GMS Stock Competitors

GMS (NYSE:GMS) and AutoNation (NYSE:AN) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

98.4% of GMS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.8% of AutoNation shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of GMS shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of AutoNation shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for GMS and AutoNation, as provided by MarketBeat.

GMS currently has a consensus target price of $59.6667, indicating a potential upside of 29.23%. AutoNation has a consensus target price of $107.6667, indicating a potential downside of 2.56%. Given GMS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe GMS is more favorable than AutoNation.

Profitability

This table compares GMS and AutoNation's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

GMS has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AutoNation has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares GMS and AutoNation's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

AutoNation has higher revenue and earnings than GMS. GMS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AutoNation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kohl's (NYSE:KSS) and GMS (NYSE:GMS) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kohl's and GMS's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

GMS has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kohl's. Kohl's is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GMS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Kohl's has a beta of 2.16, suggesting that its stock price is 116% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, GMS has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Kohl's and GMS's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Kohl's and GMS, as provided by MarketBeat.

Kohl's currently has a consensus target price of $55.1333, suggesting a potential upside of 5.16%. GMS has a consensus target price of $59.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 29.23%. Given GMS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe GMS is more favorable than Kohl's.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

85.2% of Kohl's shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of GMS shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Kohl's shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of GMS shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

GMS beats Kohl's on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

GMS (NYSE:GMS) and Capri (NYSE:CPRI) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

GMS has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Capri has a beta of 2.51, suggesting that its share price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for GMS and Capri, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

GMS presently has a consensus price target of $59.6667, indicating a potential upside of 29.23%. Capri has a consensus price target of $67.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.37%. Given Capri's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Capri is more favorable than GMS.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares GMS and Capri's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

GMS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capri. GMS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capri, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares GMS and Capri's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.4% of GMS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Capri shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of GMS shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Capri shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Capri beats GMS on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

GMS (NYSE:GMS) and Penske Automotive Group (NYSE:PAG) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for GMS and Penske Automotive Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

GMS presently has a consensus price target of $59.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 29.23%. Penske Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $89.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 2.68%. Given GMS's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe GMS is more favorable than Penske Automotive Group.

Profitability

This table compares GMS and Penske Automotive Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.4% of GMS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.1% of Penske Automotive Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of GMS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.3% of Penske Automotive Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares GMS and Penske Automotive Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Penske Automotive Group has higher revenue and earnings than GMS. GMS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Penske Automotive Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

GMS has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Penske Automotive Group has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

GMS beats Penske Automotive Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

GMS (NYSE:GMS) and Casey's General Stores (NASDAQ:CASY) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares GMS and Casey's General Stores' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

98.4% of GMS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.8% of Casey's General Stores shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of GMS shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Casey's General Stores shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

GMS has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for GMS and Casey's General Stores, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

GMS presently has a consensus target price of $59.6667, indicating a potential upside of 29.23%. Casey's General Stores has a consensus target price of $233.8182, indicating a potential upside of 21.09%. Given GMS's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe GMS is more favorable than Casey's General Stores.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares GMS and Casey's General Stores' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Casey's General Stores has higher revenue and earnings than GMS. GMS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Casey's General Stores, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

GMS (NYSE:GMS) and Fiverr International (NYSE:FVRR) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares GMS and Fiverr International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

GMS has higher revenue and earnings than Fiverr International. Fiverr International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GMS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

GMS has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fiverr International has a beta of 1.93, indicating that its share price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for GMS and Fiverr International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

GMS presently has a consensus target price of $59.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 29.23%. Fiverr International has a consensus target price of $231.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 22.60%. Given GMS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe GMS is more favorable than Fiverr International.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.4% of GMS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.2% of Fiverr International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of GMS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares GMS and Fiverr International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

GMS beats Fiverr International on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.