Fabrinet Competitors

Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) and Trimble (NASDAQ:TRMB) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Fabrinet and Trimble's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Fabrinet and Trimble, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Fabrinet currently has a consensus target price of $72.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.49%. Trimble has a consensus target price of $56.75, suggesting a potential downside of 29.42%. Given Fabrinet's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Fabrinet is more favorable than Trimble.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fabrinet and Trimble's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Trimble has higher revenue and earnings than Fabrinet. Fabrinet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trimble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

94.5% of Fabrinet shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Trimble shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Fabrinet shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Trimble shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Fabrinet has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trimble has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its share price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Trimble beats Fabrinet on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) and Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and risk.

Profitability

This table compares IPG Photonics and Fabrinet's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares IPG Photonics and Fabrinet's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

IPG Photonics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fabrinet. Fabrinet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IPG Photonics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

IPG Photonics has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fabrinet has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for IPG Photonics and Fabrinet, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

IPG Photonics currently has a consensus price target of $230.9444, suggesting a potential downside of 3.25%. Fabrinet has a consensus price target of $72.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.49%. Given IPG Photonics' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe IPG Photonics is more favorable than Fabrinet.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

63.4% of IPG Photonics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of Fabrinet shares are held by institutional investors. 34.0% of IPG Photonics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Fabrinet shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

IPG Photonics beats Fabrinet on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jabil (NYSE:JBL) and Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

87.8% of Jabil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of Fabrinet shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Jabil shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Fabrinet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Jabil and Fabrinet's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Jabil and Fabrinet, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Jabil presently has a consensus price target of $53.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 0.20%. Fabrinet has a consensus price target of $72.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.49%. Given Jabil's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Jabil is more favorable than Fabrinet.

Risk & Volatility

Jabil has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fabrinet has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Jabil and Fabrinet's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fabrinet has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jabil. Fabrinet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jabil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Fabrinet beats Jabil on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) and Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

94.5% of Fabrinet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Fabrinet shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Fabrinet and Mercury Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Fabrinet and Mercury Systems, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Fabrinet presently has a consensus target price of $72.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.49%. Mercury Systems has a consensus target price of $94.1111, suggesting a potential upside of 23.41%. Given Mercury Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Mercury Systems is more favorable than Fabrinet.

Volatility and Risk

Fabrinet has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mercury Systems has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fabrinet and Mercury Systems' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fabrinet has higher revenue and earnings than Mercury Systems. Fabrinet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mercury Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Mercury Systems beats Fabrinet on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) and Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

94.5% of Fabrinet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of Sanmina shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Fabrinet shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Sanmina shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Fabrinet and Sanmina's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Fabrinet and Sanmina, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Fabrinet presently has a consensus target price of $72.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.49%. Sanmina has a consensus target price of $39.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.70%. Given Sanmina's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sanmina is more favorable than Fabrinet.

Volatility and Risk

Fabrinet has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sanmina has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fabrinet and Sanmina's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than Fabrinet. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fabrinet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Fabrinet beats Sanmina on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) and Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

94.5% of Fabrinet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.2% of Plexus shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Fabrinet shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Plexus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Fabrinet and Plexus' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Fabrinet and Plexus, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Fabrinet presently has a consensus target price of $72.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.49%. Plexus has a consensus target price of $86.40, suggesting a potential downside of 5.71%. Given Plexus' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Plexus is more favorable than Fabrinet.

Volatility and Risk

Fabrinet has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Plexus has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fabrinet and Plexus' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Plexus has higher revenue and earnings than Fabrinet. Plexus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fabrinet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Fabrinet beats Plexus on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.