Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) Competitors

In the previous week, Paychex had 8 more articles in the media than Fidelity National Information Services. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Paychex and 19 mentions for Fidelity National Information Services. Paychex's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Fidelity National Information Services' score of 0.84 indicating that Paychex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Fidelity National Information Services pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Paychex pays an annual dividend of $4.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Fidelity National Information Services pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Paychex pays out 97.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fidelity National Information Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Paychex has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Fidelity National Information Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Paychex has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Paychex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fidelity National Information Services. Fidelity National Information Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Paychex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fidelity National Information Services currently has a consensus price target of $58.77, indicating a potential upside of 45.20%. Paychex has a consensus price target of $107.53, indicating a potential downside of 2.90%. Given Fidelity National Information Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Fidelity National Information Services is more favorable than Paychex.

Paychex has a net margin of 27.03% compared to Fidelity National Information Services' net margin of 23.35%. Paychex's return on equity of 50.90% beat Fidelity National Information Services' return on equity.

96.2% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Paychex shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Paychex shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fiserv currently has a consensus target price of $76.77, indicating a potential upside of 52.86%. Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus target price of $58.77, indicating a potential upside of 45.20%. Given Fiserv's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fiserv is more favorable than Fidelity National Information Services.

Fiserv has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity National Information Services. Fidelity National Information Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiserv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Fiserv had 1 more articles in the media than Fidelity National Information Services. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Fiserv and 19 mentions for Fidelity National Information Services. Fiserv's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Fidelity National Information Services' score of 0.84 indicating that Fiserv is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Fidelity National Information Services has a net margin of 23.35% compared to Fiserv's net margin of 15.17%. Fidelity National Information Services' return on equity of 21.30% beat Fiserv's return on equity.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

91.0% of Fiserv shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Fiserv shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity National Information Services pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Broadridge Financial Solutions pays an annual dividend of $3.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Fidelity National Information Services pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Broadridge Financial Solutions pays out 41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fidelity National Information Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Broadridge Financial Solutions has raised its dividend for 18 consecutive years. Fidelity National Information Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Fidelity National Information Services and Fidelity National Information Services both had 19 articles in the media. Broadridge Financial Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Fidelity National Information Services' score of 0.84 indicating that Broadridge Financial Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

96.2% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Broadridge Financial Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Broadridge Financial Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Broadridge Financial Solutions has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fidelity National Information Services. Fidelity National Information Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadridge Financial Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Broadridge Financial Solutions has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity National Information Services presently has a consensus price target of $58.77, indicating a potential upside of 45.20%. Broadridge Financial Solutions has a consensus price target of $221.57, indicating a potential upside of 53.76%. Given Broadridge Financial Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Broadridge Financial Solutions is more favorable than Fidelity National Information Services.

Fidelity National Information Services has a net margin of 23.35% compared to Broadridge Financial Solutions' net margin of 15.03%. Broadridge Financial Solutions' return on equity of 40.14% beat Fidelity National Information Services' return on equity.

Jack Henry & Associates currently has a consensus target price of $186.07, suggesting a potential upside of 27.32%. Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus target price of $58.77, suggesting a potential upside of 45.20%. Given Fidelity National Information Services' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fidelity National Information Services is more favorable than Jack Henry & Associates.

In the previous week, Fidelity National Information Services had 13 more articles in the media than Jack Henry & Associates. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Fidelity National Information Services and 6 mentions for Jack Henry & Associates. Jack Henry & Associates' average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Fidelity National Information Services' score of 0.84 indicating that Jack Henry & Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

98.8% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Jack Henry & Associates has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fidelity National Information Services. Fidelity National Information Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jack Henry & Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Jack Henry & Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Fidelity National Information Services pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Jack Henry & Associates pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Jack Henry & Associates has increased its dividend for 35 consecutive years and Fidelity National Information Services has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Fidelity National Information Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fidelity National Information Services has a net margin of 23.35% compared to Jack Henry & Associates' net margin of 20.64%. Jack Henry & Associates' return on equity of 24.03% beat Fidelity National Information Services' return on equity.