Question 1

Do analysts rate ADI or MPWR?

Accepted Answer

Analog Devices currently has a consensus price target of $457.97, indicating a potential upside of 21.89%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $1,731.42, indicating a potential upside of 42.18%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than Analog Devices. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Analog Devices 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 26 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Monolithic Power Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 12 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.93

Question 2

Is ADI or MPWR a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Analog Devices pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Analog Devices pays out 52.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 49.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Analog Devices has increased its dividend for 23 consecutive years and Monolithic Power Systems has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Analog Devices is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Question 3

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, ADI or MPWR?

Accepted Answer

Analog Devices has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Analog Devices is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Analog Devices $11.02B 16.52 $2.27B $8.43 44.57 Monolithic Power Systems $2.79B 21.45 $621.48M $16.31 74.67

Question 4

Do institutionals and insiders believe in ADI or MPWR?

Accepted Answer

86.8% of Analog Devices shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Analog Devices shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Question 5

Is ADI or MPWR more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Analog Devices has a net margin of 29.79% compared to Monolithic Power Systems' net margin of 24.41%. Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity of 22.31% beat Analog Devices' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Analog Devices 29.79% 16.39% 11.49% Monolithic Power Systems 24.41% 22.31% 18.67%

Question 6

Which has more risk and volatility, ADI or MPWR?

Accepted Answer

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Question 7

Does the media refer more to ADI or MPWR?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Monolithic Power Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Analog Devices. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems and 9 mentions for Analog Devices. Monolithic Power Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Analog Devices' score of 0.56 indicating that Monolithic Power Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Analog Devices 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Monolithic Power Systems 3 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 8

Do analysts prefer MPWR or AMAT?

Accepted Answer

Monolithic Power Systems presently has a consensus target price of $1,731.42, indicating a potential upside of 42.18%. Applied Materials has a consensus target price of $658.45, indicating a potential upside of 48.11%. Given Applied Materials' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Monolithic Power Systems. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Monolithic Power Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 12 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.93 Applied Materials 0 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 27 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.88

Question 9

Is MPWR or AMAT a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 49.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Monolithic Power Systems has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Question 10

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MPWR or AMAT?

Accepted Answer

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Monolithic Power Systems $2.79B 21.45 $621.48M $16.31 74.67 Applied Materials $30.84B 11.44 $7.00B $11.60 38.33

Question 11

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in MPWR or AMAT?

Accepted Answer

93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 12

Is MPWR or AMAT more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Applied Materials has a net margin of 30.05% compared to Monolithic Power Systems' net margin of 24.41%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 38.02% beat Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Monolithic Power Systems 24.41% 22.31% 18.67% Applied Materials 30.05% 38.02% 22.09%

Question 13

Which has more volatility & risk, MPWR or AMAT?

Accepted Answer

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Question 14

Does the media favor MPWR or AMAT?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 29 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Applied Materials and 10 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. Monolithic Power Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.81 indicating that Monolithic Power Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Monolithic Power Systems 3 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Applied Materials 20 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 15

Do analysts prefer MPWR or GOOGL?

Accepted Answer

Monolithic Power Systems currently has a consensus target price of $1,731.42, suggesting a potential upside of 42.18%. Alphabet has a consensus target price of $422.16, suggesting a potential upside of 20.77%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than Alphabet. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Monolithic Power Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 12 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.93 Alphabet 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 45 Buy rating(s) 5 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.02

Question 16

Is MPWR or GOOGL a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Alphabet pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 49.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alphabet pays out 4.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Monolithic Power Systems has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Alphabet has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Monolithic Power Systems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Question 17

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MPWR or GOOGL?

Accepted Answer

Alphabet has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Alphabet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Monolithic Power Systems $2.79B 21.45 $621.48M $16.31 74.67 Alphabet $402.84B 10.61 $132.17B $19.91 17.56

Question 18

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MPWR or GOOGL?

Accepted Answer

93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.0% of Alphabet shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.6% of Alphabet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Question 19

Is MPWR or GOOGL more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Alphabet has a net margin of 54.77% compared to Monolithic Power Systems' net margin of 24.41%. Alphabet's return on equity of 51.32% beat Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Monolithic Power Systems 24.41% 22.31% 18.67% Alphabet 54.77% 51.32% 35.42%

Question 20

Which has more volatility & risk, MPWR or GOOGL?

Accepted Answer

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alphabet has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Question 21

Does the media refer more to MPWR or GOOGL?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Alphabet had 177 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 187 mentions for Alphabet and 10 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. Alphabet's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Monolithic Power Systems' score of 0.85 indicating that Alphabet is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Monolithic Power Systems 3 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Alphabet 125 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 32 Neutral mention(s) 18 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 22

Do analysts recommend KLAC or MPWR?

Accepted Answer

KLA currently has a consensus target price of $222.22, indicating a potential upside of 25.55%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus target price of $1,731.42, indicating a potential upside of 42.18%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than KLA. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score KLA 0 Sell rating(s) 9 Hold rating(s) 19 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.72 Monolithic Power Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 12 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.93

Question 23

Is KLAC or MPWR a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. KLA pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 49.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Monolithic Power Systems has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Question 24

Which has better earnings and valuation, KLAC or MPWR?

Accepted Answer

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio KLA $13.58B 17.03 $4.83B $3.67 48.23 Monolithic Power Systems $2.79B 21.45 $621.48M $16.31 74.67

Question 25

Do institutionals & insiders believe in KLAC or MPWR?

Accepted Answer

86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 91.5% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Question 26

Is KLAC or MPWR more profitable?

Accepted Answer

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to Monolithic Power Systems' net margin of 24.41%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets KLA 35.57% 87.66% 29.23% Monolithic Power Systems 24.41% 22.31% 18.67%

Question 27

Which has more risk and volatility, KLAC or MPWR?

Accepted Answer

KLA has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Question 28

Does the media refer more to KLAC or MPWR?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, KLA had 5 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for KLA and 10 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. KLA's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Monolithic Power Systems' score of 0.85 indicating that KLA is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment KLA 9 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Monolithic Power Systems 3 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 29

Do analysts recommend MPWR or LRCX?

Accepted Answer

Monolithic Power Systems currently has a consensus target price of $1,731.42, suggesting a potential upside of 42.18%. Lam Research has a consensus target price of $361.81, suggesting a potential upside of 25.58%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than Lam Research. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Monolithic Power Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 12 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.93 Lam Research 0 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 26 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.88

Question 30

Is MPWR or LRCX a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 49.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lam Research pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Monolithic Power Systems has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Lam Research has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

Question 31

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MPWR or LRCX?

Accepted Answer

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Lam Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Monolithic Power Systems $2.79B 21.45 $621.48M $16.31 74.67 Lam Research $23.23B 15.52 $7.27B $5.76 50.02

Question 32

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MPWR or LRCX?

Accepted Answer

93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 33

Is MPWR or LRCX more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Monolithic Power Systems' net margin of 24.41%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Monolithic Power Systems 24.41% 22.31% 18.67% Lam Research 31.27% 67.60% 33.48%

Question 34

Which has more volatility & risk, MPWR or LRCX?

Accepted Answer

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lam Research has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market.

Question 35

Does the media prefer MPWR or LRCX?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Lam Research had 10 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Lam Research and 10 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. Monolithic Power Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Lam Research's score of 0.72 indicating that Monolithic Power Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Monolithic Power Systems 3 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Lam Research 10 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Metric	Monolithic Power Systems	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$57.48B	$109.69B	$30.10B	$13.13B
Dividend Yield	0.68%	1.65%	2.74%	12.94%
P/E Ratio	74.67	80.11	77.00	25.39
Price / Sales	21.45	88.47	590.13	114.04
Price / Cash	84.11	62.13	48.01	51.66
Price / Book	16.52	10.19	7.80	6.33
Net Income	$621.48M	$2.05B	$703.76M	$358.24M
7 Day Performance	-1.35%	-0.69%	-0.53%	1.17%
1 Month Performance	-6.33%	-2.52%	-2.41%	-2.59%
1 Year Performance	32.90%	76.99%	176.32%	5.97%

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems	4.9368 of 5 stars	$1,217.80 +4.1%	$1,731.42 +42.2%	+32.7%	$57.48B	$2.79B	74.67	4,501	Analyst Downgrade High Trading Volume
ADI Analog Devices	4.8586 of 5 stars	$362.25 flat	$454.63 +25.5%	+50.9%	$175.53B	$11.02B	42.97	24,500
AMAT Applied Materials	4.9511 of 5 stars	$454.71 flat	$658.45 +44.8%	+134.3%	$360.86B	$28.37B	39.20	36,500	Trending News
GOOGL Alphabet	4.6206 of 5 stars	$338.46 flat	$420.19 +24.1%	+38.7%	$4.14T	$402.84B	17.00	190,820	Trending News Analyst Forecast Options Volume Analyst Revision Gap Up
KLAC KLA	4.9177 of 5 stars	$185.60 flat	$222.22 +19.7%	+69.1%	$242.50B	$13.58B	50.61	17,200	Positive News Insider Trade

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) Competitors

MPWR vs. ADI, AMAT, GOOGL, KLAC, and LRCX

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Analog Devices?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Applied Materials?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Alphabet?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to KLA?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Lam Research?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPWR vs. The Competition

Monolithic Power Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) Competitors

MPWR vs. ADI, AMAT, GOOGL, KLAC, and LRCX

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Analog Devices?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, ADI or MPWR?

Which has more risk and volatility, ADI or MPWR?

Does the media refer more to ADI or MPWR?

Do analysts rate ADI or MPWR?

Is ADI or MPWR more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in ADI or MPWR?

Is ADI or MPWR a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Applied Materials?

Is MPWR or AMAT more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MPWR or AMAT?

Is MPWR or AMAT a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in MPWR or AMAT?

Which has more volatility & risk, MPWR or AMAT?

Does the media favor MPWR or AMAT?

Do analysts prefer MPWR or AMAT?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Alphabet?

Is MPWR or GOOGL more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, MPWR or GOOGL?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MPWR or GOOGL?

Is MPWR or GOOGL a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MPWR or GOOGL?

Does the media refer more to MPWR or GOOGL?

Do analysts prefer MPWR or GOOGL?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to KLA?

Which has better earnings and valuation, KLAC or MPWR?

Do analysts recommend KLAC or MPWR?

Does the media refer more to KLAC or MPWR?

Is KLAC or MPWR a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in KLAC or MPWR?

Which has more risk and volatility, KLAC or MPWR?

Is KLAC or MPWR more profitable?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Lam Research?

Do analysts recommend MPWR or LRCX?

Is MPWR or LRCX more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, MPWR or LRCX?

Is MPWR or LRCX a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer MPWR or LRCX?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MPWR or LRCX?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MPWR or LRCX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPWR vs. The Competition

Monolithic Power Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools