NASDAQ:CPTA

Capitala Finance Competitors

$15.95
-0.30 (-1.85 %)
(As of 04/12/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$15.75
Now: $15.95
$16.15
50-Day Range
$15.25
MA: $16.01
$16.96
52-Week Range
$8.40
Now: $15.95
$26.66
Volume8,014 shs
Average Volume19,403 shs
Market Capitalization$43.24 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.85

Competitors

Capitala Finance (NASDAQ:CPTA) Vs. ARCC, PSEC, GBDC, TSLX, NMFC, and PFLT

Should you be buying CPTA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investors, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to Capitala Finance, including Ares Capital (ARCC), Prospect Capital (PSEC), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT).

Capitala Finance (NASDAQ:CPTA) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Capitala Finance and Ares Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Capitala Finance10001.00
Ares Capital02602.75

Capitala Finance presently has a consensus price target of $2.25, suggesting a potential downside of 85.89%. Ares Capital has a consensus price target of $17.50, suggesting a potential downside of 9.00%. Given Ares Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than Capitala Finance.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

14.4% of Capitala Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.3% of Ares Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.0% of Capitala Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Ares Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Capitala Finance has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Capitala Finance and Ares Capital's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capitala Finance$44.03 million0.98$-27,650,000.00$4.803.32
Ares Capital$1.53 billion5.49$793 million$1.8910.16

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Capitala Finance. Capitala Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Capitala Finance and Ares Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Capitala Finance-118.60%1.74%0.53%
Ares Capital21.28%10.05%4.63%

Summary

Ares Capital beats Capitala Finance on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Prospect Capital (NASDAQ:PSEC) and Capitala Finance (NASDAQ:CPTA) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Prospect Capital and Capitala Finance's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Prospect Capital$623.53 million4.95$-16,220,000.00$0.7211.07
Capitala Finance$44.03 million0.98$-27,650,000.00$4.803.32

Prospect Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Capitala Finance. Capitala Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Prospect Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

10.3% of Prospect Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.4% of Capitala Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 26.8% of Prospect Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.0% of Capitala Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Prospect Capital and Capitala Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Prospect Capital22.08%8.16%4.72%
Capitala Finance-118.60%1.74%0.53%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Prospect Capital and Capitala Finance, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Prospect Capital20001.00
Capitala Finance10001.00

Prospect Capital presently has a consensus price target of $4.50, indicating a potential downside of 43.54%. Capitala Finance has a consensus price target of $2.25, indicating a potential downside of 85.89%. Given Prospect Capital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Prospect Capital is more favorable than Capitala Finance.

Volatility and Risk

Prospect Capital has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Capitala Finance has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Prospect Capital beats Capitala Finance on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) and Capitala Finance (NASDAQ:CPTA) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Golub Capital BDC and Capitala Finance, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Golub Capital BDC02002.00
Capitala Finance10001.00

Golub Capital BDC presently has a consensus price target of $11.50, indicating a potential downside of 25.08%. Capitala Finance has a consensus price target of $2.25, indicating a potential downside of 85.89%. Given Golub Capital BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Golub Capital BDC is more favorable than Capitala Finance.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Golub Capital BDC and Capitala Finance's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golub Capital BDC$298.95 million8.58$54.87 million$1.2212.57
Capitala Finance$44.03 million0.98$-27,650,000.00$4.803.32

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Capitala Finance. Capitala Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Golub Capital BDC and Capitala Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Golub Capital BDC18.35%7.95%3.99%
Capitala Finance-118.60%1.74%0.53%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

36.9% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.4% of Capitala Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.0% of Capitala Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Capitala Finance has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats Capitala Finance on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Capitala Finance (NASDAQ:CPTA) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Capitala Finance has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Capitala Finance and Sixth Street Specialty Lending's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capitala Finance$44.03 million0.98$-27,650,000.00$4.803.32
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$251.49 million6.01$128.28 million$1.9411.47

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Capitala Finance. Capitala Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Capitala Finance and Sixth Street Specialty Lending's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Capitala Finance-118.60%1.74%0.53%
Sixth Street Specialty Lending59.17%13.52%6.95%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

14.4% of Capitala Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.7% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.0% of Capitala Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Capitala Finance and Sixth Street Specialty Lending, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Capitala Finance10001.00
Sixth Street Specialty Lending00603.00

Capitala Finance currently has a consensus target price of $2.25, indicating a potential downside of 85.89%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a consensus target price of $18.50, indicating a potential downside of 16.89%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than Capitala Finance.

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats Capitala Finance on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and Capitala Finance (NASDAQ:CPTA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for New Mountain Finance and Capitala Finance, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New Mountain Finance02202.50
Capitala Finance10001.00

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus price target of $11.1667, indicating a potential downside of 14.17%. Capitala Finance has a consensus price target of $2.25, indicating a potential downside of 85.89%. Given New Mountain Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Capitala Finance.

Volatility and Risk

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Capitala Finance has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares New Mountain Finance and Capitala Finance's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance$276.51 million4.55$112.56 million$1.2710.24
Capitala Finance$44.03 million0.98$-27,650,000.00$4.803.32

New Mountain Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Capitala Finance. Capitala Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New Mountain Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares New Mountain Finance and Capitala Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New Mountain Finance4.94%10.30%3.93%
Capitala Finance-118.60%1.74%0.53%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

34.5% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.4% of Capitala Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.0% of Capitala Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats Capitala Finance on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Capitala Finance (NASDAQ:CPTA) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NASDAQ:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Capitala Finance and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Capitala Finance10001.00
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital01202.67

Capitala Finance currently has a consensus price target of $2.25, indicating a potential downside of 85.89%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential downside of 17.71%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Capitala Finance.

Volatility and Risk

Capitala Finance has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.97, indicating that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Capitala Finance and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capitala Finance$44.03 million0.98$-27,650,000.00$4.803.32
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$95.49 million5.18$18.41 million$1.1211.39

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Capitala Finance. Capitala Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Capitala Finance and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Capitala Finance-118.60%1.74%0.53%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital19.28%9.04%3.59%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

14.4% of Capitala Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.3% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.0% of Capitala Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats Capitala Finance on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Capitala Finance Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Ares Capital logo
ARCC
Ares Capital
1.2$19.21-0.7%$8.45 billion$1.53 billion25.61Analyst Downgrade
Prospect Capital logo
PSEC
Prospect Capital
1.3$7.97-0.4%$3.10 billion$623.53 million22.77News Coverage
Golub Capital BDC logo
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
1.4$15.33-0.3%$2.56 billion$298.95 million109.51Decrease in Short Interest
Sixth Street Specialty Lending logo
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
1.7$22.25-0.2%$1.51 billion$251.49 million9.23Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
New Mountain Finance logo
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
1.2$13.00-0.2%$1.26 billion$276.51 million-1,298.70Decrease in Short Interest
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital logo
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1.0$12.76-0.2%$493.93 million$95.49 million27.15Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC logo
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC
1.4$15.50-0.6%$481.76 million$73.39 million12.71Decrease in Short Interest
Capital Southwest logo
CSWC
Capital Southwest
1.4$23.89-0.5%$476.83 million$62.04 million-59.73Analyst Upgrade
Gladstone Investment logo
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
1.2$13.50-0.5%$445.94 million$61.92 million-25.00
PennantPark Investment logo
PNNT
PennantPark Investment
1.3$6.46-5.6%$408.97 million$100.22 million-26.92
Stellus Capital Investment logo
SCM
Stellus Capital Investment
1.2$13.60-1.3%$265.01 million$58.91 million54.40
Oaktree Strategic Income logo
OCSI
Oaktree Strategic Income
1.3$8.50-0.0%$250.47 million$39.53 million-212.45
PTMN
Portman Ridge Finance
1.2$2.42-1.2%$179.72 million$26.50 million-8.34
Safeguard Scientifics logo
SFE
Safeguard Scientifics
0.9$6.49-0.6%$135.09 millionN/A-4.36News Coverage
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC logo
FCRD
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC
1.2$4.17-1.0%$124.35 million$52.49 million-2.29
OFS Capital logo
OFS
OFS Capital
1.1$9.00-0.3%$121.08 million$52.52 million-16.67News Coverage
Investcorp Credit Management BDC logo
ICMB
Investcorp Credit Management BDC
1.2$5.66-0.5%$78.76 million$34.46 million-3.75Decrease in Short Interest
TURN
180 Degree Capital
0.8$7.28-1.8%$75.52 millionN/A0.00
Rand Capital logo
RAND
Rand Capital
1.3$18.53-1.0%$48.31 million$2.72 million10.65Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
Live Ventures logo
LIVE
Live Ventures
0.9$29.72-2.6%$47.43 million$191.70 million-25.19Gap Down
Firsthand Technology Value Fund logo
SVVC
Firsthand Technology Value Fund
0.8$6.02-0.2%$41.57 million$1.79 million-0.78News Coverage
LYL
Dragon Victory International
0.4$1.57-9.6%$16.53 million$10,000.000.00News Coverage
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/13/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.