S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
Log in
NYSE:SSD

Simpson Manufacturing Competitors

$99.49
-1.48 (-1.47 %)
(As of 01/15/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$97.30
Now: $99.49
$100.02
50-Day Range
$89.37
MA: $93.85
$102.38
52-Week Range
$47.02
Now: $99.49
$104.33
Volume167,467 shs
Average Volume239,377 shs
Market Capitalization$4.32 billion
P/E Ratio27.26
Dividend Yield0.91%
Beta1.36

Competitors

Simpson Manufacturing (NYSE:SSD) Vs. MAS, FBHS, LII, TREX, AOS, and OC

Should you be buying SSD stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "building products" are considered alternatives and competitors to Simpson Manufacturing, including Masco (MAS), Fortune Brands Home & Security (FBHS), Lennox International (LII), Trex (TREX), A. O. Smith (AOS), and Owens Corning (OC).

Masco (NYSE:MAS) and Simpson Manufacturing (NYSE:SSD) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

90.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Simpson Manufacturing shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Simpson Manufacturing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Masco and Simpson Manufacturing, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Masco161202.58
Simpson Manufacturing01102.50

Masco currently has a consensus target price of $58.5526, indicating a potential upside of 4.39%. Simpson Manufacturing has a consensus target price of $105.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.54%. Given Simpson Manufacturing's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Simpson Manufacturing is more favorable than Masco.

Risk and Volatility

Masco has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Simpson Manufacturing has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Masco and Simpson Manufacturing's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Masco$6.71 billion2.19$935 million$2.2524.93
Simpson Manufacturing$1.14 billion3.80$133.98 million$2.9833.39

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Simpson Manufacturing. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Simpson Manufacturing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Masco and Simpson Manufacturing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Masco21.27%1,966.88%14.89%
Simpson Manufacturing13.71%18.50%13.90%

Dividends

Masco pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Simpson Manufacturing pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Masco pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Simpson Manufacturing pays out 30.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Masco has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Simpson Manufacturing has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Masco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Masco beats Simpson Manufacturing on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) and Simpson Manufacturing (NYSE:SSD) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

86.6% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Simpson Manufacturing shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Simpson Manufacturing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Fortune Brands Home & Security and Simpson Manufacturing, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fortune Brands Home & Security161002.53
Simpson Manufacturing01102.50

Fortune Brands Home & Security currently has a consensus target price of $83.2222, indicating a potential downside of 5.77%. Simpson Manufacturing has a consensus target price of $105.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.54%. Given Simpson Manufacturing's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Simpson Manufacturing is more favorable than Fortune Brands Home & Security.

Risk and Volatility

Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Simpson Manufacturing has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Fortune Brands Home & Security and Simpson Manufacturing's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Home & Security$5.76 billion2.13$431.90 million$3.6024.53
Simpson Manufacturing$1.14 billion3.80$133.98 million$2.9833.39

Fortune Brands Home & Security has higher revenue and earnings than Simpson Manufacturing. Fortune Brands Home & Security is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Simpson Manufacturing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Fortune Brands Home & Security and Simpson Manufacturing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fortune Brands Home & Security8.36%22.37%8.68%
Simpson Manufacturing13.71%18.50%13.90%

Dividends

Fortune Brands Home & Security pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Simpson Manufacturing pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Simpson Manufacturing pays out 30.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fortune Brands Home & Security has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Simpson Manufacturing has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Fortune Brands Home & Security is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Fortune Brands Home & Security beats Simpson Manufacturing on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lennox International (NYSE:LII) and Simpson Manufacturing (NYSE:SSD) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Dividends

Lennox International pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Simpson Manufacturing pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Lennox International pays out 27.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Simpson Manufacturing pays out 30.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lennox International has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Simpson Manufacturing has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Lennox International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

66.3% of Lennox International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Simpson Manufacturing shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Lennox International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Simpson Manufacturing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Lennox International has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Simpson Manufacturing has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Lennox International and Simpson Manufacturing, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Lennox International311101.87
Simpson Manufacturing01102.50

Lennox International currently has a consensus target price of $255.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.39%. Simpson Manufacturing has a consensus target price of $105.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.54%. Given Simpson Manufacturing's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Simpson Manufacturing is more favorable than Lennox International.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Lennox International and Simpson Manufacturing's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lennox International$3.81 billion2.83$408.70 million$11.1925.15
Simpson Manufacturing$1.14 billion3.80$133.98 million$2.9833.39

Lennox International has higher revenue and earnings than Simpson Manufacturing. Lennox International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Simpson Manufacturing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Lennox International and Simpson Manufacturing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Lennox International9.95%-176.45%17.78%
Simpson Manufacturing13.71%18.50%13.90%

Summary

Lennox International beats Simpson Manufacturing on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trex (NYSE:TREX) and Simpson Manufacturing (NYSE:SSD) are both construction companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

99.7% of Trex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Simpson Manufacturing shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Trex shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Simpson Manufacturing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Trex has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Simpson Manufacturing has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Trex and Simpson Manufacturing, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Trex012402.25
Simpson Manufacturing01102.50

Trex currently has a consensus target price of $69.5667, indicating a potential downside of 23.68%. Simpson Manufacturing has a consensus target price of $105.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.54%. Given Simpson Manufacturing's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Simpson Manufacturing is more favorable than Trex.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Trex and Simpson Manufacturing's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trex$745.35 million14.16$144.74 million$1.2473.51
Simpson Manufacturing$1.14 billion3.80$133.98 million$2.9833.39

Trex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Simpson Manufacturing. Simpson Manufacturing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Trex and Simpson Manufacturing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Trex21.41%36.64%27.12%
Simpson Manufacturing13.71%18.50%13.90%

Summary

Trex beats Simpson Manufacturing on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) and Simpson Manufacturing (NYSE:SSD) are both mid-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

Dividends

A. O. Smith pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Simpson Manufacturing pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. A. O. Smith pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Simpson Manufacturing pays out 30.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. A. O. Smith has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years and Simpson Manufacturing has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. A. O. Smith is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

75.1% of A. O. Smith shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Simpson Manufacturing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Simpson Manufacturing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Simpson Manufacturing has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for A. O. Smith and Simpson Manufacturing, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
A. O. Smith17402.25
Simpson Manufacturing01102.50

A. O. Smith currently has a consensus target price of $51.25, indicating a potential downside of 9.82%. Simpson Manufacturing has a consensus target price of $105.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.54%. Given Simpson Manufacturing's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Simpson Manufacturing is more favorable than A. O. Smith.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares A. O. Smith and Simpson Manufacturing's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
A. O. Smith$2.99 billion3.07$370 million$2.2225.60
Simpson Manufacturing$1.14 billion3.80$133.98 million$2.9833.39

A. O. Smith has higher revenue and earnings than Simpson Manufacturing. A. O. Smith is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Simpson Manufacturing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares A. O. Smith and Simpson Manufacturing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
A. O. Smith11.25%19.29%10.75%
Simpson Manufacturing13.71%18.50%13.90%

Summary

Simpson Manufacturing beats A. O. Smith on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) and Simpson Manufacturing (NYSE:SSD) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Owens Corning and Simpson Manufacturing's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Owens Corning$7.16 billion1.25$405 million$4.5418.28
Simpson Manufacturing$1.14 billion3.80$133.98 million$2.9833.39

Owens Corning has higher revenue and earnings than Simpson Manufacturing. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Simpson Manufacturing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Owens Corning has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Simpson Manufacturing has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Owens Corning and Simpson Manufacturing, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Owens Corning112702.30
Simpson Manufacturing01102.50

Owens Corning currently has a consensus target price of $111.4737, indicating a potential upside of 34.35%. Simpson Manufacturing has a consensus target price of $105.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.54%. Given Owens Corning's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than Simpson Manufacturing.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

91.2% of Owens Corning shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Simpson Manufacturing shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Owens Corning shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Simpson Manufacturing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Owens Corning and Simpson Manufacturing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Owens Corning-7.94%11.99%4.98%
Simpson Manufacturing13.71%18.50%13.90%

Dividends

Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Simpson Manufacturing pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Owens Corning pays out 22.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Simpson Manufacturing pays out 30.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Owens Corning has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Simpson Manufacturing has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Owens Corning is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Owens Corning beats Simpson Manufacturing on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.


Simpson Manufacturing Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Masco logo
MAS
Masco
2.2$56.09-0.9%$14.68 billion$6.71 billion10.37Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Fortune Brands Home & Security logo
FBHS
Fortune Brands Home & Security
2.2$88.32-1.1%$12.27 billion$5.76 billion25.16Analyst Report
Lennox International logo
LII
Lennox International
1.8$281.44-1.1%$10.78 billion$3.81 billion30.33Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Heavy News Reporting
Trex logo
TREX
Trex
1.5$91.15-0.9%$10.55 billion$745.35 million63.52Analyst Report
A. O. Smith logo
AOS
A. O. Smith
2.4$56.83-1.0%$9.18 billion$2.99 billion29.14Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Owens Corning logo
OC
Owens Corning
2.4$82.97-0.5%$8.98 billion$7.16 billion-16.56
Builders FirstSource logo
BLDR
Builders FirstSource
1.8$40.87-1.5%$4.77 billion$7.28 billion22.46Analyst Report
Armstrong World Industries logo
AWI
Armstrong World Industries
1.5$83.76-0.9%$4.01 billion$1.04 billion-53.35Increase in Short Interest
AAON logo
AAON
AAON
1.1$70.44-0.6%$3.68 billion$469.33 million48.25
UFP Industries logo
UFPI
UFP Industries
1.9$56.67-0.2%$3.47 billion$4.42 billion17.82Unusual Options Activity
Heavy News Reporting
Gibraltar Industries logo
ROCK
Gibraltar Industries
1.0$96.05-0.9%$3.12 billion$1.05 billion40.19Heavy News Reporting
American Woodmark logo
AMWD
American Woodmark
1.4$96.66-0.8%$1.64 billion$1.65 billion25.44
Patrick Industries logo
PATK
Patrick Industries
2.1$69.85-2.9%$1.63 billion$2.34 billion25.68
PGT Innovations logo
PGTI
PGT Innovations
1.4$22.64-0.4%$1.33 billion$744.96 million36.52
Griffon logo
GFF
Griffon
2.6$23.36-0.6%$1.31 billion$2.41 billion19.97Analyst Upgrade
Apogee Enterprises logo
APOG
Apogee Enterprises
2.0$36.79-1.9%$956.83 million$1.39 billion13.88Dividend Increase
Quanex Building Products logo
NX
Quanex Building Products
1.9$25.57-3.4%$839.41 million$851.57 million21.67Insider Selling
Insteel Industries logo
IIIN
Insteel Industries
1.2$24.41-4.1%$471.46 million$472.62 million24.91Upcoming Earnings
Heavy News Reporting
This page was last updated on 1/15/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.