Go Pro

Sanmina (SANM) Competitors

Sanmina logo
$194.01 -9.34 (-4.59%)
As of 08/28/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

SANM vs. FLEX, PLXS, BHE, JBL, and CLS

Should you buy Sanmina stock or one of its competitors? Sanmina's main competitors and comparable companies include Flex (FLEX), Plexus (PLXS), Benchmark Electronics (BHE), Jabil (JBL), and Celestica (CLS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electronic manufacturing services" industry.

How does Sanmina compare to Flex?

Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) and Flex (NASDAQ:FLEX) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Flex has higher revenue and earnings than Sanmina. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanmina$8.13B1.28$245.89M$5.5934.71
Flex$27.91B1.46$880M$2.5942.66

Sanmina has a beta of 1.59, indicating that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flex has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

Flex has a net margin of 3.32% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 2.41%. Flex's return on equity of 23.15% beat Sanmina's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanmina2.41% 19.08% 5.75%
Flex 3.32%23.15%5.50%

In the previous week, Sanmina had 8 more articles in the media than Flex. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Sanmina and 7 mentions for Flex. Sanmina's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Flex's score of 0.68 indicating that Sanmina is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sanmina
13 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Flex
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Sanmina currently has a consensus price target of $198.33, suggesting a potential upside of 2.23%. Flex has a consensus price target of $114.20, suggesting a potential upside of 3.35%. Given Flex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Flex is more favorable than Sanmina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sanmina
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Flex
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

92.7% of Sanmina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.3% of Flex shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Sanmina shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Flex shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Flex beats Sanmina on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanmina compare to Plexus?

Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) and Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than Plexus. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plexus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanmina$8.13B1.28$245.89M$5.5934.71
Plexus$4.03B1.60$172.88M$6.7835.53

92.7% of Sanmina shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of Plexus shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Sanmina shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Plexus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Plexus has a net margin of 4.03% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 2.41%. Sanmina's return on equity of 19.08% beat Plexus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanmina2.41% 19.08% 5.75%
Plexus 4.03%12.46%5.57%

Sanmina presently has a consensus target price of $198.33, suggesting a potential upside of 2.23%. Plexus has a consensus target price of $273.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.34%. Given Plexus' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Plexus is more favorable than Sanmina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sanmina
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Plexus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.14

Sanmina has a beta of 1.59, indicating that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plexus has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sanmina had 4 more articles in the media than Plexus. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Sanmina and 11 mentions for Plexus. Sanmina's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Plexus' score of 1.32 indicating that Sanmina is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sanmina
13 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Plexus
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Sanmina and Plexus tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanmina compare to Benchmark Electronics?

Benchmark Electronics (NYSE:BHE) and Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanmina has a beta of 1.59, indicating that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the broader market.

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than Benchmark Electronics. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Benchmark Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Benchmark Electronics$2.66B0.96$24.85M$1.4748.50
Sanmina$8.13B1.28$245.89M$5.5934.71

Sanmina has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Benchmark Electronics' net margin of 1.89%. Sanmina's return on equity of 19.08% beat Benchmark Electronics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Benchmark Electronics1.89% 7.28% 3.81%
Sanmina 2.41%19.08%5.75%

Benchmark Electronics presently has a consensus target price of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.63%. Sanmina has a consensus target price of $198.33, indicating a potential upside of 2.23%. Given Benchmark Electronics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Benchmark Electronics is more favorable than Sanmina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Benchmark Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Sanmina
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

In the previous week, Sanmina had 4 more articles in the media than Benchmark Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Sanmina and 11 mentions for Benchmark Electronics. Benchmark Electronics' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Sanmina's score of 1.40 indicating that Benchmark Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Benchmark Electronics
10 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Sanmina
13 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

92.3% of Benchmark Electronics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Sanmina shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Benchmark Electronics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Sanmina shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sanmina beats Benchmark Electronics on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanmina compare to Jabil?

Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) and Jabil (NYSE:JBL) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Jabil has higher revenue and earnings than Sanmina. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jabil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanmina$8.13B1.28$245.89M$5.5934.71
Jabil$29.80B1.06$657M$8.0137.66

Jabil has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 2.41%. Jabil's return on equity of 83.93% beat Sanmina's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanmina2.41% 19.08% 5.75%
Jabil 2.57%83.93%5.65%

Sanmina presently has a consensus price target of $198.33, suggesting a potential upside of 2.23%. Jabil has a consensus price target of $453.67, suggesting a potential upside of 50.38%. Given Jabil's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Jabil is more favorable than Sanmina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sanmina
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Jabil
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

92.7% of Sanmina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Jabil shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Sanmina shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Jabil shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sanmina has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jabil has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Jabil had 24 more articles in the media than Sanmina. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Jabil and 15 mentions for Sanmina. Jabil's average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat Sanmina's score of 1.40 indicating that Jabil is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sanmina
13 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Jabil
38 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Jabil beats Sanmina on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanmina compare to Celestica?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Sanmina shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Sanmina shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Celestica had 22 more articles in the media than Sanmina. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Celestica and 15 mentions for Sanmina. Sanmina's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Celestica's score of 1.14 indicating that Sanmina is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Celestica
25 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Sanmina
13 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Celestica currently has a consensus price target of $439.81, indicating a potential upside of 47.16%. Sanmina has a consensus price target of $198.33, indicating a potential upside of 2.23%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than Sanmina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Sanmina
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Sanmina. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanmina, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celestica$15.59B2.20$832.50M$9.6231.07
Sanmina$8.13B1.28$245.89M$5.5934.71

Celestica has a beta of 2.06, meaning that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanmina has a beta of 1.59, meaning that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 2.41%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Sanmina's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica7.16% 39.96% 11.06%
Sanmina 2.41%19.08%5.75%

Summary

Celestica beats Sanmina on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sanmina News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SANM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SANM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SANM vs. The Competition

MetricSanminaElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$10.40B$8.67B$29.76B$12.91B
Dividend YieldN/A2.25%2.74%11.28%
P/E Ratio34.7127.3976.4425.45
Price / Sales1.2843.91591.6294.29
Price / Cash25.6731.3349.2953.00
Price / Book3.775.329.316.14
Net Income$245.89M$202.63M$678.22M$348.86M
7 Day Performance2.71%-0.91%-0.07%-0.80%
1 Month Performance5.74%3.68%4.19%4.13%
1 Year Performance65.09%820.47%187.24%15.17%

Sanmina Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SANM
Sanmina
3.9429 of 5 stars
$194.01
-4.6%
$198.33
+2.2%
+65.1%$10.40B$8.13B34.7139,000
FLEX
Flex
4.2065 of 5 stars
$106.65
-3.4%
$114.20
+7.1%
+106.1%$40.80B$27.91B41.18149,686
PLXS
Plexus
4.3279 of 5 stars
$237.61
-1.1%
$273.00
+14.9%
+75.8%$6.43B$4.03B35.0520,000
BHE
Benchmark Electronics
3.8723 of 5 stars
$71.65
-1.4%
$91.00
+27.0%
+76.1%$2.61B$2.66B48.7411,840
JBL
Jabil
4.998 of 5 stars
$304.83
-2.7%
$453.67
+48.8%
+47.4%$32.82B$29.80B38.06135,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SANM) was last updated on 8/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners