Enersys (ENS) Competitors

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Littelfuse pays out -640.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Littelfuse has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Littelfuse is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enersys currently has a consensus price target of $265.00, indicating a potential upside of 38.13%. Littelfuse has a consensus price target of $465.83, indicating a potential upside of 2.03%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Enersys is more favorable than Littelfuse.

Enersys has higher revenue and earnings than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enersys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enersys has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -0.31%. Enersys' return on equity of 21.39% beat Littelfuse's return on equity.

Enersys has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Littelfuse has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

94.9% of Enersys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Littelfuse shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Enersys shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Enersys and Enersys both had 8 articles in the media. Littelfuse's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Enersys' score of 1.02 indicating that Littelfuse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, MKS had 29 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for MKS and 8 mentions for Enersys. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat MKS's score of 0.65 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

MKS currently has a consensus target price of $385.00, indicating a potential upside of 26.23%. Enersys has a consensus target price of $265.00, indicating a potential upside of 38.13%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Enersys is more favorable than MKS.

99.8% of MKS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Enersys shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of MKS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Enersys shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MKS pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. MKS pays out 15.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Enersys is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

MKS has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MKS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

MKS has a net margin of 10.15% compared to Enersys' net margin of 7.83%. MKS's return on equity of 24.72% beat Enersys' return on equity.

MKS has a beta of 1.98, indicating that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enersys has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Caterpillar had 84 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 92 mentions for Caterpillar and 8 mentions for Enersys. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Caterpillar's score of 0.85 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Enersys presently has a consensus price target of $265.00, indicating a potential upside of 38.13%. Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $995.52, indicating a potential upside of 17.88%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Enersys is more favorable than Caterpillar.

Caterpillar has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caterpillar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enersys has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caterpillar has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

94.9% of Enersys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Caterpillar shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Enersys shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Caterpillar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Caterpillar pays an annual dividend of $6.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Caterpillar pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Caterpillar has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Caterpillar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Caterpillar has a net margin of 14.51% compared to Enersys' net margin of 7.83%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 55.53% beat Enersys' return on equity.

Enersys presently has a consensus price target of $265.00, suggesting a potential upside of 38.13%. Cummins has a consensus price target of $745.64, suggesting a potential upside of 15.74%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Enersys is more favorable than Cummins.

Enersys has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cummins has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Cummins has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cummins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enersys has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Cummins' net margin of 7.82%. Cummins' return on equity of 25.29% beat Enersys' return on equity.

In the previous week, Cummins had 27 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Cummins and 8 mentions for Enersys. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Cummins' score of 0.82 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Cummins pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cummins pays out 40.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Cummins has raised its dividend for 19 consecutive years. Cummins is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Cummins shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Enersys shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Cummins shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.