Does the media refer more to USFD or PFGC?

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 9 more articles in the media than US Foods. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Performance Food Group and 2 mentions for US Foods. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat US Foods' score of 0.32 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment US Foods 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Performance Food Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor PFGC or FERG?

In the previous week, Ferguson had 11 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Ferguson and 11 mentions for Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Ferguson's score of 0.42 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Performance Food Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ferguson 7 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 5 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to CNM or PFGC?

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 7 more articles in the media than Core & Main. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Performance Food Group and 4 mentions for Core & Main. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Core & Main's score of 0.00 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Core & Main 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Performance Food Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, AVT or PFGC?

Performance Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Avnet. Avnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Avnet $22.20B 0.34 $240.22M $2.57 36.16 Performance Food Group $63.30B 0.24 $340.20M $2.10 45.80

Does the media favor AVT or PFGC?

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 6 more articles in the media than Avnet. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Performance Food Group and 5 mentions for Avnet. Avnet's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.88 indicating that Avnet is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Avnet 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Performance Food Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

$96.19 -1.40 (-1.44%)

Closing price 06/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$96.06 -0.12 (-0.13%)

As of 04:01 AM Eastern

Compare

PFGC vs. USFD, FERG, WSO.B, CNM, and AVT

Should you buy Performance Food Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Performance Food Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Performance Food Group include US Foods (USFD), Ferguson (FERG), Watsco (WSO.B), Core & Main (CNM), and Avnet (AVT). These companies are all part of the "wholesale" industry.

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

US Foods (NYSE:USFD) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both large-cap wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

US Foods has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Performance Food Group. US Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
US Foods	$39.42B	0.45	$676M	$2.97	27.15
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.24	$340.20M	$2.10	45.80

US Foods has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 9 more articles in the media than US Foods. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Performance Food Group and 2 mentions for US Foods. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat US Foods' score of 0.32 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
US Foods	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Performance Food Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

98.8% of US Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of US Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

US Foods currently has a consensus price target of $105.50, suggesting a potential upside of 30.82%. Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $119.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.72%. Given US Foods' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe US Foods is more favorable than Performance Food Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
US Foods	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

US Foods has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. US Foods' return on equity of 19.37% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
US Foods	1.71%	19.37%	6.14%
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%

Summary

US Foods beats Performance Food Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Ferguson?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and Ferguson (NYSE:FERG) are both large-cap wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Performance Food Group currently has a consensus target price of $119.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.72%. Ferguson has a consensus target price of $269.73, indicating a potential upside of 18.60%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Ferguson.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Ferguson	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78

Ferguson has a net margin of 6.98% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. Ferguson's return on equity of 38.81% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%
Ferguson	6.98%	38.81%	12.83%

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Ferguson shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Ferguson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ferguson has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Performance Food Group. Ferguson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.24	$340.20M	$2.10	45.80
Ferguson	$31.32B	1.41	$1.86B	$8.60	26.45

In the previous week, Ferguson had 11 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Ferguson and 11 mentions for Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Ferguson's score of 0.42 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ferguson	7 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	5 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferguson has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ferguson beats Performance Food Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Watsco?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and Watsco (NYSE:WSO.B) are both large-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 11 more articles in the media than Watsco. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Performance Food Group and 0 mentions for Watsco. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Watsco's score of 0.00 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group	Positive
Watsco	Neutral

Performance Food Group currently has a consensus price target of $119.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.72%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Watsco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Watsco	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Watsco shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.8% of Watsco shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Watsco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Performance Food Group. Watsco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.24	$340.20M	$2.10	45.80
Watsco	$7.24B	2.09	$496.99M	$12.05	30.86

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watsco has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Watsco has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 15.33% beat Watsco's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%
Watsco	6.85%	15.31%	10.81%

Summary

Performance Food Group beats Watsco on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Core & Main?

Core & Main (NYSE:CNM) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

Core & Main presently has a consensus target price of $61.64, suggesting a potential upside of 22.12%. Performance Food Group has a consensus target price of $119.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.72%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Core & Main.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Core & Main	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.58
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Core & Main has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Core & Main has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. Core & Main's return on equity of 25.45% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Core & Main	5.77%	25.45%	8.06%
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%

94.2% of Core & Main shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Core & Main shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 7 more articles in the media than Core & Main. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Performance Food Group and 4 mentions for Core & Main. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Core & Main's score of 0.00 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Core & Main	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Performance Food Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Core & Main has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Performance Food Group. Core & Main is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Core & Main	$7.65B	1.28	$441M	$2.31	21.85
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.24	$340.20M	$2.10	45.80

Summary

Performance Food Group beats Core & Main on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Avnet?

