Log in
NYSE:JBL

Jabil Competitors

$34.13
-1.61 (-4.50 %)
(As of 10/26/2020 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$33.98
Now: $34.13
$35.14
50-Day Range
$30.63
MA: $34.15
$36.74
52-Week Range
$17.63
Now: $34.13
$44.20
Volume1.05 million shs
Average Volume1.40 million shs
Market Capitalization$5.14 billion
P/E Ratio100.39
Dividend Yield0.90%
Beta1.25

Competitors

Jabil (NYSE:JBL) Vs. TRMB, IPGP, MRCY, FN, PLXS, and SANM

Should you be buying JBL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "electronic manufacturing services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Jabil, including Trimble (TRMB), IPG Photonics (IPGP), Mercury Systems (MRCY), Fabrinet (FN), Plexus (PLXS), and Sanmina (SANM).

Trimble (NASDAQ:TRMB) and Jabil (NYSE:JBL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Trimble and Jabil, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Trimble04802.67
Jabil04502.56

Trimble presently has a consensus target price of $48.7778, suggesting a potential downside of 0.92%. Jabil has a consensus target price of $39.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 14.64%. Given Jabil's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Jabil is more favorable than Trimble.

Profitability

This table compares Trimble and Jabil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Trimble15.39%14.69%6.96%
Jabil0.20%5.25%0.67%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

91.4% of Trimble shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.5% of Jabil shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Trimble shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Jabil shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Trimble has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Jabil has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Trimble and Jabil's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trimble$3.26 billion3.77$514.30 million$1.7627.97
Jabil$27.27 billion0.19$53.91 million$0.3597.51

Trimble has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Jabil. Trimble is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jabil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Trimble beats Jabil on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jabil (NYSE:JBL) and IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Jabil and IPG Photonics, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Jabil04502.56
IPG Photonics07402.36

Jabil presently has a consensus target price of $39.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 14.64%. IPG Photonics has a consensus target price of $171.6125, suggesting a potential downside of 12.14%. Given Jabil's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Jabil is more favorable than IPG Photonics.

Profitability

This table compares Jabil and IPG Photonics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Jabil0.20%5.25%0.67%
IPG Photonics10.79%7.35%6.46%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.5% of Jabil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.5% of IPG Photonics shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Jabil shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.0% of IPG Photonics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Jabil has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, IPG Photonics has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Jabil and IPG Photonics' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jabil$27.27 billion0.19$53.91 million$0.3597.51
IPG Photonics$1.31 billion7.91$180.23 million$4.3644.80

IPG Photonics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jabil. IPG Photonics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jabil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

IPG Photonics beats Jabil on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jabil (NYSE:JBL) and Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Jabil and Mercury Systems' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jabil$27.27 billion0.19$53.91 million$0.3597.51
Mercury Systems$796.61 million5.28$85.71 million$1.9239.15

Mercury Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jabil. Mercury Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jabil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.5% of Jabil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Jabil shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Jabil and Mercury Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Jabil04502.56
Mercury Systems01702.88

Jabil presently has a consensus target price of $39.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 14.64%. Mercury Systems has a consensus target price of $93.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.74%. Given Mercury Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mercury Systems is more favorable than Jabil.

Profitability

This table compares Jabil and Mercury Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Jabil0.20%5.25%0.67%
Mercury Systems10.76%7.92%6.65%

Risk and Volatility

Jabil has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mercury Systems has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Summary

Mercury Systems beats Jabil on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jabil (NYSE:JBL) and Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

89.5% of Jabil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of Fabrinet shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Jabil shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fabrinet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Jabil and Fabrinet, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Jabil04502.56
Fabrinet02602.75

Jabil currently has a consensus target price of $39.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 14.64%. Fabrinet has a consensus target price of $69.25, suggesting a potential upside of 10.85%. Given Jabil's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Jabil is more favorable than Fabrinet.

Profitability

This table compares Jabil and Fabrinet's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Jabil0.20%5.25%0.67%
Fabrinet6.91%12.87%9.02%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Jabil and Fabrinet's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jabil$27.27 billion0.19$53.91 million$0.3597.51
Fabrinet$1.64 billion1.40$113.48 million$3.1419.89

Fabrinet has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jabil. Fabrinet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jabil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Jabil has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fabrinet has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Fabrinet beats Jabil on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) and Jabil (NYSE:JBL) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Plexus and Jabil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Plexus3.55%12.41%5.28%
Jabil0.20%5.25%0.67%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Plexus and Jabil, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Plexus03302.50
Jabil04502.56

Plexus currently has a consensus price target of $82.80, suggesting a potential upside of 16.29%. Jabil has a consensus price target of $39.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 14.64%. Given Plexus' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Plexus is more favorable than Jabil.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

93.5% of Plexus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.5% of Jabil shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of Plexus shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Jabil shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Plexus and Jabil's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Plexus$3.16 billion0.66$108.62 million$3.4320.76
Jabil$27.27 billion0.19$53.91 million$0.3597.51

Plexus has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Jabil. Plexus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jabil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Plexus has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Jabil has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Plexus beats Jabil on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) and Jabil (NYSE:JBL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Risk and Volatility

Sanmina has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Jabil has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sanmina and Jabil's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanmina$8.23 billion0.21$141.51 million$3.068.25
Jabil$27.27 billion0.19$53.91 million$0.3597.51

Sanmina has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Jabil. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jabil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Sanmina and Jabil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sanmina1.55%10.35%4.12%
Jabil0.20%5.25%0.67%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Sanmina and Jabil, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sanmina02102.33
Jabil04502.56

Sanmina presently has a consensus price target of $34.3333, indicating a potential upside of 35.97%. Jabil has a consensus price target of $39.1250, indicating a potential upside of 14.64%. Given Sanmina's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Sanmina is more favorable than Jabil.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

92.8% of Sanmina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.5% of Jabil shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Sanmina shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Jabil shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sanmina beats Jabil on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Jabil Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Trimble logo
TRMB
Trimble
1.5$49.23-1.7%$12.32 billion$3.26 billion25.64Analyst Downgrade
IPG Photonics logo
IPGP
IPG Photonics
1.5$195.33-2.5%$10.40 billion$1.31 billion82.07Upcoming Earnings
Mercury Systems logo
MRCY
Mercury Systems
1.6$75.16-2.7%$4.21 billion$796.61 million48.18Upcoming Earnings
Fabrinet logo
FN
Fabrinet
1.6$62.47-2.0%$2.30 billion$1.64 billion20.69Upcoming Earnings
Plexus logo
PLXS
Plexus
1.5$71.20-2.6%$2.08 billion$3.16 billion18.30Upcoming Earnings
Sanmina logo
SANM
Sanmina
2.1$25.25-4.7%$1.71 billion$8.23 billion16.72
TTM Technologies logo
TTMI
TTM Technologies
1.6$12.32-0.8%$1.31 billion$2.69 billion5.78Upcoming Earnings
Methode Electronics logo
MEI
Methode Electronics
1.3$31.55-2.6%$1.18 billion$1.02 billion10.34
CTS logo
CTS
CTS
1.7$26.51-2.4%$855.43 million$469 million40.17Upcoming Earnings
Benchmark Electronics logo
BHE
Benchmark Electronics
1.7$20.55-4.4%$749.27 million$2.27 billion2,057.06Upcoming Earnings
Heavy News Reporting
Park Aerospace logo
PKE
Park Aerospace
0.9$11.10-1.3%$226.23 million$60.01 million28.46
Neonode logo
NEON
Neonode
1.4$9.08-2.3%$97.91 million$6.65 million-13.35
Key Tronic logo
KTCC
Key Tronic
0.9$9.04-0.2%$97.27 million$449.48 million20.55
This page was last updated on 10/27/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.