JinkoSolar (JKS) Competitors

In the previous week, Bel Fuse had 5 more articles in the media than JinkoSolar. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Bel Fuse and 0 mentions for JinkoSolar. Bel Fuse's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat JinkoSolar's score of 0.00 indicating that Bel Fuse is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Bel Fuse has a net margin of 7.21% compared to JinkoSolar's net margin of -5.62%. Bel Fuse's return on equity of 20.55% beat JinkoSolar's return on equity.

Bel Fuse currently has a consensus target price of $250.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.47%. JinkoSolar has a consensus target price of $24.38, indicating a potential upside of 43.47%. Given JinkoSolar's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe JinkoSolar is more favorable than Bel Fuse.

Bel Fuse has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JinkoSolar. JinkoSolar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bel Fuse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Bel Fuse pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. JinkoSolar pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. Bel Fuse pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JinkoSolar pays out -15.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Bel Fuse has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. JinkoSolar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Bel Fuse has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JinkoSolar has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

6.0% of Bel Fuse shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of JinkoSolar shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Bel Fuse shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of JinkoSolar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Intuitive Machines has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JinkoSolar. Intuitive Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JinkoSolar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Intuitive Machines has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JinkoSolar has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

72.2% of Intuitive Machines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of JinkoSolar shares are held by institutional investors. 54.1% of Intuitive Machines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of JinkoSolar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Intuitive Machines had 7 more articles in the media than JinkoSolar. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Intuitive Machines and 0 mentions for JinkoSolar. Intuitive Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat JinkoSolar's score of 0.00 indicating that Intuitive Machines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

JinkoSolar has a net margin of -5.62% compared to Intuitive Machines' net margin of -32.69%. Intuitive Machines' return on equity of 0.00% beat JinkoSolar's return on equity.

Intuitive Machines currently has a consensus price target of $33.31, suggesting a potential upside of 110.71%. JinkoSolar has a consensus price target of $24.38, suggesting a potential upside of 43.47%. Given Intuitive Machines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Intuitive Machines is more favorable than JinkoSolar.

35.8% of JinkoSolar shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Penguin Solutions shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of JinkoSolar shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Penguin Solutions had 4 more articles in the media than JinkoSolar. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Penguin Solutions and 0 mentions for JinkoSolar. Penguin Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat JinkoSolar's score of 0.00 indicating that Penguin Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Penguin Solutions presently has a consensus price target of $63.33, suggesting a potential upside of 11.68%. JinkoSolar has a consensus price target of $24.38, suggesting a potential upside of 43.47%. Given JinkoSolar's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe JinkoSolar is more favorable than Penguin Solutions.

Penguin Solutions has a net margin of 6.44% compared to JinkoSolar's net margin of -5.62%. Penguin Solutions' return on equity of 28.23% beat JinkoSolar's return on equity.

Penguin Solutions has a beta of 2.87, suggesting that its share price is 187% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JinkoSolar has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Penguin Solutions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JinkoSolar. JinkoSolar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Penguin Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Vistance Networks has a net margin of 247.69% compared to JinkoSolar's net margin of -5.62%. Vistance Networks' return on equity of 32.28% beat JinkoSolar's return on equity.

JinkoSolar has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vistance Networks has a beta of 2.36, indicating that its stock price is 136% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Vistance Networks had 11 more articles in the media than JinkoSolar. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Vistance Networks and 0 mentions for JinkoSolar. JinkoSolar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Vistance Networks' score of -0.17 indicating that JinkoSolar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Vistance Networks has lower revenue, but higher earnings than JinkoSolar. JinkoSolar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vistance Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

JinkoSolar presently has a consensus price target of $24.38, indicating a potential upside of 43.47%. Vistance Networks has a consensus price target of $19.33, indicating a potential upside of 74.10%. Given Vistance Networks' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vistance Networks is more favorable than JinkoSolar.

35.8% of JinkoSolar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.0% of Vistance Networks shares are held by institutional investors. 19.8% of JinkoSolar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of Vistance Networks shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.