Does the media refer more to PL or STM?

In the previous week, STMicroelectronics had 11 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for STMicroelectronics and 16 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. STMicroelectronics' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.34 indicating that STMicroelectronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Planet Labs PBC 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral STMicroelectronics 11 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor LHX or PL?

In the previous week, Planet Labs PBC had 3 more articles in the media than L3Harris Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Planet Labs PBC and 13 mentions for L3Harris Technologies. L3Harris Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.34 indicating that L3Harris Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment L3Harris Technologies 10 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Planet Labs PBC 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ALAB or PL?

Astera Labs has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Astera Labs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Astera Labs $852.53M 73.09 $219.13M $1.48 245.64 Planet Labs PBC $307.73M 48.53 -$246.86M -$0.78 N/A

Is ALAB or PL more profitable?

Astera Labs has a net margin of 26.72% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -80.22%. Astera Labs' return on equity of 18.49% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Astera Labs 26.72% 18.49% 16.60% Planet Labs PBC -80.22% -69.61% -27.38%

Does the media prefer ALAB or PL?

In the previous week, Astera Labs had 7 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Astera Labs and 16 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. Astera Labs' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.34 indicating that Astera Labs is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Astera Labs 17 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Planet Labs PBC 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer UMC or PL?

In the previous week, Planet Labs PBC had 10 more articles in the media than United Microelectronics. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Planet Labs PBC and 6 mentions for United Microelectronics. United Microelectronics' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.34 indicating that United Microelectronics is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment United Microelectronics 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Planet Labs PBC 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PL or FLEX?

Flex has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Planet Labs PBC $307.73M 48.53 -$246.86M -$0.78 N/A Flex $27.91B 2.13 $880M $2.33 69.50

Is PL or FLEX more profitable?

Flex has a net margin of 3.15% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -80.22%. Flex's return on equity of 22.12% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Planet Labs PBC -80.22% -69.61% -27.38% Flex 3.15% 22.12% 5.53%

Does the media favor PL or FLEX?

In the previous week, Flex had 5 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Flex and 16 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. Flex's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.34 indicating that Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Planet Labs PBC 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Flex 16 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Planet Labs PBC (PL) Competitors

$43.14 -4.95 (-10.29%)

Closing price 03:58 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$42.94 -0.20 (-0.45%)

As of 07:59 PM Eastern

Compare

PL vs. STM, LHX, ALAB, UMC, and FLEX

Should you buy Planet Labs PBC stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Planet Labs PBC with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Planet Labs PBC include STMicroelectronics (STM), L3Harris Technologies (LHX), Astera Labs (ALAB), United Microelectronics (UMC), and Flex (FLEX). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to STMicroelectronics?

Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) and STMicroelectronics (NYSE:STM) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

Planet Labs PBC currently has a consensus target price of $30.61, indicating a potential downside of 29.05%. STMicroelectronics has a consensus target price of $57.81, indicating a potential downside of 27.59%. Given STMicroelectronics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe STMicroelectronics is more favorable than Planet Labs PBC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Planet Labs PBC	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
STMicroelectronics	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64

41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of STMicroelectronics shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 1.99, indicating that its share price is 99% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, STMicroelectronics has a beta of 1.94, indicating that its share price is 94% more volatile than the broader market.

STMicroelectronics has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than STMicroelectronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Planet Labs PBC	$307.73M	48.53	-$246.86M	-$0.78	N/A
STMicroelectronics	$11.80B	6.08	$166M	$0.16	498.99

STMicroelectronics has a net margin of 1.19% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -80.22%. STMicroelectronics' return on equity of 3.01% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Planet Labs PBC	-80.22%	-69.61%	-27.38%
STMicroelectronics	1.19%	3.01%	2.18%

In the previous week, STMicroelectronics had 11 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for STMicroelectronics and 16 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. STMicroelectronics' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.34 indicating that STMicroelectronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Planet Labs PBC	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
STMicroelectronics	11 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

STMicroelectronics beats Planet Labs PBC on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to L3Harris Technologies?

L3Harris Technologies (NYSE:LHX) and Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) are both large-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the broader market.

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -80.22%. L3Harris Technologies' return on equity of 10.65% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
L3Harris Technologies	7.71%	10.65%	5.05%
Planet Labs PBC	-80.22%	-69.61%	-27.38%

84.8% of L3Harris Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of L3Harris Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.4% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Planet Labs PBC had 3 more articles in the media than L3Harris Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Planet Labs PBC and 13 mentions for L3Harris Technologies. L3Harris Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.34 indicating that L3Harris Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
L3Harris Technologies	10 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Planet Labs PBC	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

L3Harris Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L3Harris Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
L3Harris Technologies	$21.87B	2.59	$1.61B	$9.21	32.98
Planet Labs PBC	$307.73M	48.53	-$246.86M	-$0.78	N/A

L3Harris Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $354.75, indicating a potential upside of 16.78%. Planet Labs PBC has a consensus price target of $30.61, indicating a potential downside of 29.05%. Given L3Harris Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe L3Harris Technologies is more favorable than Planet Labs PBC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
L3Harris Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Planet Labs PBC	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Summary

L3Harris Technologies beats Planet Labs PBC on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Astera Labs?

Astera Labs (NASDAQ:ALAB) and Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Astera Labs had 7 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Astera Labs and 16 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. Astera Labs' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.34 indicating that Astera Labs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Astera Labs	17 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Planet Labs PBC	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Astera Labs has a beta of 3.95, meaning that its stock price is 295% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 1.99, meaning that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the broader market.

Astera Labs has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Astera Labs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Astera Labs	$852.53M	73.09	$219.13M	$1.48	245.64
Planet Labs PBC	$307.73M	48.53	-$246.86M	-$0.78	N/A

60.5% of Astera Labs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by institutional investors. 10.4% of Astera Labs shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.4% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Astera Labs presently has a consensus target price of $233.75, suggesting a potential downside of 35.70%. Planet Labs PBC has a consensus target price of $30.61, suggesting a potential downside of 29.05%. Given Planet Labs PBC's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Planet Labs PBC is more favorable than Astera Labs.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Astera Labs	0 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.52
Planet Labs PBC	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Astera Labs has a net margin of 26.72% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -80.22%. Astera Labs' return on equity of 18.49% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Astera Labs	26.72%	18.49%	16.60%
Planet Labs PBC	-80.22%	-69.61%	-27.38%

Summary

Astera Labs beats Planet Labs PBC on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to United Microelectronics?

United Microelectronics (NYSE:UMC) and Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

United Microelectronics presently has a consensus target price of $8.60, indicating a potential downside of 59.84%. Planet Labs PBC has a consensus target price of $30.61, indicating a potential downside of 29.05%. Given Planet Labs PBC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Planet Labs PBC is more favorable than United Microelectronics.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
United Microelectronics	3 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.25
Planet Labs PBC	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

5.1% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.4% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 1.99, meaning that its share price is 99% more volatile than the broader market.

United Microelectronics has a net margin of 20.71% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -80.22%. United Microelectronics' return on equity of 13.67% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
United Microelectronics	20.71%	13.67%	8.85%
Planet Labs PBC	-80.22%	-69.61%	-27.38%

United Microelectronics has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Microelectronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
United Microelectronics	$7.57B	7.13	$1.29B	$0.65	32.94
Planet Labs PBC	$307.73M	48.53	-$246.86M	-$0.78	N/A

In the previous week, Planet Labs PBC had 10 more articles in the media than United Microelectronics. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Planet Labs PBC and 6 mentions for United Microelectronics. United Microelectronics' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.34 indicating that United Microelectronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
United Microelectronics	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Planet Labs PBC	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

United Microelectronics and Planet Labs PBC tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Flex?

Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) and Flex (NASDAQ:FLEX) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Planet Labs PBC presently has a consensus price target of $30.61, suggesting a potential downside of 29.05%. Flex has a consensus price target of $112.80, suggesting a potential downside of 30.34%. Given Planet Labs PBC's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Planet Labs PBC is more favorable than Flex.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Planet Labs PBC	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Flex	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 1.99, meaning that its share price is 99% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flex has a beta of 1.64, meaning that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Flex has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Planet Labs PBC	$307.73M	48.53	-$246.86M	-$0.78	N/A
Flex	$27.91B	2.13	$880M	$2.33	69.50

Flex has a net margin of 3.15% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -80.22%. Flex's return on equity of 22.12% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Planet Labs PBC	-80.22%	-69.61%	-27.38%
Flex	3.15%	22.12%	5.53%

41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.3% of Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Flex shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Flex had 5 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Flex and 16 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. Flex's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.34 indicating that Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Planet Labs PBC	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Flex	16 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Flex beats Planet Labs PBC on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Planet Labs PBC News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Planet Labs PBC	Satellite Communication Industry	Computer Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$16.65B	$8.25B	$41.29B	$23.28B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.21%	3.06%	4.06%
P/E Ratio	-55.31	26.62	173.02	31.00
Price / Sales	48.53	18.30	622.02	23.82
Price / Cash	N/A	42.76	53.03	24.93
Price / Book	77.04	18.16	10.09	4.67
Net Income	-$246.86M	-$1.61B	$1.06B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-14.31%	-11.23%	3.81%	-0.67%
1 Month Performance	17.08%	6.99%	10.98%	0.22%
1 Year Performance	1,021.68%	260.81%	170.16%	25.44%

Planet Labs PBC Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PL Planet Labs PBC	1.7325 of 5 stars	$43.14 -10.3%	$30.61 -29.0%	+1,165.2%	$16.65B	$307.73M	N/A	800	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings Analyst Downgrade
STM STMicroelectronics	2.5894 of 5 stars	$69.69 +4.2%	$51.93 -25.5%	+217.6%	$62.59B	$11.80B	435.59	49,157	Trending News Analyst Forecast Options Volume
LHX L3Harris Technologies	4.8923 of 5 stars	$310.97 -0.3%	$354.75 +14.1%	+26.7%	$57.93B	$21.87B	33.76	45,000	Positive News
ALAB Astera Labs	3.4344 of 5 stars	$311.41 +1.5%	$233.75 -24.9%	+282.9%	$53.38B	$852.53M	210.41	225	Positive News Gap Up
UMC United Microelectronics	3.0161 of 5 stars	$21.03 +15.4%	$8.60 -59.1%	+190.2%	$52.95B	$7.57B	32.35	19,097	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PL) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Planet Labs PBC (PL) Competitors

PL vs. STM, LHX, ALAB, UMC, and FLEX

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to STMicroelectronics?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to L3Harris Technologies?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Astera Labs?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to United Microelectronics?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Flex?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PL vs. The Competition

Planet Labs PBC Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Planet Labs PBC (PL) Competitors

PL vs. STM, LHX, ALAB, UMC, and FLEX

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to STMicroelectronics?

Do analysts prefer PL or STM?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PL or STM?

Which has more risk & volatility, PL or STM?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, PL or STM?

Is PL or STM more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PL or STM?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to L3Harris Technologies?

Which has more risk & volatility, LHX or PL?

Is LHX or PL more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in LHX or PL?

Does the media favor LHX or PL?

Which has better valuation & earnings, LHX or PL?

Do analysts recommend LHX or PL?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Astera Labs?

Does the media prefer ALAB or PL?

Which has more volatility & risk, ALAB or PL?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ALAB or PL?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in ALAB or PL?

Do analysts recommend ALAB or PL?

Is ALAB or PL more profitable?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to United Microelectronics?

Do analysts recommend UMC or PL?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in UMC or PL?

Which has more volatility and risk, UMC or PL?

Is UMC or PL more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, UMC or PL?

Does the media prefer UMC or PL?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Flex?

Do analysts rate PL or FLEX?

Which has more volatility and risk, PL or FLEX?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PL or FLEX?

Is PL or FLEX more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PL or FLEX?

Does the media favor PL or FLEX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PL vs. The Competition

Planet Labs PBC Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools