Enersys (ENS) Competitors

94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Littelfuse shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Enersys shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enersys has higher revenue and earnings than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enersys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enersys has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Littelfuse has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

Enersys has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -1.61%. Enersys' return on equity of 21.39% beat Littelfuse's return on equity.

In the previous week, Littelfuse had 2 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Littelfuse and 4 mentions for Enersys. Littelfuse's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Enersys' score of 0.04 indicating that Littelfuse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Littelfuse pays out -177.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Littelfuse has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Littelfuse is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enersys currently has a consensus target price of $265.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.29%. Littelfuse has a consensus target price of $465.83, indicating a potential downside of 0.24%. Given Enersys' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Enersys is more favorable than Littelfuse.

Cummins has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Enersys' net margin of 7.83%. Cummins' return on equity of 25.25% beat Enersys' return on equity.

In the previous week, Cummins had 35 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Cummins and 4 mentions for Enersys. Cummins' average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Enersys' score of 0.04 indicating that Cummins is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cummins has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cummins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Cummins shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Enersys shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Cummins shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Cummins pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cummins pays out 41.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Cummins has raised its dividend for 19 consecutive years. Cummins is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enersys presently has a consensus target price of $265.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.29%. Cummins has a consensus target price of $731.86, suggesting a potential upside of 4.62%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enersys is more favorable than Cummins.

Enersys has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cummins has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Enersys had 1 more articles in the media than Dover. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Enersys and 3 mentions for Dover. Dover's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Enersys' score of 0.04 indicating that Dover is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Dover has a net margin of 13.30% compared to Enersys' net margin of 7.83%. Enersys' return on equity of 21.39% beat Dover's return on equity.

Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Dover pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dover has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years and Enersys has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Dover presently has a consensus price target of $239.85, indicating a potential upside of 7.09%. Enersys has a consensus price target of $265.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.29%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Enersys is more favorable than Dover.

84.5% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Dover shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Enersys shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dover has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enersys has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enersys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enersys has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Element Solutions has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Enersys has higher revenue and earnings than Element Solutions. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Element Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Element Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Element Solutions pays out 51.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Element Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Enersys shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Element Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Enersys and Enersys both had 4 articles in the media. Element Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Enersys' score of 0.04 indicating that Element Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Enersys has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Element Solutions' net margin of 5.32%. Enersys' return on equity of 21.39% beat Element Solutions' return on equity.

Enersys presently has a consensus target price of $265.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.29%. Element Solutions has a consensus target price of $39.57, suggesting a potential downside of 13.99%. Given Enersys' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Enersys is more favorable than Element Solutions.