,000	Trending News Analyst Revision
ZS Zscaler	3.6351 of 5 stars	$188.55 +3.4%	$261.26 +38.6%	-49.0%	$30.32B	$2.67B	N/A	7,923	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Gap Down
APH Amphenol	4.8698 of 5 stars	$143.45 +8.6%	$176.53 +23.1%	+65.3%	$176.48B	$23.09B	41.22	170,000	Positive News Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CLS) was last updated on 5/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Celestica (CLS) Competitors