Does the media refer more to PFGC or USFD?

In the previous week, US Foods had 3 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for US Foods and 14 mentions for Performance Food Group. US Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.51 indicating that US Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Performance Food Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive US Foods 15 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, PFGC or SYY?

Sysco has higher revenue and earnings than Performance Food Group. Sysco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Performance Food Group $67.84B 0.24 $359.30M $2.29 45.85 Sysco $84.55B 0.48 $1.76B $3.66 22.96

Does the media prefer PFGC or SYY?

In the previous week, Sysco had 36 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 50 mentions for Sysco and 14 mentions for Performance Food Group. Sysco's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Sysco is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Performance Food Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Sysco 39 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to PFGC or CHEF?

In the previous week, Chefs' Warehouse had 4 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse and 14 mentions for Performance Food Group. Chefs' Warehouse's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Chefs' Warehouse is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Performance Food Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Chefs' Warehouse 12 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer UNFI or PFGC?

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 9 more articles in the media than United Natural Foods. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Performance Food Group and 5 mentions for United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.51 indicating that United Natural Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment United Natural Foods 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Performance Food Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor ANDE or PFGC?

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 6 more articles in the media than Andersons. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Performance Food Group and 8 mentions for Andersons. Andersons' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Andersons is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Andersons 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Performance Food Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

$104.99 +1.01 (+0.97%)

As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

PFGC vs. USFD, SYY, CHEF, UNFI, and ANDE

Should you buy Performance Food Group stock or one of its competitors? Performance Food Group's main competitors and comparable companies include US Foods (USFD), Sysco (SYY), Chefs' Warehouse (CHEF), United Natural Foods (UNFI), and Andersons (ANDE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food distributors" industry.

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and US Foods (NYSE:USFD) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

US Foods has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Performance Food Group. US Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.24	$359.30M	$2.29	45.85
US Foods	$39.42B	0.60	$676M	$3.25	33.70

Performance Food Group currently has a consensus target price of $126.90, indicating a potential upside of 20.87%. US Foods has a consensus target price of $113.92, indicating a potential upside of 4.02%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than US Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
US Foods	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, US Foods has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, US Foods had 3 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for US Foods and 14 mentions for Performance Food Group. US Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.51 indicating that US Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
US Foods	15 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of US Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of US Foods shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

US Foods has a net margin of 1.81% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.53%. US Foods' return on equity of 20.53% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%
US Foods	1.81%	20.53%	6.32%

Summary

US Foods beats Performance Food Group on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Sysco?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and Sysco (NYSE:SYY) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Sysco had 36 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 50 mentions for Sysco and 14 mentions for Performance Food Group. Sysco's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Sysco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Sysco	39 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sysco has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Sysco has higher revenue and earnings than Performance Food Group. Sysco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.24	$359.30M	$2.29	45.85
Sysco	$84.55B	0.48	$1.76B	$3.66	22.96

Sysco has a net margin of 2.08% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.53%. Sysco's return on equity of 95.05% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%
Sysco	2.08%	95.05%	8.00%

Performance Food Group presently has a consensus target price of $126.90, suggesting a potential upside of 20.87%. Sysco has a consensus target price of $89.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.50%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Sysco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Sysco	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.4% of Sysco shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Sysco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sysco beats Performance Food Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Chefs' Warehouse?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Chefs' Warehouse had 4 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse and 14 mentions for Performance Food Group. Chefs' Warehouse's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Chefs' Warehouse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Chefs' Warehouse	12 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.53%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 16.95% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%
Chefs' Warehouse	2.09%	16.95%	5.19%

Performance Food Group presently has a consensus target price of $126.90, suggesting a potential upside of 20.87%. Chefs' Warehouse has a consensus target price of $107.43, suggesting a potential downside of 2.88%. Given Performance Food Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Chefs' Warehouse.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Chefs' Warehouse	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Performance Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Chefs' Warehouse. Performance Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.24	$359.30M	$2.29	45.85
Chefs' Warehouse	$4.15B	1.09	$72.36M	$2.10	52.67

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats Performance Food Group on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to United Natural Foods?

United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 9 more articles in the media than United Natural Foods. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Performance Food Group and 5 mentions for United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.51 indicating that United Natural Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
United Natural Foods	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Performance Food Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

United Natural Foods presently has a consensus target price of $47.86, suggesting a potential downside of 0.59%. Performance Food Group has a consensus target price of $126.90, suggesting a potential upside of 20.87%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than United Natural Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
United Natural Foods	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Performance Food Group has a net margin of 0.53% compared to United Natural Foods' net margin of -0.12%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 15.15% beat United Natural Foods' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
United Natural Foods	-0.12%	7.42%	1.57%
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%

Performance Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
United Natural Foods	$31.78B	0.09	-$118M	-$0.66	N/A
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.24	$359.30M	$2.29	45.85

Summary

Performance Food Group beats United Natural Foods on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Andersons?

Andersons (NASDAQ:ANDE) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Andersons has a net margin of 1.62% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.53%. Andersons' return on equity of 16.23% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Andersons	1.62%	16.23%	5.84%
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%

87.1% of Andersons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Andersons shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Performance Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Andersons. Andersons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Andersons	$11.01B	0.21	$95.71M	$5.18	13.14
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.24	$359.30M	$2.29	45.85

Andersons has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 6 more articles in the media than Andersons. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Performance Food Group and 8 mentions for Andersons. Andersons' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Andersons is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Andersons	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Performance Food Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Andersons presently has a consensus price target of $95.00, indicating a potential upside of 39.58%. Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $126.90, indicating a potential upside of 20.87%. Given Andersons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Andersons is more favorable than Performance Food Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Andersons	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.20
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

Summary

Performance Food Group beats Andersons on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Performance Food Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PFGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PFGC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Performance Food Group	Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail Industry	Consumer Staples Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$16.54B	$26.67B	$15.97B	$24.30B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.52%	3.20%	3.70%
P/E Ratio	45.85	15.83	13.58	30.31
Price / Sales	0.24	8.21	262,280.22	19.95
Price / Cash	10.71	42.67	57.57	32.49
Price / Book	3.38	3.94	4.51	6.77
Net Income	$359.30M	$884.06M	$834.02M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-1.95%	-1.72%	0.26%	-0.65%
1 Month Performance	-4.75%	1.07%	2.22%	3.38%
1 Year Performance	3.14%	-5.65%	13.47%	14.90%

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PFGC Performance Food Group	4.2063 of 5 stars	$104.99 +1.0%	$126.90 +20.9%	+3.1%	$16.54B	$67.84B	45.85	44,000	News Coverage Insider Trade
USFD US Foods	3.3162 of 5 stars	$108.59 -0.3%	$112.38 +3.5%	+40.4%	$23.55B	$39.42B	33.41	30,000	News Coverage
SYY Sysco	4.4843 of 5 stars	$83.78 -0.6%	$89.50 +6.8%	+4.8%	$40.35B	$84.55B	22.89	75,000	Trending News Dividend Announcement Analyst Upgrade
CHEF Chefs' Warehouse	2.4218 of 5 stars	$108.83 -1.2%	$107.43 -1.3%	+72.6%	$4.50B	$4.15B	51.82	5,156	Insider Trade
UNFI United Natural Foods	2.9833 of 5 stars	$46.27 -1.7%	$47.86 +3.4%	+75.7%	$2.85B	$31.78B	N/A	25,600	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PFGC) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

PFGC vs. USFD, SYY, CHEF, UNFI, and ANDE

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Sysco?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Chefs' Warehouse?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to United Natural Foods?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Andersons?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFGC vs. The Competition

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

PFGC vs. USFD, SYY, CHEF, UNFI, and ANDE

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PFGC or USFD?

Do analysts prefer PFGC or USFD?

Which has more volatility & risk, PFGC or USFD?

Does the media refer more to PFGC or USFD?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PFGC or USFD?

Is PFGC or USFD more profitable?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Sysco?

Does the media prefer PFGC or SYY?

Which has more risk & volatility, PFGC or SYY?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PFGC or SYY?

Is PFGC or SYY more profitable?

Do analysts recommend PFGC or SYY?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in PFGC or SYY?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Chefs' Warehouse?

Does the media refer more to PFGC or CHEF?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PFGC or CHEF?

Is PFGC or CHEF more profitable?

Do analysts recommend PFGC or CHEF?

Which has more risk and volatility, PFGC or CHEF?

Which has better valuation & earnings, PFGC or CHEF?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to United Natural Foods?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of UNFI or PFGC?

Does the media prefer UNFI or PFGC?

Do analysts recommend UNFI or PFGC?

Which has more risk & volatility, UNFI or PFGC?

Is UNFI or PFGC more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, UNFI or PFGC?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Andersons?

Is ANDE or PFGC more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in ANDE or PFGC?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, ANDE or PFGC?

Which has more risk and volatility, ANDE or PFGC?

Does the media favor ANDE or PFGC?

Do analysts recommend ANDE or PFGC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFGC vs. The Competition

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools