Monolithic Power Systems Competitors

Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. NVIDIA pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 79.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. NVIDIA pays out 13.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Monolithic Power Systems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

93.3% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.7% of NVIDIA shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of NVIDIA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Monolithic Power Systems and NVIDIA's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. NVIDIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Monolithic Power Systems and NVIDIA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Monolithic Power Systems and NVIDIA, as provided by MarketBeat.

Monolithic Power Systems presently has a consensus price target of $370.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.21%. NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $583.9167, indicating a potential upside of 6.44%. Given NVIDIA's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Monolithic Power Systems.

Summary

NVIDIA beats Monolithic Power Systems on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) and Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Monolithic Power Systems and Intel's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Intel has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Intel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

93.3% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.3% of Intel shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Intel shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Intel pays an annual dividend of $1.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 79.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Intel pays out 28.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Intel has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Intel is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Monolithic Power Systems and Intel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Monolithic Power Systems and Intel, as provided by MarketBeat.

Monolithic Power Systems presently has a consensus price target of $370.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.21%. Intel has a consensus price target of $61.7714, indicating a potential upside of 1.63%. Given Intel's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intel is more favorable than Monolithic Power Systems.

Risk and Volatility

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intel has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Intel beats Monolithic Power Systems on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) and Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Broadcom and Monolithic Power Systems' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Broadcom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

80.6% of Broadcom shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Broadcom shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Broadcom pays an annual dividend of $14.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Broadcom pays out 78.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 79.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Broadcom has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Monolithic Power Systems has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Broadcom is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Broadcom and Monolithic Power Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Broadcom and Monolithic Power Systems, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Broadcom presently has a consensus target price of $425.8077, indicating a potential downside of 9.38%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus target price of $370.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.21%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than Broadcom.

Volatility & Risk

Broadcom has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Broadcom beats Monolithic Power Systems on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Texas Instruments (NASDAQ:TXN) and Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Texas Instruments and Monolithic Power Systems' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Texas Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Texas Instruments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

83.1% of Texas Instruments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Texas Instruments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Texas Instruments pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Texas Instruments pays out 77.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 79.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Texas Instruments has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Monolithic Power Systems has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Texas Instruments is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Texas Instruments and Monolithic Power Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Texas Instruments and Monolithic Power Systems, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Texas Instruments presently has a consensus target price of $166.5185, indicating a potential downside of 3.34%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus target price of $370.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.21%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than Texas Instruments.

Volatility & Risk

Texas Instruments has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Texas Instruments beats Monolithic Power Systems on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) and Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Micron Technology and Monolithic Power Systems' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Micron Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Micron Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

80.4% of Micron Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Micron Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Micron Technology and Monolithic Power Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Micron Technology and Monolithic Power Systems, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Micron Technology presently has a consensus target price of $89.0909, indicating a potential downside of 2.66%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus target price of $370.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.21%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than Micron Technology.

Risk and Volatility

Micron Technology has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Monolithic Power Systems beats Micron Technology on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Analog Devices (NASDAQ:ADI) and Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Analog Devices and Monolithic Power Systems, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Analog Devices presently has a consensus target price of $154.50, indicating a potential downside of 0.85%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus target price of $370.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.21%. Given Analog Devices' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Analog Devices is more favorable than Monolithic Power Systems.

Dividends

Analog Devices pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Analog Devices pays out 50.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 79.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Analog Devices has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Monolithic Power Systems has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Analog Devices is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Analog Devices and Monolithic Power Systems' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Analog Devices has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Analog Devices is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its share price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

91.9% of Analog Devices shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Analog Devices shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Analog Devices and Monolithic Power Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Analog Devices beats Monolithic Power Systems on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.