Hansteen Competitors

Primary Health Properties (LON:PHP) and Hansteen (LON:HSTN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Primary Health Properties and Hansteen's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Hansteen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Primary Health Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Primary Health Properties pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Hansteen pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Primary Health Properties pays out 69.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hansteen pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares Primary Health Properties and Hansteen's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Primary Health Properties and Hansteen, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Primary Health Properties presently has a consensus target price of GBX 167.33, suggesting a potential upside of 11.93%. Given Primary Health Properties' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Primary Health Properties is more favorable than Hansteen.

Summary

Primary Health Properties beats Hansteen on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Grainger (LON:GRI) and Hansteen (LON:HSTN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability and valuation.

Dividends

Grainger pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Hansteen pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Grainger pays out 35.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hansteen pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Grainger and Hansteen, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Grainger currently has a consensus price target of GBX 309, suggesting a potential upside of 10.75%. Given Grainger's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Grainger is more favorable than Hansteen.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Grainger and Hansteen's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Hansteen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grainger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Grainger and Hansteen's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Grainger beats Hansteen on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hansteen (LON:HSTN) and Hammerson (LON:HMSO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Hansteen and Hammerson's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Hansteen and Hammerson's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Hammerson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hansteen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Hansteen and Hammerson, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Hammerson has a consensus price target of GBX 62.11, indicating a potential upside of 58.33%. Given Hammerson's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hammerson is more favorable than Hansteen.

Dividends

Hansteen pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Hammerson pays an annual dividend of GBX 0 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Hansteen pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hammerson pays out 0.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Capital & Counties Properties PLC (LON:CAPC) and Hansteen (LON:HSTN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Capital & Counties Properties PLC and Hansteen's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Capital & Counties Properties PLC and Hansteen's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Capital & Counties Properties PLC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hansteen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Capital & Counties Properties PLC pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Hansteen pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Capital & Counties Properties PLC pays out 0.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hansteen pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Capital & Counties Properties PLC and Hansteen, as provided by MarketBeat.

Capital & Counties Properties PLC currently has a consensus price target of GBX 187.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.88%. Given Capital & Counties Properties PLC's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Capital & Counties Properties PLC is more favorable than Hansteen.

Summary

Capital & Counties Properties PLC beats Hansteen on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Schroders (LON:SDRC) and Hansteen (LON:HSTN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Schroders and Hansteen, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Schroders and Hansteen's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Hansteen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 114 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Hansteen pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Schroders pays out 67.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hansteen pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares Schroders and Hansteen's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Schroders beats Hansteen on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

IP Group (LON:IPO) and Hansteen (LON:HSTN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

IP Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Hansteen pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. IP Group pays out 5.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hansteen pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares IP Group and Hansteen's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares IP Group and Hansteen's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

IP Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hansteen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for IP Group and Hansteen, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

IP Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 116.50, suggesting a potential downside of 12.67%. Given IP Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe IP Group is more favorable than Hansteen.

Summary

IP Group beats Hansteen on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.