Enersys (ENS) Competitors

Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Littelfuse pays out -640.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enersys pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Littelfuse has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Littelfuse is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Enersys had 1 more articles in the media than Littelfuse. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Enersys and 2 mentions for Littelfuse. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Littelfuse's score of 0.22 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Enersys has higher revenue and earnings than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enersys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Littelfuse presently has a consensus target price of $465.83, indicating a potential upside of 6.95%. Enersys has a consensus target price of $265.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.04%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Enersys is more favorable than Littelfuse.

96.1% of Littelfuse shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Enersys shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Enersys has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -0.31%. Enersys' return on equity of 24.02% beat Littelfuse's return on equity.

Littelfuse has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enersys has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

94.9% of Enersys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of MKS shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Enersys shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of MKS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MKS has a net margin of 10.15% compared to Enersys' net margin of 9.29%. MKS's return on equity of 24.72% beat Enersys' return on equity.

Enersys has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MKS has a beta of 2.03, meaning that its share price is 103% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, MKS had 1 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for MKS and 3 mentions for Enersys. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat MKS's score of 0.72 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. MKS pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Enersys pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MKS pays out 15.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Enersys is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enersys currently has a consensus price target of $265.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.04%. MKS has a consensus price target of $375.93, suggesting a potential upside of 38.60%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Enersys is more favorable than MKS.

MKS has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MKS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Caterpillar has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caterpillar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enersys presently has a consensus price target of $265.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.04%. Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $994.38, indicating a potential upside of 20.29%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Enersys is more favorable than Caterpillar.

Caterpillar has a net margin of 14.51% compared to Enersys' net margin of 9.29%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 55.53% beat Enersys' return on equity.

94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Caterpillar shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Enersys shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Caterpillar shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Caterpillar had 43 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for Caterpillar and 3 mentions for Enersys. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Caterpillar's score of 0.57 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Enersys has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caterpillar has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Caterpillar pays an annual dividend of $6.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Enersys pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Caterpillar pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Caterpillar has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Caterpillar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enersys has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Cummins' net margin of 7.82%. Cummins' return on equity of 25.29% beat Enersys' return on equity.

In the previous week, Cummins had 4 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Cummins and 3 mentions for Enersys. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Cummins' score of 0.12 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cummins has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cummins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enersys currently has a consensus price target of $265.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.04%. Cummins has a consensus price target of $731.06, suggesting a potential upside of 41.39%. Given Cummins' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cummins is more favorable than Enersys.

Enersys has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cummins has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Cummins pays an annual dividend of $8.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Enersys pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cummins pays out 45.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Cummins has increased its dividend for 19 consecutive years. Cummins is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Cummins shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Enersys shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Cummins shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.