Sanmina Competitors

Trimble (NASDAQ:TRMB) and Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Trimble and Sanmina, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Trimble currently has a consensus price target of $54.3333, indicating a potential downside of 28.82%. Sanmina has a consensus price target of $39.50, indicating a potential upside of 8.07%. Given Sanmina's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sanmina is more favorable than Trimble.

Volatility & Risk

Trimble has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sanmina has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Trimble and Sanmina's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Trimble and Sanmina's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Trimble has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sanmina. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trimble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

89.4% of Trimble shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of Sanmina shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Trimble shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Sanmina shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Trimble beats Sanmina on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) and Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for IPG Photonics and Sanmina, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

IPG Photonics currently has a consensus price target of $230.9444, suggesting a potential upside of 1.16%. Sanmina has a consensus price target of $39.50, suggesting a potential upside of 8.07%. Given Sanmina's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sanmina is more favorable than IPG Photonics.

Profitability

This table compares IPG Photonics and Sanmina's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares IPG Photonics and Sanmina's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

IPG Photonics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sanmina. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IPG Photonics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

63.4% of IPG Photonics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of Sanmina shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.0% of IPG Photonics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Sanmina shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

IPG Photonics has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sanmina has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

IPG Photonics beats Sanmina on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jabil (NYSE:JBL) and Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

87.8% of Jabil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of Sanmina shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Jabil shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Sanmina shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Jabil has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sanmina has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Jabil and Sanmina's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Jabil and Sanmina's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Sanmina has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jabil. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jabil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Jabil and Sanmina, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Jabil currently has a consensus target price of $44.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 1.38%. Sanmina has a consensus target price of $39.50, suggesting a potential upside of 8.07%. Given Sanmina's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sanmina is more favorable than Jabil.

Summary

Sanmina beats Jabil on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) and Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Mercury Systems and Sanmina's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

95.7% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of Sanmina shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Sanmina shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Mercury Systems has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Sanmina has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Mercury Systems and Sanmina, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Mercury Systems currently has a consensus target price of $94.1111, indicating a potential upside of 38.81%. Sanmina has a consensus target price of $39.50, indicating a potential upside of 8.07%. Given Mercury Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Mercury Systems is more favorable than Sanmina.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Mercury Systems and Sanmina's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than Mercury Systems. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mercury Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Mercury Systems beats Sanmina on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) and Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Fabrinet and Sanmina, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Fabrinet currently has a consensus target price of $72.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.42%. Sanmina has a consensus target price of $39.50, indicating a potential upside of 8.07%. Given Sanmina's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sanmina is more favorable than Fabrinet.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fabrinet and Sanmina's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than Fabrinet. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fabrinet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Fabrinet has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sanmina has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Fabrinet and Sanmina's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.5% of Fabrinet shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of Sanmina shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Fabrinet shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Sanmina shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Fabrinet beats Sanmina on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) and Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Sanmina and Plexus' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than Plexus. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plexus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

94.6% of Sanmina shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.2% of Plexus shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Sanmina shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Plexus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Sanmina and Plexus, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sanmina currently has a consensus target price of $39.50, suggesting a potential upside of 8.07%. Plexus has a consensus target price of $85.40, suggesting a potential downside of 1.71%. Given Sanmina's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Sanmina is more favorable than Plexus.

Risk and Volatility

Sanmina has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Plexus has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Sanmina and Plexus' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Plexus beats Sanmina on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.