JinkoSolar (JKS) Competitors

In the previous week, Impinj had 15 more articles in the media than JinkoSolar. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Impinj and 0 mentions for JinkoSolar. Impinj's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat JinkoSolar's score of -0.54 indicating that Impinj is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Impinj has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its share price is 91% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JinkoSolar has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Impinj has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JinkoSolar. Impinj is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JinkoSolar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

35.8% of JinkoSolar shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of Impinj shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of JinkoSolar shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Impinj currently has a consensus price target of $175.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.31%. JinkoSolar has a consensus price target of $24.38, suggesting a potential upside of 24.36%. Given Impinj's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Impinj is more favorable than JinkoSolar.

JinkoSolar has a net margin of -5.62% compared to Impinj's net margin of -7.66%. Impinj's return on equity of 5.67% beat JinkoSolar's return on equity.

Universal Display has a net margin of 34.08% compared to JinkoSolar's net margin of -5.62%. Universal Display's return on equity of 12.34% beat JinkoSolar's return on equity.

In the previous week, Universal Display had 5 more articles in the media than JinkoSolar. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Universal Display and 0 mentions for JinkoSolar. Universal Display's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat JinkoSolar's score of -0.54 indicating that Universal Display is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

JinkoSolar currently has a consensus target price of $24.38, indicating a potential upside of 24.36%. Universal Display has a consensus target price of $130.60, indicating a potential upside of 47.04%. Given Universal Display's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Universal Display is more favorable than JinkoSolar.

Universal Display has lower revenue, but higher earnings than JinkoSolar. JinkoSolar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Universal Display, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

JinkoSolar pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Universal Display pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. JinkoSolar pays out -13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Universal Display pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Universal Display has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. JinkoSolar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

35.8% of JinkoSolar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.2% of Universal Display shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.8% of JinkoSolar shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Universal Display shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

JinkoSolar has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Display has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

JinkoSolar has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, nLight has a beta of 2.31, suggesting that its stock price is 131% more volatile than the broader market.

35.8% of JinkoSolar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.9% of nLight shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.8% of JinkoSolar shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of nLight shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

nLight has a net margin of -5.08% compared to JinkoSolar's net margin of -5.62%. nLight's return on equity of -4.18% beat JinkoSolar's return on equity.

JinkoSolar presently has a consensus target price of $24.38, indicating a potential upside of 24.36%. nLight has a consensus target price of $69.06, indicating a potential upside of 3.43%. Given JinkoSolar's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe JinkoSolar is more favorable than nLight.

In the previous week, nLight had 20 more articles in the media than JinkoSolar. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for nLight and 0 mentions for JinkoSolar. nLight's average media sentiment score of -0.01 beat JinkoSolar's score of -0.54 indicating that nLight is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

nLight has lower revenue, but higher earnings than JinkoSolar. nLight is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JinkoSolar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Himax Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. JinkoSolar pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Himax Technologies pays out 180.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. JinkoSolar pays out -13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JinkoSolar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

69.8% of Himax Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of JinkoSolar shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.5% of Himax Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of JinkoSolar shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Himax Technologies has a net margin of 3.91% compared to JinkoSolar's net margin of -5.62%. Himax Technologies' return on equity of 3.57% beat JinkoSolar's return on equity.

Himax Technologies has a beta of 2.24, indicating that its share price is 124% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JinkoSolar has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Himax Technologies had 5 more articles in the media than JinkoSolar. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Himax Technologies and 0 mentions for JinkoSolar. Himax Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat JinkoSolar's score of -0.54 indicating that Himax Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Himax Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 60.65%. JinkoSolar has a consensus target price of $24.38, indicating a potential upside of 24.36%. Given JinkoSolar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe JinkoSolar is more favorable than Himax Technologies.

Himax Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JinkoSolar. JinkoSolar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himax Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.