Park Aerospace Competitors

Park Aerospace (NYSE:PKE) and Trimble (NASDAQ:TRMB) are both aerospace companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Park Aerospace and Trimble's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Trimble has higher revenue and earnings than Park Aerospace.

Volatility and Risk

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trimble has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Park Aerospace and Trimble's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Park Aerospace and Trimble, as reported by MarketBeat.

Trimble has a consensus target price of $56.75, indicating a potential downside of 31.49%. Given Trimble's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trimble is more favorable than Park Aerospace.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.9% of Park Aerospace shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Trimble shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Park Aerospace shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Trimble shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Trimble beats Park Aerospace on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Park Aerospace (NYSE:PKE) and IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) are both aerospace companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Park Aerospace and IPG Photonics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Park Aerospace and IPG Photonics, as reported by MarketBeat.

IPG Photonics has a consensus target price of $230.9444, indicating a potential upside of 2.29%. Given IPG Photonics' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe IPG Photonics is more favorable than Park Aerospace.

Volatility and Risk

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, IPG Photonics has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Park Aerospace and IPG Photonics' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

IPG Photonics has higher revenue and earnings than Park Aerospace.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.9% of Park Aerospace shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of IPG Photonics shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Park Aerospace shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.0% of IPG Photonics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

IPG Photonics beats Park Aerospace on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jabil (NYSE:JBL) and Park Aerospace (NYSE:PKE) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Jabil and Park Aerospace's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Jabil and Park Aerospace, as reported by MarketBeat.

Jabil presently has a consensus price target of $53.3333, indicating a potential downside of 1.73%. Given Jabil's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Jabil is more favorable than Park Aerospace.

Dividends

Jabil pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Park Aerospace pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Jabil pays out 91.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Jabil has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Park Aerospace has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

Jabil has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Jabil and Park Aerospace's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Jabil has higher revenue and earnings than Park Aerospace.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

87.8% of Jabil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Park Aerospace shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Jabil shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Park Aerospace shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) and Park Aerospace (NYSE:PKE) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

95.7% of Mercury Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Park Aerospace shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Mercury Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Park Aerospace shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Mercury Systems and Park Aerospace's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Mercury Systems has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Mercury Systems and Park Aerospace, as reported by MarketBeat.

Mercury Systems presently has a consensus price target of $94.1111, indicating a potential upside of 19.54%. Given Mercury Systems' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Mercury Systems is more favorable than Park Aerospace.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Mercury Systems and Park Aerospace's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Mercury Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Park Aerospace.

Summary

Mercury Systems beats Park Aerospace on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) and Park Aerospace (NYSE:PKE) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.5% of Fabrinet shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Park Aerospace shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Fabrinet shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Park Aerospace shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Fabrinet and Park Aerospace's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Fabrinet has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fabrinet and Park Aerospace, as reported by MarketBeat.

Fabrinet presently has a consensus price target of $72.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.56%. Given Fabrinet's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Fabrinet is more favorable than Park Aerospace.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Fabrinet and Park Aerospace's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fabrinet has higher revenue and earnings than Park Aerospace.

Summary

Fabrinet beats Park Aerospace on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) and Park Aerospace (NYSE:PKE) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.6% of Sanmina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Park Aerospace shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Sanmina shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Park Aerospace shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Sanmina and Park Aerospace's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Sanmina has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Sanmina and Park Aerospace, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sanmina presently has a consensus price target of $39.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.16%. Given Sanmina's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Sanmina is more favorable than Park Aerospace.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Sanmina and Park Aerospace's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than Park Aerospace.

Summary

Sanmina beats Park Aerospace on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.