Neonode Competitors

Trimble (NASDAQ:TRMB) and Neonode (NASDAQ:NEON) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability and valuation.

Risk and Volatility

Trimble has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Neonode has a beta of 2.9, meaning that its stock price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Trimble and Neonode's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Trimble and Neonode, as provided by MarketBeat.

Trimble currently has a consensus target price of $56.75, suggesting a potential downside of 31.16%. Neonode has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.45%. Given Neonode's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Neonode is more favorable than Trimble.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Trimble and Neonode's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Trimble has higher revenue and earnings than Neonode.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

89.4% of Trimble shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.3% of Neonode shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Trimble shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.8% of Neonode shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Trimble beats Neonode on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Neonode (NASDAQ:NEON) and IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Neonode has a beta of 2.9, suggesting that its share price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, IPG Photonics has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Neonode and IPG Photonics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Neonode and IPG Photonics, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Neonode currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.45%. IPG Photonics has a consensus price target of $230.9444, suggesting a potential upside of 1.42%. Given Neonode's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Neonode is more favorable than IPG Photonics.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Neonode and IPG Photonics' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

IPG Photonics has higher revenue and earnings than Neonode.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

12.3% of Neonode shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of IPG Photonics shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.8% of Neonode shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.0% of IPG Photonics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

IPG Photonics beats Neonode on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Neonode (NASDAQ:NEON) and Jabil (NYSE:JBL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

12.3% of Neonode shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.8% of Jabil shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.8% of Neonode shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Jabil shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Neonode has a beta of 2.9, suggesting that its share price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Jabil has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Neonode and Jabil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Neonode and Jabil, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Neonode currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.45%. Jabil has a consensus price target of $53.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 1.56%. Given Neonode's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Neonode is more favorable than Jabil.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Neonode and Jabil's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Jabil has higher revenue and earnings than Neonode.

Summary

Jabil beats Neonode on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Neonode (NASDAQ:NEON) and Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

12.3% of Neonode shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.8% of Neonode shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Neonode has a beta of 2.9, indicating that its share price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mercury Systems has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Neonode and Mercury Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Neonode and Mercury Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.

Neonode presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.45%. Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $94.1111, suggesting a potential upside of 23.78%. Given Neonode's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Neonode is more favorable than Mercury Systems.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Neonode and Mercury Systems' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Mercury Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Neonode.

Summary

Mercury Systems beats Neonode on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Neonode (NASDAQ:NEON) and Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

12.3% of Neonode shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of Fabrinet shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.8% of Neonode shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Fabrinet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Neonode has a beta of 2.9, indicating that its share price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fabrinet has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Neonode and Fabrinet's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Neonode and Fabrinet, as reported by MarketBeat.

Neonode presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.45%. Fabrinet has a consensus price target of $72.00, suggesting a potential downside of 21.35%. Given Neonode's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Neonode is more favorable than Fabrinet.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Neonode and Fabrinet's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fabrinet has higher revenue and earnings than Neonode.

Summary

Fabrinet beats Neonode on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Neonode (NASDAQ:NEON) and Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

12.3% of Neonode shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of Sanmina shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.8% of Neonode shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Sanmina shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Neonode has a beta of 2.9, indicating that its share price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sanmina has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Neonode and Sanmina's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Neonode and Sanmina, as reported by MarketBeat.

Neonode presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.45%. Sanmina has a consensus price target of $39.50, suggesting a potential downside of 5.55%. Given Neonode's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Neonode is more favorable than Sanmina.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Neonode and Sanmina's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than Neonode.

Summary

Sanmina beats Neonode on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.