Enersys (ENS) Competitors

Littelfuse currently has a consensus price target of $436.67, suggesting a potential downside of 10.25%. Enersys has a consensus price target of $257.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7.81%. Given Enersys' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Enersys is more favorable than Littelfuse.

Enersys has higher revenue and earnings than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enersys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Littelfuse and Littelfuse both had 7 articles in the media. Littelfuse's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Enersys' score of 0.70 indicating that Littelfuse is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Littelfuse pays out -177.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Littelfuse has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Littelfuse is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

96.1% of Littelfuse shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Enersys shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Littelfuse has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enersys has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Enersys has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -1.61%. Enersys' return on equity of 21.39% beat Littelfuse's return on equity.

Nordson has a net margin of 18.19% compared to Enersys' net margin of 7.83%. Enersys' return on equity of 21.39% beat Nordson's return on equity.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Nordson pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nordson pays out 35.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Nordson has raised its dividend for 62 consecutive years. Nordson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Nordson had 3 more articles in the media than Enersys. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Nordson and 7 mentions for Enersys. Nordson's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Enersys' score of 0.70 indicating that Nordson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

94.9% of Enersys shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.1% of Nordson shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Enersys shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Nordson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nordson has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Enersys. Nordson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enersys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enersys has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nordson has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Enersys currently has a consensus price target of $257.50, indicating a potential upside of 7.81%. Nordson has a consensus price target of $311.29, indicating a potential upside of 7.58%. Given Enersys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enersys is more favorable than Nordson.

94.9% of Enersys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Enersys shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Dover shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Enersys currently has a consensus target price of $257.50, indicating a potential upside of 7.81%. Dover has a consensus target price of $237.36, indicating a potential upside of 10.59%. Given Dover's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dover is more favorable than Enersys.

Enersys has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Enersys. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enersys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dover has a net margin of 13.30% compared to Enersys' net margin of 7.83%. Enersys' return on equity of 21.39% beat Dover's return on equity.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Dover has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Enersys had 3 more articles in the media than Dover. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Enersys and 4 mentions for Dover. Dover's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Enersys' score of 0.70 indicating that Dover is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Enersys pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Element Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Enersys pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Element Solutions pays out 51.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enersys has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Enersys has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Element Solutions has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Enersys currently has a consensus target price of $257.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7.81%. Element Solutions has a consensus target price of $39.57, suggesting a potential downside of 7.17%. Given Enersys' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Enersys is more favorable than Element Solutions.

Enersys has higher revenue and earnings than Element Solutions. Enersys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Element Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

94.9% of Enersys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Element Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Enersys shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Element Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Enersys has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Element Solutions' net margin of 5.32%. Enersys' return on equity of 21.39% beat Element Solutions' return on equity.

In the previous week, Enersys had 7 more articles in the media than Element Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Enersys and 0 mentions for Element Solutions. Element Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Enersys' score of 0.70 indicating that Element Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.