CTS (CTS) Competitors

Avnet has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. Avnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CTS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, CTS had 5 more articles in the media than Avnet. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for CTS and 7 mentions for Avnet. Avnet's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat CTS's score of 0.83 indicating that Avnet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

96.9% of CTS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.8% of Avnet shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of CTS shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Avnet shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CTS has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avnet has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

CTS pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Avnet pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. CTS pays out 6.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avnet pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avnet has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Avnet is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CTS presently has a consensus price target of $73.50, indicating a potential upside of 30.93%. Avnet has a consensus price target of $93.25, indicating a potential upside of 0.30%. Given CTS's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe CTS is more favorable than Avnet.

CTS has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Avnet's net margin of 1.21%. CTS's return on equity of 13.48% beat Avnet's return on equity.

CTS presently has a consensus price target of $73.50, indicating a potential upside of 30.93%. Diodes has a consensus price target of $135.00, indicating a potential upside of 47.28%. Given Diodes' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Diodes is more favorable than CTS.

CTS has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Diodes' net margin of 5.27%. CTS's return on equity of 13.48% beat Diodes' return on equity.

CTS has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diodes has a beta of 1.89, suggesting that its share price is 89% more volatile than the broader market.

Diodes has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diodes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, CTS had 9 more articles in the media than Diodes. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for CTS and 3 mentions for Diodes. Diodes' average media sentiment score of 1.82 beat CTS's score of 0.83 indicating that Diodes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

96.9% of CTS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of Diodes shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of CTS shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Diodes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CTS has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Littelfuse has a beta of 1.47, meaning that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

CTS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CTS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CTS currently has a consensus price target of $73.50, suggesting a potential upside of 30.93%. Littelfuse has a consensus price target of $465.83, suggesting a potential upside of 12.68%. Given CTS's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CTS is more favorable than Littelfuse.

CTS has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -0.31%. CTS's return on equity of 13.48% beat Littelfuse's return on equity.

In the previous week, CTS had 4 more articles in the media than Littelfuse. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for CTS and 8 mentions for Littelfuse. Littelfuse's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat CTS's score of 0.83 indicating that Littelfuse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

96.9% of CTS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Littelfuse shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of CTS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CTS pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. CTS pays out 6.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Littelfuse pays out -640.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Littelfuse has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Littelfuse is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Plexus has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plexus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CTS has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Plexus' net margin of 4.03%. CTS's return on equity of 13.48% beat Plexus' return on equity.

Plexus has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CTS has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CTS had 7 more articles in the media than Plexus. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for CTS and 5 mentions for Plexus. Plexus' average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat CTS's score of 0.83 indicating that Plexus is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Plexus currently has a consensus target price of $273.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.55%. CTS has a consensus target price of $73.50, suggesting a potential upside of 30.93%. Given CTS's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CTS is more favorable than Plexus.

94.5% of Plexus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of CTS shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Plexus shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CTS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.