Avnet (NASDAQ:AVT) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Performance Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Avnet. Avnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Avnet	$22.20B	0.34	$240.22M	$2.57	36.16
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.24	$340.20M	$2.10	45.80

Avnet has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Avnet has a net margin of 0.86% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 15.33% beat Avnet's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Avnet	0.86%	7.07%	2.73%
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%

Avnet presently has a consensus price target of $89.00, suggesting a potential downside of 4.23%. Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $119.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.72%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Avnet.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Avnet	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 6 more articles in the media than Avnet. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Performance Food Group and 5 mentions for Avnet. Avnet's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.88 indicating that Avnet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Avnet	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Performance Food Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

95.8% of Avnet shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Avnet shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Performance Food Group beats Avnet on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Performance Food Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PFGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PFGC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Performance Food Group	FOOD ITEMS Industry	Retail Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$15.33B	$4.99B	$27.38B	$23.16B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.75%	178.37%	4.09%
P/E Ratio	45.80	18.47	19.83	31.31
Price / Sales	0.24	1.04	4.25	24.50
Price / Cash	10.65	10.44	15.01	24.80
Price / Book	3.36	3.57	6.10	4.74
Net Income	$340.20M	$203.19M	$969.96M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-0.52%	-3.84%	-0.54%	0.62%
1 Month Performance	8.41%	1.73%	-1.33%	1.54%
1 Year Performance	8.09%	1.07%	0.30%	26.87%

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PFGC Performance Food Group	4.3961 of 5 stars	$96.19 -1.4%	$119.00 +23.7%	+7.8%	$15.33B	$63.30B	45.80	43,000	Insider Trade
USFD US Foods	4.6023 of 5 stars	$80.41 -0.1%	$106.75 +32.8%	+2.1%	$17.72B	$39.42B	27.07	30,000	Analyst Forecast
FERG Ferguson	4.2828 of 5 stars	$223.37 +0.0%	$269.73 +20.8%	N/A	$43.31B	$31.32B	25.97	35,000
WSO.B Watsco	N/A	$381.78 -5.5%	N/A	-17.4%	$16.42B	$7.24B	31.68	7,280	Gap Down
CNM Core & Main	3.448 of 5 stars	$47.27 0.0%	$61.64 +30.4%	-5.7%	$9.20B	$7.65B	20.46	5,600	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PFGC) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

PFGC vs. USFD, FERG, WSO.B, CNM, and AVT

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Ferguson?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Watsco?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Core & Main?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Avnet?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFGC vs. The Competition

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

PFGC vs. USFD, FERG, WSO.B, CNM, and AVT

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, USFD or PFGC?

Which has more volatility and risk, USFD or PFGC?

Does the media refer more to USFD or PFGC?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of USFD or PFGC?

Do analysts rate USFD or PFGC?

Is USFD or PFGC more profitable?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Ferguson?

Do analysts recommend PFGC or FERG?

Is PFGC or FERG more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PFGC or FERG?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PFGC or FERG?

Does the media favor PFGC or FERG?

Which has more volatility and risk, PFGC or FERG?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Watsco?

Does the media prefer PFGC or WSO.B?

Do analysts recommend PFGC or WSO.B?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PFGC or WSO.B?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PFGC or WSO.B?

Which has more volatility & risk, PFGC or WSO.B?

Is PFGC or WSO.B more profitable?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Core & Main?

Do analysts rate CNM or PFGC?

Which has more volatility & risk, CNM or PFGC?

Is CNM or PFGC more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CNM or PFGC?

Does the media refer more to CNM or PFGC?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CNM or PFGC?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Avnet?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, AVT or PFGC?

Which has more volatility & risk, AVT or PFGC?

Is AVT or PFGC more profitable?

Do analysts prefer AVT or PFGC?

Does the media favor AVT or PFGC?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of AVT or PFGC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFGC vs. The Competition

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools