Genpact (G) Competitors

In the previous week, ExlService had 5 more articles in the media than Genpact. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for ExlService and 4 mentions for Genpact. ExlService's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Genpact's score of 0.37 indicating that ExlService is being referred to more favorably in the media.

ExlService has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genpact has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

ExlService has a net margin of 11.66% compared to Genpact's net margin of 11.04%. ExlService's return on equity of 28.50% beat Genpact's return on equity.

Genpact has higher revenue and earnings than ExlService. Genpact is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ExlService, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

92.9% of ExlService shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Genpact shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of ExlService shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Genpact shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ExlService presently has a consensus price target of $41.50, indicating a potential upside of 54.91%. Genpact has a consensus price target of $43.29, indicating a potential upside of 53.15%. Given ExlService's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ExlService is more favorable than Genpact.

Global Payments presently has a consensus price target of $83.87, suggesting a potential upside of 11.83%. Genpact has a consensus price target of $43.29, suggesting a potential upside of 53.15%. Given Genpact's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Genpact is more favorable than Global Payments.

In the previous week, Global Payments and Global Payments both had 4 articles in the media. Global Payments' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Genpact's score of 0.37 indicating that Global Payments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Global Payments has higher revenue and earnings than Genpact. Global Payments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genpact, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Genpact has a net margin of 11.04% compared to Global Payments' net margin of -7.99%. Genpact's return on equity of 22.70% beat Global Payments' return on equity.

Global Payments pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Genpact pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Global Payments pays out -49.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genpact pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Genpact has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Genpact is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

89.8% of Global Payments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Genpact shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Global Payments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Genpact shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Global Payments has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genpact has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

90.0% of Broadridge Financial Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Genpact shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Broadridge Financial Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Genpact shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Broadridge Financial Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Genpact. Genpact is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadridge Financial Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Broadridge Financial Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $221.57, suggesting a potential upside of 57.22%. Genpact has a consensus target price of $43.29, suggesting a potential upside of 53.15%. Given Broadridge Financial Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Broadridge Financial Solutions is more favorable than Genpact.

Broadridge Financial Solutions has a net margin of 15.03% compared to Genpact's net margin of 11.04%. Broadridge Financial Solutions' return on equity of 40.14% beat Genpact's return on equity.

Broadridge Financial Solutions has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genpact has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Broadridge Financial Solutions pays an annual dividend of $3.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Genpact pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Broadridge Financial Solutions pays out 41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genpact pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Broadridge Financial Solutions has raised its dividend for 18 consecutive years and Genpact has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Broadridge Financial Solutions is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Broadridge Financial Solutions had 2 more articles in the media than Genpact. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Broadridge Financial Solutions and 4 mentions for Genpact. Broadridge Financial Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Genpact's score of 0.37 indicating that Broadridge Financial Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Genpact has higher revenue and earnings than Jack Henry & Associates. Genpact is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jack Henry & Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

98.8% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Genpact shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Genpact shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Jack Henry & Associates had 4 more articles in the media than Genpact. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Jack Henry & Associates and 4 mentions for Genpact. Jack Henry & Associates' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Genpact's score of 0.37 indicating that Jack Henry & Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Jack Henry & Associates has a net margin of 20.64% compared to Genpact's net margin of 11.04%. Jack Henry & Associates' return on equity of 24.03% beat Genpact's return on equity.

Jack Henry & Associates presently has a consensus price target of $187.31, indicating a potential upside of 31.52%. Genpact has a consensus price target of $43.29, indicating a potential upside of 53.15%. Given Genpact's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Genpact is more favorable than Jack Henry & Associates.

Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genpact has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Jack Henry & Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Genpact pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Jack Henry & Associates pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genpact pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Jack Henry & Associates has increased its dividend for 35 consecutive years and Genpact has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Genpact is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.