Enersys (ENS) Competitors

Enersys has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -0.31%. Enersys' return on equity of 24.02% beat Littelfuse's return on equity.

96.1% of Littelfuse shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Enersys shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enersys has higher revenue and earnings than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enersys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Littelfuse has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enersys has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Littelfuse currently has a consensus price target of $465.83, indicating a potential upside of 13.00%. Enersys has a consensus price target of $265.00, indicating a potential upside of 39.67%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Enersys is more favorable than Littelfuse.

Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Littelfuse pays out -640.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enersys pays out 11.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Littelfuse has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Littelfuse is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Enersys had 2 more articles in the media than Littelfuse. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Enersys and 14 mentions for Littelfuse. Littelfuse's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Enersys' score of 0.98 indicating that Littelfuse is being referred to more favorably in the media.

MKS presently has a consensus target price of $385.00, indicating a potential upside of 37.94%. Enersys has a consensus target price of $265.00, indicating a potential upside of 39.67%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Enersys is more favorable than MKS.

99.8% of MKS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Enersys shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of MKS shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Enersys shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MKS has a beta of 1.98, suggesting that its share price is 98% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enersys has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, MKS had 8 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for MKS and 16 mentions for Enersys. MKS's average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Enersys' score of 0.98 indicating that MKS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

MKS has a net margin of 10.15% compared to Enersys' net margin of 9.29%. MKS's return on equity of 24.72% beat Enersys' return on equity.

MKS has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MKS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

MKS pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. MKS pays out 15.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enersys pays out 11.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Enersys is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Caterpillar has a net margin of 14.51% compared to Enersys' net margin of 9.29%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 55.53% beat Enersys' return on equity.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enersys has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

71.0% of Caterpillar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Enersys shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Caterpillar shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Enersys shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Caterpillar presently has a consensus target price of $995.52, indicating a potential upside of 20.10%. Enersys has a consensus target price of $265.00, indicating a potential upside of 39.67%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enersys is more favorable than Caterpillar.

Caterpillar has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caterpillar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Caterpillar pays an annual dividend of $6.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Caterpillar pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enersys pays out 11.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Caterpillar has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years and Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Caterpillar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Caterpillar had 64 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 80 mentions for Caterpillar and 16 mentions for Enersys. Caterpillar's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Enersys' score of 0.98 indicating that Caterpillar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Enersys has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cummins has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Enersys has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Cummins' net margin of 7.82%. Cummins' return on equity of 25.29% beat Enersys' return on equity.

94.9% of Enersys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Cummins shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Enersys shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Cummins shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Cummins pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Enersys pays out 11.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cummins pays out 40.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Cummins has increased its dividend for 19 consecutive years. Cummins is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Cummins has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cummins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Cummins had 47 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Cummins and 16 mentions for Enersys. Cummins' average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat Enersys' score of 0.98 indicating that Cummins is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Enersys presently has a consensus price target of $265.00, indicating a potential upside of 39.67%. Cummins has a consensus price target of $745.64, indicating a potential upside of 26.84%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Enersys is more favorable than Cummins.