Which has higher earnings and valuation, AVGO or CLS?

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Broadcom $63.89B 25.93 $23.13B $7.83 44.32 Celestica $12.39B 3.44 $832.50M $9.62 38.57

Is AVGO or CLS more profitable?

Broadcom has a net margin of 42.94% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Broadcom's return on equity of 48.33% beat Celestica's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Broadcom 42.94% 48.33% 23.78% Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06%

Does the media refer more to AVGO or CLS?

In the previous week, Broadcom had 19 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Broadcom and 24 mentions for Celestica. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Celestica's score of 0.32 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Broadcom 22 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 11 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Celestica 6 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CLS or ZS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Zscaler. Zscaler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica $12.39B 3.44 $832.50M $9.62 38.57 Zscaler $3.35B 9.67 -$63.18M -$0.39 N/A

Is CLS or ZS more profitable?

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -1.88%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Zscaler's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06% Zscaler -1.88% 1.23% 0.40%

Does the media prefer CLS or ZS?

In the previous week, Zscaler had 13 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Zscaler and 24 mentions for Celestica. Zscaler's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Celestica's score of 0.32 indicating that Zscaler is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 6 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Zscaler 11 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 11 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, APH or CLS?

Amphenol has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amphenol, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Amphenol $23.09B 9.14 $4.27B $2.00 42.79 Celestica $12.39B 3.44 $832.50M $9.62 38.57

Is APH or CLS more profitable?

Amphenol has a net margin of 17.73% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Amphenol's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Amphenol 17.73% 39.87% 14.80% Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06%

Does the media prefer APH or CLS?

In the previous week, Celestica had 6 more articles in the media than Amphenol. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Celestica and 18 mentions for Amphenol. Amphenol's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Celestica's score of 0.32 indicating that Amphenol is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Amphenol 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Celestica 6 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CLS or CIEN?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Ciena. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ciena, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica $12.39B 3.44 $832.50M $9.62 38.57 Ciena $4.77B 11.04 $123.34M $4.48 82.87

Is CLS or CIEN more profitable?

Ciena has a net margin of 10.87% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Ciena's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06% Ciena 10.87% 25.33% 11.27%

Does the media refer more to CLS or CIEN?

In the previous week, Ciena had 3 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Ciena and 24 mentions for Celestica. Ciena's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Celestica's score of 0.32 indicating that Ciena is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 6 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Ciena 10 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CLS or ETN?

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica $12.39B 3.44 $832.50M $9.62 38.57 Eaton $27.45B 6.09 $4.09B $9.83 43.76

Is CLS or ETN more profitable?

Eaton has a net margin of 12.75% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Eaton's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06% Eaton 12.75% 24.58% 9.98%

Does the media refer more to CLS or ETN?

In the previous week, Eaton had 3 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Eaton and 24 mentions for Celestica. Eaton's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Celestica's score of 0.32 indicating that Eaton is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 6 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Eaton 14 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Celestica (CLS) Competitors

$371.08 +9.65 (+2.67%)

As of 11:47 AM Eastern

Compare

CLS vs. AVGO, ZS, APH, CIEN, and ETN

Should you buy Celestica stock or one of its competitors? Celestica's main competitors and comparable companies include Broadcom (AVGO), Zscaler (ZS), Amphenol (APH), Ciena (CIEN), and Eaton (ETN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Celestica compare to Broadcom?

Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and profitability.

76.4% of Broadcom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Broadcom shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Broadcom currently has a consensus price target of $527.20, suggesting a potential upside of 51.90%. Celestica has a consensus price target of $450.50, suggesting a potential upside of 21.40%. Given Broadcom's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Broadcom is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Broadcom	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	37 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.95
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	23 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Broadcom	$63.89B	25.93	$23.13B	$7.83	44.32
Celestica	$12.39B	3.44	$832.50M	$9.62	38.57

Broadcom has a net margin of 42.94% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Broadcom's return on equity of 48.33% beat Celestica's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Broadcom	42.94%	48.33%	23.78%
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%

In the previous week, Broadcom had 19 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Broadcom and 24 mentions for Celestica. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Celestica's score of 0.32 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Broadcom	22 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	11 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	6 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Broadcom has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.04, indicating that its stock price is 104% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Broadcom beats Celestica on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Zscaler?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Zscaler (NASDAQ:ZS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Celestica has a beta of 2.04, indicating that its share price is 104% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zscaler has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -1.88%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Zscaler's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%
Zscaler	-1.88%	1.23%	0.40%

In the previous week, Zscaler had 13 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Zscaler and 24 mentions for Celestica. Zscaler's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Celestica's score of 0.32 indicating that Zscaler is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	6 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Zscaler	11 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	11 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Celestica presently has a consensus price target of $450.50, indicating a potential upside of 21.40%. Zscaler has a consensus price target of $219.78, indicating a potential upside of 10.54%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than Zscaler.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	23 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96
Zscaler	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	34 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Zscaler. Zscaler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$12.39B	3.44	$832.50M	$9.62	38.57
Zscaler	$3.35B	9.67	-$63.18M	-$0.39	N/A

67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Zscaler shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.2% of Zscaler shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Celestica beats Zscaler on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Amphenol?

Amphenol (NYSE:APH) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Celestica had 6 more articles in the media than Amphenol. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Celestica and 18 mentions for Amphenol. Amphenol's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Celestica's score of 0.32 indicating that Amphenol is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Amphenol	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Celestica	6 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Amphenol has a net margin of 17.73% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Amphenol's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Amphenol	17.73%	39.87%	14.80%
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%

Amphenol presently has a consensus price target of $96.85, indicating a potential upside of 13.18%. Celestica has a consensus price target of $450.50, indicating a potential upside of 21.40%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than Amphenol.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Amphenol	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	23 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96

97.0% of Amphenol shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Amphenol shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.04, indicating that its stock price is 104% more volatile than the broader market.

Amphenol has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amphenol, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Amphenol	$23.09B	9.14	$4.27B	$2.00	42.79
Celestica	$12.39B	3.44	$832.50M	$9.62	38.57

Summary

Amphenol beats Celestica on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Ciena?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Ciena (NYSE:CIEN) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Ciena had 3 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Ciena and 24 mentions for Celestica. Ciena's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Celestica's score of 0.32 indicating that Ciena is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	6 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ciena	10 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ciena has a net margin of 10.87% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Ciena's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%
Ciena	10.87%	25.33%	11.27%

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Ciena. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ciena, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$12.39B	3.44	$832.50M	$9.62	38.57
Ciena	$4.77B	11.04	$123.34M	$4.48	82.87

Celestica has a beta of 2.04, meaning that its stock price is 104% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ciena has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica presently has a consensus target price of $450.50, suggesting a potential upside of 21.40%. Ciena has a consensus target price of $490.05, suggesting a potential upside of 32.00%. Given Ciena's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ciena is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	23 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96
Ciena	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Ciena shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Ciena shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ciena beats Celestica on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Eaton?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Celestica has a beta of 2.04, meaning that its stock price is 104% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica currently has a consensus price target of $450.50, suggesting a potential upside of 21.40%. Eaton has a consensus price target of $456.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.12%. Given Celestica's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than Eaton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	23 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96
Eaton	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.06

67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Eaton had 3 more articles in the media than Celestica. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Eaton and 24 mentions for Celestica. Eaton's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Celestica's score of 0.32 indicating that Eaton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	6 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Eaton	14 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Eaton has a net margin of 12.75% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Eaton's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%
Eaton	12.75%	24.58%	9.98%

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$12.39B	3.44	$832.50M	$9.62	38.57
Eaton	$27.45B	6.09	$4.09B	$9.83	43.76

Summary

Eaton beats Celestica on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celestica News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CLS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Celestica	Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry	Technology Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$42.62B	$9.03B	$31.03B	$22.44B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.25%	2.76%	3.72%
P/E Ratio	38.53	26.34	79.77	27.30
Price / Sales	3.44	40.44	586.82	21.32
Price / Cash	51.12	31.32	47.86	40.95
Price / Book	19.24	4.58	8.00	4.58
Net Income	$832.50M	$200.42M	$701.71M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	-0.58%	-0.25%	-0.58%	-2.10%
1 Month Performance	26.81%	-0.56%	-0.22%	-5.51%
1 Year Performance	47.31%	814.43%	176.82%	4.15%

Celestica Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CLS Celestica	4.7919 of 5 stars	$371.08 +2.7%	$450.50 +21.4%	+46.9%	$42.62B	$12.39B	38.53	29,591	Analyst Downgrade
AVGO Broadcom	4.9238 of 5 stars	$353.45 +0.9%	$527.20 +49.2%	+6.5%	$1.69T	$63.89B	45.14	33,000	Trending News
ZS Zscaler	3.6465 of 5 stars	$196.60 -8.4%	$219.28 +11.5%	-33.5%	$32.04B	$3.35B	N/A	8,700	Analyst Forecast Insider Trade Gap Down
APH Amphenol	4.4624 of 5 stars	$84.47 +1.7%	$96.34 +14.1%	+36.4%	$208.30B	$23.09B	42.34	170,000	Analyst Downgrade
CIEN Ciena	4.3715 of 5 stars	$359.04 +0.2%	$492.68 +37.2%	+142.4%	$50.92B	$4.77B	80.14	9,080	Analyst Forecast Insider Trade Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CLS) was last updated on 10/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Celestica (CLS) Competitors