Avnet (AVT) Competitors

95.8% of Avnet shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.8% of Analog Devices shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Avnet shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Analog Devices shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Avnet presently has a consensus target price of $89.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.73%. Analog Devices has a consensus target price of $432.71, indicating a potential downside of 2.87%. Given Analog Devices' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Analog Devices is more favorable than Avnet.

Avnet has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Analog Devices has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Analog Devices has a net margin of 26.01% compared to Avnet's net margin of 0.86%. Analog Devices' return on equity of 14.37% beat Avnet's return on equity.

Avnet pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Analog Devices pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Avnet pays out 54.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Analog Devices pays out 65.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avnet has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Analog Devices has increased its dividend for 23 consecutive years. Avnet is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Analog Devices had 54 more articles in the media than Avnet. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Analog Devices and 2 mentions for Avnet. Avnet's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Analog Devices' score of 1.34 indicating that Avnet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Analog Devices has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Avnet. Avnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Analog Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

InterDigital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Avnet. InterDigital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

InterDigital has a net margin of 44.20% compared to Avnet's net margin of 0.86%. InterDigital's return on equity of 35.25% beat Avnet's return on equity.

InterDigital pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Avnet pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. InterDigital pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avnet pays out 54.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. InterDigital has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Avnet has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Avnet is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, InterDigital had 13 more articles in the media than Avnet. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for InterDigital and 2 mentions for Avnet. Avnet's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat InterDigital's score of 0.22 indicating that Avnet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

InterDigital has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avnet has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

99.8% of InterDigital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.8% of Avnet shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.5% of InterDigital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Avnet shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

InterDigital currently has a consensus price target of $416.67, indicating a potential upside of 39.90%. Avnet has a consensus price target of $89.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.73%. Given InterDigital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe InterDigital is more favorable than Avnet.

Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Avnet pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Littelfuse pays out -177.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avnet pays out 54.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Littelfuse has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Avnet has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Avnet has higher revenue and earnings than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Avnet has a net margin of 0.86% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -1.61%. Littelfuse's return on equity of 11.62% beat Avnet's return on equity.

Littelfuse has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avnet has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Littelfuse had 4 more articles in the media than Avnet. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Littelfuse and 2 mentions for Avnet. Avnet's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Littelfuse's score of 0.78 indicating that Avnet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Littelfuse presently has a consensus target price of $465.83, indicating a potential downside of 4.76%. Avnet has a consensus target price of $89.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.73%. Given Avnet's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Avnet is more favorable than Littelfuse.

96.1% of Littelfuse shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.8% of Avnet shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Avnet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.69, suggesting that its share price is 69% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avnet has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.8% of Avnet shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Avnet shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Avnet pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avnet pays out 54.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Monolithic Power Systems has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Avnet has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Avnet is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Monolithic Power Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Avnet. Avnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Monolithic Power Systems has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Avnet's net margin of 0.86%. Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity of 19.58% beat Avnet's return on equity.

Monolithic Power Systems presently has a consensus price target of $1,599.17, suggesting a potential upside of 3.99%. Avnet has a consensus price target of $89.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.73%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than Avnet.

In the previous week, Monolithic Power Systems had 27 more articles in the media than Avnet. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems and 2 mentions for Avnet. Avnet's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Monolithic Power Systems' score of 1.22 indicating that Avnet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.