Euronet Worldwide Competitors

Euronet Worldwide (NASDAQ:EEFT) and Visa (NYSE:V) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

Euronet Worldwide has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Visa has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Euronet Worldwide and Visa's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Euronet Worldwide and Visa, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Euronet Worldwide presently has a consensus price target of $159.20, indicating a potential upside of 9.06%. Visa has a consensus price target of $230.92, indicating a potential upside of 2.27%. Given Euronet Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Euronet Worldwide is more favorable than Visa.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Euronet Worldwide and Visa's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Visa has higher revenue and earnings than Euronet Worldwide. Euronet Worldwide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Visa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

92.9% of Euronet Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.5% of Visa shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Euronet Worldwide shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Visa shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mastercard (NYSE:MA) and Euronet Worldwide (NASDAQ:EEFT) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability and valuation.

Risk and Volatility

Mastercard has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Euronet Worldwide has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Mastercard and Euronet Worldwide's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Mastercard and Euronet Worldwide's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Mastercard has higher revenue and earnings than Euronet Worldwide. Euronet Worldwide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mastercard, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

73.6% of Mastercard shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.9% of Euronet Worldwide shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Mastercard shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of Euronet Worldwide shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Mastercard and Euronet Worldwide, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Mastercard currently has a consensus price target of $369.6897, suggesting a potential downside of 3.26%. Euronet Worldwide has a consensus price target of $159.20, suggesting a potential upside of 9.06%. Given Euronet Worldwide's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Euronet Worldwide is more favorable than Mastercard.

Summary

Mastercard beats Euronet Worldwide on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Euronet Worldwide (NASDAQ:EEFT) and Fidelity National Information Services (NYSE:FIS) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

Euronet Worldwide has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

92.9% of Euronet Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Euronet Worldwide shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Euronet Worldwide and Fidelity National Information Services' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Euronet Worldwide has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fidelity National Information Services. Euronet Worldwide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity National Information Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Euronet Worldwide and Fidelity National Information Services, as reported by MarketBeat.

Euronet Worldwide presently has a consensus target price of $159.20, suggesting a potential upside of 9.06%. Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus target price of $159.9583, suggesting a potential upside of 5.08%. Given Euronet Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Euronet Worldwide is more favorable than Fidelity National Information Services.

Profitability

This table compares Euronet Worldwide and Fidelity National Information Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Euronet Worldwide beats Fidelity National Information Services on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Euronet Worldwide (NASDAQ:EEFT) and Fiserv (NASDAQ:FISV) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Euronet Worldwide and Fiserv, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Euronet Worldwide presently has a consensus target price of $159.20, suggesting a potential upside of 9.06%. Fiserv has a consensus target price of $129.7188, suggesting a potential upside of 3.67%. Given Euronet Worldwide's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Euronet Worldwide is more favorable than Fiserv.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Euronet Worldwide and Fiserv's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fiserv has higher revenue and earnings than Euronet Worldwide. Euronet Worldwide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiserv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Euronet Worldwide has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fiserv has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its share price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

92.9% of Euronet Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.7% of Fiserv shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Euronet Worldwide shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Fiserv shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Euronet Worldwide and Fiserv's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Euronet Worldwide beats Fiserv on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Euronet Worldwide (NASDAQ:EEFT) and Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ:ADP) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Euronet Worldwide and Automatic Data Processing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Euronet Worldwide has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

92.9% of Euronet Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.7% of Automatic Data Processing shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Euronet Worldwide shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Automatic Data Processing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Euronet Worldwide and Automatic Data Processing's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Automatic Data Processing has higher revenue and earnings than Euronet Worldwide. Euronet Worldwide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Automatic Data Processing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Euronet Worldwide and Automatic Data Processing, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Euronet Worldwide currently has a consensus price target of $159.20, suggesting a potential upside of 9.06%. Automatic Data Processing has a consensus price target of $169.9375, suggesting a potential downside of 11.84%. Given Euronet Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Euronet Worldwide is more favorable than Automatic Data Processing.

Summary

Euronet Worldwide beats Automatic Data Processing on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Euronet Worldwide (NASDAQ:EEFT) and Global Payments (NYSE:GPN) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Euronet Worldwide and Global Payments, as provided by MarketBeat.

Euronet Worldwide currently has a consensus price target of $159.20, indicating a potential upside of 9.06%. Global Payments has a consensus price target of $211.3214, indicating a potential downside of 2.12%. Given Euronet Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Euronet Worldwide is more favorable than Global Payments.

Profitability

This table compares Euronet Worldwide and Global Payments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Euronet Worldwide has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Payments has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

92.9% of Euronet Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Global Payments shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Euronet Worldwide shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Global Payments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Euronet Worldwide and Global Payments' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Global Payments has higher revenue and earnings than Euronet Worldwide. Euronet Worldwide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Payments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Euronet Worldwide beats Global Payments on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.