CHNR vs. AUMN, AUST, FMST, ITP, ELBM, GURE, MGIH, ZKIN, WWR, and FSI
Should you be buying China Natural Resources stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of China Natural Resources include Golden Minerals (AUMN), Austin Gold (AUST), Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology (FMST), IT Tech Packaging (ITP), Electra Battery Materials (ELBM), Gulf Resources (GURE), Millennium Group International (MGIH), ZK International Group (ZKIN), Westwater Resources (WWR), and Flexible Solutions International (FSI). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.
China Natural Resources (NASDAQ:CHNR) and Golden Minerals (NYSE:AUMN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, community ranking and earnings.
China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Golden Minerals has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.
China Natural Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Golden Minerals' net margin of -77.16%. China Natural Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Golden Minerals' return on equity.
China Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Minerals.
0.0% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.2% of China Natural Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of Golden Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Golden Minerals has a consensus target price of $7.23, suggesting a potential upside of 1,181.91%. Given Golden Minerals' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Golden Minerals is more favorable than China Natural Resources.
China Natural Resources received 85 more outperform votes than Golden Minerals when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 34.68% of users gave China Natural Resources an outperform vote while only 4.55% of users gave Golden Minerals an outperform vote.
In the previous week, China Natural Resources and China Natural Resources both had 2 articles in the media. China Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Golden Minerals' score of -0.34 indicating that China Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Summary
China Natural Resources beats Golden Minerals on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get China Natural Resources News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHNR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHNR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
China Natural Resources Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
