Free Trial

Nano Dimension (NNDM) Competitors

Nano Dimension logo
$1.66 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.65 -0.01 (-0.72%)
As of 05/22/2026 07:58 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

NNDM vs. NSSC, JKS, DQ, CSIQ, and GILT

Should you buy Nano Dimension stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Nano Dimension with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Nano Dimension include NAPCO Security Technologies (NSSC), JinkoSolar (JKS), DAQO New Energy (DQ), Canadian Solar (CSIQ), and Gilat Satellite Networks (GILT). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Nano Dimension compare to NAPCO Security Technologies?

NAPCO Security Technologies (NASDAQ:NSSC) and Nano Dimension (NASDAQ:NNDM) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

NAPCO Security Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Nano Dimension. Nano Dimension is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NAPCO Security Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NAPCO Security Technologies$181.62M7.36$43.41M$1.0435.97
Nano Dimension$102.44M3.39-$293.30M-$0.44N/A

NAPCO Security Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $48.67, suggesting a potential upside of 30.09%. Given NAPCO Security Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe NAPCO Security Technologies is more favorable than Nano Dimension.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NAPCO Security Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Nano Dimension
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

NAPCO Security Technologies has a net margin of 18.70% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of -286.72%. NAPCO Security Technologies' return on equity of 28.93% beat Nano Dimension's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NAPCO Security Technologies18.70% 28.93% 24.39%
Nano Dimension -286.72%-22.07%-18.18%

85.1% of NAPCO Security Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.9% of Nano Dimension shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of NAPCO Security Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Nano Dimension shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, NAPCO Security Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Nano Dimension. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for NAPCO Security Technologies and 0 mentions for Nano Dimension. NAPCO Security Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Nano Dimension's score of 0.00 indicating that NAPCO Security Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
NAPCO Security Technologies Very Positive
Nano Dimension Neutral

NAPCO Security Technologies has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nano Dimension has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

NAPCO Security Technologies beats Nano Dimension on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nano Dimension compare to JinkoSolar?

Nano Dimension (NASDAQ:NNDM) and JinkoSolar (NYSE:JKS) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

33.9% of Nano Dimension shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of JinkoSolar shares are held by institutional investors. 13.1% of Nano Dimension shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of JinkoSolar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Nano Dimension has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JinkoSolar has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

JinkoSolar has a net margin of -5.62% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of -286.72%. JinkoSolar's return on equity of -9.52% beat Nano Dimension's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nano Dimension-286.72% -22.07% -18.18%
JinkoSolar -5.62%-9.52%-2.14%

In the previous week, JinkoSolar had 1 more articles in the media than Nano Dimension. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for JinkoSolar and 0 mentions for Nano Dimension. JinkoSolar's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Nano Dimension's score of 0.00 indicating that JinkoSolar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nano Dimension Neutral
JinkoSolar Neutral

Nano Dimension has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JinkoSolar. Nano Dimension is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JinkoSolar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nano Dimension$102.44M3.39-$293.30M-$0.44N/A
JinkoSolar$9.37B0.13-$635.64M-$9.74N/A

JinkoSolar has a consensus price target of $24.13, suggesting a potential upside of 5.69%. Given JinkoSolar's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe JinkoSolar is more favorable than Nano Dimension.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nano Dimension
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
JinkoSolar
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14

Summary

JinkoSolar beats Nano Dimension on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nano Dimension compare to DAQO New Energy?

DAQO New Energy (NYSE:DQ) and Nano Dimension (NASDAQ:NNDM) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and dividends.

DAQO New Energy has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nano Dimension has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

DAQO New Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Nano Dimension. DAQO New Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nano Dimension, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DAQO New Energy$665.41M1.81-$170.51M-$2.78N/A
Nano Dimension$102.44M3.39-$293.30M-$0.44N/A

In the previous week, DAQO New Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Nano Dimension. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for DAQO New Energy and 0 mentions for Nano Dimension. DAQO New Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Nano Dimension's score of 0.00 indicating that DAQO New Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
DAQO New Energy Positive
Nano Dimension Neutral

DAQO New Energy has a net margin of -32.92% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of -286.72%. DAQO New Energy's return on equity of -3.19% beat Nano Dimension's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DAQO New Energy-32.92% -3.19% -2.94%
Nano Dimension -286.72%-22.07%-18.18%

DAQO New Energy presently has a consensus target price of $23.59, suggesting a potential upside of 32.67%. Given DAQO New Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe DAQO New Energy is more favorable than Nano Dimension.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DAQO New Energy
3 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Nano Dimension
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

47.2% of DAQO New Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.9% of Nano Dimension shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.3% of DAQO New Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Nano Dimension shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

DAQO New Energy beats Nano Dimension on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nano Dimension compare to Canadian Solar?

Nano Dimension (NASDAQ:NNDM) and Canadian Solar (NASDAQ:CSIQ) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Canadian Solar has a consensus price target of $18.36, indicating a potential downside of 2.73%. Given Canadian Solar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Canadian Solar is more favorable than Nano Dimension.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nano Dimension
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Canadian Solar
4 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.92

Canadian Solar has higher revenue and earnings than Nano Dimension. Canadian Solar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nano Dimension, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nano Dimension$102.44M3.39-$293.30M-$0.44N/A
Canadian Solar$5.60B0.23-$104.13M-$2.52N/A

In the previous week, Canadian Solar had 7 more articles in the media than Nano Dimension. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Canadian Solar and 0 mentions for Nano Dimension. Canadian Solar's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Nano Dimension's score of 0.00 indicating that Canadian Solar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nano Dimension Neutral
Canadian Solar Neutral

Canadian Solar has a net margin of -1.87% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of -286.72%. Canadian Solar's return on equity of -4.20% beat Nano Dimension's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nano Dimension-286.72% -22.07% -18.18%
Canadian Solar -1.87%-4.20%-1.10%

Nano Dimension has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canadian Solar has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

33.9% of Nano Dimension shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.4% of Canadian Solar shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.1% of Nano Dimension shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.5% of Canadian Solar shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Canadian Solar beats Nano Dimension on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nano Dimension compare to Gilat Satellite Networks?

Gilat Satellite Networks (NASDAQ:GILT) and Nano Dimension (NASDAQ:NNDM) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Gilat Satellite Networks has a net margin of 6.80% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of -286.72%. Gilat Satellite Networks' return on equity of 11.65% beat Nano Dimension's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gilat Satellite Networks6.80% 11.65% 7.37%
Nano Dimension -286.72%-22.07%-18.18%

35.7% of Gilat Satellite Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.9% of Nano Dimension shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Gilat Satellite Networks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Nano Dimension shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gilat Satellite Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Nano Dimension. Nano Dimension is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gilat Satellite Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gilat Satellite Networks$451.66M2.57$20.72M$0.5130.84
Nano Dimension$102.44M3.39-$293.30M-$0.44N/A

In the previous week, Gilat Satellite Networks had 3 more articles in the media than Nano Dimension. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Gilat Satellite Networks and 0 mentions for Nano Dimension. Gilat Satellite Networks' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Nano Dimension's score of 0.00 indicating that Gilat Satellite Networks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gilat Satellite Networks Positive
Nano Dimension Neutral

Gilat Satellite Networks presently has a consensus target price of $20.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.15%. Given Gilat Satellite Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gilat Satellite Networks is more favorable than Nano Dimension.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gilat Satellite Networks
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Nano Dimension
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Gilat Satellite Networks has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nano Dimension has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gilat Satellite Networks beats Nano Dimension on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Nano Dimension News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NNDM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NNDM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NNDM vs. The Competition

MetricNano DimensionNanotechnology IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$347.29M$3.17B$39.37B$12.34B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A3.20%5.28%
P/E Ratio-3.7730.6179.1825.66
Price / Sales3.395.09626.4186.31
Price / CashN/A32.6548.7256.67
Price / Book0.724.0010.537.14
Net Income-$293.30M-$31.96M$1.07B$335.98M
7 Day Performance10.67%8.74%3.78%4.15%
1 Month Performance-7.78%-3.41%6.27%2.54%
1 Year Performance7.10%90.78%169.87%35.06%

Nano Dimension Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NNDM
Nano Dimension
0.2908 of 5 stars
$1.66
flat
N/A+7.1%$347.29M$102.44MN/A340
NSSC
NAPCO Security Technologies
4.4376 of 5 stars
$36.08
-0.4%
$48.67
+34.9%
+33.1%$1.29B$181.62M34.691,061
JKS
JinkoSolar
2.5435 of 5 stars
$23.66
-3.8%
$24.13
+2.0%
+24.6%$1.29B$9.37BN/A26,409
DQ
DAQO New Energy
2.717 of 5 stars
$17.29
-4.9%
$23.59
+36.4%
+29.2%$1.23B$665.41MN/A3,842
CSIQ
Canadian Solar
1.6284 of 5 stars
$17.18
-3.9%
$18.36
+6.9%
+92.7%$1.21B$5.60BN/A12,587

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:NNDM) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners