CTS (CTS) Competitors

95.8% of Avnet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of CTS shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Avnet shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CTS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CTS has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Avnet's net margin of 1.21%. CTS's return on equity of 13.48% beat Avnet's return on equity.

In the previous week, CTS had 6 more articles in the media than Avnet. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for CTS and 2 mentions for Avnet. Avnet's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat CTS's score of 0.49 indicating that Avnet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Avnet has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Avnet currently has a consensus target price of $93.25, suggesting a potential downside of 6.70%. CTS has a consensus target price of $73.50, suggesting a potential upside of 25.05%. Given CTS's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CTS is more favorable than Avnet.

Avnet has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CTS has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Avnet pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. CTS pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Avnet pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CTS pays out 6.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avnet has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Avnet is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Diodes has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diodes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CTS has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Diodes' net margin of 5.27%. CTS's return on equity of 13.48% beat Diodes' return on equity.

CTS has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diodes has a beta of 1.89, meaning that its share price is 89% more volatile than the broader market.

96.9% of CTS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of Diodes shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of CTS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Diodes shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CTS had 2 more articles in the media than Diodes. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for CTS and 6 mentions for Diodes. Diodes' average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat CTS's score of 0.49 indicating that Diodes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

CTS currently has a consensus target price of $73.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.05%. Diodes has a consensus target price of $135.00, indicating a potential upside of 39.48%. Given Diodes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Diodes is more favorable than CTS.

CTS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CTS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CTS has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Littelfuse has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

CTS currently has a consensus target price of $73.50, suggesting a potential upside of 25.05%. Littelfuse has a consensus target price of $465.83, suggesting a potential upside of 9.93%. Given CTS's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CTS is more favorable than Littelfuse.

96.9% of CTS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Littelfuse shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of CTS shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CTS has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -0.31%. CTS's return on equity of 13.48% beat Littelfuse's return on equity.

In the previous week, CTS had 4 more articles in the media than Littelfuse. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for CTS and 4 mentions for Littelfuse. Littelfuse's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat CTS's score of 0.49 indicating that Littelfuse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

CTS pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. CTS pays out 6.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Littelfuse pays out -640.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Littelfuse has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Littelfuse is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CTS has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Plexus' net margin of 4.03%. CTS's return on equity of 13.48% beat Plexus' return on equity.

96.9% of CTS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of Plexus shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of CTS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Plexus shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CTS had 2 more articles in the media than Plexus. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for CTS and 6 mentions for Plexus. Plexus' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat CTS's score of 0.49 indicating that Plexus is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

CTS has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plexus has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

CTS currently has a consensus target price of $73.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.05%. Plexus has a consensus target price of $276.86, indicating a potential upside of 6.10%. Given CTS's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe CTS is more favorable than Plexus.

Plexus has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plexus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.