A. O. Smith Competitors

A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Risk & Volatility

A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

A. O. Smith pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. A. O. Smith pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. A. O. Smith has increased its dividend for 29 consecutive years and Masco has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. A. O. Smith is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares A. O. Smith and Masco's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than A. O. Smith. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A. O. Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for A. O. Smith and Masco, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

A. O. Smith presently has a consensus price target of $51.25, suggesting a potential downside of 11.39%. Masco has a consensus price target of $58.5526, suggesting a potential upside of 0.21%. Given Masco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Masco is more favorable than A. O. Smith.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

75.1% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares A. O. Smith and Masco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Masco beats A. O. Smith on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) and Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Risk & Volatility

A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its share price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

A. O. Smith pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. A. O. Smith pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. A. O. Smith has increased its dividend for 29 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Home & Security has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. A. O. Smith is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares A. O. Smith and Fortune Brands Home & Security's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fortune Brands Home & Security has higher revenue and earnings than A. O. Smith. Fortune Brands Home & Security is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A. O. Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for A. O. Smith and Fortune Brands Home & Security, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

A. O. Smith presently has a consensus price target of $51.25, suggesting a potential downside of 11.39%. Fortune Brands Home & Security has a consensus price target of $83.2222, suggesting a potential downside of 9.39%. Given Fortune Brands Home & Security's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Home & Security is more favorable than A. O. Smith.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

75.1% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares A. O. Smith and Fortune Brands Home & Security's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Fortune Brands Home & Security beats A. O. Smith on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) and Lennox International (NYSE:LII) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Risk & Volatility

A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lennox International has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

A. O. Smith pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Lennox International pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. A. O. Smith pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lennox International pays out 27.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. A. O. Smith has increased its dividend for 29 consecutive years and Lennox International has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. A. O. Smith is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares A. O. Smith and Lennox International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lennox International has higher revenue and earnings than A. O. Smith. Lennox International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A. O. Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for A. O. Smith and Lennox International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

A. O. Smith presently has a consensus price target of $51.25, suggesting a potential downside of 11.39%. Lennox International has a consensus price target of $255.00, suggesting a potential downside of 11.95%. Given A. O. Smith's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe A. O. Smith is more favorable than Lennox International.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

75.1% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.3% of Lennox International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Lennox International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares A. O. Smith and Lennox International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

A. O. Smith beats Lennox International on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) and Trex (NYSE:TREX) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Risk & Volatility

A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trex has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares A. O. Smith and Trex's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares A. O. Smith and Trex's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

A. O. Smith has higher revenue and earnings than Trex. A. O. Smith is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for A. O. Smith and Trex, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

A. O. Smith presently has a consensus price target of $51.25, suggesting a potential downside of 11.39%. Trex has a consensus price target of $69.5667, suggesting a potential downside of 26.91%. Given A. O. Smith's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe A. O. Smith is more favorable than Trex.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

75.1% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of Trex shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Trex shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Trex beats A. O. Smith on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) and Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) are both mid-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Owens Corning has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares A. O. Smith and Owens Corning's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares A. O. Smith and Owens Corning's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Owens Corning has higher revenue and earnings than A. O. Smith. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A. O. Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for A. O. Smith and Owens Corning, as provided by MarketBeat.

A. O. Smith presently has a consensus price target of $51.25, suggesting a potential downside of 11.39%. Owens Corning has a consensus price target of $111.4737, suggesting a potential upside of 28.22%. Given Owens Corning's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than A. O. Smith.

Dividends

A. O. Smith pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. A. O. Smith pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Owens Corning pays out 22.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. A. O. Smith has increased its dividend for 29 consecutive years and Owens Corning has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. A. O. Smith is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

75.1% of A. O. Smith shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of Owens Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Owens Corning shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Owens Corning beats A. O. Smith on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) and Builders FirstSource (NASDAQ:BLDR) are both mid-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Builders FirstSource has a beta of 2.65, suggesting that its share price is 165% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares A. O. Smith and Builders FirstSource's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares A. O. Smith and Builders FirstSource's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

A. O. Smith has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Builders FirstSource. Builders FirstSource is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A. O. Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for A. O. Smith and Builders FirstSource, as provided by MarketBeat.

A. O. Smith presently has a consensus price target of $51.25, suggesting a potential downside of 11.39%. Builders FirstSource has a consensus price target of $38.9375, suggesting a potential downside of 6.11%. Given Builders FirstSource's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Builders FirstSource is more favorable than A. O. Smith.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

75.1% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.3% of Builders FirstSource shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Builders FirstSource shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Builders FirstSource beats A. O. Smith on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.