Steinhoff International Competitors

Steinhoff International (ETR:SNH) and CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA (ETR:CWC) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Steinhoff International and CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Steinhoff International. Steinhoff International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Steinhoff International pays an annual dividend of €0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.0%. CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA pays an annual dividend of €2.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Steinhoff International pays out -5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA pays out 32.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Steinhoff International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Steinhoff International and CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA has a consensus target price of €134.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.36%. Given CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA is more favorable than Steinhoff International.

Profitability

This table compares Steinhoff International and CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA beats Steinhoff International on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Steinhoff International (ETR:SNH) and ElringKlinger (ETR:ZIL2) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Steinhoff International and ElringKlinger's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ElringKlinger has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Steinhoff International. ElringKlinger is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steinhoff International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Steinhoff International pays an annual dividend of €0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.0%. ElringKlinger pays an annual dividend of €0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Steinhoff International pays out -5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ElringKlinger pays out -77.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares Steinhoff International and ElringKlinger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Steinhoff International and ElringKlinger, as reported by MarketBeat.

ElringKlinger has a consensus price target of €13.40, suggesting a potential downside of 3.94%. Given ElringKlinger's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ElringKlinger is more favorable than Steinhoff International.

Summary

ElringKlinger beats Steinhoff International on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Steinhoff International (ETR:SNH) and Lotto24 (ETR:LO24) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Steinhoff International and Lotto24, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Steinhoff International and Lotto24's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lotto24 has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Steinhoff International. Steinhoff International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lotto24, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Steinhoff International and Lotto24's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Lotto24 beats Steinhoff International on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

SAF-Holland (ETR:SFQ) and Steinhoff International (ETR:SNH) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SAF-Holland and Steinhoff International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SAF-Holland has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Steinhoff International. Steinhoff International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SAF-Holland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares SAF-Holland and Steinhoff International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for SAF-Holland and Steinhoff International, as provided by MarketBeat.

SAF-Holland presently has a consensus price target of €15.29, indicating a potential upside of 15.63%. Given SAF-Holland's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe SAF-Holland is more favorable than Steinhoff International.

Dividends

SAF-Holland pays an annual dividend of €0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Steinhoff International pays an annual dividend of €0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.0%. SAF-Holland pays out 150.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Steinhoff International pays out -5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Steinhoff International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

SAF-Holland beats Steinhoff International on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Steinhoff International (ETR:SNH) and home24 (ETR:H24) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Steinhoff International and home24, as provided by MarketBeat.

home24 has a consensus target price of €32.33, indicating a potential upside of 65.81%. Given home24's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe home24 is more favorable than Steinhoff International.

Profitability

This table compares Steinhoff International and home24's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Steinhoff International and home24's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

home24 has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Steinhoff International. home24 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steinhoff International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

home24 beats Steinhoff International on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Bertrandt Aktiengesellschaft (ETR:BDT) and Steinhoff International (ETR:SNH) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Bertrandt Aktiengesellschaft pays an annual dividend of €0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Steinhoff International pays an annual dividend of €0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.0%. Bertrandt Aktiengesellschaft pays out -36.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Steinhoff International pays out -5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares Bertrandt Aktiengesellschaft and Steinhoff International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Bertrandt Aktiengesellschaft and Steinhoff International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Bertrandt Aktiengesellschaft presently has a consensus price target of €36.70, indicating a potential downside of 20.99%. Given Bertrandt Aktiengesellschaft's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Bertrandt Aktiengesellschaft is more favorable than Steinhoff International.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Bertrandt Aktiengesellschaft and Steinhoff International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Bertrandt Aktiengesellschaft has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Steinhoff International. Bertrandt Aktiengesellschaft is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steinhoff International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Bertrandt Aktiengesellschaft beats Steinhoff International on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.