Skip to main content
NYSE:FI

Frank's International Competitors

$3.79
+0.10 (+2.71 %)
(As of 05/17/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$3.58
$3.80
50-Day Range
$3.14
$3.82
52-Week Range
$1.49
$5.44
Volume555,049 shs
Average Volume1.20 million shs
Market Capitalization$863.03 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.51

Competitors

Frank's International (NYSE:FI) Vs. LBRT, CLB, OII, RES, NESR, and PUMP

Should you be buying FI stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "oil & gas field services, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to Frank's International, including Liberty Oilfield Services (LBRT), Core Laboratories (CLB), Oceaneering International (OII), RPC (RES), National Energy Services Reunited (NESR), and ProPetro (PUMP).

Frank's International (NYSE:FI) and Liberty Oilfield Services (NYSE:LBRT) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

Frank's International has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Liberty Oilfield Services has a beta of 3.31, indicating that its stock price is 231% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Frank's International and Liberty Oilfield Services' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frank's International$579.92 million1.49$-235,330,000.00($0.33)-11.48
Liberty Oilfield Services$1.99 billion1.33$39 million$0.5327.68

Liberty Oilfield Services has higher revenue and earnings than Frank's International. Frank's International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Oilfield Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Frank's International and Liberty Oilfield Services, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Frank's International01002.00
Liberty Oilfield Services24602.33

Frank's International presently has a consensus price target of $4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.73%. Liberty Oilfield Services has a consensus price target of $12.25, suggesting a potential downside of 16.50%. Given Frank's International's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Frank's International is more favorable than Liberty Oilfield Services.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

49.5% of Frank's International shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.2% of Frank's International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Liberty Oilfield Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Frank's International and Liberty Oilfield Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Frank's International-72.93%-10.38%-8.48%
Liberty Oilfield Services-8.20%-11.01%-6.95%

Summary

Liberty Oilfield Services beats Frank's International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Frank's International (NYSE:FI) and Core Laboratories (NYSE:CLB) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

49.5% of Frank's International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Core Laboratories shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.2% of Frank's International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Core Laboratories shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Frank's International and Core Laboratories' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Frank's International-72.93%-10.38%-8.48%
Core Laboratories-19.02%45.39%6.74%

Risk & Volatility

Frank's International has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Core Laboratories has a beta of 3.38, suggesting that its stock price is 238% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Frank's International and Core Laboratories, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Frank's International01002.00
Core Laboratories17102.00

Frank's International presently has a consensus price target of $4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.73%. Core Laboratories has a consensus price target of $26.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 24.43%. Given Frank's International's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Frank's International is more favorable than Core Laboratories.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Frank's International and Core Laboratories' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frank's International$579.92 million1.49$-235,330,000.00($0.33)-11.48
Core Laboratories$668.21 million2.39$101.98 million$1.7919.30

Core Laboratories has higher revenue and earnings than Frank's International. Frank's International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Core Laboratories, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Core Laboratories beats Frank's International on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Frank's International (NYSE:FI) and Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Frank's International and Oceaneering International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Frank's International-72.93%-10.38%-8.48%
Oceaneering International-37.40%-3.56%-1.14%

Volatility and Risk

Frank's International has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, meaning that its share price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Frank's International and Oceaneering International, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Frank's International01002.00
Oceaneering International03202.40

Frank's International currently has a consensus target price of $4.50, indicating a potential upside of 18.73%. Oceaneering International has a consensus target price of $12.6857, indicating a potential downside of 16.76%. Given Frank's International's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Frank's International is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Frank's International and Oceaneering International's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frank's International$579.92 million1.49$-235,330,000.00($0.33)-11.48
Oceaneering International$2.05 billion0.74$-348,440,000.00($0.82)-18.59

Frank's International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oceaneering International. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frank's International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

49.5% of Frank's International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.2% of Frank's International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Oceaneering International beats Frank's International on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Frank's International (NYSE:FI) and RPC (NYSE:RES) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Frank's International has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPC has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Frank's International and RPC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Frank's International01002.00
RPC22001.50

Frank's International currently has a consensus target price of $4.50, indicating a potential upside of 18.73%. RPC has a consensus target price of $3.35, indicating a potential downside of 43.98%. Given Frank's International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Frank's International is more favorable than RPC.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Frank's International and RPC's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frank's International$579.92 million1.49$-235,330,000.00($0.33)-11.48
RPC$1.22 billion1.06$-87,110,000.00($0.12)-49.83

RPC has higher revenue and earnings than Frank's International. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frank's International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

49.5% of Frank's International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.2% of Frank's International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 73.6% of RPC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Frank's International and RPC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Frank's International-72.93%-10.38%-8.48%
RPC-32.86%-9.35%-7.44%

Summary

RPC beats Frank's International on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

National Energy Services Reunited (NASDAQ:NESR) and Frank's International (NYSE:FI) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares National Energy Services Reunited and Frank's International's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
National Energy Services Reunited$658.39 million1.82$39.36 million$0.7418.46
Frank's International$579.92 million1.49$-235,330,000.00($0.33)-11.48

National Energy Services Reunited has higher revenue and earnings than Frank's International. Frank's International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than National Energy Services Reunited, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for National Energy Services Reunited and Frank's International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
National Energy Services Reunited00103.00
Frank's International01002.00

National Energy Services Reunited presently has a consensus target price of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 61.05%. Frank's International has a consensus target price of $4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.73%. Given National Energy Services Reunited's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe National Energy Services Reunited is more favorable than Frank's International.

Risk & Volatility

National Energy Services Reunited has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Frank's International has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

28.1% of National Energy Services Reunited shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.5% of Frank's International shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of Frank's International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares National Energy Services Reunited and Frank's International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
National Energy Services Reunited4.63%6.46%3.66%
Frank's International-72.93%-10.38%-8.48%

Summary

National Energy Services Reunited beats Frank's International on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Frank's International (NYSE:FI) and ProPetro (NYSE:PUMP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Frank's International has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ProPetro has a beta of 3.48, meaning that its stock price is 248% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Frank's International and ProPetro's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Frank's International-72.93%-10.38%-8.48%
ProPetro-3.76%-0.92%-0.69%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

49.5% of Frank's International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.5% of ProPetro shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of Frank's International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of ProPetro shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Frank's International and ProPetro, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Frank's International01002.00
ProPetro14802.54

Frank's International currently has a consensus target price of $4.50, indicating a potential upside of 18.73%. ProPetro has a consensus target price of $8.65, indicating a potential downside of 21.29%. Given Frank's International's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Frank's International is more favorable than ProPetro.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Frank's International and ProPetro's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frank's International$579.92 million1.49$-235,330,000.00($0.33)-11.48
ProPetro$2.05 billion0.55$163.01 million$1.606.87

ProPetro has higher revenue and earnings than Frank's International. Frank's International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProPetro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

ProPetro beats Frank's International on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Frank's International Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Liberty Oilfield Services logo
LBRT
Liberty Oilfield Services
0.9$14.67+2.3%$2.64 billion$1.99 billion-13.46Insider Selling
Core Laboratories logo
CLB
Core Laboratories
1.5$34.55+1.7%$1.60 billion$668.21 million-15.22
Oceaneering International logo
OII
Oceaneering International
1.0$15.24+1.4%$1.52 billion$2.05 billion-2.05
RPC logo
RES
RPC
1.0$5.98+2.8%$1.29 billion$1.22 billion-5.59Insider Selling
NESR
National Energy Services Reunited
1.5$13.66+4.2%$1.20 billion$658.39 million32.52Upcoming Earnings
ProPetro logo
PUMP
ProPetro
1.1$10.99+3.8%$1.12 billion$2.05 billion-26.80
NexTier Oilfield Solutions logo
NEX
NexTier Oilfield Solutions
1.3$4.79+3.5%$1.03 billion$1.82 billion-2.63Analyst Downgrade
Helix Energy Solutions Group logo
HLX
Helix Energy Solutions Group
1.2$5.29+3.0%$797.33 million$751.91 million33.06
Select Energy Services logo
WTTR
Select Energy Services
1.0$6.44+0.6%$661.12 million$1.29 billion-1.88
North American Construction Group logo
NOA
North American Construction Group
2.4$13.80+0.9%$413.31 million$541.89 million11.69
RCON
Recon Technology
0.5$10.18+5.7%$186.49 million$9.30 million0.00
Mammoth Energy Services logo
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services
0.9$3.14+1.0%$145.30 million$625.01 million-0.91
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.1$10.62+1.2%$144.64 million$78.44 million75.86Earnings Announcement
KLXE
KLX Energy Services
1.4$12.06+0.7%$106.55 million$544 million-0.18Gap Down
Ranger Energy Services logo
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services
1.2$6.48+5.1%$99.84 million$336.90 million-7.90News Coverage
U.S. Well Services logo
USWS
U.S. Well Services
0.8$0.96+18.8%$82.46 million$514.76 million-0.22News Coverage
Gap Up
CSI Compressco logo
CCLP
CSI Compressco
0.5$1.59+7.5%$76.27 million$476.58 million-1.47Gap Up
Nine Energy Service logo
NINE
Nine Energy Service
1.0$1.98+9.1%$62.09 million$832.94 million-0.10
NCS Multistage logo
NCSM
NCS Multistage
0.8$24.01+3.2%$57.12 million$205.49 million-0.82
This page was last updated on 5/17/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.