Skip to main content
LON:CAL

Capital & Regional Competitors

GBX 87
+2.00 (+2.35 %)
(As of 05/12/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
85
89
50-Day Range
77.10
92
52-Week Range
32.30
135
Volume5,764 shs
Average Volume70,914 shs
Market Capitalization£97.28 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield30.88%
BetaN/A

Competitors

Capital & Regional (LON:CAL) Vs. SUS, BRK, IIT, CLIG, STB, and MCKS

Should you be buying CAL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "finance" are considered alternatives and competitors to Capital & Regional, including S&U (SUS), Brooks Macdonald Group (BRK), The Independent Investment Trust (IIT), City of London Investment Group (CLIG), Secure Trust Bank (STB), and McKay Securities (MCKS).

Capital & Regional (LON:CAL) and S&U (LON:SUS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Capital & Regional and S&U's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital & Regional£72.70 million1.34N/AGBX (188.30)-0.46
S&U£80.15 million4.20N/AGBX 120.7022.95

Capital & Regional is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&U, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Capital & Regional pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. S&U pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Capital & Regional pays out -0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&U pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Capital & Regional is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Capital & Regional and S&U, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Capital & Regional20001.00
S&U02002.00

Capital & Regional currently has a consensus price target of GBX 50, suggesting a potential downside of 42.53%. S&U has a consensus price target of GBX 3,300, suggesting a potential upside of 19.13%. Given S&U's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe S&U is more favorable than Capital & Regional.

Profitability

This table compares Capital & Regional and S&U's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Capital & RegionalN/AN/AN/A
S&UN/AN/AN/A

Summary

S&U beats Capital & Regional on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Capital & Regional (LON:CAL) and Brooks Macdonald Group (LON:BRK) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Capital & Regional and Brooks Macdonald Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Capital & RegionalN/AN/AN/A
Brooks Macdonald GroupN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Capital & Regional and Brooks Macdonald Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Capital & Regional20001.00
Brooks Macdonald Group00203.00

Capital & Regional currently has a consensus price target of GBX 50, suggesting a potential downside of 42.53%. Brooks Macdonald Group has a consensus price target of GBX 2,505, suggesting a potential upside of 22.20%. Given Brooks Macdonald Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brooks Macdonald Group is more favorable than Capital & Regional.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Capital & Regional and Brooks Macdonald Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital & Regional£72.70 million1.34N/AGBX (188.30)-0.46
Brooks Macdonald Group£109.52 million3.02N/AGBX 78.6026.08

Capital & Regional is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brooks Macdonald Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Capital & Regional pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Brooks Macdonald Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Capital & Regional pays out -0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brooks Macdonald Group pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Capital & Regional is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Brooks Macdonald Group beats Capital & Regional on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Independent Investment Trust (LON:IIT) and Capital & Regional (LON:CAL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares The Independent Investment Trust and Capital & Regional's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Independent Investment TrustN/AN/AN/A
Capital & RegionalN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for The Independent Investment Trust and Capital & Regional, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Independent Investment Trust0000N/A
Capital & Regional20001.00

Capital & Regional has a consensus price target of GBX 50, suggesting a potential downside of 42.53%. Given Capital & Regional's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Capital & Regional is more favorable than The Independent Investment Trust.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares The Independent Investment Trust and Capital & Regional's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Independent Investment Trust£-6,301,000.00-46.83N/AGBX (12.90)-42.95
Capital & Regional£72.70 million1.34N/AGBX (188.30)-0.46

The Independent Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital & Regional, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

The Independent Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Capital & Regional pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. The Independent Investment Trust pays out -1.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital & Regional pays out -0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Capital & Regional beats The Independent Investment Trust on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) and Capital & Regional (LON:CAL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares City of London Investment Group and Capital & Regional's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
City of London Investment GroupN/AN/AN/A
Capital & RegionalN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for City of London Investment Group and Capital & Regional, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
City of London Investment Group0000N/A
Capital & Regional20001.00

Capital & Regional has a consensus price target of GBX 50, suggesting a potential downside of 42.53%. Given Capital & Regional's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Capital & Regional is more favorable than City of London Investment Group.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares City of London Investment Group and Capital & Regional's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London Investment Group£39.68 million6.79N/AGBX 28.9018.41
Capital & Regional£72.70 million1.34N/AGBX (188.30)-0.46

Capital & Regional is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London Investment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

City of London Investment Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Capital & Regional pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. City of London Investment Group pays out 1.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital & Regional pays out -0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Capital & Regional is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Capital & Regional beats City of London Investment Group on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Secure Trust Bank (LON:STB) and Capital & Regional (LON:CAL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Secure Trust Bank and Capital & Regional's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Secure Trust BankN/AN/AN/A
Capital & RegionalN/AN/AN/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Secure Trust Bank and Capital & Regional's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Secure Trust Bank£111.70 million1.97N/AGBX 85.2013.85
Capital & Regional£72.70 million1.34N/AGBX (188.30)-0.46

Capital & Regional is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Secure Trust Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Secure Trust Bank and Capital & Regional, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Secure Trust Bank10202.33
Capital & Regional20001.00

Secure Trust Bank currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,255, suggesting a potential upside of 6.36%. Capital & Regional has a consensus price target of GBX 50, suggesting a potential downside of 42.53%. Given Secure Trust Bank's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Secure Trust Bank is more favorable than Capital & Regional.

Summary

Secure Trust Bank beats Capital & Regional on 7 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

McKay Securities (LON:MCKS) and Capital & Regional (LON:CAL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares McKay Securities and Capital & Regional's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
McKay SecuritiesN/AN/AN/A
Capital & RegionalN/AN/AN/A

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares McKay Securities and Capital & Regional's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McKay Securities£29.29 million7.27N/AGBX (18.20)-12.58
Capital & Regional£72.70 million1.34N/AGBX (188.30)-0.46

McKay Securities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital & Regional, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for McKay Securities and Capital & Regional, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
McKay Securities02002.00
Capital & Regional20001.00

McKay Securities presently has a consensus price target of GBX 210, suggesting a potential downside of 8.30%. Capital & Regional has a consensus price target of GBX 50, suggesting a potential downside of 42.53%. Given McKay Securities' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe McKay Securities is more favorable than Capital & Regional.

Dividends

McKay Securities pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Capital & Regional pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. McKay Securities pays out -0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital & Regional pays out -0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

McKay Securities beats Capital & Regional on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.


Capital & Regional Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
S&U logo
SUS
S&U
1.3$2,770.00+1.4%£336.42 million£80.15 million22.95Gap Up
Brooks Macdonald Group logo
BRK
Brooks Macdonald Group
1.4$2,050.00+2.0%£330.87 million£109.52 million26.08
IIT
The Independent Investment Trust
0.5$554.00+1.4%£295.05 million£-6,301,000.00-42.95
City of London Investment Group logo
CLIG
City of London Investment Group
1.3$532.00+0.4%£269.61 million£39.68 million18.41Gap Up
Secure Trust Bank logo
STB
Secure Trust Bank
1.4$1,180.00+0.8%£219.88 million£111.70 million13.85
McKay Securities logo
MCKS
McKay Securities
0.9$229.00+0.4%£213.98 million£29.29 million-12.58Upcoming Earnings
AFH Financial Group logo
AFHP
AFH Financial Group
1.5$475.00+0.0%£204.84 million£77.13 million20.65News Coverage
Charles Stanley Group logo
CAY
Charles Stanley Group
1.7$350.00+1.7%£182.40 million£168.66 million16.36Gap Up
HKLB
Hongkong Land
0.5$7.41+0.0%£173.93 million£2.09 billion-6.53Gap Down
Arbuthnot Banking Group logo
ARBB
Arbuthnot Banking Group
0.9$1,135.00+2.6%£170.51 million£69.65 million-127.53News Coverage
HDIV
Henderson Diversified Income Trust
1.3$87.90+0.2%£168.12 million£13.74 million20.44
Record logo
REC
Record
1.0$83.80+3.3%£166.81 million£26.02 million27.03News Coverage
Inland Homes logo
INL
Inland Homes
0.9$60.45+0.1%£137.96 million£124 million75.56
Countrywide logo
CWD
Countrywide
0.4$394.80+0.0%£129.60 million£427.28 million-2.74
JIM
Jarvis Securities
1.3$273.00+0.0%£119.66 million£13.34 million21.50Dividend Increase
News Coverage
H&T Group logo
HAT
H&T Group
1.1$292.50+0.2%£116.60 million£129.12 million9.11
PCA
Palace Capital
1.3$247.50+0.4%£114.02 million£17.49 million-7.52
HUW
Helios Underwriting
1.4$154.00+3.9%£104.34 million£48.89 million8.19Gap Down
PGH
Personal Group
1.1$235.00+1.3%£73.37 million£71.52 million10.63
GRIO
Ground Rents Income Fund
1.0$75.00+0.7%£72.75 million£5.64 million-31.25
Real Estate Investors logo
RLE
Real Estate Investors
1.9$37.00+2.0%£66.37 million£16.43 million-3.22
The Conygar Investment logo
CIC
The Conygar Investment
0.7$123.50+0.0%£65.15 million£1.68 million-8.40Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Gap Up
SQN
SQN Asset Finance Income
0.8$25.50+4.9%£61.16 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
PCF Group logo
PCF
PCF Group
1.1$24.00+0.0%£60.24 million£28.06 million40.00Gap Down
BCRE
Bcre Brack Capital Real Estat Investm
0.7$0.38+33.3%£59.77 million£-824,956.00-1.18Gap Down
RBD
Reabold Resources
0.9$0.67+1.5%£56.69 million£1.63 million-6.70
SGR
Shore Capital Group
1.4$222.50+30.3%£48.00 million£45.59 million21.60
HCFT
Highcroft Investments
1.0$825.00+0.0%£42.28 million£6.08 million-37.16
WHI
WH Ireland Group
0.5$57.25+0.0%£35.51 million£23.02 million-18.47
SIGB
Sherborne Investors (Guernsey) B
0.8$11.00+18.2%£34.60 million£-12,647,644.00-3.55Gap Down
BCAP
Better Capital PCC Limited 2009 (BCAP.L)
0.5$20.02+7.4%£26.40 million£-8,416,000.00-7.41High Trading Volume
Gap Down
WINK
M Winkworth
1.1$202.00+3.8%£25.72 million£6.41 million22.20Analyst Report
CDFF
Cardiff Property
1.0$1,850.00+0.0%£21.68 million£2.00 million12.20High Trading Volume
WSP
Wynnstay Properties
0.7$605.00+0.0%£16.41 million£2.14 million-41.44
Tavistock Investments logo
TAVI
Tavistock Investments
0.5$2.69+7.1%£16.35 million£27.87 million-2.69Gap Up
HML Holdings plc (HMLH.L) logo
HMLH
HML Holdings plc (HMLH.L)
0.8$36.50+0.0%£16.33 million£31.22 million15.21
GWI
Globalworth Real Estate Investments
1.1$7.17+1.3%£15.85 million£225.21 million-34.14
GLI Finance logo
GLIF
GLI Finance
0.7$2.62+5.0%£12.83 million£6.20 million-0.57High Trading Volume
News Coverage
WCW
Walker Crips Group
0.8$27.52+0.1%£11.72 million£30.00 million-68.80
LFI
London Finance & Investment Group
0.7$36.97+7.1%£11.54 million£856,000.00-46.21Gap Up
Concepta PLC (CPT.L) logo
CPT
Concepta PLC (CPT.L)
0.4$1.98+19.2%£10.87 million£28,960.00-2.83High Trading Volume
Gap Up
SVE
Starvest
1.2$18.50+0.0%£10.65 million£322,743.000.76Gap Up
MFX
Manx Financial Group
0.9$8.48+10.4%£9.67 million£15.91 million6.05Gap Up
PEY
Princess Private Equity
1.4$12.20+2.5%£8.44 millionN/A5.45
FKE
Fiske
0.4$70.00+0.0%£8.23 million£5.62 million-63.64
BAF
British & American Investment Trust
0.8$25.00+14.0%£7.13 million£-5,875,000.00-0.88
BHMU
BH Macro
0.9$34.40+0.0%£5.91 million£-5,236,000.009.69
SAF
Safeland
1.1N/AN/A£5.54 million£2.02 million5.36Gap Down
BHGU
BH Global
0.9$20.35+1.0%£4.59 million£1.21 million9.76
LXB
LXB Retail Properties
0.5$2.70+5.6%£4.55 million£39.67 million-0.39
This page was last updated on 5/12/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.