Go Pro
→ Read now. Do not delete. You’ve been warned. (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free PFGC Stock Alerts

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

Performance Food Group logo
$113.31 -0.05 (-0.05%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$113.28 -0.03 (-0.02%)
As of 06:18 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

PFGC vs. USFD, TEL, FERG, WSO.B, and CNM

Should you buy Performance Food Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Performance Food Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Performance Food Group include US Foods (USFD), TE Connectivity (TEL), Ferguson (FERG), Watsco (WSO.B), and Core & Main (CNM). These companies are all part of the "wholesale" industry.

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and US Foods (NYSE:USFD) are both large-cap wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, US Foods has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Performance Food Group presently has a consensus price target of $120.73, indicating a potential upside of 6.55%. US Foods has a consensus price target of $106.31, indicating a potential upside of 4.88%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than US Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Performance Food Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
US Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 3 more articles in the media than US Foods. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Performance Food Group and 2 mentions for US Foods. US Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.87 indicating that US Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
US Foods
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

US Foods has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Performance Food Group. US Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group$63.30B0.28$340.20M$2.1053.96
US Foods$39.42B0.57$676M$2.9734.13

US Foods has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. US Foods' return on equity of 19.37% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Performance Food Group0.49% 15.33% 3.88%
US Foods 1.71%19.37%6.14%

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of US Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of US Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

US Foods beats Performance Food Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to TE Connectivity?

TE Connectivity (NYSE:TEL) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both large-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

TE Connectivity has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

TE Connectivity presently has a consensus target price of $255.31, indicating a potential upside of 28.81%. Performance Food Group has a consensus target price of $120.73, indicating a potential upside of 6.55%. Given TE Connectivity's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe TE Connectivity is more favorable than Performance Food Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TE Connectivity
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Performance Food Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

TE Connectivity has a net margin of 15.54% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. TE Connectivity's return on equity of 23.56% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TE Connectivity15.54% 23.56% 11.92%
Performance Food Group 0.49%15.33%3.88%

91.4% of TE Connectivity shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of TE Connectivity shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, TE Connectivity had 4 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for TE Connectivity and 5 mentions for Performance Food Group. TE Connectivity's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.87 indicating that TE Connectivity is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TE Connectivity
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Performance Food Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

TE Connectivity has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Performance Food Group. TE Connectivity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TE Connectivity$17.26B3.35$1.84B$9.7920.25
Performance Food Group$63.30B0.28$340.20M$2.1053.96

Summary

TE Connectivity beats Performance Food Group on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Ferguson?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and Ferguson (NYSE:FERG) are both large-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferguson has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Ferguson shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Ferguson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ferguson has a net margin of 6.98% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. Ferguson's return on equity of 38.81% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Performance Food Group0.49% 15.33% 3.88%
Ferguson 6.98%38.81%12.83%

Ferguson has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Performance Food Group. Ferguson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group$63.30B0.28$340.20M$2.1053.96
Ferguson$31.32B1.45$1.86B$8.6027.20

Performance Food Group presently has a consensus price target of $120.73, indicating a potential upside of 6.55%. Ferguson has a consensus price target of $276.61, indicating a potential upside of 18.25%. Given Ferguson's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ferguson is more favorable than Performance Food Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Performance Food Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Ferguson
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

In the previous week, Ferguson had 13 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Ferguson and 5 mentions for Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Ferguson's score of 0.77 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ferguson
8 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Ferguson beats Performance Food Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Watsco?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and Watsco (NYSE:WSO.B) are both large-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 5 more articles in the media than Watsco. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Performance Food Group and 0 mentions for Watsco. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Watsco's score of 0.00 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group Positive
Watsco Neutral

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watsco has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Watsco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Performance Food Group. Watsco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group$63.30B0.28$340.20M$2.1053.96
Watsco$7.24B2.24$496.99M$12.0533.07

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Watsco shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.8% of Watsco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Performance Food Group currently has a consensus target price of $120.73, indicating a potential upside of 6.55%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Watsco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Performance Food Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Watsco
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Watsco has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 15.33% beat Watsco's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Performance Food Group0.49% 15.33% 3.88%
Watsco 6.85%15.31%10.81%

Summary

Performance Food Group beats Watsco on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Core & Main?

Core & Main (NYSE:CNM) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Core & Main has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Performance Food Group. Core & Main is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Core & Main$7.65B1.13$441M$2.3618.94
Performance Food Group$63.30B0.28$340.20M$2.1053.96

Core & Main has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

94.2% of Core & Main shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Core & Main shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Core & Main has a net margin of 5.87% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. Core & Main's return on equity of 26.17% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Core & Main5.87% 26.17% 8.58%
Performance Food Group 0.49%15.33%3.88%

In the previous week, Core & Main and Core & Main both had 5 articles in the media. Core & Main's average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.87 indicating that Core & Main is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Core & Main
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Performance Food Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Core & Main presently has a consensus price target of $57.73, suggesting a potential upside of 29.14%. Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $120.73, suggesting a potential upside of 6.55%. Given Core & Main's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Core & Main is more favorable than Performance Food Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Core & Main
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58
Performance Food Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Summary

Core & Main beats Performance Food Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Performance Food Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PFGC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PFGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PFGC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPerformance Food GroupFOOD ITEMS IndustryRetail SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$17.80B$5.49B$26.97B$23.40B
Dividend YieldN/A3.82%175.39%4.03%
P/E Ratio53.9620.1921.1631.08
Price / Sales0.281.024.28154.92
Price / Cash12.3710.6518.1818.64
Price / Book3.953.796.484.77
Net Income$340.20M$203.19M$951.67M$1.06B
7 Day Performance-0.44%-1.86%-1.05%-0.56%
1 Month Performance8.71%-0.89%-1.61%-0.11%
1 Year Performance19.42%-0.53%-3.83%16.64%

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PFGC
Performance Food Group
3.1058 of 5 stars		$113.31
0.0%		$120.73
+6.5%		+19.4%$17.80B$63.30B53.9643,000
USFD
US Foods
2.8873 of 5 stars		$102.82
-1.4%		$105.50
+2.6%		+25.2%$22.97B$39.42B34.6230,000
TEL
TE Connectivity
4.9538 of 5 stars		$200.27
+1.4%		$254.93
+27.3%		+12.8%$57.63B$17.26B20.4693,000
FERG
Ferguson
4.5962 of 5 stars		$228.76
-0.6%		$276.61
+20.9%		+3.3%$44.65B$31.32BN/A35,000
WSO.B
Watsco
N/A$406.18
+16.1%		N/A-16.3%$14.23B$7.24B33.717,280

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PFGC) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Better than SpaceX? Grab this ticker instead.
Larry Benedict generated $274 million for his clients by finding the trades most investors missed. Now he says...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel