Green Plains Partners Competitors

LyondellBasell Industries (NYSE:LYB) and Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

67.6% of LyondellBasell Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.5% of Green Plains Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of LyondellBasell Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

LyondellBasell Industries pays an annual dividend of $4.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Green Plains Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. LyondellBasell Industries pays out 43.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Green Plains Partners pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. LyondellBasell Industries has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Green Plains Partners has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Green Plains Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for LyondellBasell Industries and Green Plains Partners, as provided by MarketBeat.

LyondellBasell Industries currently has a consensus target price of $92.1579, indicating a potential downside of 16.67%. Green Plains Partners has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. Given Green Plains Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Green Plains Partners is more favorable than LyondellBasell Industries.

Profitability

This table compares LyondellBasell Industries and Green Plains Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares LyondellBasell Industries and Green Plains Partners' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

LyondellBasell Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains Partners. Green Plains Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LyondellBasell Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

LyondellBasell Industries has a beta of 1.55, indicating that its share price is 55% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Green Plains Partners has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

LyondellBasell Industries beats Green Plains Partners on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) and International Flavors & Fragrances (NYSE:IFF) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Green Plains Partners and International Flavors & Fragrances' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

International Flavors & Fragrances has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains Partners. Green Plains Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Flavors & Fragrances, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Green Plains Partners and International Flavors & Fragrances, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Green Plains Partners currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. International Flavors & Fragrances has a consensus price target of $146.0267, indicating a potential upside of 5.46%. Given International Flavors & Fragrances' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe International Flavors & Fragrances is more favorable than Green Plains Partners.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

20.5% of Green Plains Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.4% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains Partners and International Flavors & Fragrances' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Green Plains Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. International Flavors & Fragrances pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Green Plains Partners pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Flavors & Fragrances pays out 49.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Green Plains Partners has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and International Flavors & Fragrances has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Green Plains Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Risk & Volatility

Green Plains Partners has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

International Flavors & Fragrances beats Green Plains Partners on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) and Westlake Chemical (NYSE:WLK) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Green Plains Partners and Westlake Chemical's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Westlake Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains Partners. Green Plains Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Westlake Chemical, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Green Plains Partners and Westlake Chemical, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Green Plains Partners currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. Westlake Chemical has a consensus price target of $86.1429, indicating a potential downside of 15.79%. Given Green Plains Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Green Plains Partners is more favorable than Westlake Chemical.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

20.5% of Green Plains Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.2% of Westlake Chemical shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.1% of Westlake Chemical shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains Partners and Westlake Chemical's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Green Plains Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Westlake Chemical pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Green Plains Partners pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Westlake Chemical pays out 33.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Green Plains Partners has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Westlake Chemical has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Green Plains Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Risk & Volatility

Green Plains Partners has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Westlake Chemical has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Westlake Chemical beats Green Plains Partners on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) and Braskem (NYSE:BAK) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Green Plains Partners and Braskem's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Green Plains Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Braskem. Braskem is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Green Plains Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Green Plains Partners and Braskem, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Green Plains Partners currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. Braskem has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential downside of 13.09%. Given Green Plains Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Green Plains Partners is more favorable than Braskem.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

20.5% of Green Plains Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Braskem shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Braskem shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains Partners and Braskem's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Green Plains Partners has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Braskem has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Green Plains Partners beats Braskem on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) and NewMarket (NYSE:NEU) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Green Plains Partners and NewMarket's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

NewMarket has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains Partners.

Dividends

Green Plains Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. NewMarket pays an annual dividend of $7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Green Plains Partners pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Green Plains Partners has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and NewMarket has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains Partners and NewMarket's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Green Plains Partners and NewMarket, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Green Plains Partners currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. Given Green Plains Partners' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Green Plains Partners is more favorable than NewMarket.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

20.5% of Green Plains Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.7% of NewMarket shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of NewMarket shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Green Plains Partners has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NewMarket has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) and Sensient Technologies (NYSE:SXT) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Green Plains Partners and Sensient Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Sensient Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains Partners. Green Plains Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensient Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Green Plains Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Green Plains Partners pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sensient Technologies pays out 52.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Green Plains Partners has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Sensient Technologies has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Green Plains Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains Partners and Sensient Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Green Plains Partners and Sensient Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Green Plains Partners presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. Sensient Technologies has a consensus price target of $70.00, indicating a potential downside of 17.56%. Given Green Plains Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Green Plains Partners is more favorable than Sensient Technologies.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

20.5% of Green Plains Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Green Plains Partners has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Sensient Technologies beats Green Plains Partners on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.