Sangoma Technologies (SANG) Competitors

GAN (NASDAQ:GAN) and Sangoma Technologies (NASDAQ:SANG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, community ranking, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Do institutionals and insiders believe in GAN or SANG?

16.7% of GAN shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.7% of Sangoma Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.5% of GAN shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.0% of Sangoma Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Is GAN or SANG more profitable?

Sangoma Technologies has a net margin of -12.23% compared to Sangoma Technologies' net margin of -32.10%. GAN's return on equity of -3.07% beat Sangoma Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
GAN	-32.10%	-1,285.94%	-34.88%
Sangoma Technologies	-12.23%	-3.07%	-1.89%

Which has better valuation and earnings, GAN or SANG?

Sangoma Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than GAN. Sangoma Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GAN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
GAN	$129.42M	0.47	-$34.44M	-$0.90	-1.49
Sangoma Technologies	$252.53M	0.41	-$29.03M	-$0.93	-4.68

Which has more risk & volatility, GAN or SANG?

GAN has a beta of 1.97, suggesting that its share price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sangoma Technologies has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the media prefer GAN or SANG?

In the previous week, GAN had 9 more articles in the media than Sangoma Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for GAN and 8 mentions for Sangoma Technologies. GAN's average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat Sangoma Technologies' score of 0.03 indicating that Sangoma Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
GAN	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Sangoma Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Does the MarketBeat Community favor GAN or SANG?

GAN received 6 more outperform votes than Sangoma Technologies when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 33.33% of users gave GAN an outperform vote while only 23.81% of users gave Sangoma Technologies an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
GAN	Outperform Votes 11 33.33%	Underperform Votes 22 66.67%
Sangoma Technologies	Outperform Votes 5 23.81%	Underperform Votes 16 76.19%

Do analysts prefer GAN or SANG?

Sangoma Technologies has a consensus price target of $4.83, suggesting a potential upside of 11.11%. Given GAN's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sangoma Technologies is more favorable than GAN.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
GAN	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Sangoma Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Summary

Sangoma Technologies beats GAN on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.