Does the media prefer PFGC or USFD?

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 2 more articles in the media than US Foods. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Performance Food Group and 5 mentions for US Foods. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat US Foods' score of -0.24 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Performance Food Group 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral US Foods 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation & earnings, PFGC or SYY?

Sysco has higher revenue and earnings than Performance Food Group. Sysco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Performance Food Group $67.84B 0.22 $359.30M $2.29 40.87 Sysco $84.55B 0.44 $1.76B $3.66 21.20

Does the media refer more to PFGC or SYY?

In the previous week, Sysco had 2 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Sysco and 7 mentions for Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Sysco's score of 0.03 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Performance Food Group 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Sysco 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to PFGC or CHEF?

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 4 more articles in the media than Chefs' Warehouse. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Performance Food Group and 3 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse. Chefs' Warehouse's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.26 indicating that Chefs' Warehouse is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Performance Food Group 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Chefs' Warehouse 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor UNFI or PFGC?

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 4 more articles in the media than United Natural Foods. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Performance Food Group and 3 mentions for United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.26 indicating that United Natural Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment United Natural Foods 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Performance Food Group 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer ANDE or PFGC?

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 1 more articles in the media than Andersons. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Performance Food Group and 6 mentions for Andersons. Andersons' average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.26 indicating that Andersons is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Andersons 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Performance Food Group 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

$93.44 +1.60 (+1.74%)

As of 03:03 PM Eastern

Compare

PFGC vs. USFD, SYY, CHEF, UNFI, and ANDE

Should you buy Performance Food Group stock or one of its competitors? Performance Food Group's main competitors and comparable companies include US Foods (USFD), Sysco (SYY), Chefs' Warehouse (CHEF), United Natural Foods (UNFI), and Andersons (ANDE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food distributors" industry.

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and US Foods (NYSE:USFD) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, US Foods has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 2 more articles in the media than US Foods. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Performance Food Group and 5 mentions for US Foods. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat US Foods' score of -0.24 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
US Foods	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

US Foods has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Performance Food Group. US Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.22	$359.30M	$2.29	40.87
US Foods	$39.42B	0.53	$676M	$3.25	29.79

US Foods has a net margin of 1.81% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.53%. US Foods' return on equity of 20.53% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%
US Foods	1.81%	20.53%	6.32%

Performance Food Group currently has a consensus price target of $126.40, suggesting a potential upside of 35.04%. US Foods has a consensus price target of $114.54, suggesting a potential upside of 18.29%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than US Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
US Foods	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of US Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of US Foods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Performance Food Group beats US Foods on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Sysco?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and Sysco (NYSE:SYY) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Sysco has a net margin of 2.08% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.53%. Sysco's return on equity of 95.05% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%
Sysco	2.08%	95.05%	8.00%

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.4% of Sysco shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Sysco shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Performance Food Group presently has a consensus price target of $126.40, indicating a potential upside of 35.04%. Sysco has a consensus price target of $90.17, indicating a potential upside of 16.19%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Sysco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Sysco	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Sysco had 2 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Sysco and 7 mentions for Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Sysco's score of 0.03 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Sysco	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Sysco has higher revenue and earnings than Performance Food Group. Sysco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.22	$359.30M	$2.29	40.87
Sysco	$84.55B	0.44	$1.76B	$3.66	21.20

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sysco has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Performance Food Group and Sysco tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Chefs' Warehouse?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 4 more articles in the media than Chefs' Warehouse. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Performance Food Group and 3 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse. Chefs' Warehouse's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.26 indicating that Chefs' Warehouse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Chefs' Warehouse	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Performance Food Group presently has a consensus price target of $126.40, suggesting a potential upside of 35.04%. Chefs' Warehouse has a consensus price target of $115.67, suggesting a potential downside of 0.49%. Given Performance Food Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Chefs' Warehouse.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Chefs' Warehouse	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.53%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 16.95% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%
Chefs' Warehouse	2.09%	16.95%	5.19%

Performance Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Chefs' Warehouse. Performance Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.22	$359.30M	$2.29	40.87
Chefs' Warehouse	$4.15B	1.14	$72.36M	$2.10	55.35

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats Performance Food Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to United Natural Foods?

United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

United Natural Foods presently has a consensus price target of $52.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.15%. Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $126.40, indicating a potential upside of 35.04%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than United Natural Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
United Natural Foods	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.22
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

Performance Food Group has a net margin of 0.53% compared to United Natural Foods' net margin of 0.27%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 15.15% beat United Natural Foods' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
United Natural Foods	0.27%	10.51%	2.28%
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 4 more articles in the media than United Natural Foods. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Performance Food Group and 3 mentions for United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.26 indicating that United Natural Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
United Natural Foods	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Performance Food Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Performance Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
United Natural Foods	$31.15B	0.09	$84M	$1.34	33.99
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.22	$359.30M	$2.29	40.87

Summary

Performance Food Group beats United Natural Foods on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Andersons?

Andersons (NASDAQ:ANDE) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Andersons presently has a consensus price target of $95.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.56%. Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $126.40, suggesting a potential upside of 35.04%. Given Andersons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Andersons is more favorable than Performance Food Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Andersons	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 1 more articles in the media than Andersons. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Performance Food Group and 6 mentions for Andersons. Andersons' average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.26 indicating that Andersons is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Andersons	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Performance Food Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Andersons has a net margin of 1.62% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.53%. Andersons' return on equity of 16.23% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Andersons	1.62%	16.23%	5.84%
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%

Andersons has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

87.1% of Andersons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Andersons shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Performance Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Andersons. Andersons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Andersons	$11.01B	0.21	$95.71M	$5.18	12.86
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.22	$359.30M	$2.29	40.87

Summary

Performance Food Group beats Andersons on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Performance Food Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PFGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PFGC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Performance Food Group	Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail Industry	Consumer Staples Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$14.73B	$26.25B	$15.20B	$22.70B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.31%	3.32%	3.74%
P/E Ratio	40.82	15.90	13.90	27.82
Price / Sales	0.22	8.07	263,620.96	20.16
Price / Cash	9.33	42.01	56.97	39.56
Price / Book	3.00	3.94	4.14	4.64
Net Income	$359.30M	$903.97M	$839.86M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	1.96%	-1.25%	-1.92%	-1.00%
1 Month Performance	-5.95%	-2.68%	-5.21%	-4.97%
1 Year Performance	-8.80%	-5.50%	8.01%	5.83%

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PFGC Performance Food Group	4.1811 of 5 stars	$93.44 +1.7%	$126.40 +35.3%	-10.2%	$14.73B	$67.84B	40.82	44,000	News Coverage
USFD US Foods	4.0015 of 5 stars	$94.10 -0.1%	$113.92 +21.1%	+24.8%	$20.38B	$39.42B	28.95	30,000	Analyst Forecast
SYY Sysco	4.6103 of 5 stars	$78.71 +0.4%	$89.50 +13.7%	-6.2%	$37.61B	$84.55B	21.50	75,000	Analyst Forecast
CHEF Chefs' Warehouse	2.491 of 5 stars	$108.36 -2.1%	$115.67 +6.7%	+106.2%	$4.52B	$4.15B	51.60	5,156
UNFI United Natural Foods	3.5864 of 5 stars	$45.89 -0.7%	$50.29 +9.6%	+13.4%	$2.79B	$31.15B	34.24	23,431	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PFGC) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

PFGC vs. USFD, SYY, CHEF, UNFI, and ANDE

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Sysco?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Chefs' Warehouse?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to United Natural Foods?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Andersons?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFGC vs. The Competition

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

PFGC vs. USFD, SYY, CHEF, UNFI, and ANDE

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Which has more risk and volatility, PFGC or USFD?

Does the media prefer PFGC or USFD?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PFGC or USFD?

Is PFGC or USFD more profitable?

Do analysts recommend PFGC or USFD?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PFGC or USFD?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Sysco?

Is PFGC or SYY more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PFGC or SYY?

Do analysts prefer PFGC or SYY?

Does the media refer more to PFGC or SYY?

Which has better valuation & earnings, PFGC or SYY?

Which has more risk and volatility, PFGC or SYY?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Chefs' Warehouse?

Does the media refer more to PFGC or CHEF?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PFGC or CHEF?

Which has more risk and volatility, PFGC or CHEF?

Do analysts recommend PFGC or CHEF?

Is PFGC or CHEF more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PFGC or CHEF?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to United Natural Foods?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in UNFI or PFGC?

Do analysts recommend UNFI or PFGC?

Is UNFI or PFGC more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, UNFI or PFGC?

Does the media favor UNFI or PFGC?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, UNFI or PFGC?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Andersons?

Do analysts recommend ANDE or PFGC?

Does the media prefer ANDE or PFGC?

Is ANDE or PFGC more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, ANDE or PFGC?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of ANDE or PFGC?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ANDE or PFGC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFGC vs. The Competition

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools