CTS (CTS) Competitors

Avnet pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. CTS pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Avnet pays out 54.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CTS pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avnet has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Avnet is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Avnet has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CTS has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Avnet currently has a consensus target price of $89.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.69%. Given Avnet's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Avnet is more favorable than CTS.

Avnet has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

95.8% of Avnet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of CTS shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Avnet shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CTS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CTS has a net margin of 12.46% compared to Avnet's net margin of 0.86%. CTS's return on equity of 12.90% beat Avnet's return on equity.

In the previous week, Avnet and Avnet both had 7 articles in the media. Avnet's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat CTS's score of 0.43 indicating that Avnet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

96.9% of CTS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Littelfuse shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of CTS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Littelfuse has a consensus target price of $436.67, suggesting a potential downside of 7.09%. Given Littelfuse's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Littelfuse is more favorable than CTS.

CTS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CTS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CTS has a net margin of 12.46% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -1.61%. CTS's return on equity of 12.90% beat Littelfuse's return on equity.

In the previous week, Littelfuse had 1 more articles in the media than CTS. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Littelfuse and 7 mentions for CTS. Littelfuse's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat CTS's score of 0.43 indicating that Littelfuse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

CTS pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. CTS pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Littelfuse pays out -177.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Littelfuse has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Littelfuse is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CTS has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Littelfuse has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

CTS has a net margin of 12.46% compared to Plexus' net margin of 4.35%. CTS's return on equity of 12.90% beat Plexus' return on equity.

In the previous week, Plexus had 3 more articles in the media than CTS. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Plexus and 7 mentions for CTS. Plexus' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat CTS's score of 0.43 indicating that Plexus is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Plexus has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CTS has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Plexus has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plexus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

94.5% of Plexus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of CTS shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Plexus shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CTS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Plexus presently has a consensus target price of $238.33, suggesting a potential downside of 11.63%. Given Plexus' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Plexus is more favorable than CTS.

Belden has a consensus target price of $162.50, indicating a potential upside of 56.50%. Given Belden's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Belden is more favorable than CTS.

96.9% of CTS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Belden shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of CTS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Belden shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CTS has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Belden has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

CTS pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Belden pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. CTS pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Belden pays out 3.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CTS has a net margin of 12.46% compared to Belden's net margin of 8.49%. Belden's return on equity of 24.47% beat CTS's return on equity.

In the previous week, CTS had 3 more articles in the media than Belden. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for CTS and 4 mentions for Belden. CTS's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Belden's score of 0.16 indicating that CTS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Belden has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. Belden is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CTS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.