Free Trial

Planet Labs PBC (PL) Competitors

Planet Labs PBC logo
$43.14 +2.40 (+5.90%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$43.09 -0.05 (-0.12%)
As of 04:08 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PL vs. CLS, ON, ERIC, GFS, and ALAB

Should you buy Planet Labs PBC stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Planet Labs PBC with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Planet Labs PBC include Celestica (CLS), onsemi (ON), Ericsson (ERIC), GlobalFoundries (GFS), and Astera Labs (ALAB). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Celestica?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celestica$13.79B3.19$832.50M$8.2746.22
Planet Labs PBC$307.73M48.53-$246.86M-$0.78N/A

In the previous week, Celestica and Celestica both had 13 articles in the media. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.92 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Celestica
11 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Planet Labs PBC
4 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Celestica presently has a consensus target price of $427.42, suggesting a potential upside of 11.83%. Planet Labs PBC has a consensus target price of $30.61, suggesting a potential downside of 29.05%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than Planet Labs PBC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
Planet Labs PBC
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -80.22%. Celestica's return on equity of 36.91% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica6.95% 36.91% 10.56%
Planet Labs PBC -80.22%-69.61%-27.38%

Celestica has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Celestica beats Planet Labs PBC on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to onsemi?

Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) and onsemi (NASDAQ:ON) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

onsemi has a net margin of 9.46% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -80.22%. onsemi's return on equity of 12.79% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Planet Labs PBC-80.22% -69.61% -27.38%
onsemi 9.46%12.79%7.80%

Planet Labs PBC currently has a consensus target price of $30.61, suggesting a potential downside of 29.05%. onsemi has a consensus target price of $88.81, suggesting a potential downside of 25.07%. Given onsemi's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe onsemi is more favorable than Planet Labs PBC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Planet Labs PBC
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
onsemi
1 Sell rating(s)
15 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.48

41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of onsemi shares are held by institutional investors. 17.5% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of onsemi shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

onsemi has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than onsemi, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Planet Labs PBC$307.73M48.53-$246.86M-$0.78N/A
onsemi$6.06B7.66$121M$1.4184.06

In the previous week, onsemi had 367 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 380 mentions for onsemi and 13 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. onsemi's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.92 indicating that onsemi is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Planet Labs PBC
4 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
onsemi
223 Very Positive mention(s)
59 Positive mention(s)
45 Neutral mention(s)
31 Negative mention(s)
19 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 1.91, indicating that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, onsemi has a beta of 1.94, indicating that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

onsemi beats Planet Labs PBC on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Ericsson?

Ericsson (NASDAQ:ERIC) and Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Ericsson has a net margin of 10.80% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -80.22%. Ericsson's return on equity of 22.17% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ericsson10.80% 22.17% 7.93%
Planet Labs PBC -80.22%-69.61%-27.38%

In the previous week, Planet Labs PBC had 2 more articles in the media than Ericsson. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Planet Labs PBC and 11 mentions for Ericsson. Planet Labs PBC's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Ericsson's score of 0.49 indicating that Planet Labs PBC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ericsson
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Planet Labs PBC
4 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ericsson has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ericsson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ericsson$24.19B1.76$2.91B$0.7916.03
Planet Labs PBC$307.73M48.53-$246.86M-$0.78N/A

Ericsson currently has a consensus target price of $11.00, suggesting a potential downside of 13.15%. Planet Labs PBC has a consensus target price of $30.61, suggesting a potential downside of 29.05%. Given Ericsson's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ericsson is more favorable than Planet Labs PBC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ericsson
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89
Planet Labs PBC
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

8.0% of Ericsson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by institutional investors. 17.5% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ericsson has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its share price is 91% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ericsson and Planet Labs PBC tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to GlobalFoundries?

Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) and GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ:GFS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

GlobalFoundries has a net margin of 11.40% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -80.22%. GlobalFoundries' return on equity of 6.85% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Planet Labs PBC-80.22% -69.61% -27.38%
GlobalFoundries 11.40%6.85%4.76%

In the previous week, Planet Labs PBC had 4 more articles in the media than GlobalFoundries. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Planet Labs PBC and 9 mentions for GlobalFoundries. Planet Labs PBC's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat GlobalFoundries' score of 0.70 indicating that Planet Labs PBC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Planet Labs PBC
4 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GlobalFoundries
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Planet Labs PBC presently has a consensus target price of $30.61, indicating a potential downside of 29.05%. GlobalFoundries has a consensus target price of $67.53, indicating a potential downside of 8.53%. Given GlobalFoundries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GlobalFoundries is more favorable than Planet Labs PBC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Planet Labs PBC
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
GlobalFoundries
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.35

41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.5% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

GlobalFoundries has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GlobalFoundries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Planet Labs PBC$307.73M48.53-$246.86M-$0.78N/A
GlobalFoundries$6.79B6.05$885M$1.3953.11

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 1.91, indicating that its share price is 91% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GlobalFoundries has a beta of 1.71, indicating that its share price is 71% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

GlobalFoundries beats Planet Labs PBC on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Astera Labs?

Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) and Astera Labs (NASDAQ:ALAB) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Astera Labs has a net margin of 26.72% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -80.22%. Astera Labs' return on equity of 18.49% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Planet Labs PBC-80.22% -69.61% -27.38%
Astera Labs 26.72%18.49%16.60%

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Astera Labs has a beta of 3.35, suggesting that its stock price is 235% more volatile than the broader market.

41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.5% of Astera Labs shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.5% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.5% of Astera Labs shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Planet Labs PBC presently has a consensus target price of $30.61, indicating a potential downside of 29.05%. Astera Labs has a consensus target price of $229.65, indicating a potential upside of 0.41%. Given Astera Labs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Astera Labs is more favorable than Planet Labs PBC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Planet Labs PBC
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Astera Labs
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Astera Labs has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Astera Labs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Planet Labs PBC$307.73M48.53-$246.86M-$0.78N/A
Astera Labs$1.00B39.15$219.13M$1.48154.54

In the previous week, Astera Labs had 31 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 44 mentions for Astera Labs and 13 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Astera Labs' score of 0.56 indicating that Planet Labs PBC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Planet Labs PBC
4 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Astera Labs
14 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Astera Labs beats Planet Labs PBC on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Planet Labs PBC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PL vs. The Competition

MetricPlanet Labs PBCSatellite Communication IndustryComputer SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$15.03B$8.21B$39.48B$23.00B
Dividend YieldN/A1.39%3.20%4.07%
P/E Ratio-55.6531.00163.7928.39
Price / Sales48.5318.75623.3639.21
Price / CashN/A42.4247.8225.11
Price / Book77.0418.589.574.76
Net Income-$246.86M-$1.61B$1.03B$1.06B
7 Day Performance22.33%6.98%0.36%-0.74%
1 Month Performance27.12%12.82%9.57%1.74%
1 Year Performance1,006.23%236.23%164.76%25.05%

Planet Labs PBC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PL
Planet Labs PBC
2.3438 of 5 stars
$43.14
+5.9%
$30.61
-29.1%
+978.8%$15.03B$307.73MN/A800
CLS
Celestica
4.834 of 5 stars
$422.39
+0.4%
$427.42
+1.2%
+238.7%$48.36B$13.79B50.8629,591
ON
onsemi
3.9755 of 5 stars
$102.66
+0.6%
$78.31
-23.7%
+152.8%$40.50B$6.00B302.8222,670
ERIC
Ericsson
1.5946 of 5 stars
$11.94
+2.6%
$11.00
-7.8%
+48.3%$40.23B$24.19B15.1188,826
GFS
GlobalFoundries
3.393 of 5 stars
$70.46
+4.0%
$50.12
-28.9%
+88.9%$39.38B$6.79B44.5114,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PL) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners