CTL vs. FAR, KP2, GSP, ARS, ARCM, PXC, MKA, KAV, 1SN, and POW
Should you be buying CleanTech Lithium stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of CleanTech Lithium include Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR), Kore Potash (KP2), Gensource Potash (GSP), Asiamet Resources (ARS), Arc Minerals (ARCM), Phoenix Copper (PXC), Mkango Resources (MKA), Kavango Resources (KAV), First Tin (1SN), and Power Metal Resources (POW). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.
Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) and CleanTech Lithium (LON:CTL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, community ranking, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.
Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CleanTech Lithium has a beta of -0.78, indicating that its stock price is 178% less volatile than the S&P 500.
CleanTech Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CleanTech Lithium's net margin of -90.26%. CleanTech Lithium's return on equity of -43.57% beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity.
CleanTech Lithium received 3 more outperform votes than Ferro-Alloy Resources when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 100.00% of users gave CleanTech Lithium an outperform vote while only 0.00% of users gave Ferro-Alloy Resources an outperform vote.
CleanTech Lithium has a consensus price target of GBX 295, indicating a potential upside of 1,538.89%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Ferro-Alloy Resources.
Ferro-Alloy Resources has higher revenue and earnings than CleanTech Lithium. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CleanTech Lithium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
In the previous week, Ferro-Alloy Resources and Ferro-Alloy Resources both had 3 articles in the media. CleanTech Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' score of 0.05 indicating that Ferro-Alloy Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.
2.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.7% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 49.5% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Summary
Ferro-Alloy Resources beats CleanTech Lithium on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get CleanTech Lithium News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CTL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CTL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
CleanTech Lithium Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
