Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) Competitors

$1,550.02 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 05/15/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$1,548.80 -1.22 (-0.08%)

As of 08:06 AM Eastern

MPWR vs. ADI, AMAT, GOOGL, KLAC, and LRCX

Should you buy Monolithic Power Systems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Monolithic Power Systems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Monolithic Power Systems include Analog Devices (ADI), Applied Materials (AMAT), Alphabet (GOOGL), KLA (KLAC), and Lam Research (LRCX). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Analog Devices?

Analog Devices (NASDAQ:ADI) and Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Analog Devices has a net margin of 23.02% compared to Monolithic Power Systems' net margin of 22.84%. Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity of 19.58% beat Analog Devices' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Analog Devices	23.02%	12.49%	8.92%
Monolithic Power Systems	22.84%	19.58%	16.50%

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

86.8% of Analog Devices shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Analog Devices shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analog Devices currently has a consensus target price of $379.54, suggesting a potential downside of 9.09%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus target price of $1,599.17, suggesting a potential upside of 3.17%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than Analog Devices.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Analog Devices	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	24 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.97
Monolithic Power Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Analog Devices has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Analog Devices is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Analog Devices	$11.76B	17.34	$2.27B	$5.47	76.32
Monolithic Power Systems	$2.79B	27.29	$621.48M	$13.87	111.75

Analog Devices pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Analog Devices pays out 80.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Analog Devices has increased its dividend for 23 consecutive years and Monolithic Power Systems has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Analog Devices is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Analog Devices had 22 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Analog Devices and 21 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. Monolithic Power Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Analog Devices' score of 1.09 indicating that Monolithic Power Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Analog Devices	25 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Monolithic Power Systems	11 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Monolithic Power Systems beats Analog Devices on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Applied Materials?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$28.37B	12.21	$7.00B	$10.65	41.00
Monolithic Power Systems	$2.79B	27.29	$621.48M	$13.87	111.75

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 102 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 123 mentions for Applied Materials and 21 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. Monolithic Power Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.78 indicating that Monolithic Power Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	55 Very Positive mention(s)	15 Positive mention(s)	32 Neutral mention(s)	6 Negative mention(s)	3 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Monolithic Power Systems	11 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Monolithic Power Systems' net margin of 22.84%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%
Monolithic Power Systems	22.84%	19.58%	16.50%

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Applied Materials pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Monolithic Power Systems has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Applied Materials currently has a consensus target price of $463.89, suggesting a potential upside of 6.25%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus target price of $1,599.17, suggesting a potential upside of 3.17%. Given Applied Materials' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Monolithic Power Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.79
Monolithic Power Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Applied Materials and Monolithic Power Systems tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Alphabet?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and media sentiment.

Alphabet pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Alphabet pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Alphabet has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Monolithic Power Systems has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Monolithic Power Systems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Alphabet has a net margin of 37.92% compared to Monolithic Power Systems' net margin of 22.84%. Alphabet's return on equity of 38.99% beat Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alphabet	37.92%	38.99%	27.41%
Monolithic Power Systems	22.84%	19.58%	16.50%

40.0% of Alphabet shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 11.6% of Alphabet shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Alphabet has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Alphabet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alphabet	$402.84B	11.93	$132.17B	$13.11	30.27
Monolithic Power Systems	$2.79B	27.29	$621.48M	$13.87	111.75

Alphabet has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its share price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

Alphabet presently has a consensus target price of $410.84, suggesting a potential upside of 3.54%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus target price of $1,599.17, suggesting a potential upside of 3.17%. Given Alphabet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Alphabet is more favorable than Monolithic Power Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alphabet	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	47 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94
Monolithic Power Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

In the previous week, Alphabet had 184 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 205 mentions for Alphabet and 21 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. Monolithic Power Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Alphabet's score of 1.03 indicating that Monolithic Power Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alphabet	139 Very Positive mention(s)	10 Positive mention(s)	35 Neutral mention(s)	16 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Monolithic Power Systems	11 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Alphabet beats Monolithic Power Systems on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to KLA?

KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) and Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, KLA had 8 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for KLA and 21 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. Monolithic Power Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat KLA's score of 0.64 indicating that Monolithic Power Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
KLA	12 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	5 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Monolithic Power Systems	11 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

KLA currently has a consensus target price of $1,838.48, suggesting a potential upside of 1.89%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus target price of $1,599.17, suggesting a potential upside of 3.17%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than KLA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
KLA	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Monolithic Power Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Monolithic Power Systems' net margin of 22.84%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
KLA	35.66%	91.89%	29.21%
Monolithic Power Systems	22.84%	19.58%	16.50%

KLA has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

86.7% of KLA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 91.5% of KLA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
KLA	$12.16B	19.39	$4.06B	$35.33	51.07
Monolithic Power Systems	$2.79B	27.29	$621.48M	$13.87	111.75

KLA pays an annual dividend of $7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. KLA pays out 21.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Monolithic Power Systems has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Summary

KLA beats Monolithic Power Systems on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Lam Research?

Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) and Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

84.6% of Lam Research shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lam Research had 50 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 71 mentions for Lam Research and 21 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Monolithic Power Systems' score of 1.14 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lam Research	49 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Monolithic Power Systems	11 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Lam Research pays out 19.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Monolithic Power Systems has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.81, indicating that its stock price is 81% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

Lam Research currently has a consensus target price of $291.75, indicating a potential upside of 2.47%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus target price of $1,599.17, indicating a potential upside of 3.17%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than Lam Research.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lam Research	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.79
Monolithic Power Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Lam Research has a net margin of 30.94% compared to Monolithic Power Systems' net margin of 22.84%. Lam Research's return on equity of 66.21% beat Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lam Research	30.94%	66.21%	31.61%
Monolithic Power Systems	22.84%	19.58%	16.50%

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Lam Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lam Research	$18.44B	19.31	$5.36B	$5.30	53.72
Monolithic Power Systems	$2.79B	27.29	$621.48M	$13.87	111.75

Summary

Lam Research beats Monolithic Power Systems on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Monolithic Power Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MPWR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MPWR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Monolithic Power Systems	SEMI Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$76.15B	$50.57B	$38.74B	$12.29B
Dividend Yield	0.52%	1.21%	3.21%	5.30%
P/E Ratio	111.75	150.95	168.33	25.26
Price / Sales	27.29	13.83	625.56	73.54
Price / Cash	111.46	214.41	47.81	37.27
Price / Book	21.03	11.72	9.66	6.71
Net Income	$621.48M	$493.49M	$1.06B	$336.00M
7 Day Performance	-6.69%	-1.73%	-1.44%	-0.72%
1 Month Performance	5.56%	46.00%	4.15%	-0.09%
1 Year Performance	116.66%	160.09%	161.34%	30.62%

Monolithic Power Systems Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems	4.6041 of 5 stars	$1,550.02 flat	$1,599.17 +3.2%	+116.7%	$76.15B	$2.79B	111.75	4,501	Positive News
ADI Analog Devices	4.0455 of 5 stars	$397.02 -0.2%	$370.69 -6.6%	+83.8%	$194.15B	$11.02B	72.58	24,500	Trending News Upcoming Earnings Analyst Downgrade
AMAT Applied Materials	4.5549 of 5 stars	$391.38 +0.6%	$368.29 -5.9%	+163.7%	$308.78B	$28.37B	40.06	36,500	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
GOOGL Alphabet	4.1055 of 5 stars	$383.25 -0.6%	$402.96 +5.1%	+138.8%	$4.67T	$402.84B	29.23	190,820	Trending News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
KLAC KLA	4.2668 of 5 stars	$1,713.32 -0.7%	$1,798.30 +5.0%	+128.1%	$225.50B	$12.16B	48.49	15,200	Trending News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MPWR) was last updated on 5/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) Competitors

MPWR vs. ADI, AMAT, GOOGL, KLAC, and LRCX

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Analog Devices?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Applied Materials?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Alphabet?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to KLA?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Lam Research?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPWR vs. The Competition

Monolithic Power Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) Competitors

MPWR vs. ADI, AMAT, GOOGL, KLAC, and LRCX

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Analog Devices?

Is ADI or MPWR more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, ADI or MPWR?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ADI or MPWR?

Do analysts rate ADI or MPWR?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ADI or MPWR?

Is ADI or MPWR a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to ADI or MPWR?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Applied Materials?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AMAT or MPWR?

Does the media refer more to AMAT or MPWR?

Is AMAT or MPWR more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, AMAT or MPWR?

Is AMAT or MPWR a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate AMAT or MPWR?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AMAT or MPWR?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Alphabet?

Is GOOGL or MPWR a better dividend stock?

Is GOOGL or MPWR more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in GOOGL or MPWR?

Which has better earnings and valuation, GOOGL or MPWR?

Which has more risk & volatility, GOOGL or MPWR?

Do analysts recommend GOOGL or MPWR?

Does the media favor GOOGL or MPWR?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to KLA?

Does the media favor KLAC or MPWR?

Do analysts rate KLAC or MPWR?

Is KLAC or MPWR more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, KLAC or MPWR?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in KLAC or MPWR?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, KLAC or MPWR?

Is KLAC or MPWR a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Monolithic Power Systems compare to Lam Research?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in LRCX or MPWR?

Does the media refer more to LRCX or MPWR?

Is LRCX or MPWR a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, LRCX or MPWR?

Do analysts rate LRCX or MPWR?

Is LRCX or MPWR more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, LRCX or MPWR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPWR vs. The Competition

Monolithic Power Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools