NYSE:CTS

CTS Competitors

$30.68
-0.14 (-0.45 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$30.35
Now: $30.68
$31.04
50-Day Range
$30.08
MA: $31.88
$33.64
52-Week Range
$18.17
Now: $30.68
$37.26
Volume105,200 shs
Average Volume159,762 shs
Market Capitalization$992.44 million
P/E Ratio33.35
Dividend Yield0.52%
Beta0.79

Competitors

CTS (NYSE:CTS) Vs. TRMB, IPGP, JBL, MRCY, FN, and SANM

Should you be buying CTS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "electronic manufacturing services" are considered alternatives and competitors to CTS, including Trimble (TRMB), IPG Photonics (IPGP), Jabil (JBL), Mercury Systems (MRCY), Fabrinet (FN), and Sanmina (SANM).

Trimble (NASDAQ:TRMB) and CTS (NYSE:CTS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Trimble has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its share price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CTS has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Trimble and CTS's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trimble$3.26 billion6.31$514.30 million$1.7646.57
CTS$469 million2.12$36.15 million$1.4521.16

Trimble has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trimble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Trimble and CTS, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Trimble02602.75
CTS01002.00

Trimble presently has a consensus target price of $56.75, indicating a potential downside of 30.77%. CTS has a consensus target price of $25.00, indicating a potential downside of 18.51%. Given CTS's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CTS is more favorable than Trimble.

Profitability

This table compares Trimble and CTS's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Trimble15.56%14.84%7.13%
CTS7.16%8.51%5.20%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

89.4% of Trimble shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of CTS shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Trimble shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of CTS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Trimble beats CTS on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

CTS (NYSE:CTS) and IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares CTS and IPG Photonics' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CTS$469 million2.12$36.15 million$1.4521.16
IPG Photonics$1.31 billion9.12$180.23 million$4.3651.35

IPG Photonics has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IPG Photonics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

CTS has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, IPG Photonics has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

93.2% of CTS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of IPG Photonics shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of CTS shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 34.0% of IPG Photonics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares CTS and IPG Photonics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CTS7.16%8.51%5.20%
IPG Photonics9.04%7.76%6.85%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for CTS and IPG Photonics, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CTS01002.00
IPG Photonics04502.56

CTS presently has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential downside of 18.51%. IPG Photonics has a consensus price target of $230.9444, indicating a potential upside of 3.15%. Given IPG Photonics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe IPG Photonics is more favorable than CTS.

Summary

IPG Photonics beats CTS on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jabil (NYSE:JBL) and CTS (NYSE:CTS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

Jabil has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CTS has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Jabil and CTS's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Jabil0.78%14.01%1.80%
CTS7.16%8.51%5.20%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Jabil and CTS, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Jabil03402.57
CTS01002.00

Jabil currently has a consensus target price of $53.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 2.03%. CTS has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential downside of 18.51%. Given Jabil's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Jabil is more favorable than CTS.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Jabil and CTS's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jabil$27.27 billion0.30$53.91 million$0.35155.54
CTS$469 million2.12$36.15 million$1.4521.16

Jabil has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jabil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

87.8% of Jabil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of CTS shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Jabil shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of CTS shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Jabil pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. CTS pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Jabil pays out 91.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CTS pays out 11.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jabil has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CTS has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Jabil beats CTS on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

CTS (NYSE:CTS) and Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CTS and Mercury Systems' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CTS$469 million2.12$36.15 million$1.4521.16
Mercury Systems$796.61 million5.59$85.71 million$1.9241.29

Mercury Systems has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mercury Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

93.2% of CTS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of CTS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Mercury Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for CTS and Mercury Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CTS01002.00
Mercury Systems01602.86

CTS currently has a consensus price target of $25.00, suggesting a potential downside of 18.51%. Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $94.1111, suggesting a potential upside of 18.71%. Given Mercury Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Mercury Systems is more favorable than CTS.

Risk & Volatility

CTS has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mercury Systems has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares CTS and Mercury Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CTS7.16%8.51%5.20%
Mercury Systems9.97%7.98%6.65%

Summary

Mercury Systems beats CTS on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) and CTS (NYSE:CTS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Fabrinet and CTS's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fabrinet$1.64 billion2.01$113.48 million$3.1428.47
CTS$469 million2.12$36.15 million$1.4521.16

Fabrinet has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. CTS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fabrinet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.5% of Fabrinet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of CTS shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Fabrinet shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of CTS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fabrinet and CTS, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fabrinet03502.63
CTS01002.00

Fabrinet currently has a consensus price target of $72.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.46%. CTS has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential downside of 18.51%. Given CTS's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CTS is more favorable than Fabrinet.

Volatility and Risk

Fabrinet has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CTS has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Fabrinet and CTS's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fabrinet7.18%13.37%9.41%
CTS7.16%8.51%5.20%

Summary

Fabrinet beats CTS on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) and CTS (NYSE:CTS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Sanmina and CTS, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sanmina03102.25
CTS01002.00

Sanmina currently has a consensus price target of $39.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.25%. CTS has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential downside of 18.51%. Given Sanmina's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Sanmina is more favorable than CTS.

Profitability

This table compares Sanmina and CTS's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sanmina2.01%11.51%4.61%
CTS7.16%8.51%5.20%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.6% of Sanmina shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of CTS shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Sanmina shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of CTS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sanmina and CTS's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanmina$6.96 billion0.39$139.71 million$2.6815.56
CTS$469 million2.12$36.15 million$1.4521.16

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than CTS. Sanmina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CTS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Sanmina has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CTS has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Sanmina beats CTS on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


CTS Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Trimble logo
TRMB
Trimble
1.5$81.97-0.1%$20.60 billion$3.26 billion42.04
IPG Photonics logo
IPGP
IPG Photonics
1.3$223.90-2.5%$11.99 billion$1.31 billion113.66Insider Selling
Jabil logo
JBL
Jabil
1.8$54.44-1.4%$8.10 billion$27.27 billion39.17
Mercury Systems logo
MRCY
Mercury Systems
1.9$79.28-1.3%$4.45 billion$796.61 million52.85
Fabrinet logo
FN
Fabrinet
1.6$89.40-0.6%$3.30 billion$1.64 billion27.85
Sanmina logo
SANM
Sanmina
1.9$41.69-0.2%$2.71 billion$6.96 billion20.95Upcoming Earnings
Plexus logo
PLXS
Plexus
1.5$91.85-0.9%$2.65 billion$3.39 billion23.43Upcoming Earnings
Methode Electronics logo
MEI
Methode Electronics
2.0$44.75-0.2%$1.72 billion$1.02 billion13.05News Coverage
TTM Technologies logo
TTMI
TTM Technologies
1.2$15.08-0.3%$1.61 billion$2.69 billion9.43
Benchmark Electronics logo
BHE
Benchmark Electronics
1.7$30.48-1.1%$1.10 billion$2.27 billion-1,523.24
Park Aerospace logo
PKE
Park Aerospace
1.1$13.84-1.2%$282.07 million$60.01 million43.25
Neonode logo
NEON
Neonode
1.3$8.80-2.7%$101.24 million$6.65 million-12.22
Key Tronic logo
KTCC
Key Tronic
1.0$7.77-0.6%$83.61 million$449.48 million16.89
This page was last updated on 4/19/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.