CYN vs. RIII, AATG, BGCG, REC, WKOF, AAEV, BSC, AMAT, MAJE, and DUKE
Should you be buying CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income include Rights & Issues Investment Trust (RIII), Albion Technology & Gen VCT (AATG), Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (BGCG), Record (REC), Weiss Korea Opportunity (WKOF), Albion Enterprise VCT (AAEV), British Smaller Companies VCT2 (BSC), Amati AIM VCT (AMAT), Majedie Investments (MAJE), and Duke Capital (DUKE). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
Rights & Issues Investment Trust (LON:RIII) and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, community ranking, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.
17.0% of Rights & Issues Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.1% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.3% of Rights & Issues Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
In the previous week, Rights & Issues Investment Trust had 40 more articles in the media than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for Rights & Issues Investment Trust and 1 mentions for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. Rights & Issues Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's score of -0.36 indicating that CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income received 50 more outperform votes than Rights & Issues Investment Trust when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 67.92% of users gave Rights & Issues Investment Trust an outperform vote while only 64.66% of users gave CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income an outperform vote.
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a net margin of 58.17% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of 0.00%. Rights & Issues Investment Trust's return on equity of 3.85% beat CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity.
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has higher revenue and earnings than Rights & Issues Investment Trust. Rights & Issues Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Rights & Issues Investment Trust has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Rights & Issues Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 41 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Rights & Issues Investment Trust pays out -2,907.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 7,500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.
Summary
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income beats Rights & Issues Investment Trust on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CYN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools