Benchmark Electronics (BHE) Competitors

Benchmark Electronics has a net margin of 1.27% compared to Avnet's net margin of 0.86%. Avnet's return on equity of 7.07% beat Benchmark Electronics' return on equity.

Benchmark Electronics presently has a consensus target price of $86.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.82%. Avnet has a consensus target price of $77.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.56%. Given Benchmark Electronics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Benchmark Electronics is more favorable than Avnet.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avnet has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Avnet has higher revenue and earnings than Benchmark Electronics. Avnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Benchmark Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Avnet had 5 more articles in the media than Benchmark Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Avnet and 7 mentions for Benchmark Electronics. Benchmark Electronics' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Avnet's score of 0.64 indicating that Benchmark Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

92.3% of Benchmark Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.8% of Avnet shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Benchmark Electronics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Avnet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Benchmark Electronics pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Avnet pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Benchmark Electronics pays out 71.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avnet pays out 54.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Benchmark Electronics has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Avnet has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Avnet is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Cohu and Cohu both had 7 articles in the media. Benchmark Electronics' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Cohu's score of 0.30 indicating that Benchmark Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

94.7% of Cohu shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Benchmark Electronics shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Cohu shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Benchmark Electronics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Benchmark Electronics has higher revenue and earnings than Cohu. Cohu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Benchmark Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cohu presently has a consensus price target of $49.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.72%. Benchmark Electronics has a consensus price target of $86.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.82%. Given Benchmark Electronics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Benchmark Electronics is more favorable than Cohu.

Benchmark Electronics has a net margin of 1.27% compared to Cohu's net margin of -11.54%. Benchmark Electronics' return on equity of 6.63% beat Cohu's return on equity.

Cohu has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Flex currently has a consensus price target of $112.80, suggesting a potential downside of 18.10%. Benchmark Electronics has a consensus price target of $86.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.82%. Given Benchmark Electronics' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Benchmark Electronics is more favorable than Flex.

Flex has higher revenue and earnings than Benchmark Electronics. Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Benchmark Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Flex had 35 more articles in the media than Benchmark Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Flex and 7 mentions for Benchmark Electronics. Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Benchmark Electronics' score of 0.70 indicating that Flex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

94.3% of Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Benchmark Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Flex shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Benchmark Electronics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Flex has a beta of 1.46, indicating that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Flex has a net margin of 3.15% compared to Benchmark Electronics' net margin of 1.27%. Flex's return on equity of 22.12% beat Benchmark Electronics' return on equity.

In the previous week, Plexus had 10 more articles in the media than Benchmark Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Plexus and 7 mentions for Benchmark Electronics. Benchmark Electronics' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Plexus' score of 0.26 indicating that Benchmark Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plexus has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Plexus has a net margin of 4.35% compared to Benchmark Electronics' net margin of 1.27%. Plexus' return on equity of 12.84% beat Benchmark Electronics' return on equity.

Plexus has higher revenue and earnings than Benchmark Electronics. Plexus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Benchmark Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

92.3% of Benchmark Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of Plexus shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Benchmark Electronics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Plexus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Benchmark Electronics presently has a consensus price target of $86.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.82%. Plexus has a consensus price target of $229.17, suggesting a potential downside of 12.95%. Given Benchmark Electronics' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Benchmark Electronics is more favorable than Plexus.