AAIF vs. PINT, AUSC, TAM, OAP3, BGEU, BGS, FAS, HFEL, BIOG, and CTUK
Should you be buying abrdn Asian Income Fund stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of abrdn Asian Income Fund include Pantheon Infrastructure (PINT), abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth (AUSC), Tatton Asset Management (TAM), Octopus Apollo VCT (OAP3), Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust (BGEU), Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (BGS), Fidelity Asian Values (FAS), Henderson Far East Income (HFEL), The Biotech Growth Trust (BIOG), and CT UK Capital and Income (CTUK). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
abrdn Asian Income Fund (LON:AAIF) and Pantheon Infrastructure (LON:PINT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, community ranking and institutional ownership.
Pantheon Infrastructure has a net margin of 0.00% compared to abrdn Asian Income Fund's net margin of -22.36%. Pantheon Infrastructure's return on equity of 0.00% beat abrdn Asian Income Fund's return on equity.
abrdn Asian Income Fund received 98 more outperform votes than Pantheon Infrastructure when rated by MarketBeat users.
abrdn Asian Income Fund has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pantheon Infrastructure has a beta of 0.14, indicating that its share price is 86% less volatile than the S&P 500.
abrdn Asian Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Pantheon Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. abrdn Asian Income Fund pays out -110,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.
54.9% of abrdn Asian Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Pantheon Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of abrdn Asian Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Pantheon Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Pantheon Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than abrdn Asian Income Fund.
In the previous week, abrdn Asian Income Fund had 1 more articles in the media than Pantheon Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for abrdn Asian Income Fund and 0 mentions for Pantheon Infrastructure. abrdn Asian Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pantheon Infrastructure'saverage media sentiment score.
Summary
abrdn Asian Income Fund beats Pantheon Infrastructure on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get abrdn Asian Income Fund News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AAIF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
abrdn Asian Income Fund Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
