Does the media favor USFD or PFGC?

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 8 more articles in the media than US Foods. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Performance Food Group and 1 mentions for US Foods. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat US Foods' score of 0.00 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment US Foods 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Performance Food Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media refer more to TEL or PFGC?

In the previous week, TE Connectivity had 16 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for TE Connectivity and 9 mentions for Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat TE Connectivity's score of 1.52 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TE Connectivity 22 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Performance Food Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media prefer FERG or PFGC?

In the previous week, Ferguson had 4 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ferguson and 9 mentions for Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Ferguson's score of 0.30 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ferguson 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Performance Food Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts recommend PFGC or WSO.B?

Performance Food Group currently has a consensus target price of $119.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.01%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Watsco. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Performance Food Group 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 10 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.83 Watsco 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media favor PFGC or WSO.B?

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 8 more articles in the media than Watsco. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Performance Food Group and 1 mentions for Watsco. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Watsco's score of 0.88 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Performance Food Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Watsco 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CNM or PFGC?

In the previous week, Core & Main and Core & Main both had 9 articles in the media. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Core & Main's score of 1.12 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Core & Main 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Performance Food Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

$104.38 +1.77 (+1.72%)

As of 10:42 AM Eastern

Compare

PFGC vs. USFD, TEL, FERG, WSO.B, and CNM

Should you buy Performance Food Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Performance Food Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Performance Food Group include US Foods (USFD), TE Connectivity (TEL), Ferguson (FERG), Watsco (WSO.B), and Core & Main (CNM). These companies are all part of the "wholesale" industry.

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

US Foods (NYSE:USFD) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both large-cap wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

98.8% of US Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of US Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

US Foods has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Performance Food Group. US Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
US Foods	$39.68B	0.52	$676M	$2.97	31.80
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.26	$340.20M	$2.10	49.70

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 8 more articles in the media than US Foods. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Performance Food Group and 1 mentions for US Foods. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat US Foods' score of 0.00 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
US Foods	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Performance Food Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

US Foods has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

US Foods currently has a consensus target price of $105.50, suggesting a potential upside of 11.70%. Performance Food Group has a consensus target price of $119.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.01%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than US Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
US Foods	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

US Foods has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. US Foods' return on equity of 19.37% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
US Foods	1.71%	19.37%	6.14%
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%

Summary

Performance Food Group beats US Foods on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to TE Connectivity?

TE Connectivity (NYSE:TEL) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both large-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

TE Connectivity has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Performance Food Group. TE Connectivity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TE Connectivity	$18.70B	3.21	$1.84B	$9.79	20.99
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.26	$340.20M	$2.10	49.70

91.4% of TE Connectivity shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of TE Connectivity shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

TE Connectivity has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

TE Connectivity presently has a consensus price target of $254.64, suggesting a potential upside of 23.91%. Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $119.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.01%. Given TE Connectivity's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TE Connectivity is more favorable than Performance Food Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TE Connectivity	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

TE Connectivity has a net margin of 15.54% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. TE Connectivity's return on equity of 23.56% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TE Connectivity	15.54%	23.56%	11.92%
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%

In the previous week, TE Connectivity had 16 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for TE Connectivity and 9 mentions for Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat TE Connectivity's score of 1.52 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TE Connectivity	22 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Performance Food Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Summary

TE Connectivity beats Performance Food Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Ferguson?

Ferguson (NYSE:FERG) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both large-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Ferguson had 4 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ferguson and 9 mentions for Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Ferguson's score of 0.30 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ferguson	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Performance Food Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

82.0% of Ferguson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Ferguson shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ferguson has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Ferguson presently has a consensus target price of $277.58, indicating a potential upside of 18.41%. Performance Food Group has a consensus target price of $119.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.01%. Given Ferguson's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Ferguson is more favorable than Performance Food Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ferguson	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Ferguson has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Performance Food Group. Ferguson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ferguson	$31.32B	1.45	$1.86B	$8.60	27.26
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.26	$340.20M	$2.10	49.70

Ferguson has a net margin of 6.98% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. Ferguson's return on equity of 38.81% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ferguson	6.98%	38.81%	12.83%
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%

Summary

Ferguson beats Performance Food Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Watsco?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and Watsco (NYSE:WSO.B) are both large-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 8 more articles in the media than Watsco. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Performance Food Group and 1 mentions for Watsco. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Watsco's score of 0.88 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Watsco	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Watsco has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 15.33% beat Watsco's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%
Watsco	6.85%	15.31%	10.81%

Watsco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Performance Food Group. Watsco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.26	$340.20M	$2.10	49.70
Watsco	$7.24B	2.26	$496.99M	$12.05	33.36

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watsco has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Performance Food Group currently has a consensus target price of $119.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.01%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Watsco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Watsco	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Watsco shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.8% of Watsco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Performance Food Group beats Watsco on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Core & Main?

Core & Main (NYSE:CNM) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Core & Main presently has a consensus target price of $57.73, suggesting a potential upside of 22.60%. Performance Food Group has a consensus target price of $119.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.01%. Given Core & Main's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Core & Main is more favorable than Performance Food Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Core & Main	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.58
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Core & Main has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Performance Food Group. Core & Main is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Core & Main	$7.65B	1.19	$441M	$2.36	19.95
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.26	$340.20M	$2.10	49.70

In the previous week, Core & Main and Core & Main both had 9 articles in the media. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Core & Main's score of 1.12 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Core & Main	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Performance Food Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

94.2% of Core & Main shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Core & Main shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Core & Main has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Core & Main has a net margin of 5.87% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. Core & Main's return on equity of 26.17% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Core & Main	5.87%	26.17%	8.58%
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%

Summary

Performance Food Group beats Core & Main on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Performance Food Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PFGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PFGC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Performance Food Group	FOOD ITEMS Industry	Retail Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$16.40B	$5.20B	$26.15B	$23.14B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.81%	175.36%	4.06%
P/E Ratio	49.71	19.20	19.85	31.08
Price / Sales	0.26	1.01	3.75	21.29
Price / Cash	11.31	10.37	15.10	18.66
Price / Book	3.64	3.71	6.14	4.66
Net Income	$340.20M	$203.19M	$962.92M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	-0.16%	-1.83%	-1.31%	-1.21%
1 Month Performance	11.39%	-0.40%	1.11%	-0.01%
1 Year Performance	19.69%	-1.16%	0.66%	24.34%

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PFGC Performance Food Group	4.3606 of 5 stars	$104.38 +1.7%	$119.00 +14.0%	+19.6%	$16.40B	$63.30B	49.71	43,000	Positive News
USFD US Foods	3.492 of 5 stars	$93.30 0.0%	$105.50 +13.1%	+21.4%	$20.55B	$39.42B	31.41	30,000
TEL TE Connectivity	4.9589 of 5 stars	$215.88 +2.6%	$256.79 +18.9%	+30.4%	$61.41B	$17.26B	22.05	93,000	Positive News Analyst Downgrade
FERG Ferguson	4.6789 of 5 stars	$235.78 +2.5%	$277.77 +17.8%	+10.4%	$44.62B	$31.32B	27.42	35,000
WSO.B Watsco	N/A	$389.64 +11.3%	N/A	-7.2%	$14.23B	$7.24B	32.34	7,280	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PFGC) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

PFGC vs. USFD, TEL, FERG, WSO.B, and CNM

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to TE Connectivity?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Ferguson?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Watsco?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Core & Main?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFGC vs. The Competition

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

PFGC vs. USFD, TEL, FERG, WSO.B, and CNM

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of USFD or PFGC?

Which has better valuation and earnings, USFD or PFGC?

Does the media favor USFD or PFGC?

Which has more risk & volatility, USFD or PFGC?

Do analysts rate USFD or PFGC?

Is USFD or PFGC more profitable?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to TE Connectivity?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, TEL or PFGC?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of TEL or PFGC?

Which has more risk & volatility, TEL or PFGC?

Do analysts rate TEL or PFGC?

Is TEL or PFGC more profitable?

Does the media refer more to TEL or PFGC?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Ferguson?

Does the media prefer FERG or PFGC?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FERG or PFGC?

Which has more volatility and risk, FERG or PFGC?

Do analysts recommend FERG or PFGC?

Which has better earnings and valuation, FERG or PFGC?

Is FERG or PFGC more profitable?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Watsco?

Does the media favor PFGC or WSO.B?

Is PFGC or WSO.B more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PFGC or WSO.B?

Which has more volatility and risk, PFGC or WSO.B?

Do analysts recommend PFGC or WSO.B?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PFGC or WSO.B?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Core & Main?

Do analysts rate CNM or PFGC?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CNM or PFGC?

Does the media refer more to CNM or PFGC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CNM or PFGC?

Which has more risk and volatility, CNM or PFGC?

Is CNM or PFGC more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFGC vs. The Competition

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools