Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CLS or PL?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica $12.39B 3.20 $832.50M $8.27 41.74 Planet Labs PBC $307.73M 30.11 -$246.86M -$1.14 N/A

Does the media favor CLS or PL?

In the previous week, Celestica had 4 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Celestica and 14 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.19 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 11 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Planet Labs PBC 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation and earnings, CBRS or PL?

Cerebras Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cerebras Systems $603.89M 76.76 N/A N/A N/A Planet Labs PBC $307.73M 30.11 -$246.86M -$1.14 N/A

Does the media prefer CBRS or PL?

In the previous week, Cerebras Systems had 8 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Cerebras Systems and 14 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. Cerebras Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.19 indicating that Cerebras Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cerebras Systems 5 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 13 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Planet Labs PBC 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher valuation & earnings, ERIC or PL?

Ericsson has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ericsson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ericsson $24.19B 1.63 $2.91B $0.79 14.84 Planet Labs PBC $307.73M 30.11 -$246.86M -$1.14 N/A

Is ERIC or PL more profitable?

Ericsson has a net margin of 10.80% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -111.17%. Ericsson's return on equity of 22.17% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ericsson 10.80% 22.17% 7.93% Planet Labs PBC -111.17% -105.29% -35.54%

Does the media refer more to ERIC or PL?

In the previous week, Planet Labs PBC had 6 more articles in the media than Ericsson. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Planet Labs PBC and 8 mentions for Ericsson. Planet Labs PBC's average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Ericsson's score of 0.11 indicating that Planet Labs PBC is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ericsson 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Planet Labs PBC 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer PL or GFS?

In the previous week, GlobalFoundries had 5 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for GlobalFoundries and 14 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. GlobalFoundries' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.19 indicating that GlobalFoundries is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Planet Labs PBC 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral GlobalFoundries 7 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, ON or PL?

onsemi has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than onsemi, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio onsemi $6.00B 5.91 $121M $1.41 64.09 Planet Labs PBC $307.73M 30.11 -$246.86M -$1.14 N/A

Is ON or PL more profitable?

onsemi has a net margin of 9.46% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -111.17%. onsemi's return on equity of 12.79% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets onsemi 9.46% 12.79% 7.80% Planet Labs PBC -111.17% -105.29% -35.54%

Does the media favor ON or PL?

In the previous week, onsemi had 322 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 336 mentions for onsemi and 14 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. onsemi's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.19 indicating that onsemi is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment onsemi 194 Very Positive mention(s) 49 Positive mention(s) 38 Neutral mention(s) 38 Negative mention(s) 14 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Planet Labs PBC 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Planet Labs PBC (PL) Competitors

$26.00 -0.05 (-0.21%)

Closing price 07/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$25.85 -0.15 (-0.57%)

As of 04:00 AM Eastern

Compare

PL vs. CLS, CBRS, ERIC, GFS, and ON

Should you buy Planet Labs PBC stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Planet Labs PBC with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Planet Labs PBC include Celestica (CLS), Cerebras Systems (CBRS), Ericsson (ERIC), GlobalFoundries (GFS), and onsemi (ON). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Celestica?

Celestica (NYSE:CLS) and Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -111.17%. Celestica's return on equity of 36.91% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	6.95%	36.91%	10.56%
Planet Labs PBC	-111.17%	-105.29%	-35.54%

Celestica has a beta of 2.05, meaning that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 2.06, meaning that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	$12.39B	3.20	$832.50M	$8.27	41.74
Planet Labs PBC	$307.73M	30.11	-$246.86M	-$1.14	N/A

In the previous week, Celestica had 4 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Celestica and 14 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.19 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	11 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Planet Labs PBC	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

67.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.4% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Celestica presently has a consensus target price of $427.42, indicating a potential upside of 23.82%. Planet Labs PBC has a consensus target price of $35.11, indicating a potential upside of 35.05%. Given Planet Labs PBC's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Planet Labs PBC is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Planet Labs PBC	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

Celestica beats Planet Labs PBC on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Cerebras Systems?

Cerebras Systems (NASDAQ:CBRS) and Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) are both electronic equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Cerebras Systems currently has a consensus price target of $299.30, indicating a potential upside of 46.27%. Planet Labs PBC has a consensus price target of $35.11, indicating a potential upside of 35.05%. Given Cerebras Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Cerebras Systems is more favorable than Planet Labs PBC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cerebras Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Planet Labs PBC	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, Cerebras Systems had 8 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Cerebras Systems and 14 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. Cerebras Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.19 indicating that Cerebras Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cerebras Systems	5 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	13 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Planet Labs PBC	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by institutional investors. 16.4% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cerebras Systems has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -111.17%. Cerebras Systems' return on equity of 0.00% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cerebras Systems	N/A	N/A	N/A
Planet Labs PBC	-111.17%	-105.29%	-35.54%

Cerebras Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cerebras Systems	$603.89M	76.76	N/A	N/A	N/A
Planet Labs PBC	$307.73M	30.11	-$246.86M	-$1.14	N/A

Summary

Cerebras Systems beats Planet Labs PBC on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Ericsson?

Ericsson (NASDAQ:ERIC) and Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Ericsson has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ericsson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ericsson	$24.19B	1.63	$2.91B	$0.79	14.84
Planet Labs PBC	$307.73M	30.11	-$246.86M	-$1.14	N/A

In the previous week, Planet Labs PBC had 6 more articles in the media than Ericsson. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Planet Labs PBC and 8 mentions for Ericsson. Planet Labs PBC's average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Ericsson's score of 0.11 indicating that Planet Labs PBC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ericsson	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Planet Labs PBC	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

8.0% of Ericsson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by institutional investors. 16.4% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ericsson has a net margin of 10.80% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -111.17%. Ericsson's return on equity of 22.17% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ericsson	10.80%	22.17%	7.93%
Planet Labs PBC	-111.17%	-105.29%	-35.54%

Ericsson presently has a consensus target price of $11.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.14%. Planet Labs PBC has a consensus target price of $35.11, indicating a potential upside of 35.05%. Given Planet Labs PBC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Planet Labs PBC is more favorable than Ericsson.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ericsson	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.89
Planet Labs PBC	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Ericsson has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 2.06, indicating that its share price is 106% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Planet Labs PBC beats Ericsson on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to GlobalFoundries?

Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) and GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ:GFS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, GlobalFoundries had 5 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for GlobalFoundries and 14 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. GlobalFoundries' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.19 indicating that GlobalFoundries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Planet Labs PBC	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
GlobalFoundries	7 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Planet Labs PBC presently has a consensus price target of $35.11, indicating a potential upside of 35.05%. GlobalFoundries has a consensus price target of $74.63, indicating a potential upside of 16.71%. Given Planet Labs PBC's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Planet Labs PBC is more favorable than GlobalFoundries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Planet Labs PBC	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
GlobalFoundries	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.47

41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 2.06, suggesting that its share price is 106% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GlobalFoundries has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its share price is 76% more volatile than the broader market.

GlobalFoundries has a net margin of 11.40% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -111.17%. GlobalFoundries' return on equity of 6.85% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Planet Labs PBC	-111.17%	-105.29%	-35.54%
GlobalFoundries	11.40%	6.85%	4.76%

GlobalFoundries has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GlobalFoundries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Planet Labs PBC	$307.73M	30.11	-$246.86M	-$1.14	N/A
GlobalFoundries	$6.79B	5.17	$885M	$1.39	46.00

Summary

GlobalFoundries beats Planet Labs PBC on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to onsemi?

onsemi (NASDAQ:ON) and Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

onsemi has a beta of 2.01, suggesting that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 2.06, suggesting that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the broader market.

onsemi presently has a consensus price target of $102.64, suggesting a potential upside of 13.58%. Planet Labs PBC has a consensus price target of $35.11, suggesting a potential upside of 35.05%. Given Planet Labs PBC's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Planet Labs PBC is more favorable than onsemi.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
onsemi	1 Sell rating(s)	14 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.45
Planet Labs PBC	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

onsemi has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than onsemi, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
onsemi	$6.00B	5.91	$121M	$1.41	64.09
Planet Labs PBC	$307.73M	30.11	-$246.86M	-$1.14	N/A

onsemi has a net margin of 9.46% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -111.17%. onsemi's return on equity of 12.79% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
onsemi	9.46%	12.79%	7.80%
Planet Labs PBC	-111.17%	-105.29%	-35.54%

97.7% of onsemi shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of onsemi shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.4% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, onsemi had 322 more articles in the media than Planet Labs PBC. MarketBeat recorded 336 mentions for onsemi and 14 mentions for Planet Labs PBC. onsemi's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.19 indicating that onsemi is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
onsemi	194 Very Positive mention(s)	49 Positive mention(s)	38 Neutral mention(s)	38 Negative mention(s)	14 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Planet Labs PBC	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

onsemi beats Planet Labs PBC on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Planet Labs PBC News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Planet Labs PBC	Satellite Communication Industry	Computer Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$9.28B	$5.96B	$39.25B	$23.46B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.20%	3.19%	4.02%
P/E Ratio	-22.80	17.93	170.03	31.08
Price / Sales	30.11	13.18	597.79	19.77
Price / Cash	N/A	35.81	45.82	18.64
Price / Book	46.42	13.06	9.49	4.77
Net Income	-$246.86M	-$1.61B	$1.07B	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	-9.44%	-5.83%	-0.51%	-0.23%
1 Month Performance	-16.58%	-12.43%	-1.38%	-0.11%
1 Year Performance	320.92%	93.23%	140.11%	16.46%

Planet Labs PBC Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PL Planet Labs PBC	3.676 of 5 stars	$26.00 -0.2%	$35.11 +35.1%	+323.4%	$9.28B	$307.73M	N/A	800	Insider Trade
CLS Celestica	4.9551 of 5 stars	$347.37 -0.8%	$427.42 +23.0%	+114.3%	$39.83B	$12.39B	41.90	29,591	Gap Down
CBRS Cerebras Systems	4.1761 of 5 stars	$179.91 -6.3%	$299.30 +66.4%	N/A	$38.63B	$603.89M	N/A	708	Gap Down
ERIC Ericsson	1.6312 of 5 stars	$10.86 -0.3%	$11.00 +1.3%	+45.8%	$36.56B	$24.19B	13.73	88,826
GFS GlobalFoundries	4.2821 of 5 stars	$65.76 -4.6%	$74.63 +13.5%	+55.1%	$36.07B	$6.79B	47.29	14,000	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PL) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Planet Labs PBC (PL) Competitors

PL vs. CLS, CBRS, ERIC, GFS, and ON

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Celestica?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Cerebras Systems?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Ericsson?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to GlobalFoundries?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to onsemi?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PL vs. The Competition

Planet Labs PBC Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Planet Labs PBC (PL) Competitors

PL vs. CLS, CBRS, ERIC, GFS, and ON

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Celestica?

Is CLS or PL more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, CLS or PL?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CLS or PL?

Does the media favor CLS or PL?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in CLS or PL?

Do analysts recommend CLS or PL?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Cerebras Systems?

Do analysts prefer CBRS or PL?

Does the media prefer CBRS or PL?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CBRS or PL?

Is CBRS or PL more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CBRS or PL?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to Ericsson?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, ERIC or PL?

Does the media refer more to ERIC or PL?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in ERIC or PL?

Is ERIC or PL more profitable?

Do analysts prefer ERIC or PL?

Which has more volatility & risk, ERIC or PL?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to GlobalFoundries?

Does the media prefer PL or GFS?

Do analysts prefer PL or GFS?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in PL or GFS?

Which has more volatility and risk, PL or GFS?

Is PL or GFS more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, PL or GFS?

Summary

How does Planet Labs PBC compare to onsemi?

Which has more volatility & risk, ON or PL?

Do analysts prefer ON or PL?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, ON or PL?

Is ON or PL more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ON or PL?

Does the media favor ON or PL?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PL vs. The Competition

Planet Labs PBC Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools