MAPS vs. FNGR, AEVA, ALAR, AISP, NRGV, EXFY, INSE, CCRD, FAAS, and RCAT
Should you be buying WM Technology stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of WM Technology include FingerMotion (FNGR), Aeva Technologies (AEVA), Alarum Technologies (ALAR), Airship AI (AISP), Energy Vault (NRGV), Expensify (EXFY), Inspired Entertainment (INSE), CoreCard (CCRD), DigiAsia (FAAS), and Red Cat (RCAT).
WM Technology (NASDAQ:MAPS) and FingerMotion (NASDAQ:FNGR) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, community ranking, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.
WM Technology received 18 more outperform votes than FingerMotion when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 100.00% of users gave FingerMotion an outperform vote while only 51.35% of users gave WM Technology an outperform vote.
FingerMotion has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 51.98%. Given FingerMotion's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FingerMotion is more favorable than WM Technology.
In the previous week, WM Technology had 2 more articles in the media than FingerMotion. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for WM Technology and 1 mentions for FingerMotion. FingerMotion's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat WM Technology's score of 0.47 indicating that FingerMotion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
FingerMotion has a net margin of -13.32% compared to WM Technology's net margin of -56.88%. WM Technology's return on equity of -25.02% beat FingerMotion's return on equity.
WM Technology has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FingerMotion has a beta of -0.9, suggesting that its share price is 190% less volatile than the S&P 500.
22.0% of WM Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of FingerMotion shares are held by institutional investors. 41.3% of WM Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of FingerMotion shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
FingerMotion has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WM Technology. FingerMotion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary
WM Technology beats FingerMotion on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get WM Technology News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MAPS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MAPS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
WM Technology Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
