Benchmark Electronics (BHE) Competitors

Benchmark Electronics currently has a consensus price target of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.16%. Avnet has a consensus price target of $89.50, indicating a potential upside of 0.74%. Given Benchmark Electronics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Benchmark Electronics is more favorable than Avnet.

92.3% of Benchmark Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.8% of Avnet shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Benchmark Electronics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Avnet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Benchmark Electronics has a net margin of 1.89% compared to Avnet's net margin of 0.86%. Benchmark Electronics' return on equity of 7.28% beat Avnet's return on equity.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avnet has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Avnet has higher revenue and earnings than Benchmark Electronics. Avnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Benchmark Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Benchmark Electronics had 14 more articles in the media than Avnet. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Benchmark Electronics and 6 mentions for Avnet. Avnet's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Benchmark Electronics' score of 0.72 indicating that Avnet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Benchmark Electronics pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Avnet pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Benchmark Electronics pays out 46.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avnet pays out 54.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Benchmark Electronics has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Avnet has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Avnet is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Cohu had 7 more articles in the media than Benchmark Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Cohu and 20 mentions for Benchmark Electronics. Cohu's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Benchmark Electronics' score of 0.72 indicating that Cohu is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Benchmark Electronics has a net margin of 1.89% compared to Cohu's net margin of -7.43%. Benchmark Electronics' return on equity of 7.28% beat Cohu's return on equity.

Benchmark Electronics has higher revenue and earnings than Cohu. Cohu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Benchmark Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

94.7% of Cohu shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Benchmark Electronics shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Cohu shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Benchmark Electronics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cohu currently has a consensus target price of $68.75, suggesting a potential upside of 43.26%. Benchmark Electronics has a consensus target price of $91.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.16%. Given Cohu's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cohu is more favorable than Benchmark Electronics.

Cohu has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flex has a beta of 1.68, meaning that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market.

Benchmark Electronics presently has a consensus target price of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.16%. Flex has a consensus target price of $114.20, indicating a potential upside of 0.40%. Given Benchmark Electronics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Benchmark Electronics is more favorable than Flex.

In the previous week, Flex had 17 more articles in the media than Benchmark Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Flex and 20 mentions for Benchmark Electronics. Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Benchmark Electronics' score of 0.72 indicating that Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Flex has higher revenue and earnings than Benchmark Electronics. Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Benchmark Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

92.3% of Benchmark Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.3% of Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Benchmark Electronics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Flex shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Flex has a net margin of 3.32% compared to Benchmark Electronics' net margin of 1.89%. Flex's return on equity of 23.15% beat Benchmark Electronics' return on equity.

In the previous week, Plexus had 4 more articles in the media than Benchmark Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Plexus and 20 mentions for Benchmark Electronics. Plexus' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Benchmark Electronics' score of 0.72 indicating that Plexus is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plexus has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

92.3% of Benchmark Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of Plexus shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Benchmark Electronics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Plexus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Benchmark Electronics presently has a consensus target price of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.16%. Plexus has a consensus target price of $273.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.62%. Given Benchmark Electronics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Benchmark Electronics is more favorable than Plexus.

Plexus has a net margin of 4.03% compared to Benchmark Electronics' net margin of 1.89%. Plexus' return on equity of 12.46% beat Benchmark Electronics' return on equity.

Plexus has higher revenue and earnings than Benchmark Electronics. Plexus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Benchmark Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.