Does the media prefer USFD or PFGC?

In the previous week, US Foods had 9 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for US Foods and 6 mentions for Performance Food Group. US Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Performance Food Group's score of 1.24 indicating that US Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment US Foods 11 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Performance Food Group 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer TEL or PFGC?

In the previous week, TE Connectivity had 11 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for TE Connectivity and 6 mentions for Performance Food Group. TE Connectivity's average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Performance Food Group's score of 1.24 indicating that TE Connectivity is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TE Connectivity 16 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Performance Food Group 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer PFGC or FERG?

In the previous week, Ferguson had 20 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Ferguson and 6 mentions for Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Ferguson's score of 0.80 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Performance Food Group 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ferguson 16 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend WSO.B or PFGC?

Performance Food Group has a consensus target price of $123.82, indicating a potential upside of 8.05%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Watsco. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Watsco 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Performance Food Group 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 11 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.85

Does the media favor CNM or PFGC?

In the previous week, Core & Main had 1 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Core & Main and 6 mentions for Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Core & Main's score of 0.89 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Core & Main 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Performance Food Group 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

$114.60 +0.21 (+0.18%)

Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$114.39 -0.21 (-0.18%)

As of 07/31/2026 07:34 PM Eastern

Compare

PFGC vs. USFD, TEL, FERG, WSO.B, and CNM

Should you buy Performance Food Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Performance Food Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Performance Food Group include US Foods (USFD), TE Connectivity (TEL), Ferguson (FERG), Watsco (WSO.B), and Core & Main (CNM).

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

US Foods (NYSE:USFD) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

98.8% of US Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of US Foods shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

US Foods has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

US Foods has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. US Foods' return on equity of 19.37% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
US Foods	1.71%	19.37%	6.14%
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%

In the previous week, US Foods had 9 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for US Foods and 6 mentions for Performance Food Group. US Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Performance Food Group's score of 1.24 indicating that US Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
US Foods	11 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Performance Food Group	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

US Foods currently has a consensus price target of $107.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.23%. Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $123.82, indicating a potential upside of 8.05%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than US Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
US Foods	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

US Foods has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Performance Food Group. US Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
US Foods	$39.42B	0.56	$676M	$2.97	33.91
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.28	$340.20M	$2.10	54.57

Summary

US Foods beats Performance Food Group on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to TE Connectivity?

TE Connectivity (NYSE:TEL) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

TE Connectivity currently has a consensus price target of $251.15, suggesting a potential upside of 21.72%. Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $123.82, suggesting a potential upside of 8.05%. Given TE Connectivity's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe TE Connectivity is more favorable than Performance Food Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TE Connectivity	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

TE Connectivity has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

91.4% of TE Connectivity shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of TE Connectivity shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TE Connectivity has a net margin of 15.61% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. TE Connectivity's return on equity of 24.59% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TE Connectivity	15.61%	24.59%	12.50%
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%

TE Connectivity has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Performance Food Group. TE Connectivity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TE Connectivity	$17.26B	3.46	$1.84B	$10.20	20.23
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.28	$340.20M	$2.10	54.57

In the previous week, TE Connectivity had 11 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for TE Connectivity and 6 mentions for Performance Food Group. TE Connectivity's average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Performance Food Group's score of 1.24 indicating that TE Connectivity is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TE Connectivity	16 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Performance Food Group	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

TE Connectivity beats Performance Food Group on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Ferguson?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and Ferguson (NYSE:FERG) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, Ferguson had 20 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Ferguson and 6 mentions for Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Ferguson's score of 0.80 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ferguson	16 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Performance Food Group currently has a consensus target price of $123.82, indicating a potential upside of 8.05%. Ferguson has a consensus target price of $277.21, indicating a potential upside of 18.22%. Given Ferguson's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ferguson is more favorable than Performance Food Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Ferguson	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.72

Ferguson has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Performance Food Group. Ferguson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.28	$340.20M	$2.10	54.57
Ferguson	$31.32B	1.45	$1.86B	$8.60	27.27

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferguson has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Ferguson shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Ferguson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ferguson has a net margin of 6.98% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. Ferguson's return on equity of 38.81% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%
Ferguson	6.98%	38.81%	12.83%

Summary

Ferguson beats Performance Food Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Watsco?

Watsco (NYSE:WSO.B) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Watsco has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Performance Food Group. Watsco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Watsco	$7.24B	1.78	$496.99M	$11.53	27.54
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.28	$340.20M	$2.10	54.57

0.1% of Watsco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.8% of Watsco shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Watsco has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 6 more articles in the media than Watsco. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Performance Food Group and 0 mentions for Watsco. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Watsco's score of 0.00 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Watsco	Neutral
Performance Food Group	Positive

Performance Food Group has a consensus target price of $123.82, indicating a potential upside of 8.05%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Watsco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Watsco	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

Watsco has a net margin of 6.53% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 15.33% beat Watsco's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Watsco	6.53%	14.40%	10.17%
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%

Summary

Performance Food Group beats Watsco on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Performance Food Group compare to Core & Main?

Core & Main (NYSE:CNM) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and valuation.

Core & Main currently has a consensus price target of $56.70, indicating a potential upside of 28.89%. Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $123.82, indicating a potential upside of 8.05%. Given Core & Main's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Core & Main is more favorable than Performance Food Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Core & Main	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.58
Performance Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

Core & Main has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Performance Food Group. Core & Main is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Core & Main	$7.65B	1.11	$441M	$2.36	18.64
Performance Food Group	$63.30B	0.28	$340.20M	$2.10	54.57

94.2% of Core & Main shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Core & Main shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Core & Main had 1 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Core & Main and 6 mentions for Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Core & Main's score of 0.89 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Core & Main	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Performance Food Group	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Core & Main has a net margin of 5.87% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.49%. Core & Main's return on equity of 26.17% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Core & Main	5.87%	26.17%	8.58%
Performance Food Group	0.49%	15.33%	3.88%

Core & Main has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Core & Main beats Performance Food Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Performance Food Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PFGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PFGC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Performance Food Group	Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail Industry	Consumer Staples Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$18.00B	$27.76B	$16.28B	$23.69B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.47%	3.20%	4.22%
P/E Ratio	54.57	17.44	14.55	30.98
Price / Sales	0.28	8.32	262,279.64	19.22
Price / Cash	12.48	43.29	56.11	18.73
Price / Book	4.00	4.22	4.94	4.76
Net Income	$340.20M	$884.73M	$841.31M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.25%	1.07%	0.72%	-0.34%
1 Month Performance	1.45%	-0.52%	-0.83%	-0.53%
1 Year Performance	14.07%	-5.03%	13.45%	19.19%

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PFGC Performance Food Group	4.0534 of 5 stars	$114.60 +0.2%	$123.82 +8.0%	+14.1%	$18.00B	$63.30B	54.57	43,000	Positive News
USFD US Foods	4.0181 of 5 stars	$95.13 -2.2%	$107.00 +12.5%	+20.9%	$21.42B	$39.42B	32.03	30,000	News Coverage Positive News Upcoming Earnings Analyst Upgrade
TEL TE Connectivity	4.934 of 5 stars	$203.11 -0.1%	$255.31 +25.7%	+2.3%	$59.35B	$18.70B	20.75	93,000	Positive News
FERG Ferguson	4.6201 of 5 stars	$229.04 -1.3%	$277.21 +21.0%	+5.6%	$45.00B	$31.32B	26.63	35,000	News Coverage
WSO.B Watsco	N/A	$374.80 -2.7%	N/A	-27.0%	$15.52B	$7.24B	31.10	7,280	High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PFGC) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

PFGC vs. USFD, TEL, FERG, WSO.B, and CNM

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to TE Connectivity?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Ferguson?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Watsco?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Core & Main?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFGC vs. The Competition

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Performance Food Group (PFGC) Competitors

PFGC vs. USFD, TEL, FERG, WSO.B, and CNM

How does Performance Food Group compare to US Foods?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in USFD or PFGC?

Which has more risk & volatility, USFD or PFGC?

Is USFD or PFGC more profitable?

Does the media prefer USFD or PFGC?

Do analysts recommend USFD or PFGC?

Which has better earnings and valuation, USFD or PFGC?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to TE Connectivity?

Do analysts prefer TEL or PFGC?

Which has more risk & volatility, TEL or PFGC?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of TEL or PFGC?

Is TEL or PFGC more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, TEL or PFGC?

Does the media prefer TEL or PFGC?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Ferguson?

Does the media prefer PFGC or FERG?

Do analysts prefer PFGC or FERG?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, PFGC or FERG?

Which has more risk and volatility, PFGC or FERG?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PFGC or FERG?

Is PFGC or FERG more profitable?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Watsco?

Which has better earnings & valuation, WSO.B or PFGC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in WSO.B or PFGC?

Which has more risk and volatility, WSO.B or PFGC?

Does the media refer more to WSO.B or PFGC?

Do analysts recommend WSO.B or PFGC?

Is WSO.B or PFGC more profitable?

Summary

How does Performance Food Group compare to Core & Main?

Do analysts recommend CNM or PFGC?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, CNM or PFGC?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CNM or PFGC?

Does the media favor CNM or PFGC?

Is CNM or PFGC more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, CNM or PFGC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFGC vs. The Competition

Performance Food Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools