PMI vs. PAC, PCGH, POLN, UEM, JUP, NESF, AAS, JCH, ATR, and MTW
Should you be buying Premier Miton Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Premier Miton Group include Pacific Assets (PAC), Polar Capital Glb Healthcare (PCGH), Pollen Street Group (POLN), Utilico Emerging Markets Trust (UEM), Jupiter Fund Management (JUP), NextEnergy Solar Fund (NESF), abrdn Asia Focus (AAS), JPMorgan Claverhouse (JCH), Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (ATR), and Mattioli Woods (MTW). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
Premier Miton Group (LON:PMI) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, community ranking and dividends.
Premier Miton Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premier Miton Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Premier Miton Group has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its share price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Premier Miton Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Premier Miton Group pays out 30,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pacific Assets pays out -8,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.
59.4% of Premier Miton Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.0% of Pacific Assets shares are held by institutional investors. 17.8% of Premier Miton Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Pacific Assets shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
In the previous week, Pacific Assets had 6 more articles in the media than Premier Miton Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Pacific Assets and 4 mentions for Premier Miton Group. Premier Miton Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Pacific Assets' score of 0.23 indicating that Premier Miton Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Premier Miton Group has a net margin of 5.49% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -103.73%. Premier Miton Group's return on equity of 2.97% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.
Pacific Assets received 92 more outperform votes than Premier Miton Group when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 95.24% of users gave Premier Miton Group an outperform vote while only 70.00% of users gave Pacific Assets an outperform vote.
Summary
Premier Miton Group beats Pacific Assets on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Premier Miton Group News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PMI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PMI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Premier Miton Group Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
