NASDAQ:NEON

Neonode Competitors

$8.25
-0.23 (-2.71 %)
(As of 04/23/2021 11:34 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$8.25
Now: $8.25
$8.45
50-Day Range
$7.40
MA: $8.67
$9.73
52-Week Range
$2.45
Now: $8.25
$13.00
Volume14 shs
Average Volume71,784 shs
Market Capitalization$94.92 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.9

Competitors

Neonode (NASDAQ:NEON) Vs. TRMB, IPGP, JBL, MRCY, FN, and SANM

Should you be buying NEON stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "electronic manufacturing services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Neonode, including Trimble (TRMB), IPG Photonics (IPGP), Jabil (JBL), Mercury Systems (MRCY), Fabrinet (FN), and Sanmina (SANM).

Trimble (NASDAQ:TRMB) and Neonode (NASDAQ:NEON) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability and valuation.

Risk and Volatility

Trimble has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Neonode has a beta of 2.9, meaning that its stock price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Trimble and Neonode's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Trimble15.56%14.84%7.13%
Neonode-128.56%-129.95%-75.29%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Trimble and Neonode, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Trimble02602.75
Neonode00103.00

Trimble currently has a consensus target price of $56.75, suggesting a potential downside of 31.16%. Neonode has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.45%. Given Neonode's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Neonode is more favorable than Trimble.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Trimble and Neonode's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trimble$3.26 billion6.35$514.30 million$1.7646.86
Neonode$6.65 million14.27$-5,300,000.00N/AN/A

Trimble has higher revenue and earnings than Neonode.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

89.4% of Trimble shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.3% of Neonode shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Trimble shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.8% of Neonode shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Trimble beats Neonode on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Neonode (NASDAQ:NEON) and IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Neonode has a beta of 2.9, suggesting that its share price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, IPG Photonics has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Neonode and IPG Photonics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Neonode-128.56%-129.95%-75.29%
IPG Photonics9.04%7.76%6.85%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Neonode and IPG Photonics, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Neonode00103.00
IPG Photonics04502.56

Neonode currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.45%. IPG Photonics has a consensus price target of $230.9444, suggesting a potential upside of 1.42%. Given Neonode's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Neonode is more favorable than IPG Photonics.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Neonode and IPG Photonics' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neonode$6.65 million14.27$-5,300,000.00N/AN/A
IPG Photonics$1.31 billion9.28$180.23 million$4.3652.29

IPG Photonics has higher revenue and earnings than Neonode.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

12.3% of Neonode shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of IPG Photonics shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.8% of Neonode shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.0% of IPG Photonics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

IPG Photonics beats Neonode on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Neonode (NASDAQ:NEON) and Jabil (NYSE:JBL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

12.3% of Neonode shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.8% of Jabil shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.8% of Neonode shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Jabil shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Neonode has a beta of 2.9, suggesting that its share price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Jabil has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Neonode and Jabil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Neonode-128.56%-129.95%-75.29%
Jabil0.78%14.01%1.80%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Neonode and Jabil, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Neonode00103.00
Jabil03402.57

Neonode currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.45%. Jabil has a consensus price target of $53.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 1.56%. Given Neonode's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Neonode is more favorable than Jabil.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Neonode and Jabil's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neonode$6.65 million14.27$-5,300,000.00N/AN/A
Jabil$27.27 billion0.30$53.91 million$0.35154.89

Jabil has higher revenue and earnings than Neonode.

Summary

Jabil beats Neonode on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Neonode (NASDAQ:NEON) and Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

12.3% of Neonode shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.8% of Neonode shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Neonode has a beta of 2.9, indicating that its share price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mercury Systems has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Neonode and Mercury Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Neonode-128.56%-129.95%-75.29%
Mercury Systems9.97%7.98%6.65%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Neonode and Mercury Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Neonode00103.00
Mercury Systems01602.86

Neonode presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.45%. Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $94.1111, suggesting a potential upside of 23.78%. Given Neonode's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Neonode is more favorable than Mercury Systems.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Neonode and Mercury Systems' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neonode$6.65 million14.27$-5,300,000.00N/AN/A
Mercury Systems$796.61 million5.35$85.71 million$1.9239.57

Mercury Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Neonode.

Summary

Mercury Systems beats Neonode on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Neonode (NASDAQ:NEON) and Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

12.3% of Neonode shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of Fabrinet shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.8% of Neonode shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Fabrinet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Neonode has a beta of 2.9, indicating that its share price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fabrinet has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Neonode and Fabrinet's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Neonode-128.56%-129.95%-75.29%
Fabrinet7.18%13.37%9.41%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Neonode and Fabrinet, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Neonode00103.00
Fabrinet03502.63

Neonode presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.45%. Fabrinet has a consensus price target of $72.00, suggesting a potential downside of 21.35%. Given Neonode's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Neonode is more favorable than Fabrinet.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Neonode and Fabrinet's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neonode$6.65 million14.27$-5,300,000.00N/AN/A
Fabrinet$1.64 billion2.06$113.48 million$3.1429.16

Fabrinet has higher revenue and earnings than Neonode.

Summary

Fabrinet beats Neonode on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Neonode (NASDAQ:NEON) and Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

12.3% of Neonode shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of Sanmina shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.8% of Neonode shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Sanmina shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Neonode has a beta of 2.9, indicating that its share price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sanmina has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Neonode and Sanmina's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Neonode-128.56%-129.95%-75.29%
Sanmina2.01%11.51%4.61%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Neonode and Sanmina, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Neonode00103.00
Sanmina03102.25

Neonode presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.45%. Sanmina has a consensus price target of $39.50, suggesting a potential downside of 5.55%. Given Neonode's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Neonode is more favorable than Sanmina.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Neonode and Sanmina's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neonode$6.65 million14.27$-5,300,000.00N/AN/A
Sanmina$6.96 billion0.39$139.71 million$2.6815.59

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than Neonode.

Summary

Sanmina beats Neonode on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.


Neonode Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Trimble logo
TRMB
Trimble
1.5$82.48-1.4%$20.44 billion$3.26 billion42.30
IPG Photonics logo
IPGP
IPG Photonics
1.3$227.99-2.7%$11.87 billion$1.31 billion115.73
Jabil logo
JBL
Jabil
1.8$54.21-1.3%$7.96 billion$27.27 billion39.00Dividend Announcement
Insider Selling
Mercury Systems logo
MRCY
Mercury Systems
1.9$75.98-0.1%$4.26 billion$796.61 million50.65News Coverage
Fabrinet logo
FN
Fabrinet
1.6$91.55-2.7%$3.28 billion$1.64 billion28.52
Sanmina logo
SANM
Sanmina
1.9$41.77-1.1%$2.68 billion$6.96 billion20.99Upcoming Earnings
Plexus logo
PLXS
Plexus
1.5$92.68-3.0%$2.59 billion$3.39 billion23.64Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Methode Electronics logo
MEI
Methode Electronics
2.0$44.58-1.3%$1.69 billion$1.02 billion13.00News Coverage
TTM Technologies logo
TTMI
TTM Technologies
1.2$15.14-1.3%$1.60 billion$2.69 billion9.46Upcoming Earnings
Benchmark Electronics logo
BHE
Benchmark Electronics
1.7$30.45-1.7%$1.08 billion$2.27 billion-1,521.74Upcoming Earnings
CTS logo
CTS
CTS
1.9$31.34-1.5%$998.58 million$469 million34.07Upcoming Earnings
Park Aerospace logo
PKE
Park Aerospace
1.1$13.52-1.0%$272.90 million$60.01 million42.25
Key Tronic logo
KTCC
Key Tronic
1.0$7.86-4.8%$80.49 million$449.48 million17.09Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
This page was last updated on 4/23/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.