RST vs. FRAN, CPI, KEYS, BEG, DLAR, KGH, JSG, RWS, FNTL, and CHRT
Should you be buying Restore stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Restore include Franchise Brands (FRAN), Capita (CPI), Keystone Law Group (KEYS), Begbies Traynor Group (BEG), De La Rue (DLAR), Knights Group (KGH), Johnson Service Group (JSG), RWS (RWS), Fintel (FNTL), and Cohort (CHRT). These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.
Franchise Brands (LON:FRAN) and Restore (LON:RST) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, community ranking, valuation and media sentiment.
Franchise Brands has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Restore has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Franchise Brands pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Restore pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Franchise Brands pays out 6,666.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restore pays out -2,173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restore is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
Franchise Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Restore. Restore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franchise Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Restore has a consensus target price of GBX 443.33, indicating a potential upside of 90.68%. Given Franchise Brands' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restore is more favorable than Franchise Brands.
In the previous week, Franchise Brands had 16 more articles in the media than Restore. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Franchise Brands and 3 mentions for Restore. Franchise Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Restore's score of 0.32 indicating that Restore is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Restore received 199 more outperform votes than Franchise Brands when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 81.63% of users gave Restore an outperform vote while only 66.12% of users gave Franchise Brands an outperform vote.
38.8% of Franchise Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.7% of Restore shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.1% of Franchise Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.6% of Restore shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Franchise Brands has a net margin of 2.97% compared to Franchise Brands' net margin of -11.08%. Restore's return on equity of 1.19% beat Franchise Brands' return on equity.
Summary
Restore beats Franchise Brands on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Restore News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RST and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RST and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Related Companies and Tools
