FedNat Competitors

FedNat (NASDAQ:FNHC) and Greenlight Capital Re (NASDAQ:GLRE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for FedNat and Greenlight Capital Re, as provided by MarketBeat.

FedNat presently has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 99.56%. Given FedNat's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FedNat is more favorable than Greenlight Capital Re.

Profitability

This table compares FedNat and Greenlight Capital Re's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares FedNat and Greenlight Capital Re's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

FedNat has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greenlight Capital Re.

Risk & Volatility

FedNat has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

47.2% of FedNat shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.5% of Greenlight Capital Re shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.8% of FedNat shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.8% of Greenlight Capital Re shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

FedNat beats Greenlight Capital Re on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Heritage Insurance (NYSE:HRTG) and FedNat (NASDAQ:FNHC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

68.0% of Heritage Insurance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.2% of FedNat shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.0% of Heritage Insurance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.8% of FedNat shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Heritage Insurance and FedNat, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Heritage Insurance presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.60%. FedNat has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 99.56%. Given FedNat's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FedNat is more favorable than Heritage Insurance.

Profitability

This table compares Heritage Insurance and FedNat's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Heritage Insurance has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FedNat has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Heritage Insurance and FedNat's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Heritage Insurance has higher revenue and earnings than FedNat. FedNat is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Heritage Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Heritage Insurance pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. FedNat pays an annual dividend of $0.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Heritage Insurance pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FedNat pays out -900.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Heritage Insurance has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. FedNat is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Heritage Insurance beats FedNat on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Maiden (NASDAQ:MHLD) and FedNat (NASDAQ:FNHC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

23.1% of Maiden shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.2% of FedNat shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Maiden shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.8% of FedNat shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Maiden and FedNat, as provided by MarketBeat.

Maiden currently has a consensus price target of $2.00, indicating a potential downside of 38.27%. FedNat has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 99.56%. Given FedNat's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FedNat is more favorable than Maiden.

Profitability

This table compares Maiden and FedNat's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Maiden has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FedNat has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Maiden and FedNat's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

FedNat has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Maiden.

Summary

Maiden beats FedNat on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

FedNat (NASDAQ:FNHC) and United Insurance (NASDAQ:UIHC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

FedNat pays an annual dividend of $0.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. United Insurance pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. FedNat pays out -900.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Insurance pays out -22.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. United Insurance has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. FedNat is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FedNat and United Insurance's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

FedNat has higher earnings, but lower revenue than United Insurance. FedNat is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares FedNat and United Insurance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for FedNat and United Insurance, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

FedNat currently has a consensus target price of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 99.56%. United Insurance has a consensus target price of $7.50, indicating a potential upside of 16.82%. Given FedNat's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe FedNat is more favorable than United Insurance.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

47.2% of FedNat shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.1% of United Insurance shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.8% of FedNat shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 53.1% of United Insurance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

FedNat has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, United Insurance has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

FedNat beats United Insurance on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kingsway Financial Services (NYSE:KFS) and FedNat (NASDAQ:FNHC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Kingsway Financial Services and FedNat, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

FedNat has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 99.56%. Given FedNat's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FedNat is more favorable than Kingsway Financial Services.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

30.9% of Kingsway Financial Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.2% of FedNat shares are owned by institutional investors. 49.1% of Kingsway Financial Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.8% of FedNat shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Kingsway Financial Services and FedNat's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

FedNat has higher revenue and earnings than Kingsway Financial Services.

Volatility & Risk

Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of -0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 125% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FedNat has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Kingsway Financial Services and FedNat's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

FedNat beats Kingsway Financial Services on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kingstone Companies (NASDAQ:KINS) and FedNat (NASDAQ:FNHC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Kingstone Companies pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. FedNat pays an annual dividend of $0.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Kingstone Companies pays out -18.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FedNat pays out -900.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kingstone Companies has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. FedNat is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Kingstone Companies and FedNat's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

FedNat has higher revenue and earnings than Kingstone Companies. FedNat is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kingstone Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Kingstone Companies and FedNat's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

37.1% of Kingstone Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.2% of FedNat shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Kingstone Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.8% of FedNat shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FedNat has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Kingstone Companies and FedNat, as provided by MarketBeat.

FedNat has a consensus price target of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 99.56%. Given FedNat's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FedNat is more favorable than Kingstone Companies.

Summary

FedNat beats Kingstone Companies on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.