S&P 500   3,441.77 (-0.04%)
DOW   28,264.05 (-0.16%)
QQQ   284.85 (+0.15%)
AAPL   117.26 (-0.21%)
MSFT   213.85 (-0.37%)
FB   279.60 (+4.50%)
GOOGL   1,573.00 (+2.81%)
AMZN   3,216.00 (-0.03%)
TSLA   421.20 (-0.18%)
NVDA   542.11 (-0.68%)
BABA   311.20 (+0.45%)
CGC   19.10 (+1.17%)
GE   7.29 (-0.68%)
MU   53.32 (-0.39%)
AMD   81.62 (+0.07%)
T   26.80 (+0.15%)
F   7.76 (+0.26%)
ACB   4.60 (+0.88%)
GILD   60.35 (-0.36%)
NFLX   503.10 (-4.25%)
BA   166.90 (-0.20%)
BAC   24.24 (+0.41%)
DIS   124.89 (-0.05%)
S&P 500   3,441.77 (-0.04%)
DOW   28,264.05 (-0.16%)
QQQ   284.85 (+0.15%)
AAPL   117.26 (-0.21%)
MSFT   213.85 (-0.37%)
FB   279.60 (+4.50%)
GOOGL   1,573.00 (+2.81%)
AMZN   3,216.00 (-0.03%)
TSLA   421.20 (-0.18%)
NVDA   542.11 (-0.68%)
BABA   311.20 (+0.45%)
CGC   19.10 (+1.17%)
GE   7.29 (-0.68%)
MU   53.32 (-0.39%)
AMD   81.62 (+0.07%)
T   26.80 (+0.15%)
F   7.76 (+0.26%)
ACB   4.60 (+0.88%)
GILD   60.35 (-0.36%)
NFLX   503.10 (-4.25%)
BA   166.90 (-0.20%)
BAC   24.24 (+0.41%)
DIS   124.89 (-0.05%)
S&P 500   3,441.77 (-0.04%)
DOW   28,264.05 (-0.16%)
QQQ   284.85 (+0.15%)
AAPL   117.26 (-0.21%)
MSFT   213.85 (-0.37%)
FB   279.60 (+4.50%)
GOOGL   1,573.00 (+2.81%)
AMZN   3,216.00 (-0.03%)
TSLA   421.20 (-0.18%)
NVDA   542.11 (-0.68%)
BABA   311.20 (+0.45%)
CGC   19.10 (+1.17%)
GE   7.29 (-0.68%)
MU   53.32 (-0.39%)
AMD   81.62 (+0.07%)
T   26.80 (+0.15%)
F   7.76 (+0.26%)
ACB   4.60 (+0.88%)
GILD   60.35 (-0.36%)
NFLX   503.10 (-4.25%)
BA   166.90 (-0.20%)
BAC   24.24 (+0.41%)
DIS   124.89 (-0.05%)
S&P 500   3,441.77 (-0.04%)
DOW   28,264.05 (-0.16%)
QQQ   284.85 (+0.15%)
AAPL   117.26 (-0.21%)
MSFT   213.85 (-0.37%)
FB   279.60 (+4.50%)
GOOGL   1,573.00 (+2.81%)
AMZN   3,216.00 (-0.03%)
TSLA   421.20 (-0.18%)
NVDA   542.11 (-0.68%)
BABA   311.20 (+0.45%)
CGC   19.10 (+1.17%)
GE   7.29 (-0.68%)
MU   53.32 (-0.39%)
AMD   81.62 (+0.07%)
T   26.80 (+0.15%)
F   7.76 (+0.26%)
ACB   4.60 (+0.88%)
GILD   60.35 (-0.36%)
NFLX   503.10 (-4.25%)
BA   166.90 (-0.20%)
BAC   24.24 (+0.41%)
DIS   124.89 (-0.05%)
Log in
NASDAQ:MRCY

Mercury Systems Competitors

$76.12
-0.34 (-0.44 %)
(As of 10/20/2020 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$76.11
Now: $76.12
$78.67
50-Day Range
$66.65
MA: $74.84
$78.70
52-Week Range
$52.24
Now: $76.12
$96.29
Volume165,925 shs
Average Volume417,339 shs
Market Capitalization$4.26 billion
P/E Ratio48.79
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1

Competitors

Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) Vs. TRMB, IPGP, JBL, FN, PLXS, and SANM

Should you be buying MRCY stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "electronic manufacturing services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Mercury Systems, including Trimble (TRMB), IPG Photonics (IPGP), Jabil (JBL), Fabrinet (FN), Plexus (PLXS), and Sanmina (SANM).

Trimble (NASDAQ:TRMB) and Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Trimble and Mercury Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Trimble15.39%14.69%6.96%
Mercury Systems10.76%7.92%6.65%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Trimble and Mercury Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Trimble04802.67
Mercury Systems01702.88

Trimble currently has a consensus price target of $48.7778, indicating a potential downside of 6.05%. Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $93.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.18%. Given Mercury Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Mercury Systems is more favorable than Trimble.

Risk & Volatility

Trimble has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mercury Systems has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Trimble and Mercury Systems' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trimble$3.26 billion3.98$514.30 million$1.7629.50
Mercury Systems$796.61 million5.35$85.71 million$1.9239.65

Trimble has higher revenue and earnings than Mercury Systems. Trimble is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mercury Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

91.4% of Trimble shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Trimble shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) and IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Mercury Systems and IPG Photonics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mercury Systems10.76%7.92%6.65%
IPG Photonics10.79%7.35%6.46%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Mercury Systems and IPG Photonics, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mercury Systems01702.88
IPG Photonics07402.36

Mercury Systems presently has a consensus price target of $93.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.18%. IPG Photonics has a consensus price target of $171.6125, suggesting a potential downside of 10.86%. Given Mercury Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Mercury Systems is more favorable than IPG Photonics.

Risk & Volatility

Mercury Systems has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, IPG Photonics has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Mercury Systems and IPG Photonics' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercury Systems$796.61 million5.35$85.71 million$1.9239.65
IPG Photonics$1.31 billion7.80$180.23 million$4.3644.16

IPG Photonics has higher revenue and earnings than Mercury Systems. Mercury Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IPG Photonics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

96.1% of Mercury Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.5% of IPG Photonics shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Mercury Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.0% of IPG Photonics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

IPG Photonics beats Mercury Systems on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) and Jabil (NYSE:JBL) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

96.1% of Mercury Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.5% of Jabil shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Mercury Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Jabil shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Mercury Systems and Jabil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mercury Systems10.76%7.92%6.65%
Jabil0.20%5.25%0.67%

Risk & Volatility

Mercury Systems has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Jabil has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Mercury Systems and Jabil, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mercury Systems01702.88
Jabil04502.56

Mercury Systems presently has a consensus price target of $93.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.18%. Jabil has a consensus price target of $39.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 10.03%. Given Mercury Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Mercury Systems is more favorable than Jabil.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Mercury Systems and Jabil's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercury Systems$796.61 million5.35$85.71 million$1.9239.65
Jabil$27.27 billion0.20$53.91 million$0.35101.60

Mercury Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Jabil. Mercury Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jabil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Mercury Systems beats Jabil on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) and Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Mercury Systems and Fabrinet's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mercury Systems10.76%7.92%6.65%
Fabrinet6.91%12.87%9.02%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Mercury Systems and Fabrinet's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercury Systems$796.61 million5.35$85.71 million$1.9239.65
Fabrinet$1.64 billion1.43$113.48 million$3.1420.32

Fabrinet has higher revenue and earnings than Mercury Systems. Fabrinet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mercury Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

96.1% of Mercury Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of Fabrinet shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Mercury Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fabrinet shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Mercury Systems and Fabrinet, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mercury Systems01702.88
Fabrinet02602.75

Mercury Systems presently has a consensus price target of $93.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.18%. Fabrinet has a consensus price target of $69.25, suggesting a potential upside of 8.54%. Given Mercury Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Mercury Systems is more favorable than Fabrinet.

