NASDAQ:MCEPMid-Con Energy Partners Competitors & Alternatives

Mid-Con Energy Partners (NASDAQ:MCEP) and Chaparral Energy (NYSE:CHAP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Mid-Con Energy Partners and Chaparral Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Mid-Con Energy Partners and Chaparral Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Chaparral Energy has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1,421.68%. Given Chaparral Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Chaparral Energy is more favorable than Mid-Con Energy Partners.

Volatility and Risk

Mid-Con Energy Partners has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chaparral Energy has a beta of 2.71, suggesting that its share price is 171% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

34.0% of Mid-Con Energy Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.4% of Chaparral Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.3% of Mid-Con Energy Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Chaparral Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Mid-Con Energy Partners and Chaparral Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Mid-Con Energy Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chaparral Energy.

SUNDANCE ENERGY/S (NASDAQ:SNDE) and Mid-Con Energy Partners (NASDAQ:MCEP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

19.4% of SUNDANCE ENERGY/S shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.0% of Mid-Con Energy Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of SUNDANCE ENERGY/S shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Mid-Con Energy Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for SUNDANCE ENERGY/S and Mid-Con Energy Partners, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

SUNDANCE ENERGY/S currently has a consensus target price of $24.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 810.21%. Given SUNDANCE ENERGY/S's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe SUNDANCE ENERGY/S is more favorable than Mid-Con Energy Partners.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares SUNDANCE ENERGY/S and Mid-Con Energy Partners' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Mid-Con Energy Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SUNDANCE ENERGY/S.

Profitability

This table compares SUNDANCE ENERGY/S and Mid-Con Energy Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

SUNDANCE ENERGY/S has a beta of 3.23, suggesting that its share price is 223% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mid-Con Energy Partners has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust (NYSE:CHKR) and Mid-Con Energy Partners (NASDAQ:MCEP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

34.0% of Mid-Con Energy Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 7.3% of Mid-Con Energy Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust and Mid-Con Energy Partners, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust and Mid-Con Energy Partners' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mid-Con Energy Partners.

Profitability

This table compares Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust and Mid-Con Energy Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mid-Con Energy Partners has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust beats Mid-Con Energy Partners on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lonestar Resources US (NASDAQ:LONE) and Mid-Con Energy Partners (NASDAQ:MCEP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Lonestar Resources US and Mid-Con Energy Partners' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Mid-Con Energy Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lonestar Resources US.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Lonestar Resources US and Mid-Con Energy Partners, as reported by MarketBeat.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

39.5% of Lonestar Resources US shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.0% of Mid-Con Energy Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Lonestar Resources US shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Mid-Con Energy Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Lonestar Resources US and Mid-Con Energy Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Lonestar Resources US has a beta of 3.21, suggesting that its stock price is 221% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mid-Con Energy Partners has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Mid-Con Energy Partners beats Lonestar Resources US on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pacific Coast Oil Trust (NYSE:ROYT) and Mid-Con Energy Partners (NASDAQ:MCEP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Pacific Coast Oil Trust has a beta of 2.36, suggesting that its stock price is 136% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mid-Con Energy Partners has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Pacific Coast Oil Trust and Mid-Con Energy Partners, as reported by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares Pacific Coast Oil Trust and Mid-Con Energy Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

6.1% of Pacific Coast Oil Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.0% of Mid-Con Energy Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.3% of Mid-Con Energy Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Pacific Coast Oil Trust and Mid-Con Energy Partners' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Pacific Coast Oil Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mid-Con Energy Partners.

Summary

Mid-Con Energy Partners beats Pacific Coast Oil Trust on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mid-Con Energy Partners (NASDAQ:MCEP) and U.S. Energy (NASDAQ:USEG) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Mid-Con Energy Partners has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, U.S. Energy has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Mid-Con Energy Partners and U.S. Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Profitability

This table compares Mid-Con Energy Partners and U.S. Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

34.0% of Mid-Con Energy Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of U.S. Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.3% of Mid-Con Energy Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 48.0% of U.S. Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Mid-Con Energy Partners and U.S. Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

U.S. Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mid-Con Energy Partners.

Summary

Mid-Con Energy Partners beats U.S. Energy on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.