CTS (CTS) Competitors

CTS has a net margin of 12.46% compared to Avnet's net margin of 0.86%. CTS's return on equity of 12.90% beat Avnet's return on equity.

Avnet presently has a consensus price target of $89.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.15%. Given Avnet's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Avnet is more favorable than CTS.

In the previous week, CTS had 5 more articles in the media than Avnet. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for CTS and 1 mentions for Avnet. Avnet's average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat CTS's score of -0.14 indicating that Avnet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Avnet has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Avnet has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CTS has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Avnet pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. CTS pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Avnet pays out 54.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CTS pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avnet has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Avnet is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

95.8% of Avnet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of CTS shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Avnet shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CTS shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Diodes has a consensus target price of $113.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.24%. Given Diodes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Diodes is more favorable than CTS.

CTS has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diodes has a beta of 1.88, suggesting that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

96.9% of CTS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of Diodes shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of CTS shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Diodes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CTS has a net margin of 12.46% compared to Diodes' net margin of 5.50%. CTS's return on equity of 12.90% beat Diodes' return on equity.

Diodes has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diodes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, CTS had 2 more articles in the media than Diodes. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for CTS and 4 mentions for Diodes. Diodes' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat CTS's score of -0.14 indicating that Diodes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Littelfuse presently has a consensus target price of $465.83, indicating a potential upside of 12.21%. Given Littelfuse's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Littelfuse is more favorable than CTS.

Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. CTS pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Littelfuse pays out -177.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CTS pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Littelfuse has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Littelfuse is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CTS has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CTS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Littelfuse has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CTS has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

CTS has a net margin of 12.46% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -1.61%. CTS's return on equity of 12.90% beat Littelfuse's return on equity.

In the previous week, CTS had 5 more articles in the media than Littelfuse. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for CTS and 1 mentions for Littelfuse. Littelfuse's average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat CTS's score of -0.14 indicating that Littelfuse is being referred to more favorably in the media.

96.1% of Littelfuse shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of CTS shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CTS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Plexus has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plexus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Plexus presently has a consensus target price of $246.67, indicating a potential downside of 7.71%. Given Plexus' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Plexus is more favorable than CTS.

Plexus has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CTS has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

94.4% of Plexus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of CTS shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Plexus shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CTS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CTS has a net margin of 12.46% compared to Plexus' net margin of 4.35%. CTS's return on equity of 12.90% beat Plexus' return on equity.

In the previous week, Plexus and Plexus both had 6 articles in the media. Plexus' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat CTS's score of -0.14 indicating that Plexus is being referred to more favorably in the media.