Volatility & Risk

Mercury Systems has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Fabrinet has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Mercury Systems beats Fabrinet on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) and Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Plexus and Mercury Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Plexus3.55%12.41%5.28%
Mercury Systems10.76%7.92%6.65%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Plexus and Mercury Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Plexus03302.50
Mercury Systems01702.88

Plexus currently has a consensus target price of $82.80, suggesting a potential upside of 14.76%. Mercury Systems has a consensus target price of $93.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.18%. Given Mercury Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Mercury Systems is more favorable than Plexus.

Risk & Volatility

Plexus has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mercury Systems has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Plexus and Mercury Systems' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Plexus$3.16 billion0.67$108.62 million$3.4321.03
Mercury Systems$796.61 million5.35$85.71 million$1.9239.65

Plexus has higher revenue and earnings than Mercury Systems. Plexus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mercury Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

93.5% of Plexus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of Plexus shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Mercury Systems beats Plexus on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) and Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Mercury Systems and Sanmina's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mercury Systems10.76%7.92%6.65%
Sanmina1.55%10.35%4.12%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Mercury Systems and Sanmina, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mercury Systems01702.88
Sanmina02102.33

Mercury Systems presently has a consensus price target of $93.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.18%. Sanmina has a consensus price target of $34.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 29.36%. Given Sanmina's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sanmina is more favorable than Mercury Systems.

Volatility and Risk

Mercury Systems has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Sanmina has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Mercury Systems and Sanmina's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercury Systems$796.61 million5.35$85.71 million$1.9239.65
Sanmina$8.23 billion0.22$141.51 million$3.068.67

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than Mercury Systems. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mercury Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

96.1% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Sanmina shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Sanmina shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Mercury Systems beats Sanmina on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Mercury Systems Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Trimble logo
TRMB
Trimble
1.5$51.92-0.1%$12.99 billion$3.26 billion27.04
IPG Photonics logo
IPGP
IPG Photonics
1.5$192.52-3.1%$10.25 billion$1.31 billion80.89
Jabil logo
JBL
Jabil
1.7$35.56-1.3%$5.35 billion$27.27 billion104.59Dividend Announcement
Fabrinet logo
FN
Fabrinet
1.4$63.80-0.1%$2.34 billion$1.64 billion21.13Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
Plexus logo
PLXS
Plexus
1.5$72.15-0.3%$2.11 billion$3.16 billion18.55Upcoming Earnings
Sanmina logo
SANM
Sanmina
2.1$26.54-1.1%$1.80 billion$8.23 billion17.58Upcoming Earnings
TTM Technologies logo
TTMI
TTM Technologies
1.6$12.36-0.6%$1.32 billion$2.69 billion5.80Upcoming Earnings
Methode Electronics logo
MEI
Methode Electronics
1.3$30.34-0.3%$1.14 billion$1.02 billion9.95Analyst Report
CTS logo
CTS
CTS
2.0$25.86-0.6%$834.45 million$469 million39.18
Benchmark Electronics logo
BHE
Benchmark Electronics
1.7$21.28-0.7%$775.89 million$2.27 billion2,130.13Upcoming Earnings
Park Aerospace logo
PKE
Park Aerospace
0.9$11.16-1.1%$227.45 million$60.01 million25.36
Key Tronic logo
KTCC
Key Tronic
0.9$9.08-0.2%$97.70 million$449.48 million20.64Upcoming Earnings
Heavy News Reporting
Neonode logo
NEON
Neonode
1.4$8.14-8.6%$87.77 million$6.65 million-11.97
This page was last updated on 10/21/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.