Enersys (ENS) Competitors

Littelfuse currently has a consensus price target of $465.83, indicating a potential upside of 5.36%. Enersys has a consensus price target of $265.00, indicating a potential upside of 42.44%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enersys is more favorable than Littelfuse.

Enersys has higher revenue and earnings than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enersys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Littelfuse has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enersys has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Littelfuse pays out -600.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Littelfuse has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Enersys has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Littelfuse is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

96.1% of Littelfuse shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Enersys shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Enersys shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Enersys has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -0.31%. Enersys' return on equity of 21.39% beat Littelfuse's return on equity.

In the previous week, Littelfuse had 19 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Littelfuse and 10 mentions for Enersys. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Littelfuse's score of 0.92 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

MKS has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MKS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, MKS had 11 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for MKS and 10 mentions for Enersys. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat MKS's score of 1.22 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

MKS has a beta of 1.98, indicating that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enersys has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

MKS has a net margin of 8.06% compared to Enersys' net margin of 7.83%. MKS's return on equity of 21.49% beat Enersys' return on equity.

MKS pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. MKS pays out 20.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Enersys is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

99.8% of MKS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Enersys shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of MKS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Enersys shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MKS currently has a consensus target price of $383.57, suggesting a potential upside of 28.95%. Enersys has a consensus target price of $265.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.44%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Enersys is more favorable than MKS.

Caterpillar has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caterpillar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Caterpillar pays an annual dividend of $6.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Caterpillar pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Caterpillar has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years and Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Caterpillar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Caterpillar had 69 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 79 mentions for Caterpillar and 10 mentions for Enersys. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Caterpillar's score of 0.84 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

71.0% of Caterpillar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Caterpillar shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Enersys shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Caterpillar has a net margin of 13.33% compared to Enersys' net margin of 7.83%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 48.21% beat Enersys' return on equity.

Caterpillar currently has a consensus target price of $966.29, suggesting a potential upside of 18.46%. Enersys has a consensus target price of $265.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.44%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Enersys is more favorable than Caterpillar.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enersys has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Cummins pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Cummins pays out 41.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cummins has raised its dividend for 19 consecutive years and Enersys has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Cummins is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Cummins has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cummins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

83.5% of Cummins shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Cummins shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Enersys shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cummins currently has a consensus price target of $740.07, suggesting a potential upside of 16.45%. Enersys has a consensus price target of $265.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.44%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Enersys is more favorable than Cummins.

In the previous week, Cummins had 13 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Cummins and 10 mentions for Enersys. Enersys' average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Cummins' score of 1.43 indicating that Enersys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cummins has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enersys has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Cummins has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Enersys' net margin of 7.83%. Cummins' return on equity of 25.25% beat Enersys' return on equity.