NYSE:PKE

Park Aerospace Competitors

$13.93
+0.25 (+1.83 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 11:01 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$13.62
Now: $13.93
$13.93
50-Day Range
$13.04
MA: $14.11
$15.38
52-Week Range
$10.51
Now: $13.93
$15.57
Volume1,392 shs
Average Volume84,109 shs
Market Capitalization$283.91 million
P/E Ratio43.53
Dividend Yield2.88%
Beta0.96

Competitors

Park Aerospace (NYSE:PKE) Vs. TRMB, IPGP, JBL, MRCY, FN, and SANM

Should you be buying PKE stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "electronic manufacturing services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Park Aerospace, including Trimble (TRMB), IPG Photonics (IPGP), Jabil (JBL), Mercury Systems (MRCY), Fabrinet (FN), and Sanmina (SANM).

Park Aerospace (NYSE:PKE) and Trimble (NASDAQ:TRMB) are both aerospace companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Park Aerospace and Trimble's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Park Aerospace$60.01 million4.73$9.55 millionN/AN/A
Trimble$3.26 billion6.38$514.30 million$1.7647.07

Trimble has higher revenue and earnings than Park Aerospace.

Volatility and Risk

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trimble has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Park Aerospace and Trimble's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Park Aerospace13.13%4.87%4.06%
Trimble15.56%14.84%7.13%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Park Aerospace and Trimble, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Park Aerospace0000N/A
Trimble02602.75

Trimble has a consensus target price of $56.75, indicating a potential downside of 31.49%. Given Trimble's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trimble is more favorable than Park Aerospace.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.9% of Park Aerospace shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Trimble shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Park Aerospace shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Trimble shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Trimble beats Park Aerospace on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Park Aerospace (NYSE:PKE) and IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) are both aerospace companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Park Aerospace and IPG Photonics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Park Aerospace13.13%4.87%4.06%
IPG Photonics9.04%7.76%6.85%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Park Aerospace and IPG Photonics, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Park Aerospace0000N/A
IPG Photonics04502.56

IPG Photonics has a consensus target price of $230.9444, indicating a potential upside of 2.29%. Given IPG Photonics' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe IPG Photonics is more favorable than Park Aerospace.

Volatility and Risk

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, IPG Photonics has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Park Aerospace and IPG Photonics' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Park Aerospace$60.01 million4.73$9.55 millionN/AN/A
IPG Photonics$1.31 billion9.19$180.23 million$4.3651.78

IPG Photonics has higher revenue and earnings than Park Aerospace.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.9% of Park Aerospace shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of IPG Photonics shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Park Aerospace shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.0% of IPG Photonics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

IPG Photonics beats Park Aerospace on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jabil (NYSE:JBL) and Park Aerospace (NYSE:PKE) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Jabil and Park Aerospace's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Jabil0.78%14.01%1.80%
Park Aerospace13.13%4.87%4.06%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Jabil and Park Aerospace, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Jabil03402.57
Park Aerospace0000N/A

Jabil presently has a consensus price target of $53.3333, indicating a potential downside of 1.73%. Given Jabil's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Jabil is more favorable than Park Aerospace.

Dividends

Jabil pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Park Aerospace pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Jabil pays out 91.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Jabil has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Park Aerospace has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

Jabil has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Jabil and Park Aerospace's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jabil$27.27 billion0.30$53.91 million$0.35155.06
Park Aerospace$60.01 million4.73$9.55 millionN/AN/A

Jabil has higher revenue and earnings than Park Aerospace.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

87.8% of Jabil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Park Aerospace shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Jabil shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Park Aerospace shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) and Park Aerospace (NYSE:PKE) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

95.7% of Mercury Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Park Aerospace shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Mercury Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Park Aerospace shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Mercury Systems and Park Aerospace's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mercury Systems9.97%7.98%6.65%
Park Aerospace13.13%4.87%4.06%

Volatility and Risk

Mercury Systems has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Mercury Systems and Park Aerospace, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mercury Systems01602.86
Park Aerospace0000N/A

Mercury Systems presently has a consensus price target of $94.1111, indicating a potential upside of 19.54%. Given Mercury Systems' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Mercury Systems is more favorable than Park Aerospace.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Mercury Systems and Park Aerospace's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercury Systems$796.61 million5.55$85.71 million$1.9241.01
Park Aerospace$60.01 million4.73$9.55 millionN/AN/A

Mercury Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Park Aerospace.

Summary

Mercury Systems beats Park Aerospace on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) and Park Aerospace (NYSE:PKE) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.5% of Fabrinet shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Park Aerospace shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Fabrinet shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Park Aerospace shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Fabrinet and Park Aerospace's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fabrinet7.18%13.37%9.41%
Park Aerospace13.13%4.87%4.06%

Volatility and Risk

Fabrinet has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fabrinet and Park Aerospace, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fabrinet03502.63
Park Aerospace0000N/A

Fabrinet presently has a consensus price target of $72.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.56%. Given Fabrinet's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Fabrinet is more favorable than Park Aerospace.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Fabrinet and Park Aerospace's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fabrinet$1.64 billion2.01$113.48 million$3.1428.51
Park Aerospace$60.01 million4.73$9.55 millionN/AN/A

Fabrinet has higher revenue and earnings than Park Aerospace.

Summary

Fabrinet beats Park Aerospace on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) and Park Aerospace (NYSE:PKE) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.6% of Sanmina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Park Aerospace shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Sanmina shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Park Aerospace shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Sanmina and Park Aerospace's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sanmina2.01%11.51%4.61%
Park Aerospace13.13%4.87%4.06%

Volatility and Risk

Sanmina has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Sanmina and Park Aerospace, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sanmina03102.25
Park Aerospace0000N/A

Sanmina presently has a consensus price target of $39.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.16%. Given Sanmina's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Sanmina is more favorable than Park Aerospace.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Sanmina and Park Aerospace's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanmina$6.96 billion0.39$139.71 million$2.6815.54
Park Aerospace$60.01 million4.73$9.55 millionN/AN/A

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than Park Aerospace.

Summary

Sanmina beats Park Aerospace on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.


Park Aerospace Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Trimble logo
TRMB
Trimble
1.5$82.84+1.0%$20.62 billion$3.26 billion42.48
IPG Photonics logo
IPGP
IPG Photonics
1.3$225.78+1.7%$12.29 billion$1.31 billion114.61
Jabil logo
JBL
Jabil
1.8$54.27+1.1%$7.99 billion$27.27 billion39.04Insider Selling
Mercury Systems logo
MRCY
Mercury Systems
1.9$78.73+0.6%$4.39 billion$796.61 million52.49
Fabrinet logo
FN
Fabrinet
1.6$89.51+0.5%$3.32 billion$1.64 billion27.88
Sanmina logo
SANM
Sanmina
1.9$41.65+0.1%$2.70 billion$6.96 billion20.93
Plexus logo
PLXS
Plexus
1.5$91.33+0.4%$2.62 billion$3.39 billion23.30Upcoming Earnings
Methode Electronics logo
MEI
Methode Electronics
2.0$44.93+0.6%$1.72 billion$1.02 billion13.10
TTM Technologies logo
TTMI
TTM Technologies
1.2$15.09+0.4%$1.61 billion$2.69 billion9.43
Benchmark Electronics logo
BHE
Benchmark Electronics
1.7$30.00+0.5%$1.09 billion$2.27 billion-1,499.25
CTS logo
CTS
CTS
1.9$30.48+1.1%$996.97 million$469 million33.13Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
Neonode logo
NEON
Neonode
1.3$8.54+0.2%$98.48 million$6.65 million-11.86
Key Tronic logo
KTCC
Key Tronic
1.0$7.72+0.1%$83.07 million$449.48 million16.78Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
This page was last updated on 4/16/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.