Jack Henry & Associates (JKHY) Competitors

Fiserv has higher revenue and earnings than Jack Henry & Associates. Fiserv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jack Henry & Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Jack Henry & Associates had 3 more articles in the media than Fiserv. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Jack Henry & Associates and 9 mentions for Fiserv. Jack Henry & Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Fiserv's score of 0.44 indicating that Jack Henry & Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

91.0% of Fiserv shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Fiserv shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fiserv presently has a consensus price target of $82.23, suggesting a potential upside of 52.91%. Jack Henry & Associates has a consensus price target of $192.08, suggesting a potential upside of 49.79%. Given Fiserv's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fiserv is more favorable than Jack Henry & Associates.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Jack Henry & Associates has a net margin of 20.64% compared to Fiserv's net margin of 15.17%. Jack Henry & Associates' return on equity of 24.03% beat Fiserv's return on equity.

96.2% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity National Information Services has a net margin of 23.35% compared to Jack Henry & Associates' net margin of 20.64%. Jack Henry & Associates' return on equity of 24.03% beat Fidelity National Information Services' return on equity.

Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity National Information Services pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Jack Henry & Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Fidelity National Information Services pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fidelity National Information Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Jack Henry & Associates has raised its dividend for 35 consecutive years. Fidelity National Information Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fidelity National Information Services presently has a consensus price target of $61.33, suggesting a potential upside of 56.61%. Jack Henry & Associates has a consensus price target of $192.08, suggesting a potential upside of 49.79%. Given Fidelity National Information Services' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fidelity National Information Services is more favorable than Jack Henry & Associates.

Jack Henry & Associates has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fidelity National Information Services. Fidelity National Information Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jack Henry & Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Fidelity National Information Services had 5 more articles in the media than Jack Henry & Associates. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Fidelity National Information Services and 12 mentions for Jack Henry & Associates. Fidelity National Information Services' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Jack Henry & Associates' score of 0.81 indicating that Fidelity National Information Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

98.8% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of Global Payments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Global Payments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Payments has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Jack Henry & Associates had 4 more articles in the media than Global Payments. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Jack Henry & Associates and 8 mentions for Global Payments. Jack Henry & Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Global Payments' score of 0.20 indicating that Jack Henry & Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Jack Henry & Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Global Payments pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Jack Henry & Associates pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Payments pays out -49.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Jack Henry & Associates has raised its dividend for 35 consecutive years. Jack Henry & Associates is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Global Payments has higher revenue and earnings than Jack Henry & Associates. Global Payments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jack Henry & Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Jack Henry & Associates has a net margin of 20.64% compared to Global Payments' net margin of -7.99%. Jack Henry & Associates' return on equity of 24.03% beat Global Payments' return on equity.

Jack Henry & Associates presently has a consensus target price of $192.08, suggesting a potential upside of 49.79%. Global Payments has a consensus target price of $84.73, suggesting a potential upside of 25.12%. Given Jack Henry & Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Jack Henry & Associates is more favorable than Global Payments.

Broadridge Financial Solutions has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Broadridge Financial Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Jack Henry & Associates. Broadridge Financial Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jack Henry & Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Jack Henry & Associates has a net margin of 20.64% compared to Broadridge Financial Solutions' net margin of 15.03%. Broadridge Financial Solutions' return on equity of 40.14% beat Jack Henry & Associates' return on equity.

90.0% of Broadridge Financial Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Broadridge Financial Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Broadridge Financial Solutions pays an annual dividend of $3.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Jack Henry & Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Broadridge Financial Solutions pays out 41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Broadridge Financial Solutions has raised its dividend for 18 consecutive years and Jack Henry & Associates has raised its dividend for 35 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Broadridge Financial Solutions had 10 more articles in the media than Jack Henry & Associates. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Broadridge Financial Solutions and 12 mentions for Jack Henry & Associates. Broadridge Financial Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Jack Henry & Associates' score of 0.81 indicating that Broadridge Financial Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Broadridge Financial Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $221.57, suggesting a potential upside of 53.01%. Jack Henry & Associates has a consensus target price of $192.08, suggesting a potential upside of 49.79%. Given Broadridge Financial Solutions' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Broadridge Financial Solutions is more favorable than Jack Henry & Associates.