CHRY vs. PCFT, CORD, IPO, FSFL, GROW, FSG, CGI, NAS, JEGI, and LIO
Should you be buying Chrysalis Investments stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Chrysalis Investments include Polar Capital Global Financials (PCFT), Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (CORD), IP Group (IPO), Foresight Solar (FSFL), Molten Ventures (GROW), Foresight Group (FSG), Canadian General Investments (CGI), North Atlantic Smaller Cos (NAS), JPMorgan European Growth & Income (JEGI), and Liontrust Asset Management (LIO). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, community ranking and profitability.
Polar Capital Global Financials received 105 more outperform votes than Chrysalis Investments when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 100.00% of users gave Chrysalis Investments an outperform vote while only 78.26% of users gave Polar Capital Global Financials an outperform vote.
Chrysalis Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital Global Financials. Polar Capital Global Financials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chrysalis Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Global Financials. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 0 mentions for Polar Capital Global Financials. Polar Capital Global Financials' average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Chrysalis Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
82.6% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity of 0.00% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.
Summary
Chrysalis Investments beats Polar Capital Global Financials on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Chrysalis Investments News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHRY and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHRY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Chrysalis Investments Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
