Enersys (ENS) Competitors

Enersys has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -1.61%. Enersys' return on equity of 21.27% beat Littelfuse's return on equity.

96.1% of Littelfuse shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Enersys shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Littelfuse currently has a consensus price target of $436.67, indicating a potential downside of 3.52%. Enersys has a consensus price target of $180.25, indicating a potential downside of 23.77%. Given Littelfuse's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Littelfuse is more favorable than Enersys.

In the previous week, Littelfuse had 4 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Littelfuse and 8 mentions for Enersys. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Littelfuse's score of 0.92 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Littelfuse has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enersys has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Enersys has higher revenue and earnings than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enersys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Littelfuse pays out -177.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enersys pays out 13.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Littelfuse has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Littelfuse is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enersys has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Cummins' net margin of 7.89%. Cummins' return on equity of 25.25% beat Enersys' return on equity.

94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Cummins shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Enersys shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Cummins shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Enersys presently has a consensus price target of $180.25, indicating a potential downside of 23.77%. Cummins has a consensus price target of $677.87, indicating a potential downside of 5.03%. Given Cummins' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cummins is more favorable than Enersys.

In the previous week, Cummins had 34 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Cummins and 8 mentions for Enersys. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Cummins' score of 0.82 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Enersys has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cummins has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Cummins has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cummins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Cummins pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Enersys pays out 13.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cummins pays out 41.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Cummins has increased its dividend for 19 consecutive years. Cummins is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

94.9% of Enersys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Enersys shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Dover shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Enersys pays out 13.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Dover has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enersys has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Dover has a net margin of 13.30% compared to Enersys' net margin of 8.37%. Enersys' return on equity of 21.27% beat Dover's return on equity.

In the previous week, Dover had 9 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Dover and 8 mentions for Enersys. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Dover's score of 0.52 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enersys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enersys presently has a consensus price target of $180.25, indicating a potential downside of 23.77%. Dover has a consensus price target of $237.36, indicating a potential upside of 10.62%. Given Dover's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dover is more favorable than Enersys.

94.9% of Enersys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Element Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Enersys shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Element Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Element Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Enersys pays out 13.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Element Solutions pays out 51.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Enersys has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Element Solutions has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Enersys has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Element Solutions' net margin of 5.32%. Enersys' return on equity of 21.27% beat Element Solutions' return on equity.

In the previous week, Enersys had 5 more articles in the media than Element Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Enersys and 3 mentions for Element Solutions. Element Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Enersys' score of 1.14 indicating that Element Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Enersys has higher revenue and earnings than Element Solutions. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Element Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enersys presently has a consensus target price of $180.25, indicating a potential downside of 23.77%. Element Solutions has a consensus target price of $39.57, indicating a potential downside of 9.62%. Given Element Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Element Solutions is more favorable than Enersys.