Nano Dimension Competitors

Nano Dimension (NASDAQ:NNDM) and Flex (NASDAQ:FLEX) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Nano Dimension and Flex's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Nano Dimension and Flex's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Flex has higher revenue and earnings than Nano Dimension.

Risk & Volatility

Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.73, meaning that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flex has a beta of 1.65, meaning that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Nano Dimension and Flex, as provided by MarketBeat.

Flex has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential downside of 10.34%. Given Flex's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Flex is more favorable than Nano Dimension.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

27.1% of Nano Dimension shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Flex shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Flex shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Flex beats Nano Dimension on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jabil (NYSE:JBL) and Nano Dimension (NASDAQ:NNDM) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Jabil has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its share price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Jabil and Nano Dimension's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.5% of Jabil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.1% of Nano Dimension shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Jabil shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Jabil and Nano Dimension's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Jabil has higher revenue and earnings than Nano Dimension.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Jabil and Nano Dimension, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Jabil presently has a consensus price target of $39.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 0.09%. Given Jabil's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Jabil is more favorable than Nano Dimension.

Summary

Jabil beats Nano Dimension on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) and Nano Dimension (NASDAQ:NNDM) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Plexus and Nano Dimension, as reported by MarketBeat.

Plexus currently has a consensus target price of $82.80, indicating a potential upside of 7.67%. Given Plexus' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Plexus is more favorable than Nano Dimension.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Plexus and Nano Dimension's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Plexus has higher revenue and earnings than Nano Dimension.

Profitability

This table compares Plexus and Nano Dimension's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Plexus has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

93.5% of Plexus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.1% of Nano Dimension shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of Plexus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Plexus beats Nano Dimension on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) and Nano Dimension (NASDAQ:NNDM) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

Sanmina has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Sanmina and Nano Dimension's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Sanmina and Nano Dimension, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sanmina presently has a consensus price target of $34.3333, indicating a potential upside of 4.67%. Given Sanmina's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Sanmina is more favorable than Nano Dimension.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Sanmina and Nano Dimension's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than Nano Dimension.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

92.8% of Sanmina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.1% of Nano Dimension shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Sanmina shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sanmina beats Nano Dimension on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nano Dimension (NASDAQ:NNDM) and TTM Technologies (NASDAQ:TTMI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nano Dimension and TTM Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

TTM Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Nano Dimension.

Volatility and Risk

Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.73, meaning that its share price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TTM Technologies has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its share price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

27.1% of Nano Dimension shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of TTM Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Nano Dimension and TTM Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Nano Dimension and TTM Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

TTM Technologies has a consensus target price of $14.60, indicating a potential upside of 10.19%. Given TTM Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TTM Technologies is more favorable than Nano Dimension.

Summary

TTM Technologies beats Nano Dimension on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nano Dimension (NASDAQ:NNDM) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Nano Dimension and Celestica's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

27.1% of Nano Dimension shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.7% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.73, meaning that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.44, meaning that its stock price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Nano Dimension and Celestica, as reported by MarketBeat.

Celestica has a consensus target price of $8.1750, indicating a potential upside of 3.22%. Given Celestica's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than Nano Dimension.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Nano Dimension and Celestica's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Nano Dimension.

Summary

Celestica beats Nano Dimension on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.