Free Trial
The Market Does Not Wait. MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Get the Deal
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Sanmina (SANM) Competitors

Sanmina logo
$219.07 -6.07 (-2.70%)
As of 11:19 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SANM vs. PLXS, JBL, FN, TTMI, and TRMB

Should you buy Sanmina stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sanmina with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sanmina include Plexus (PLXS), Jabil (JBL), Fabrinet (FN), TTM Technologies (TTMI), and Trimble (TRMB). These companies are all part of the "electronic manufacturing services" industry.

How does Sanmina compare to Plexus?

Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) and Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Plexus has a net margin of 4.35% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 2.29%. Sanmina's return on equity of 16.23% beat Plexus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Plexus4.35% 12.84% 5.87%
Sanmina 2.29%16.23%5.46%

In the previous week, Plexus had 14 more articles in the media than Sanmina. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Plexus and 3 mentions for Sanmina. Sanmina's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Plexus' score of 0.17 indicating that Sanmina is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Plexus
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Sanmina
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

94.5% of Plexus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Sanmina shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Plexus shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Sanmina shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Plexus presently has a consensus target price of $229.17, suggesting a potential downside of 8.80%. Sanmina has a consensus target price of $150.00, suggesting a potential downside of 31.53%. Given Plexus' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Plexus is more favorable than Sanmina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Plexus
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Sanmina
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Plexus has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanmina has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than Plexus. Plexus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanmina, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Plexus$4.03B1.67$172.88M$6.8436.74
Sanmina$8.13B1.44$245.89M$4.7346.31

Summary

Plexus beats Sanmina on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanmina compare to Jabil?

Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) and Jabil (NYSE:JBL) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Jabil has higher revenue and earnings than Sanmina. Jabil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanmina, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanmina$8.13B1.44$245.89M$4.7346.31
Jabil$29.80B1.17$657M$7.4544.31

Jabil has a net margin of 2.48% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 2.29%. Jabil's return on equity of 80.96% beat Sanmina's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanmina2.29% 16.23% 5.46%
Jabil 2.48%80.96%5.78%

Sanmina currently has a consensus price target of $150.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.53%. Jabil has a consensus price target of $290.63, indicating a potential downside of 11.96%. Given Jabil's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Jabil is more favorable than Sanmina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sanmina
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Jabil
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.09

92.7% of Sanmina shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Jabil shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Sanmina shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Jabil shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Jabil had 10 more articles in the media than Sanmina. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Jabil and 3 mentions for Sanmina. Jabil's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Sanmina's score of 0.82 indicating that Jabil is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sanmina
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Jabil
11 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Sanmina has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jabil has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Jabil beats Sanmina on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanmina compare to Fabrinet?

Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) and Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Fabrinet and Fabrinet both had 3 articles in the media. Fabrinet's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Sanmina's score of 0.82 indicating that Fabrinet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fabrinet
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Sanmina
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Fabrinet has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sanmina. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fabrinet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fabrinet$4.24B5.64$332.53M$11.6457.29
Sanmina$8.13B1.44$245.89M$4.7346.31

Fabrinet currently has a consensus price target of $661.75, indicating a potential downside of 0.77%. Sanmina has a consensus price target of $150.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.53%. Given Fabrinet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fabrinet is more favorable than Sanmina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fabrinet
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Sanmina
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

97.4% of Fabrinet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Sanmina shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fabrinet shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Sanmina shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fabrinet has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanmina has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

Fabrinet has a net margin of 9.94% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 2.29%. Fabrinet's return on equity of 19.83% beat Sanmina's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fabrinet9.94% 19.83% 13.41%
Sanmina 2.29%16.23%5.46%

Summary

Fabrinet beats Sanmina on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanmina compare to TTM Technologies?

Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) and TTM Technologies (NASDAQ:TTMI) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

92.7% of Sanmina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.8% of TTM Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Sanmina shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of TTM Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sanmina currently has a consensus target price of $150.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.53%. TTM Technologies has a consensus target price of $149.50, indicating a potential downside of 3.77%. Given TTM Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TTM Technologies is more favorable than Sanmina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sanmina
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
TTM Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

TTM Technologies has a net margin of 6.29% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 2.29%. Sanmina's return on equity of 16.23% beat TTM Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanmina2.29% 16.23% 5.46%
TTM Technologies 6.29%13.70%6.29%

Sanmina has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TTM Technologies has a beta of 2.11, suggesting that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TTM Technologies had 8 more articles in the media than Sanmina. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for TTM Technologies and 3 mentions for Sanmina. TTM Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Sanmina's score of 0.82 indicating that TTM Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sanmina
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TTM Technologies
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than TTM Technologies. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TTM Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanmina$8.13B1.44$245.89M$4.7346.31
TTM Technologies$2.91B5.55$177.45M$1.8583.98

Summary

TTM Technologies beats Sanmina on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanmina compare to Trimble?

Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) and Trimble (NASDAQ:TRMB) are both large-cap electronic manufacturing services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Trimble had 6 more articles in the media than Sanmina. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Trimble and 3 mentions for Sanmina. Sanmina's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Trimble's score of 0.53 indicating that Sanmina is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sanmina
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Trimble
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Trimble has a net margin of 12.38% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 2.29%. Sanmina's return on equity of 16.23% beat Trimble's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanmina2.29% 16.23% 5.46%
Trimble 12.38%11.61%7.32%

Sanmina presently has a consensus price target of $150.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.53%. Trimble has a consensus price target of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 61.66%. Given Trimble's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trimble is more favorable than Sanmina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sanmina
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Trimble
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

92.7% of Sanmina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Trimble shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Sanmina shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Trimble shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sanmina has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trimble has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Trimble has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sanmina. Trimble is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanmina, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanmina$8.13B1.44$245.89M$4.7346.31
Trimble$3.69B3.52$424M$1.9029.30

Summary

Trimble beats Sanmina on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sanmina News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SANM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SANM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SANM vs. The Competition

MetricSanminaELEC MANUF SVS (EMS) IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$11.70B$18.72B$38.00B$12.06B
Dividend YieldN/A0.45%3.21%5.32%
P/E Ratio46.1550.09167.0625.03
Price / Sales1.441.68627.0177.55
Price / Cash31.1331.2447.8137.30
Price / Book4.6010.419.476.58
Net Income$245.89M$386.62M$1.06B$335.49M
7 Day Performance-7.11%-7.17%-0.72%-1.87%
1 Month Performance25.84%8.53%3.11%-1.90%
1 Year Performance169.22%133.05%157.97%26.67%

Sanmina Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SANM
Sanmina
3.433 of 5 stars
$219.07
-2.7%
$150.00
-31.5%
+166.2%$11.70B$8.13B46.1539,000
PLXS
Plexus
3.6899 of 5 stars
$271.78
+2.0%
$229.17
-15.7%
+92.8%$7.14B$4.03B39.7320,000
JBL
Jabil
4.1438 of 5 stars
$365.28
+2.9%
$290.63
-20.4%
+101.6%$37.47B$29.80B49.03135,000
FN
Fabrinet
3.4021 of 5 stars
$650.19
+4.7%
$661.75
+1.8%
+204.2%$22.26B$3.42B55.8616,457
TTMI
TTM Technologies
4.0615 of 5 stars
$162.99
+3.6%
$149.50
-8.3%
+440.9%$16.34B$2.91B88.1018,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SANM) was last updated on 5/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners