NASDAQ:GPP

Green Plains Partners Competitors

$11.51
+0.02 (+0.17 %)
(As of 05/11/2021 11:18 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$11.51
$11.58
50-Day Range
$11.69
$12.75
52-Week Range
$4.77
$13.74
Volume123 shs
Average Volume64,553 shs
Market Capitalization$267.12 million
P/E Ratio6.58
Dividend Yield3.98%
Beta0.84

Competitors

Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) Vs. LYB, IFF, WLK, BAK, NEU, and SXT

Should you be buying GPP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "industrial organic chemicals" are considered alternatives and competitors to Green Plains Partners, including LyondellBasell Industries (LYB), International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF), Westlake Chemical (WLK), Braskem (BAK), NewMarket (NEU), and Sensient Technologies (SXT).

LyondellBasell Industries (NYSE:LYB) and Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

67.6% of LyondellBasell Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.5% of Green Plains Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of LyondellBasell Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

LyondellBasell Industries pays an annual dividend of $4.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Green Plains Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. LyondellBasell Industries pays out 43.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Green Plains Partners pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. LyondellBasell Industries has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Green Plains Partners has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Green Plains Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for LyondellBasell Industries and Green Plains Partners, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
LyondellBasell Industries291002.38
Green Plains Partners00014.00

LyondellBasell Industries currently has a consensus target price of $92.1579, indicating a potential downside of 16.67%. Green Plains Partners has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. Given Green Plains Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Green Plains Partners is more favorable than LyondellBasell Industries.

Profitability

This table compares LyondellBasell Industries and Green Plains Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
LyondellBasell Industries4.23%24.09%5.80%
Green Plains Partners49.83%-57.99%38.97%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares LyondellBasell Industries and Green Plains Partners' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LyondellBasell Industries$34.73 billion1.08$3.40 billion$9.6211.62
Green Plains Partners$82.39 million3.24$41.48 million$1.766.54

LyondellBasell Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains Partners. Green Plains Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LyondellBasell Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

LyondellBasell Industries has a beta of 1.55, indicating that its share price is 55% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Green Plains Partners has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

LyondellBasell Industries beats Green Plains Partners on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) and International Flavors & Fragrances (NYSE:IFF) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Green Plains Partners and International Flavors & Fragrances' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Green Plains Partners$82.39 million3.24$41.48 million$1.766.54
International Flavors & Fragrances$5.14 billion6.71$455.87 million$6.1722.46

International Flavors & Fragrances has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains Partners. Green Plains Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Flavors & Fragrances, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Green Plains Partners and International Flavors & Fragrances, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Green Plains Partners00014.00
International Flavors & Fragrances041202.75

Green Plains Partners currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. International Flavors & Fragrances has a consensus price target of $146.0267, indicating a potential upside of 5.46%. Given International Flavors & Fragrances' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe International Flavors & Fragrances is more favorable than Green Plains Partners.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

20.5% of Green Plains Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.4% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains Partners and International Flavors & Fragrances' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Green Plains Partners49.83%-57.99%38.97%
International Flavors & Fragrances7.44%11.00%5.10%

Dividends

Green Plains Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. International Flavors & Fragrances pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Green Plains Partners pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Flavors & Fragrances pays out 49.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Green Plains Partners has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and International Flavors & Fragrances has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Green Plains Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Risk & Volatility

Green Plains Partners has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

International Flavors & Fragrances beats Green Plains Partners on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) and Westlake Chemical (NYSE:WLK) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Green Plains Partners and Westlake Chemical's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Green Plains Partners$82.39 million3.24$41.48 million$1.766.54
Westlake Chemical$8.12 billion1.62$421 million$3.2631.42

Westlake Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains Partners. Green Plains Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Westlake Chemical, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Green Plains Partners and Westlake Chemical, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Green Plains Partners00014.00
Westlake Chemical37502.13

Green Plains Partners currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. Westlake Chemical has a consensus price target of $86.1429, indicating a potential downside of 15.79%. Given Green Plains Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Green Plains Partners is more favorable than Westlake Chemical.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

20.5% of Green Plains Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.2% of Westlake Chemical shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.1% of Westlake Chemical shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains Partners and Westlake Chemical's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Green Plains Partners49.83%-57.99%38.97%
Westlake Chemical5.14%4.74%2.25%

Dividends

Green Plains Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Westlake Chemical pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Green Plains Partners pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Westlake Chemical pays out 33.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Green Plains Partners has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Westlake Chemical has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Green Plains Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Risk & Volatility

Green Plains Partners has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Westlake Chemical has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Westlake Chemical beats Green Plains Partners on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) and Braskem (NYSE:BAK) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Green Plains Partners and Braskem's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Green Plains Partners$82.39 million3.24$41.48 million$1.766.54
Braskem$12.72 billion0.61$-643,890,000.00($1.71)-11.45

Green Plains Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Braskem. Braskem is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Green Plains Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Green Plains Partners and Braskem, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Green Plains Partners00014.00
Braskem03202.40

Green Plains Partners currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. Braskem has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential downside of 13.09%. Given Green Plains Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Green Plains Partners is more favorable than Braskem.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

20.5% of Green Plains Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Braskem shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Braskem shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains Partners and Braskem's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Green Plains Partners49.83%-57.99%38.97%
Braskem-20.56%-962.43%-13.59%

Risk and Volatility

Green Plains Partners has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Braskem has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Green Plains Partners beats Braskem on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) and NewMarket (NYSE:NEU) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Green Plains Partners and NewMarket's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Green Plains Partners$82.39 million3.24$41.48 million$1.766.54
NewMarket$2.19 billion1.74$254.29 millionN/AN/A

NewMarket has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains Partners.

Dividends

Green Plains Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. NewMarket pays an annual dividend of $7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Green Plains Partners pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Green Plains Partners has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and NewMarket has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains Partners and NewMarket's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Green Plains Partners49.83%-57.99%38.97%
NewMarket12.58%37.86%13.54%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Green Plains Partners and NewMarket, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Green Plains Partners00014.00
NewMarket0000N/A

Green Plains Partners currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. Given Green Plains Partners' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Green Plains Partners is more favorable than NewMarket.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

20.5% of Green Plains Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.7% of NewMarket shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of NewMarket shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Green Plains Partners has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NewMarket has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) and Sensient Technologies (NYSE:SXT) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Green Plains Partners and Sensient Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Green Plains Partners$82.39 million3.24$41.48 million$1.766.54
Sensient Technologies$1.32 billion2.74$82.05 million$2.9628.91

Sensient Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains Partners. Green Plains Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensient Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Green Plains Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Green Plains Partners pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sensient Technologies pays out 52.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Green Plains Partners has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Sensient Technologies has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Green Plains Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains Partners and Sensient Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Green Plains Partners49.83%-57.99%38.97%
Sensient Technologies5.12%13.65%6.97%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Green Plains Partners and Sensient Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Green Plains Partners00014.00
Sensient Technologies00103.00

Green Plains Partners presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. Sensient Technologies has a consensus price target of $70.00, indicating a potential downside of 17.56%. Given Green Plains Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Green Plains Partners is more favorable than Sensient Technologies.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

20.5% of Green Plains Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Green Plains Partners has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Sensient Technologies beats Green Plains Partners on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


Green Plains Partners Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
LyondellBasell Industries logo
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries
2.2$111.82+1.4%$37.93 billion$34.73 billion31.77Analyst Downgrade
International Flavors & Fragrances logo
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances
2.5$138.57+3.0%$35.51 billion$5.14 billion41.49Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
News Coverage
Westlake Chemical logo
WLK
Westlake Chemical
2.3$102.44+0.2%$13.15 billion$8.12 billion33.92Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Braskem logo
BAK
Braskem
0.8$19.58+0.4%$7.84 billion$12.72 billion-3.45Gap Down
NewMarket logo
NEU
NewMarket
1.0$349.07+0.5%$3.84 billion$2.19 billion15.20
Sensient Technologies logo
SXT
Sensient Technologies
1.8$85.58+1.0%$3.58 billion$1.32 billion53.82
Amyris logo
AMRS
Amyris
1.5$11.34+0.9%$3.13 billion$152.56 million-5.09Earnings Announcement
Gap Down
Methanex logo
MEOH
Methanex
1.6$37.88+3.3%$2.98 billion$2.78 billion-22.68Gap Down
Renewable Energy Group logo
REGI
Renewable Energy Group
2.4$56.11+0.7%$2.50 billion$2.64 billion4.05Analyst Report
Green Plains logo
GPRE
Green Plains
1.4$29.20+2.6%$1.34 billion$2.42 billion-10.28Analyst Report
Codexis logo
CDXS
Codexis
1.5$18.64+6.2%$1.13 billion$68.46 million-53.26Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Down
Gevo logo
GEVO
Gevo
1.5$5.45+1.8%$1.06 billion$24.49 million-3.34Upcoming Earnings
Westlake Chemical Partners logo
WLKP
Westlake Chemical Partners
1.9$27.15+0.7%$962.69 million$1.09 billion14.76Analyst Downgrade
FutureFuel logo
FF
FutureFuel
1.3$13.69+18.0%$490.80 million$205.23 million5.27High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
REX American Resources logo
REX
REX American Resources
0.9$75.56+1.2%$458.09 million$418.03 million116.25
Aemetis logo
AMTX
Aemetis
1.5$11.58+1.3%$317.87 million$202 million-8.27Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
TOMI Environmental Solutions logo
TOMZ
TOMI Environmental Solutions
0.0$2.95+2.0%$50.60 million$6.35 million0.00High Trading Volume
CYTH
Cyclo Therapeutics
1.8$7.08+5.9%$47.69 million$1.01 million0.00
TANH
Tantech
0.6$1.09+2.8%$40.20 million$49.23 million0.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 5/11/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.