Does the media refer more to USFD or PFGC?

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 3 more articles in the media than US Foods. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Performance Food Group and 8 mentions for US Foods. US Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.62 indicating that US Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment US Foods 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Performance Food Group 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PFGC or SYY?

Sysco has higher revenue and earnings than Performance Food Group. Sysco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Performance Food Group $67.84B 0.22 $359.30M $2.29 41.08 Sysco $84.55B 0.47 $1.76B $3.66 22.75

Does the media refer more to PFGC or SYY?

In the previous week, Sysco had 12 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Sysco and 11 mentions for Performance Food Group. Sysco's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.62 indicating that Sysco is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Performance Food Group 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Sysco 13 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor PFGC or CHEF?

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 7 more articles in the media than Chefs' Warehouse. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Performance Food Group and 4 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse. Chefs' Warehouse's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.62 indicating that Chefs' Warehouse is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Performance Food Group 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Chefs' Warehouse 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor PFGC or UNFI?

In the previous week, United Natural Foods had 19 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for United Natural Foods and 11 mentions for Performance Food Group. United Natural Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.62 indicating that United Natural Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Performance Food Group 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive United Natural Foods 15 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer PFGC or ANDE?

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 3 more articles in the media than Andersons. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Performance Food Group and 8 mentions for Andersons. Andersons' average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.62 indicating that Andersons is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Performance Food Group 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Andersons 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

$94.07 -0.28 (-0.30%)

Closing price 09/11/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$93.94 -0.13 (-0.14%)

As of 09/11/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

PFGC vs. USFD, SYY, CHEF, UNFI, and ANDE

Should you buy Performance Food Group stock or one of its competitors? Performance Food Group's main competitors and comparable companies include US Foods (USFD), Sysco (SYY), Chefs' Warehouse (CHEF), United Natural Foods (UNFI), and Andersons (ANDE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food distributors" industry.

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

US Foods (NYSE:USFD) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 3 more articles in the media than US Foods. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Performance Food Group and 8 mentions for US Foods. US Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.62 indicating that US Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
US Foods	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Performance Food Group	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

US Foods currently has a consensus price target of $113.92, suggesting a potential upside of 19.37%. Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $126.40, suggesting a potential upside of 34.37%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than US Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
US Foods	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

US Foods has a net margin of 1.81% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.53%. US Foods' return on equity of 20.53% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
US Foods	1.81%	20.53%	6.32%
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%

98.8% of US Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of US Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

US Foods has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

US Foods has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Performance Food Group. US Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
US Foods	$39.42B	0.52	$676M	$3.25	29.37
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.22	$359.30M	$2.29	41.08

Summary

US Foods beats Performance Food Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Sysco?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and Sysco (NYSE:SYY) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sysco has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Sysco has a net margin of 2.08% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.53%. Sysco's return on equity of 95.05% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%
Sysco	2.08%	95.05%	8.00%

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.4% of Sysco shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Sysco shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sysco has higher revenue and earnings than Performance Food Group. Sysco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.22	$359.30M	$2.29	41.08
Sysco	$84.55B	0.47	$1.76B	$3.66	22.75

In the previous week, Sysco had 12 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Sysco and 11 mentions for Performance Food Group. Sysco's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.62 indicating that Sysco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Sysco	13 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Performance Food Group currently has a consensus price target of $126.40, indicating a potential upside of 34.37%. Sysco has a consensus price target of $89.50, indicating a potential upside of 7.46%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Sysco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Sysco	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

Sysco beats Performance Food Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Chefs' Warehouse?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Performance Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Chefs' Warehouse. Performance Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.22	$359.30M	$2.29	41.08
Chefs' Warehouse	$4.15B	1.09	$72.36M	$2.10	52.60

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Performance Food Group currently has a consensus target price of $126.40, suggesting a potential upside of 34.37%. Chefs' Warehouse has a consensus target price of $115.67, suggesting a potential upside of 4.72%. Given Performance Food Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Chefs' Warehouse.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Chefs' Warehouse	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 7 more articles in the media than Chefs' Warehouse. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Performance Food Group and 4 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse. Chefs' Warehouse's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.62 indicating that Chefs' Warehouse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Chefs' Warehouse	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.53%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 16.95% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%
Chefs' Warehouse	2.09%	16.95%	5.19%

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats Performance Food Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to United Natural Foods?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Performance Food Group has a net margin of 0.53% compared to United Natural Foods' net margin of 0.27%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 15.15% beat United Natural Foods' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%
United Natural Foods	0.27%	10.51%	2.28%

Performance Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.22	$359.30M	$2.29	41.08
United Natural Foods	$31.15B	0.09	-$118M	$1.34	33.19

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Performance Food Group presently has a consensus target price of $126.40, suggesting a potential upside of 34.37%. United Natural Foods has a consensus target price of $50.29, suggesting a potential upside of 13.08%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than United Natural Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
United Natural Foods	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.10

In the previous week, United Natural Foods had 19 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for United Natural Foods and 11 mentions for Performance Food Group. United Natural Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.62 indicating that United Natural Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
United Natural Foods	15 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Performance Food Group beats United Natural Foods on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Andersons?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and Andersons (NASDAQ:ANDE) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Andersons has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.1% of Andersons shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Andersons shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Andersons has a net margin of 1.62% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.53%. Andersons' return on equity of 16.23% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Performance Food Group	0.53%	15.15%	3.87%
Andersons	1.62%	16.23%	5.84%

Performance Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Andersons. Andersons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group	$67.84B	0.22	$359.30M	$2.29	41.08
Andersons	$10.94B	0.22	$95.71M	$5.18	13.70

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 3 more articles in the media than Andersons. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Performance Food Group and 8 mentions for Andersons. Andersons' average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.62 indicating that Andersons is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Andersons	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Performance Food Group currently has a consensus target price of $126.40, indicating a potential upside of 34.37%. Andersons has a consensus target price of $95.00, indicating a potential upside of 33.86%. Given Performance Food Group's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Andersons.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Andersons	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Performance Food Group beats Andersons on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Performance Food Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PFGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PFGC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Performance Food Group	Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail Industry	Consumer Staples Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$14.86B	$26.22B	$15.57B	$23.20B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.51%	3.26%	3.56%
P/E Ratio	41.08	15.64	14.08	28.71
Price / Sales	0.22	7.74	262,948.33	94.63
Price / Cash	9.62	41.03	56.81	33.82
Price / Book	3.02	3.93	4.76	4.74
Net Income	$359.30M	$884.06M	$837.55M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-4.60%	-1.60%	-1.42%	-2.00%
1 Month Performance	-12.35%	-3.51%	-1.60%	-2.68%
1 Year Performance	-11.30%	-6.96%	10.48%	10.45%

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PFGC Performance Food Group	3.8838 of 5 stars	$94.07 -0.3%	$126.40 +34.4%	-11.5%	$14.86B	$67.84B	41.08	44,000	Analyst Downgrade
USFD US Foods	4.1478 of 5 stars	$106.53 +1.6%	$113.92 +6.9%	+19.4%	$22.68B	$40.13B	32.78	30,000	Positive News
SYY Sysco	4.3439 of 5 stars	$82.05 +1.2%	$89.50 +9.1%	+2.7%	$38.85B	$84.55B	22.42	75,000	Positive News Analyst Upgrade
CHEF Chefs' Warehouse	3.2173 of 5 stars	$115.52 +2.7%	$114.33 -1.0%	+67.4%	$4.59B	$4.39B	55.01	5,156	Positive News Analyst Forecast
UNFI United Natural Foods	3.597 of 5 stars	$44.65 +1.8%	$47.86 +7.2%	+50.0%	$2.65B	$31.78B	N/A	25,600	Positive News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PFGC) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

PFGC vs. USFD, SYY, CHEF, UNFI, and ANDE

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Sysco?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Chefs' Warehouse?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to United Natural Foods?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Andersons?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFGC vs. The Competition

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

PFGC vs. USFD, SYY, CHEF, UNFI, and ANDE

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Does the media refer more to USFD or PFGC?

Do analysts prefer USFD or PFGC?

Is USFD or PFGC more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in USFD or PFGC?

Which has more risk and volatility, USFD or PFGC?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, USFD or PFGC?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Sysco?

Which has more risk and volatility, PFGC or SYY?

Is PFGC or SYY more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PFGC or SYY?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PFGC or SYY?

Does the media refer more to PFGC or SYY?

Do analysts rate PFGC or SYY?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Chefs' Warehouse?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PFGC or CHEF?

Which has more volatility & risk, PFGC or CHEF?

Do analysts prefer PFGC or CHEF?

Does the media favor PFGC or CHEF?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PFGC or CHEF?

Is PFGC or CHEF more profitable?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to United Natural Foods?

Is PFGC or UNFI more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PFGC or UNFI?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PFGC or UNFI?

Do analysts rate PFGC or UNFI?

Does the media favor PFGC or UNFI?

Which has more risk & volatility, PFGC or UNFI?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Andersons?

Which has more risk & volatility, PFGC or ANDE?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in PFGC or ANDE?

Is PFGC or ANDE more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PFGC or ANDE?

Does the media prefer PFGC or ANDE?

Do analysts rate PFGC or ANDE?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFGC vs. The Competition

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools